[Bug 34] Review request: xmltv - A set of utilities to manage your TV viewing

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Oct 20 00:41:25 CEST 2008


Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier at bachelot.org>  2008-10-20 00:41:25 ---
+ source files match upstream :9ee2d6c8bb192e214b2674042260cf36
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license
+ license is open source-compatible. License text is included.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock.
+ package installs properly
+ rpmlint is silent.
= final provides and requires are sane:
Some duplicates requires with different versions specified. Harmless,
perl(WWW::Mechanize) >= 1.02
perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.10
perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.28
+ %check is present and all tests pass
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
= No desktop file, but it's not really useful in this case.

This package is APPROVED.

Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list