Packages that don't have a owner yet

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 14.10.2007 22:05, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> 2007/10/14, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info
> <mailto:fedora at leemhuis.info>>:
>     On 14.10.2007 18:35, Stewart Adam wrote:
>     > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 13:46 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>     >> Same for totem-xine as long as it's not in Fedora. We can easily drop
>     >> those packages from RPM Fusion once they are in Fedora.
>     > May as well not even worry about a merge review for totem-xine, I've
>     > patched up the Fedora totem spec and hopefully they will build
>     together:
>     > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327211
> 
>     Well, F8 is way beyond feature freeze and close to the real release.
>     IOW: I don't think totem  with both gstreamer and xine backends will
>     make it into Fedora 8. Thus we IMHO need to ship totem-xine initially,
>     as all those users that have it installed from livna might run into
>     dependency problems on Fedora 8 release day otherwise if they try to
>     update using yum.
> Hum...Could we add our username into the list for package we'd like to
> maintain for rpmfusion ?
> it could be more clear for other to check through thi list too.

The current list contains only those packages that come from the old
repos. If you owned one of them then just add you username behind it if
you want to own it.

If you want to take over existing packages that have no owners yet then
just add you username if you are a sponsored Fedora contributer (which
you are Xavier).

But any new packages should go through a normal review via bugzilla,
just like in Fedora.

CU
knurd