[Bug 43] Review Request: mixxx - Mixxx is an open source software for DJ'ing

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Wed Oct 1 04:29:26 CEST 2008


--- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com>  2008-10-01 04:29:26 ---
### means comments and questions
*** means issues, they need to be corrected

source files match upstream:
package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
***specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and but uses macros
***Two portions from the spec file:
***chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/mixxx/midi/convert
*** Please use the macros consistently (e.g. %{name}) in this example.
dist tag is present.
build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
license field matches the actual license.
license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
latest version is being packaged.
###BuildRequires are proper
###One of the plugins require libdjconsole-devel which is not available. But
this plugin is not enabled by default, so I think it's fine.
compiler flags are appropriate.
%clean is present.
package installs properly
package uninstalls properly
debuginfo package looks complete.
###is rpmlint silent?
###No but the the warning is from the debug-info package:
mixxx-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
###which can be ignored
final provides and requires are sane.
owns the directories it creates.
doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
no duplicates in %files.
file permissions are appropriate.
no scriptlets present.
code, not content.
documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
no headers.
no libtool .la droppings.
###GUI app: desktop file placed in proper place. no mime-types installed. 
###desktop-file-install called properly. I just have one question here: What
###is this for? : --remove-category Application 

The package can be published in rpmfusion because it requires(build-requires)
libmad(libmad-devel), which is not available through Fedora but through

The package can be approved when the above issue is fixed. (It can even be
approved now if we are not as strict as Fedora in terms of packaging
But since I'm not sponsored yet, I can't do this. I hope this guide helps the
actual reviewer.

Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list