Next steps?
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Mon Oct 27 12:13:27 CET 2008
On 27.10.2008 11:50, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl>:
>> Although maybe make that -24 hours, so that we can make plenty of fuzz
>> before the preview release, we don't want to send our announcement after the
>> preview release announcement. Hmm, I think we should do both:
>> 1) Send out an announcement that we're officially open for business 24 hours
>> before preview release
>> 2) Send out an announcement ASAP after the preview release, explaining that
>> testing the preview release is an excellent opportunity to also test
>> rpmfusion
> It sounds like a good plan to me. I have only a little doubt that
> media will care about the second announcement if this will be too
> close to the first.
The basic trick (that was also the reason for my initial "-4 hours plan;
but it works the same with -24 hours) is this: Those news sides that
found the initial RPM Fusion announcement not important enough to
mention will hopefully mention RPM Fusion together with the Fedora
Preview Release ;-)
CU
knurd
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list