owners.list not entirely right

Julian Sikorski belegdol at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 20:56:23 CEST 2008

Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
> On 14.10.2008 11:57, Xavier Lamien wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
>>> not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
>>> comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should
>>> be added to initialcc, and in the case where Chris is the primary
>>> maintainer (sdlmess), I should be.
>>> Could you please also have a look at the cvs acls (if these aren't the
>>> same). A while ago Thorsten rebuilt sdlmame due to some buildsys issues,
>>> and I did not get any mail regarding cvs commit.
>> Co-maintainers are registered in cvs acls from CVS admin requested
>> (cvs will do its job to mail maintainer and co-maintainer).
>> initalcc is something else where anybody could request to be added to
>> track changes in cvs.
> /me wonders if that's supposed to be read as "Julian, please file a
> proper cvs change request in bugzilla"
>> I'll have a look on sdlmame
> No need to afaics -- I just queued the build with the old tag (and hence
> did not commit anything to cvs), as the older build had never left the
> buildsys.

I don't mean requeueing - a good while ago you bumped sdlmame's release
and I got no email. It just took me ages to moan about it ;). If that's
reasonable, I could file cvs admin requests for all appropriate
packages, so that the acls could be checked.

> Cu
> knurd


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list