rpms/lastfm/F-9 lastfm.spec,1.1,1.2

[Till Maas]

On Tue August 5 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:

> > -desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
> > +desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \
>
> Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>
> >     * If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora
> > as <vendor_id>. * It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the
> > life of a package.
> >
> > This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop
> > file/path names).
>
> Opinions?

Iirc it was proposed to drop the vendor_id or not to use it as a file prefix 
in Fedora in the future. Therefore I would keep the vendor_id constant until 
it is clear, whether it can be dropped.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20080805/0e6d0ad6/attachment.bin