[Fwd: Re: Legality questions....
(<repositoryWhichShallNotBeNamed> & nVidia)]
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Sep 21 14:43:25 CEST 2008
On 20.09.2008 20:54, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-09-20, 16:40 GMT, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Anyway: Do you think that's split with subdomains is "good
>> enough"?
> I am afraid not, but I am not authorized to speak as a lawyer.
> I was more interested whether anybody tried to find out.
>
>> Just a crazy idea: If mentioning RPM Fusion really is or
>> becomes a problem why not create a completely new project
>> somewhere with a totally separate domain name that does nothing
>> else then providing the fglrx and nvidia driver packages from
>> RPM Fusion in their repos? It should not be much more work then
>> programming and maintaining a small script that mirrors just
>> those drivers and created new repodata for each dir they are
>> found in.
> Yeah, probably -- we may end up with something like that --
> I just thought that it is something which rpmfusion could do most
> easily.
I suppose some of us would be willing to help with that; but right now
getting RPM Fusion running is way more important and keeps most of us
busy already.
CU
knurd
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list