two questions regarding bug handling (was: Re: [Bug 4] Tracker:
Accepted packages.;
Also was [Bug 51] Review Request: ogre-cg - Cg plugin for OGRE)
Xavier Lamien
laxathom at fedoraproject.org
Sun Sep 28 12:10:11 CEST 2008
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just wondered two small details:
>
> On 28.09.2008 11:38, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4
>>
>>
>> Xavier Lamien <lxtnow at gmail.com> changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>>
>> > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Depends on|51 |
>
> Hmm. For what do we actually need or want to use the "Accepted packages"
> tracker bug? If we just use it for the "create package in cvs" case then we
> could directly use the CVS tracker bug directly, can't we? OTOH: If we want
> to keep track of things then we should not remove packages that have been
> accepted.
I'm ok
>
> On 28.09.2008 10:38, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51
>>
>> Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
>> |review at rpmfusion.org |
>
> I did something like this myself in the past a few times. But a few days ago
> I thought: Hey, this removes the subscribers to the mailing list out of the
> loop. Do we want that? I tend to say "no".
yeah, the right thing to do it's assign the review to the reviewer and
keep mailing list on CC.
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list