[Fwd: Re: Legality questions.... (<repositoryWhichShallNotBeNamed> & nVidia)]

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Sep 21 14:43:25 CEST 2008


On 20.09.2008 20:54, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-09-20, 16:40 GMT, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Anyway: Do you think that's split with subdomains is "good 
>> enough"?
> I am afraid not, but I am not authorized to speak as a lawyer.
> I was more interested whether anybody tried to find out.
> 
>> Just a crazy idea: If mentioning RPM Fusion really is or 
>> becomes a problem why not create a completely new project 
>> somewhere with a totally separate domain name that does nothing 
>> else then providing the fglrx and nvidia driver packages from 
>> RPM Fusion in their repos? It should not be much more work then 
>> programming and maintaining a small script that mirrors just 
>> those drivers and created new repodata for each dir they are 
>> found in.
> Yeah, probably -- we may end up with something like that -- 
> I just thought that it is something which rpmfusion could do most 
> easily.

I suppose some of us would be willing to help with that; but right now 
getting RPM Fusion running is way more important and keeps most of us 
busy already.

CU
knurd


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list