Did some bugzilla cleanups
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 21:47:00 CET 2008
So, everyone (but merely the infrastructure dudes), here's another
status update WITH source code.
Please don't run this without filling in your bugzilla credentials!
(and if you did, "rm -f pickle*" prior to next run)
Attached is the set of scripts to sync owners.list files to bugzilla
(remotely, i.e. via the normal web interface). Since the last status
updates, the script has been run twice a day as a cronjob.
1. extract the tarball in a working-directory
2. open "rpmfusion.conf"
3. enter your bugzilla account email and password in the [bugzilla]
section
That account MUST have "editcomponents" permission (a special account
with just that permission could be created).
4. execute "RUN.sh" once
During the first run it will create the missing files ("pickle*") in
current dir and take longer than normal for every owners.list entry
that has people in "initialcclist". As why, see bottom paragraph in
this mail.
Notice the warning on stderr about duplicate entries in some of
the owners.list files. ;) This is stuff that must be fixed in
those files.
5. execute "RUN.sh" again
This time you should not see as many update status messages as
previously (as it could use the pickle files).
(5.2 try once more with a modified owners.list in svn)
6. enable option "-q" (quiet) in RUN.sh to kill normal stdout messages
as appropriate for cron jobs
[...]
Why more than one script?
Python modules for reusability. Even the modules can be run as scripts
(use -h or --help) for testing, btw.
There's the old "CheckOwnersList" script that can compare repository
contents with an owners.list file and print missing entries (where only
the email addresses must be substituted!). E.g. for RPM Fusion Fedora free
devel:
$ python CheckOwnersList -c rpmfusion.conf -p free-rawhide
Reading repository metadata...
free-rawhide - Packages in repos: 144
Packages in owners.list: 155
Nothing missing, so no further output.
[...]
Compared with Livna, a couple of changes have been necessary to make
the scripts work with RPM Fusion:
- the bugzilla version uses special tokens to combat fraud -- this
required ugly enhancements in the scripts
- the well-known "describecomponents.cgi" web page doesn't list
the members of the Cc list but only name, description, owner -- due
to that it's not possible to simply compare bz's list of "components"
with owners.list since they don't cover the same details. The missing
details are filled in from a local cache (Python pickle files maintained
during each run).
- the "default QA contact" field is not used and unavailable compared
with Livna - that required a flag in the web page parser
[...]
And finally, although this [still] works, another solution would be to
look into modifying the bugzilla database tables directly and deal with
the different requirements (srv/db access and such). Fedora's scripts
probably would not be compatible because Red Hat's bugzilla is different
(just a guess).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bzcomps-websync.tgz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5963 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20081110/8bb89330/bzcomps-websync.tgz
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list