Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > The answer might be trivial but I have a question: Can someone explain me what is the difference between libdvdcss and lame (or any of the other packages we have in rpmfusion that is patent encumbered) from a legal perspective? Why is lame OK, but libdvdcss is not? The issue with lame is patents. libdvdcss goes beyond that. -- Rex