using rpmfusion repo during fedora install

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 08.11.2008 09:33, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 08.11.2008 05:01, David Timms wrote:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> On 07.11.2008 15:03, David Timms wrote:
>>>>> But note, the better question would have been: Does out comps.xml 
>>>>> have the right format? But I think it has, as it works just fine with 
>>>>> stand-alone pirut (if one complies and runs the F8 version on rawhide)
>>>> So I should continue to try and work out where the issue actually lies ?
>>> I'd be glad, yeah. But note, I'll try to run some test myself as well; I 
>>> plan to open a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com when I had a chance to look 
>>> deeper into this.
>>>
>>> But note, we can't be really sure our comps files is correct. But I hope 
>>> it is.
>> I don't see any test scripts etc for comps.xml {other than xml tests}.
>> OK, for 9:
>> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/9/i386/repodata/804f17201293133c36a020ea786d00eb978300a2-comps.xml
>  > [...]
>> That seems to indicate that the group would include the "(RPM Fusion 
>> Free)" text, and be different to the Fedora group, which contradicts 
>> what you said earlier about the group being undifferentiated from Fedora.
> 
> That was a workaround that was used in F-8 and F-9 -- but the plan was 
> to get rid of that workaround for rawhide and get the real soltuion in 
> place, hence the comps.xml for rawhide looks quite different.

Filed a bug upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470653

Any help getting that fixed (or help how to find the root of the error) 
appreciated!

Cu
knurd