zfs-fuse review request

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Mon Oct 27 11:53:28 CET 2008

On 27.10.2008 11:44, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>:
>> Well, that is double work for a lot of people (reviews, branch creation,
>> import, initial builds and some other things ned to be done in both Fedora
>> and RPM Fusion). Hence I'd say the way Uwe took was the right one -- go to
>> Fedora, if it looks unlikely there or if it looks like the legal
>> clarification might take months then go to RPM Fusion in parallel.
> I tried to address a broader problem than the particular one with
> zfs-fuse. For example, someone submitted VisualBoyAdvance for review
> in Fedora.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658
> IMHO this has zero probability to be accepted in Fedora.
> So I think that having a review here would have been the right thing
> to do and in the interest of the final user. Then, if Legal agrees
> that package is fine for inclusion in Fedora, the original RPM Fusion
> reviewer can re-review it quickly in Fedora. Cases like this already
> happened in Dribble past and where handled this way without any
> trouble.

Mail communication is fun sometimes :-) We are afaics in full agreement 
(note the "if it looks unlikely (to go in) there" [in Fedora] above)



More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list