9:29 p.m.
I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I should take
to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the Fedora 25
version?
9:41 p.m.
Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times, and it's
gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
I don't think you have to do anything regarding RPM Fusion. it just works.
On 11/08/2016 04:29 PM, Matt Shindala wrote:
I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I should
take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the Fedora
25 version?
9:57 a.m.
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times, and it's
gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
I don't think you have to do anything regarding RPM Fusion. it just
works.
On 11/08/2016 04:29 PM, Matt Shindala wrote:
> I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
> scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I
> should
> take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the
> Fedora
> 25 version?
I had a bad GPG key. One of the rpmfusion files in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
was linked from 'fedora-25' to 'fedora-24' so upgrading any rpmfusion
rpms resulted in dnf repeatedly wanting to install the fedora-25 key.
I fixed the link manually.
10:11 a.m.
2016-11-09 10:57 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schouwer(a)gmail.com>:
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
> Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
>
> I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times, and it's
> gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
>
> I don't think you have to do anything regarding RPM Fusion. it just
> works.
>
>
> On 11/08/2016 04:29 PM, Matt Shindala wrote:
> > I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
> > scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I
> > should
> > take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the
> > Fedora
> > 25 version?
>
I had a bad GPG key. One of the rpmfusion files in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
was linked from 'fedora-25' to 'fedora-24' so upgrading any rpmfusion
rpms resulted in dnf repeatedly wanting to install the fedora-25 key.
I don't reproduce this symlink issue on any of my f24/f25 workstations.
Can you tell us more about it inclusing the exacts steps in order to reproduce.
And the exact fix you have used ?
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
10:54 a.m.
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 11:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2016-11-09 10:57 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer
<berend.de.schouwer@gma
il.com>:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
> > Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
> >
> > I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times, and
> > it's
> > gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
> >
> > I don't think you have to do anything regarding RPM Fusion. it
> > just
> > works.
> >
> >
> > On 11/08/2016 04:29 PM, Matt Shindala wrote:
> > > I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora
> > > 25 is
> > > scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I
> > > should
> > > take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the
> > > Fedora
> > > 25 version?
>
>
> I had a bad GPG key. One of the rpmfusion files in /etc/pki/rpm-
> gpg/
> was linked from 'fedora-25' to 'fedora-24' so upgrading any
> rpmfusion
> rpms resulted in dnf repeatedly wanting to install the fedora-25
> key.
I don't reproduce this symlink issue on any of my f24/f25
workstations.
Can you tell us more about it inclusing the exacts steps in order to
reproduce.
And the exact fix you have used ?
Sure
'sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --refresh' wanted to
upgrade +-2000 packages, remove +-5 (old kernel) and downgrade +-100
packages. I'm assuming Koji still has to catch up some updates to f25.
One of the packages was gstreamer-ffmpeg. This package comes from
rpmfusion. It wanted to install gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-15.fc24
(event though it's upgrading to F25)
That package is signed by GPG key 6806A9CB (rpmfusion fedora 25) even
though the package release is fc24.
dnf kept asking to import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-
fedora-25. I said yes, and dnf did successfully import the key. dnf
then promptly failed to install gstreamer-ffmpeg. The error message
was something like 'wrong key'. I don't remember the exact error
message.
It would do this every time it tried gstreamer-ffmpeg.
I did a 'ls -la' on /etc/pki/rpm-gpg, noticed that RPM-GPG-KEY-
rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 was a link to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-
fedora-24-primary. I manually did a 'sudo rm ...; sudo ln -sf ...' to
link it to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary.
The next 'sudo dnf system-upgrade download' asked to import that key,
and that key import worked.
The next 'sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot' worked too. It probably took
20 minutes.
So the fix was to correct the link, which was done by
cd /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ ;
sudo rm RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 ;
sudo ln -sf RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary RPM-GPG-KEY-
rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 ;
In this process I also tried to gpg --recv-key, --export, but then I
noticed that the file RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary
already existed -- it's just that the link was wrong.
11:28 a.m.
2016-11-09 11:54 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schouwer(a)gmail.com>:
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 11:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-11-09 10:57 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schouwer@gma
> il.com>:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
> > > Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
> > >
> > > I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times, and
> > > it's
> > > gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
[...]
> I don't reproduce this symlink issue on any of my f24/f25
> workstations.
> Can you tell us more about it inclusing the exacts steps in order to
> reproduce.
> And the exact fix you have used ?
Sure
'sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --refresh' wanted to
upgrade +-2000 packages, remove +-5 (old kernel) and downgrade +-100
packages. I'm assuming Koji still has to catch up some updates to f25.
One of the packages was gstreamer-ffmpeg. This package comes from
rpmfusion. It wanted to install gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-15.fc24
(event though it's upgrading to F25)
That package is signed by GPG key 6806A9CB (rpmfusion fedora 25)
even
though the package release is fc24.
There is a little mixup here.
Packages ending with .fc24 can perfectly be compatible with f25.
Specially as fedora has not made a mass rebuilt, we don't plan to
update it needlessly.
So the package is indeed signed with the f25 key because it's provided
as part of the f25-free repository that is only intended for f25.
I did a 'ls -la' on /etc/pki/rpm-gpg, noticed that
RPM-GPG-KEY-
rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 was a link to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-
fedora-24-primary. I manually did a 'sudo rm ...; sudo ln -sf ...' to
link it to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary.
What's weird is
that's an issue that we have fixed two months agos:
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-release.git/commit/?h...
and the package is provided in the updates repo since then:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/r/rpmfusion-...
Is there any issue with your repository configuration ? (or mirror ?)
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
11:41 a.m.
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2016-11-09 11:54 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer
<berend.de.schouwer@gma
il.com>:
> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 11:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2016-11-09 10:57 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schouwer
> > @gma
> > il.com>:
> > > On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
> > > > Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
> > > >
> > > > I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times,
> > > > and
> > > > it's
> > > > gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgr
> > > > ade
[...]
> > I don't reproduce this symlink issue on any of my f24/f25
> > workstations.
> > Can you tell us more about it inclusing the exacts steps in order
> > to
> > reproduce.
> > And the exact fix you have used ?
>
>
> Sure
>
> 'sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --refresh' wanted
> to
> upgrade +-2000 packages, remove +-5 (old kernel) and downgrade +-
> 100
> packages. I'm assuming Koji still has to catch up some updates to
> f25.
>
> One of the packages was gstreamer-ffmpeg. This package comes from
> rpmfusion. It wanted to install gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-15.fc24
> (event though it's upgrading to F25)
> That package is signed by GPG key 6806A9CB (rpmfusion fedora 25)
> even
> though the package release is fc24.
There is a little mixup here.
Packages ending with .fc24 can perfectly be compatible with f25.
Specially as fedora has not made a mass rebuilt, we don't plan to
update it needlessly.
So the package is indeed signed with the f25 key because it's
provided
as part of the f25-free repository that is only intended for f25.
> I did a 'ls -la' on /etc/pki/rpm-gpg, noticed that RPM-GPG-KEY-
> rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 was a link to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-
> fedora-24-primary. I manually did a 'sudo rm ...; sudo ln -sf ...'
> to
> link it to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary.
What's weird is that's an issue that we have fixed two months agos:
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-release.git/commi
t/?h=f24&id=470dafd8ea4b0eeddf7dda9177fc7450c2b7ebfe
and the package is provided in the updates repo since then:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/r/rpmfus
ion-free-release-24-2.noarch.rpm
Is there any issue with your repository configuration ? (or mirror ?)
I checked the .repo files now, and -debuginfo and -source are disabled,
but the others are enabled. I can't tell you if they were disabled
prior.
This machine gets daily updates. I do those manually because of a
gnome-software/packagekit bug, so I would have noticed problems.
dnf does sometimes send me to mirrors that are missing updates, which
then gives some kind of metalnk.xml error (from memory)
I checked, I can download free-release-24-2.noarch.rpm manually.
I checked /var/log/dnf.log; rpmfusion-free was being checked regularly
(daily), for at least every day in October, but the metadata file was
dated Fri Jun 24 23:00:24 2016; so I assume there is an out-of-date
mirror somewhere. dnf kept using cached info.
11:45 a.m.
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2016-11-09 11:54 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer
<berend.de.schouwer@gma
il.com>:
> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 11:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2016-11-09 10:57 GMT+01:00 Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schouwer
> > @gma
> > il.com>:
> > > On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:41 -0500, Vic Ricker wrote:
> > > > Looks like it was pushed to the 15th.
> > > >
> > > > I have used 'dnf system-upgrade', to upgrade several times,
> > > > and
> > > > it's
> > > > gone smoothly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgr
> > > > ade
[...]
> > I don't reproduce this symlink issue on any of my f24/f25
> > workstations.
> > Can you tell us more about it inclusing the exacts steps in order
> > to
> > reproduce.
> > And the exact fix you have used ?
>
>
> Sure
>
> 'sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25 --refresh' wanted
> to
> upgrade +-2000 packages, remove +-5 (old kernel) and downgrade +-
> 100
> packages. I'm assuming Koji still has to catch up some updates to
> f25.
>
> One of the packages was gstreamer-ffmpeg. This package comes from
> rpmfusion. It wanted to install gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-15.fc24
> (event though it's upgrading to F25)
> That package is signed by GPG key 6806A9CB (rpmfusion fedora 25)
> even
> though the package release is fc24.
There is a little mixup here.
Packages ending with .fc24 can perfectly be compatible with f25.
Specially as fedora has not made a mass rebuilt, we don't plan to
update it needlessly.
So the package is indeed signed with the f25 key because it's
provided
as part of the f25-free repository that is only intended for f25.
> I did a 'ls -la' on /etc/pki/rpm-gpg, noticed that RPM-GPG-KEY-
> rpmfusion-free-fedora-25 was a link to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-
> fedora-24-primary. I manually did a 'sudo rm ...; sudo ln -sf ...'
> to
> link it to RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-25-primary.
What's weird is that's an issue that we have fixed two months agos:
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-release.git/commi
t/?h=f24&id=470dafd8ea4b0eeddf7dda9177fc7450c2b7ebfe
and the package is provided in the updates repo since then:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/r/rpmfus
ion-free-release-24-2.noarch.rpm
Is there any issue with your repository configuration ? (or mirror ?)
Thx
Since my rpmfusion-free metadata file was definitely out of date, I
thought I'd mail this:
rpmfusion-free-updates for 25 is still empty; for 24 it gives me:
# repo = free-fedora-updates-released-24 arch = x86_64 country = ZA
country = global
http://mirror.wbs.co.za/RPMFusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x
86_64/
http://mirror.telepoint.bg/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86
_64/
http://muug.ca/mirror/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/
updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.vutbr.cz/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://www.fedora.is/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://rpmfusion.ip-connect.vn.ua/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://ftp.nluug.nl/os/Linux/distr/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86
_64/
http://ucmirror.canterbury.ac.nz/linux/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24
/x86_64/
http://free.nchc.org.tw/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
https://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/
updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.proserve.nl/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
https://mirror.redsox.cc/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.nexcess.net/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
https://lug.mtu.edu/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.uta.edu.ec/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mir01.syntis.net/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirror.epn.edu.ec/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
https://mirror.lzu.edu.cn/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_64/
http://mirrors.ustc.edu.cn/fedora/rpmfusion/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_
64/
http://ftp.astral.ro/mirrors/rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/24/x86_6
4/
10:03 p.m.
Am 08.11.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Matt Shindala:
I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I should
take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the Fedora
25 version?
just wait until the repos are ready and use "dnf --releasever=25
distro-sync" as always
11:22 p.m.
I myself prefer a fresh install on each release, though I tend to skip
every second release.
Rather that install over the old system, I typically install into a
partition separate from the old one, so both old and new systems are
bootable, and accessible from each other, for a period of time. Home and
data partition are separate to root.
The last time I did this I did not use a bootable disk (USB) to install,
but use the DNF running on the old system to install the new system onto
the new partition! Quite an experience, some quirks, but it worked!
The attached text file is the steps I took (for fedora 24)
Comments welcome.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net>
wrote:
Am 08.11.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Matt Shindala:
> I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
> scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I should
> take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the Fedora
> 25 version?
>
just wait until the repos are ready and use "dnf --releasever=25
distro-sync" as always
11:36 p.m.
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:22:23 +1000
Anthony Thyssen <a.thyssen(a)griffith.edu.au> wrote:
I myself prefer a fresh install on each release, though I tend to
skip
every second release.
Rather that install over the old system, I typically install into a
partition separate from the old one, so both old and new systems are
bootable, and accessible from each other, for a period of time. Home
and data partition are separate to root.
The last time I did this I did not use a bootable disk (USB) to
install, but use the DNF running on the old system to install the new
system onto the new partition! Quite an experience, some quirks, but
it worked!
The attached text file is the steps I took (for fedora 24)
Thanks for posting this. I do the same thing as you do mostly, but
leave the old version around in case there are future problems. A lot
easier to diagnose things from a working system. I used BFO last time,
though I've also used rsync and updated to rawhide, and the network
install from the server release. Your technique should make it dead
simple to install the new release with no risk. I look forward to
using it. Not this cycle, I'm already on F25, and I have rawhide
installed for F26, so probably F27.
3:42 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:03:29PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.11.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Matt Shindala:
>I am currently running Fedora 24 with RPMFusion repos. Fedora 25 is
>scheduled to be released today. What is the correct process I should
>take to upgrade my system and upgrade my RPMFusion repos to the Fedora
>25 version?
just wait until the repos are ready and use "dnf --releasever=25
distro-sync" as always
I think it's probably better to use the recommended dnf plugin[1] these
days:
sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
sudo dnf --refresh system-upgrade download --releasever=25
sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
-c
2964
days inactive
2965
days old
rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
11 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Anthony Thyssen -
Berend De Schouwer -
Chris Smart -
Matt Shindala -
Nicolas Chauvet -
Reindl Harald -
stan -
Vic Ricker