amule not in fedora?

[Paul Howarth]

Aurélien Bompard wrote:
>> I did little investigation, and I can't see why amule isn't in fedora?
> 
> Well, I can't remember exactly why, but I suppose it's now more for
> historical reasons : it went into Livna at about the same time as
> mldonkey, and at that time peer to peer was considered litigious
> (Bittorrent wasn't in Fedora).

Huh? Fedora CVS has bittorrent branches going all the way back to RHL-8?

Paul.