Yet again: Current package status updated (package maintainers
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Sun Oct 19 23:10:20 CEST 2008
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> livna crimson-fields-0.5.0-1.lvn7.x86_64
Hmm, this one really should go to Fedora, does anyone know why this should not
go to Fedora?
If not anyone want to review it there if I clean it up and submit it?
> freshrpms amule-2.1.3-4.fc9.x86_64
> freshrpms lame-3.98.2-1.fc9.x86_64
> freshrpms lame-devel-3.98.2-1.fc9.x86_64
> freshrpms subtitleripper-0.3.4-3.fc7.x86_64
> freshrpms xine-0.99.5-3.fc9.x86_64
> freshrpms xrick-0.0.021212-2.fc7.x86_64
> -> have a higher EVR in freshrpms then in RPM Fusion; package
> maintainers, please fix!
I've fixed xrick.
> freshrpms dkms-lirc-0.8.2-1.noarch
> -> lirc is in Fedora's kernel iirc
> freshrpms ffmpeg-libpostproc-0.4.9-0.10.20080510.fc9.x86_64
> - not sure, but I suppose ffmpeg in RPM Fusion needs to obsolete it?
> freshrpms lbreakout2-2.6-0.8.beta.fc7.x86_64
> -> in Fedora with a different name
For those curious its called lbrickbuster2 there (trademark concerns)
> freshrpms dkms-gspca-1.0.20-1.noarch
> freshrpms dkms-kqemu-1.3.0-0.2.pre11.noarch
> freshrpms dkms-ndiswrapper-1.52-1.fc9.x86_64
> -> as kmod in RPM Fusion; have no obsolete afaik
Note that gspca is no longer needed and should really be dropped for devel/F-10
More information about the rpmfusion-developers