Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15

[Michael Schwendt]

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:57:47 +0100, Julian wrote:

> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze:
> > On Monday, 15 December 2008 at 21:21, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >> Michael Schwendt pisze:
> > [...]
> >>> ======================================================================
> >>> Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64:
> >>>
> >>>     ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386  requires  libfaac.so.0
> >>>     gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386  requires  libfaac.so.0
> >>>     libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386  requires  libfaac.so.0
> >>>     mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386  requires  libfaac.so.0
> > [...]
> >> I am somewhat responsible for faac, I suggested to update it but did not
> >> notice the abi bump. Sorry. Please let me know if I can help to bring
> >> this back to shape.
> > 
> > Well, you could check if there haven't been any API changes, IOW if the
> > affected packages build against the new faac. I would prefer it if this
> > build were removed because we're in the middle of rebuilding most of our
> > multimedia stack against the new x264 and ffmpeg and I don't want any
> > unnecessary release bumps and rebuilds.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > R.
> > 
> Hmm, I just installed the faac-1.26 on my Fedora 10, and it seems the
> soname is the same:
> $ rpm -q --provides faac
> libfaac.so.0()(64bit)
> faac = 1.26-1.fc11
> faac(x86-64) = 1.26-1.fc11
> $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libfaac.so.0.0.0 |grep SONAME
>  0x000000000000000e (SONAME)             Library soname: [libfaac.so.0]

And what are you trying to prove?

 * Notice the repository id.
 * Notice the package %arch.
 * Draw your conclusion.
 * Confirm by listing the repo directory.