[Bug 48] New: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs
on Linux
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Sep 23 00:54:37 CEST 2008
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48
Summary: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on
Linux
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://freej.dyne.org
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SRPM:
http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej-0.10-8.20080726.fc9.src.rpm
SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej.spec
FreeJ is a digital instrument for video livesets, featuring realtime
rendering of multilayered video and chained effect filtering directly
on the screen. It plays with video4linux devices, DIVX/AVI files, and
PNG images, letting you dynamically apply on each layer a chain of
effect plugins.
NOTE: This package is hard-coded to require an MMX capable processor.
RPMLINT:
freej.i386: I: checking
freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js
"/usr/local/bin/freej"
freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js 0644
freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan.js
"/usr/local/bin/freej"
freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan.js 0644
freej.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/freej
freej.src: I: checking
freej.src:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make
freej-debuginfo.i386: I: checking
freej-devel.i386: I: checking
freej.spec:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings.
FreeJ has a built in javascript interpreter. rpmlint is not intelligent enough
to realize this. The rest is a silly warning.
This package depends on libffmpeg which is not available in Fedora.
Note: First time submitter.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list