Next steps to get RPM Fusion running (V2)
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Wed Oct 15 06:52:43 CEST 2008
On 15.10.2008 04:18, Stewart Adam wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> - are the nvidia bits sane? There were some mails about the 177series,
>> but seems some questions were not answered yet
> As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong Nicolas), we're dropping 177 for
> Livna F-8/9 and focus on the move to RPM Fusion and provide it there
> instead. Nicolas is still testing the final bits of the parallel-installable
> drivers, from there I'm going to write a quick initscript and redo bits of
> livna-config-display and then everything should be ready.
Well, I posted some comments to the plan that was posted last week on
this list and mentioned that I see some serious trouble ahead in regards
to kmods:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001520.html
Nobody answered that mail afaics, that's why I added this point to the
list. I just want to prevent you two spend a lot of time in a scheme
that has some well known problems that we imho should avoid.
CU
knurd
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list