From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 1 07:34:58 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 1 07:35:04 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49D1D0DC.3020603@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <20090331092327.3cb329bc@faldor.intranet> <49D1D0DC.3020603@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49D2FD02.4060808@leemhuis.info> On 31.03.2009 10:14, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.03.2009 09:23, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > The little bit longer version: Some of our plague servers and builders > are not fully up to date. Some (e.g. the newest one) are not configured > properly (private buildsys repos are not enabled) as I justed noticed a > few minutes ago. I should have looked closer -- the needsign repos were configured, but not enabled on that newly configured x86-builder from j-rod, resulting in packages to be build against older versions of faad and x264 (among others). I disabled the builder and I requeued mmplyer and xmms-wma; the latest mythtv build is affected as well, but needs to be build on j-rod's builder, as it for some strange reasons doesn't build on the two other x86 builders (also one of those problems that somebody needs to look at or fix by updating mock and plague). I'll try to review the mock configs on the new builder later to bring them in sync with those from the other builders; then I'll enabled that builder again and build mythtv there. CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 1 09:41:10 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 1 09:41:18 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49D31A96.7000409@leemhuis.info> On 31.03.2009 20:02, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [...] >> kmediafactory-0_7_0-0_3_rc2_fc11 on >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233-kmediafactory-0.7.0-0.3.rc2.fc11/ppc > The correct logs are actually here: Sorry, I did a rebuild after my post and that build failed on a different arch :-/ > This fails due to broken deps in mplayer (and it tries to build it anyway > even though yum failed and chokes on the cmake_kde4 macro because > kde-filesystem is not installed, looks like a bug in mock). We need mplayer > fixed first. Fixed, not kmediafactory fails differently: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233-kmediafactory-0.7.0-0.3.rc2.fc11/x86_64/build.log > /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (132296) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (91833). > CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function `KMF::Tools::loadStringFromFile(KUrl const&, QString*, bool)': > /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:667: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::download(KUrl const&, QString&, QWidget*)' > /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:678: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::removeTempFile(QString const&)' > CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function `KMF::Tools::saveString2File(KUrl const&, QString const&, bool)': > /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:646: undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::upload(QString const&, KUrl const&, QWidget*)' > /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (65994) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (9311). > CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmfmultiurldialog.o: In function `KMFMultiURLDialog::add()': > /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmfmultiurldialog.cpp:84: undefined reference to `KFileDialog::getOpenFileNames(KUrl const&, QString const&, QWidget*, QString const&)' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [lib/libkmf.so.0.7.0_rc2] Error 1 CU knurd From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Apr 1 10:58:06 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed Apr 1 10:55:55 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49D32C9E.3010707@hhs.nl> On 03/31/2009 08:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi! > > wormsofprey-0_4_3-4_fc11 on > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3315-wormsofprey-0.4.3-4.fc11/x86_64 > Fixed. > vice-2_1-2_fc11 on > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/3382-vice-2.1-2.fc11/i586 > Fixed. Drop me a mail if anyone needs help fixing some gcc-4.4 introduced compile errors. Regards, Hans From denis at poolshark.org Wed Apr 1 10:22:47 2009 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Wed Apr 1 11:13:54 2009 Subject: open-vm-tools Message-ID: <49D32457.7010106@poolshark.org> Thorsten, Do yo know what is up with the rebuilds of open-vm-tools ? It seems currently broken somehow. I've checked in the latest version of the package, but the akmod package available for rawhide is still very old. How do I force a akmod package rebuild ? I only have modules for 'open-vm-tools' and 'open-vm-tools-kmod' in CVS... -denis From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 17:53:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 17:53:00 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] New: Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Summary: Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://terminatorx.org/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/terminatorX.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/terminatorX-3.82-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: terminatorX is a realtime audio synthesizer that allows you to "scratch" on digitally sampled audio data (*.wav, *.au, *.ogg, *.mp3, etc.) the way hiphop-DJs scratch on vinyl records. It features multiple turntables, realtime effects (buit-in as well as LADSPA plugin effects), a sequencer and an easy-to-use gtk+ GUI. rpmlint: is silent why rpmfusion? depends on libmad and mpg321 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 18:24:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 18:24:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] New: Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package which contains non-free parts of blender Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Summary: Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package which contains non-free parts of blender Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Jochen@herr-schmitt.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-nonfree.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Blender is the essential software solution you need for 3D, from modeling, animation, rendering and post-production to interactive creation and playback. Professionals and novices can easily and inexpensively publish stand-alone, secure, multi-platform content to the web, CD-ROMs, and other media. This package contains the non-free parts which you will get, if you are building blender with ffmpeg support. This Package requires the free blender package from the Fedora project. Why not in Fedora: This packages contains part of the blender package which you will get if you may build blender with ffmpget. This part which depend on ffmpeg can't be included into Fedora caused by potential patent issues. Rpmlit output: $ rpmlint blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint blenderplayer-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint blender-nonfree-debuginfo-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 18:35:10 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 18:35:09 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package which contains non-free parts of blender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401163502.45B852C3B8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-01 18:35:09 --- As far as I know ffmpeg is free software (hence it is in rpmfusion-free). The reason it is not in Fedora is, it contains patent-encumbered media decoder/encoders. For similar reasons, some packages in rpmfusion-free have "-freeworld" appended to their names. You might want to update the package name, summary and the description accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 18:53:37 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 18:53:37 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package which contains non-free parts of blender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401165329.9E54E2C3C9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-01 18:53:37 --- New release: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-freeword.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-freeword-2.48a-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 18:55:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 18:55:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401165459.11BB42C3E1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: blender- |Review request: blender- |nonfree - Additonal package |freeworld - Additonal parts |which contains non-free |of blender not distributed |parts of blender |in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 20:50:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 20:50:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401185016.EF3DC2C3AF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-04-01 20:50:25 --- (In reply to comment #2) > New release: > > SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-freeword.spec > SRPM: > http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-freeword-2.48a-1.fc10.src.rpm Error 404 - Not found. I think the correct URL's are: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld.spec http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeword-2.48a-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 20:54:45 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 20:54:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401185436.B140F2C473@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-01 20:54:45 --- Yes, sorry for any inconvieniences. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 20:57:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 20:57:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401185716.69B6F2C4BD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-04-01 20:57:25 --- * This macro seems not to be used: %define blend blender-freeworld * In this macro blender-nonfree needs to be changed to blender-freeworld: %define plugins %{_libdir}/blender-nonfree/plugins It would be easier to use the name macro in this way: %define plugins %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins * Moreover, there are various references to "blenderplayer-nonfree" that needs to be changed too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 21:57:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 21:57:43 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401195734.B41652C3CB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-01 21:57:44 --- New upload: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeword-2.48a-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 23:52:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 23:52:01 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] New: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: solarflow99@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 DOSEMU is a PC Emulator that allows Linux to run a DOS operating system in a virtual x86 machine. This allows you to run all kinds of different DOS programs including DPMI applications. Enjoy running your DOS programs forever! http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ I think the package is complete, just have to get it into rpmfusion since it was discovered it couldn't quite make it into Fedora (reason is listed below). This is my first package, the original Fedora review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 we're not saying it's illegal. It just doesn't grant the user the freedom to modify the program to suit his needs. See the thread on packaging list for discussion on this [1]: [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/msg00056.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 1 23:52:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 1 23:52:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401215153.331F02C3CB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 solarflow99@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 00:08:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 00:08:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additonal parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401220815.4AE4A2C3E3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-02 00:08:25 --- (In reply to comment #5) > * This macro seems not to be used: > > %define blend blender-freeworld > > * In this macro blender-nonfree needs to be changed to blender-freeworld: > > %define plugins %{_libdir}/blender-nonfree/plugins > > It would be easier to use the name macro in this way: > > %define plugins %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins This is not as easy, so I tend to disagree, this content from blender-nonfree shoudln't override the content fromm blender itself. so for some part, it should use the blender compiled shared object. This is a dumb assumption at this time as I've just look at the spec file itself. Use libGL-devel and libGLU-devel instead of harcoded mesa vendor ones. - I never understood why ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_bindir} was used instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}; but this is trivial. (and also more aesthetic: it suggest that you know that %{_bindir} already have a "/" at the beginning). BTW, - You need to remove the x264 sources along with ffmpeg ones from the fedora source archive. - Are you sure to have solve the problem with the blender binary/noarch script directory (where blender plugins will store their content and temporary files)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 00:55:58 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 00:55:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401225547.C505F2C385@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 solarflow99@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |solarflow99@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-02 00:55:58 --- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm > SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec > > Description: > Dynamips is an IOS emulator with hypervisor, allowing users > to run several IOS images (in particular 3600 and 7200 series) as fully > functional routers # rpmlint dynamips* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I guess this package has been reviewed already? rpmlint output is clean, however I only see the x86_64.rpm no SRC or i386 rpm? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 01:14:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 01:14:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090401231356.453962C3C0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 solarflow99@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |solarflow99@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-02 01:14:07 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I know, that rpmlint has complaints about the demo package. This happens > because the demos which are located on %{_libdir}/Xm contains c header files. > But I think this is acceptable. Moving to %{_datadir} is not an option, because > the demo package contains runable binaries of the demos. > # rpmlint openmotif* openmotif.src: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Looking at the spec file, I just noticed this very minor error: # SMP build doesn't works make # %{?_smp_mflags} should be work, not works right? There are 2 makes, but I assume you know what you are doing here. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 02:07:10 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 02:07:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 436] Review request: moonlight - Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402000658.45ABF2C3C1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnomeuser@gmail.com --- Comment #26 from David Nielsen 2009-04-02 02:07:07 --- (In reply to comment #20) > And please enable ffmpeg in the RPM Fusion package, otherwise people will have > to download the non-Free M$ codecs to play back any multimedia content. An interesting approach would be finding a way to have this be separate subpackages (moonlight-nopants and moonlight-ffmpeg). For testing purposes one might imagine upstream would like confirmation that both are broken also some users might prefer using the proprietary media pack over ffmpeg (for whatever reason). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 06:44:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 06:44:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402044413.D98AE2C383@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2009-04-02 06:44:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I guess this package has been reviewed already? package never got an formal review but yes most of the issues where already checked > however I only see the x86_64.rpm no SRC or i386 rpm? oops. wrong file uploaed: SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kevin.kofler at chello.at Thu Apr 2 06:53:26 2009 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Thu Apr 2 06:55:06 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49D31A96.7000409@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Fixed, not kmediafactory fails differently: > > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3233-kmediafactory-0.7.0-0.3.rc2.fc11/x86_64/build.log > >> /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (132296) greater than or equal to >> .debug_str size (91833). CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function >> `KMF::Tools::loadStringFromFile(KUrl const&, QString*, bool)': >> /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:667: >> undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::download(KUrl const&, QString&, >> QWidget*)' >> /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:678: >> undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::removeTempFile(QString const&)' >> CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmftools.o: In function >> `KMF::Tools::saveString2File(KUrl const&, QString const&, bool)': >> /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmftools.cpp:646: >> undefined reference to `KIO::NetAccess::upload(QString const&, KUrl >> const&, QWidget*)' /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (65994) greater than >> or equal to .debug_str size (9311). >> CMakeFiles/kmf.dir/kmfmultiurldialog.o: In function >> `KMFMultiURLDialog::add()': >> /builddir/build/BUILD/kmediafactory-0.7.0_rc2/lib/kmfmultiurldialog.cpp:84: >> undefined reference to `KFileDialog::getOpenFileNames(KUrl const&, >> QString const&, QWidget*, QString const&)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit >> status make[2]: *** [lib/libkmf.so.0.7.0_rc2] Error 1 This needs to link to libkio and fails to do so. Kevin Kofler From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 06:57:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 06:57:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402045739.ABA5F2C380@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: blender- |Review request: blender- |freeworld - Additonal parts |freeworld - Additional parts |of blender not distributed |of blender not distributed |in Fedora |in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 08:04:09 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 08:04:10 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402060407.502062C3AF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak@v3.sk Blocks|2 |4 URL| |http://jzygmont.fedorapeople |http://jzygmont.fedorapeople|.org/ |.org/ | --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 08:04:08 --- Just continuing the current status here: SPEC: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec SRPM: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu-1.4.0-2.1868svn.src.rpm http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec (In reply to comment #47) > (In reply to comment #46) > > > 1.) Source files > > > > > > Please comment on how did you get these: > > > > > > You mean comment where I got it in the spec file? > > Exactly. Like: > > # Get revision 1234 from SVN: > # svn co -r1234 http://repoistory-url@1234 dosbox > # tar --exclude .svn -czf dosbox.tar.gz dosbox I see this is done. > > > Isn't etc/dosemu.xpm from the source tarball sufficient? > > > Source3: %{name}.xpm > > > > > > I think I got that idea from the dosbox spec file, I can change it if > > necessary. > > Yup. Just droop the Source3 and replace %{SOURCE3} with etc/dosemu.xpm Done as well. > > > 2.) FreeDOS image > > > > > > I don't believe this is formally allowed (shipping binaries), though other > > > packages do this (say, qemu includes bochs bios image). I'll ask on packaging > > > list how to deal with this and let you know. Soo, I believe you should add the source for the FreeDOS image to the srpm, so that we distribute it and therefore comply with GPL. Or ask FreeDOS people for permission to distribute it w/o source. Won't block though. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 08:57:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 08:57:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402065703.0C4C52C3B0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-02 08:57:05 --- (In reply to comment #1) > APPROVED Two questions: - is this aiming the free or nonfree repo? - lkundrak, will your sponsor Justin? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 09:20:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 09:20:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-02 09:20:47 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED > > Two questions: > > - is this aiming the free or nonfree repo? Free, I believe. Only issue with this is that we can't rebuild the FreeDOS image, which is GPLed. We just don't have the tools. > - lkundrak, will your sponsor Justin? Yes, I can sponsor him, provided someone upgrades my rpmfusion account to sponsor. (I'm already a sponsor in Fedora) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 10:35:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 10:35:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 479] New: Review Request: xmms-mplayer - Mplayer plugin for XMMS Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Summary: Review Request: xmms-mplayer - Mplayer plugin for XMMS Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://xmmsmplayer.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms-mplayer.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms-mplayer-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Xmms-Mplayer is a input plugin for xmms that allows you to play all audio and video files in xmms. Thus, allowing you to use xmms as a playlist frontend for mplayer. This project aims at merely being a connecting link between xmms and mplayer. It does not intend to get involved into any processing of video files, all that is left to MPlayer XMMS Mplayer plugin. rpmlint: silent why rpmfusion? depends on mplayer -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 10:41:27 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 10:41:28 2009 Subject: [Bug 479] Review Request: xmms-mplayer - MPlayer plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402084124.4E3012C38C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xmms-mplayer|Review Request: xmms-mplayer |- Mplayer plugin for XMMS |- MPlayer plugin for XMMS --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-02 10:41:27 --- Please disregard the above description. It should be: Description: Xmms-MPlayer is an input plugin for XMMS that allows you to play all audio and video files in XMMS. Thus, allowing you to use XMMS as a playlist frontend for MPlayer. This project aims at merely being a connecting link between XMMS and MPlayer. It does not intend to get involved into any processing of video files, all that is left to MPlayer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Thu Apr 2 10:52:49 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Thu Apr 2 10:52:57 2009 Subject: orphaning xmms-wma Message-ID: There is this long standing crasher bug [1] that I couldn't to solve after spending many hours and days. At the end, as of today, I finally lost my interest in this package. Instead, I packaged xmms-mplayer [2] which can play not only wma files, but also whatever mplayer can play (audio and video). If there's anyone who wants to fix the bug and maintain xmms-wma, (s)he can take it over. I'm pretty much done with this package. Orcan [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357 [2] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=xmms-mplayer From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 18:32:50 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 18:32:50 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402163243.19FCE2C3E3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-02 18:32:50 --- (In reply to comment #4) > # rpmlint openmotif* > openmotif.src: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License > 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint doesn't know this license because this is not a free license. That is the reason why openmotif should go into rpmfusion.non-free. > Looking at the spec file, I just noticed this very minor error: > # SMP build doesn't works > make # %{?_smp_mflags} I have try out a SMP build, but it's failed on my system. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 19:59:04 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 2 19:59:04 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-02 Message-ID: <20090402175904.AED6F2411A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 23 NEW amule-2.2.3-1.fc10 : File sharing client compatible with eDonkey blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc10.4 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.19 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.11 NEW faac-1.28-1.fc10 : Encoder and encoding library for MPEG2/4 AAC gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.17 kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.16 NEW motion-3.2.11-3.fc10 : A motion detection system ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.16 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.142982-1.fc10.3 qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.15 NEW rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc10 : Tools for setting up a rpmfusion maintainer environment rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.4 rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-7.fc10.3 rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.2 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.2 transcode-1.0.7-3.fc10 vlc-0.9.9-0.5rc2.fc10 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.2-3.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 1 NEW compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc10 : An interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 19 amule-2.2.3-1.fc9 blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc9.3 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-29 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc9.11 faac-1.28-1.fc9 gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc9 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc9 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc9.13 kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.13 NEW motion-3.2.11-3.fc9 : A motion detection system mpd-0.14.2-1.fc9 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc9.13 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.123053-1.fc9.10 qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc9.11 NEW rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc9 : Tools for setting up a rpmfusion maintainer environment rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-1.fc9.14 rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc9 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc9.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: amule-2.2.3-1.fc10 ------------------ * Sun Mar 22 2009 Felix Kaechele - 2.2.3-1 - updated to 2.2.3 - replaced patch3 with new one for gcc4.4 blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc10.4 ------------------------ * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2.4 - rebuild for new kernels * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2.3 - rebuild for new kernels buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.19 -------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:10-0.19 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.11 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.11 - rebuild for new kernels faac-1.28-1.fc10 ---------------- * Thu Mar 12 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.28-1 - update to 1.28 - drop redundant BRs - fix Source URL and use bz2 tarball - fix rpath - include manpage - ship AUTHORS NEWS docs/* - integrated changes from Julian Sikorski -- Dropped dos2unix BR, not needed anymore -- Made Source0 use macros -- Fixed License tag -- Fixed file permissions -- Converted ChangeLog to utf-8 gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 ------------------------------ * Fri Mar 13 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-1 - Updated to 0.9.5 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-1 - Updated to 0.9.5 - Added nautilus-devel to BuildRequires - Packaged nautilus extension separately - Adjusted whitespaces - Added keyboard shortcuts to documentation * Sun Mar 01 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.4-2 - Rebuilt for new libgpod iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.17 ----------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.15-41.svn147.17 - rebuild for new kernels kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.16 ----------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.0-0.42.16 - rebuild for new kernels motion-3.2.11-3.fc10 -------------------- * Wed Mar 18 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-3 - Even more corrected init script thanks to Stewart Adam * Sun Mar 15 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-2 - Removed the ffmpeg requires - Corrected the spec file - New init script with a corrected start() function and LSB header support * Tue Mar 03 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-1 - Updated to Fedora 10 standard ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.16 ------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.16 - rebuild for new kernels open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.142982-1.fc10.3 ---------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.142982-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.15 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-42.15 - rebuild for new kernels rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc10 ----------------------------- * Sat Feb 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.2-1 - Update to 0.2 (splits rpmfusion-cvs into rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-cvs) rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.4 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-3.4 - rebuild for new kernels rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 --------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - Rebuild for 2.1.0.0 - Move suspend.sh to %doc - Fix description: rt2870 is USB only rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-7.fc10.3 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-7.3 - rebuild for new kernels rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-2 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - New upstream version - Drop additional-devices patch since it is upstreamed * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-7.3 - rebuild for new kernels rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.2 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Tue Feb 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-2.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.2 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-1.2 - rebuild for new kernels transcode-1.0.7-3.fc10 ---------------------- * Thu Mar 12 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.0.7-3 - Re-enable faac xvidcore x264 * Thu Dec 11 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.0.7-2 - Fix autoreconf use - Fix CFLAGS - Fix asm options vlc-0.9.9-0.5rc2.fc10 --------------------- * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.5rc2 - Use libxml2-static 2.6.2 from the Fedora GA repository * Fri Mar 06 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.4rc2 - Update to 0.9.9-rc2 - Add lua support by default xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.2-3.fc10 ----------------------------------------- * Mon Mar 16 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-3 - Requires: xine-lib(plugin-abi)%{?_isa} = ... * Thu Mar 12 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-2 - respin for newer rpm/hashes ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc10 ---------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Hans de Goede 2.4.5-6 - Link db4 module against db-4.7 not 4.6 (oops) * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.5-5 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: amule-2.2.3-1.fc9 ----------------- * Sun Mar 22 2009 Felix Kaechele - 2.2.3-1 - updated to 2.2.3 - replaced patch3 with new one for gcc4.4 blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc9.3 ----------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2.3 - rebuild for new kernels buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-29 ------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9:9.1-29 - rebuild for kernels 2.6.25.3-2.fc9xen 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc9.11 --------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.11 - rebuild for new kernels faac-1.28-1.fc9 --------------- * Thu Mar 12 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.28-1 - update to 1.28 - drop redundant BRs - fix Source URL and use bz2 tarball - fix rpath - include manpage - ship AUTHORS NEWS docs/* - integrated changes from Julian Sikorski -- Dropped dos2unix BR, not needed anymore -- Made Source0 use macros -- Fixed License tag -- Fixed file permissions -- Converted ChangeLog to utf-8 gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc9 ----------------------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-1 - Updated to 0.9.5 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-1 - Updated to 0.9.5 - Added nautilus-devel to BuildRequires - Packaged nautilus extension separately - Adjusted whitespaces - Added keyboard shortcuts to documentation * Sun Mar 01 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.4-2 - Rebuilt for new libgpod iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc9.13 ---------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.15-41.svn147.13 - rebuild for new kernels kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.13 ---------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.0-0.42.13 - rebuild for new kernels motion-3.2.11-3.fc9 ------------------- * Wed Mar 18 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-3 - Even more corrected init script thanks to Stewart Adam * Sun Mar 15 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-2 - Removed the ffmpeg requires - Corrected the spec file - New init script with a corrected start() function and LSB header support * Tue Mar 03 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-1 - Updated to Fedora 10 standard mpd-0.14.2-1.fc9 ---------------- * Fri Feb 20 2009 Adrian Reber - 0.14.2-1 - updated to 0.14.2 * Sat Jan 31 2009 Adrian Reber - 0.14-4 - added BR libcurl-devel (#326) * Sat Dec 27 2008 Adrian Reber - 0.14-3 - updated to 0.14 (#229, #280) - add mpd user to group pulse-rt (#230) - added BR lame-devel, wavpack-devel, ffmpeg-devel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc9.13 ------------------------------ * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.13 - rebuild for new kernels open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.123053-1.fc9.10 ---------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.123053-1.10 - rebuild for new kernels qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc9.11 --------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-42.11 - rebuild for new kernels rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc9 ---------------------------- * Sat Feb 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.2-1 - Update to 0.2 (splits rpmfusion-cvs into rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-cvs) rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-1.fc9.14 ---------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.8.0.0-1.14 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring - Add 2.6.29 compilation patch (just in case) * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-1.13 - rebuild for new kernels rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 -------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - Rebuild for 2.1.0.0 - Move suspend.sh to %doc - Fix description: rt2870 is USB only rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc9 ------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-2 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - New upstream version - Drop additional-devices patch since it is upstreamed - Replace 2.6.25 buildfix patch with 2.6.29 one. * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-5.4 - rebuild for new kernels * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-5.3 - rebuild for new kernels sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc9.2 --------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-1.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Thu Feb 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-1.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 20:04:31 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 2 20:04:31 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-02 Message-ID: <20090402180431.C3DDC2411A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 18 bsnes-0.041-1.fc10 fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc10.2 fglrx-kmod-9.3-1.fc10 NEW mac-3.99-6.u4b5.fc10 : Monkey's Audio Codec (MAC) utility madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.17 NEW mednafen-0.8.11-1.0.8.B.fc10 : A multi-system emulator utilizing OpenGL and SDL nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10.1 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-1.fc10.2 nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10.3 nvidia-kmod-180.29-1.fc10.2 NEW pdflib-lite-7.0.4-1.fc10 : Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files pgadmin3-1.8.4-6.fc10 NEW php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-1.fc10.1 : Package for generating PDF files wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-1.fc10.1 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc10 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc10 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 16 bsnes-0.041-1.fc9 fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc9.2 fglrx-kmod-9.3-1.fc9 NEW mac-3.99-6.u4b5.fc9 : Monkey's Audio Codec (MAC) utility madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-50.r3867_20080924.fc9.13 mednafen-0.8.11-1.0.8.B.fc9 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc9.10 nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc9.3 nvidia-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc9.12 nvidia-newest-kmod-177.82-1.fc9.9 pdflib-lite-7.0.4-1.fc9 pgadmin3-1.8.4-6.fc9 php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-1.fc9 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-1.fc9.1 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc9 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: bsnes-0.041-1.fc10 ------------------ * Sun Mar 15 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.041-1 - Updated to 0.041 - Re-added documentation * Mon Mar 09 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.040-1 - Updated to 0.040 - The desktop file now comes with the tarball - Icon is now installed to %{_datadir}/pixmaps - The Qt ui is only built when it is legal to do so - Updated the strip patch - Fixed the last %changelog entry * Sun Feb 22 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.039-2 - Dropped the ExclusiveArch, libco has a C fallback - Use macros consistently fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc10.2 ----------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.2-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Tue Feb 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.2-2.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; fglrx-kmod-9.3-1.fc10 --------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.3 mac-3.99-6.u4b5.fc10 -------------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 3.99-6.u4b5 - Add permission to redistribute for RPM Fusion. (bundled with -libs) - Fix for gcc44 madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.17 -------------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.17 - rebuild for new kernels mednafen-0.8.11-1.0.8.B.fc10 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 08 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.8.11-1.0.8.B - Updated to 0.8.B nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10 ---------------------------------- * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.18-1 - Update to 173.14.18 (stable) - Build for i586 again since 173xx doesn't requires sse. nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10.1 ------------------------------------ * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.18-1 - Update to 173.14.18 (stable) - Build for i586 again since 173xx doesn't requires sse. nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-1.fc10.2 ---------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-1.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Wed Feb 25 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 96.43.11-1 - Update to 96.43.11 (stable) nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10.3 ----------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.11.02-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-kmod-180.29-1.fc10.2 --------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.29-1.2 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; pdflib-lite-7.0.4-1.fc10 ------------------------ * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4-1 - update to 7.0.4 pgadmin3-1.8.4-6.fc10 --------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Robert Scheck 1.8.4-6 - Corrected pgadmin3 documentation path to avoid errors (#448) - Re-added the branding directory for some users (RHBZ #473748) php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-1.fc10.1 ------------------------------ * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 2.1.6-1 - update to 2.1.6 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-1.fc10.1 --------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc10 ------------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Chris Nolan - 5.10.79.10-2 - repatched to load lib80211_crypt_tkip module - bug #466 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc10 ----------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalsyt 9.3 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-1.fc10 ------------------------------------------ * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.18-1 - Update to 173.14.18 (stable) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc10 ---------------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.2.0130u2 - Updated to 0.130u2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: bsnes-0.041-1.fc9 ----------------- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.041-1 - Updated to 0.041 - Re-added documentation * Mon Mar 09 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.040-1 - Updated to 0.040 - The desktop file now comes with the tarball - Icon is now installed to %{_datadir}/pixmaps - The Qt ui is only built when it is legal to do so - Updated the strip patch - Fixed the last %changelog entry * Sun Feb 22 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.039-2 - Dropped the ExclusiveArch, libco has a C fallback - Use macros consistently fglrx-kmod-9.2-2.fc9.2 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.2-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels fglrx-kmod-9.3-1.fc9 -------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.3 * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.2-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Thu Feb 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.2-2.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sat Feb 21 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.2-2 - Fix flush_tlb_page modprobe errors on x86_64 mac-3.99-6.u4b5.fc9 ------------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 3.99-6.u4b5 - Add permission to redistribute for RPM Fusion. (bundled with -libs) - Fix for gcc44 madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-50.r3867_20080924.fc9.13 ------------------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.4-50.r3867_20080924.13 - rebuild for new kernels mednafen-0.8.11-1.0.8.B.fc9 --------------------------- * Sun Mar 08 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.8.11-1.0.8.B - Updated to 0.8.B * Thu Nov 06 2008 Julian Sikorski - 0.8.10-2.0.8.A - Rebuilt. Something has mangled the x86_64 rpm nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc9.10 ---------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.09-1.10 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc9.3 ---------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.11.02-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc9.12 ------------------------------ * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.15-1.12 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-newest-kmod-177.82-1.fc9.9 --------------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 177.82-1.9 - rebuild for new kernels pdflib-lite-7.0.4-1.fc9 ----------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4-1 - update to 7.0.4 * Sat Dec 20 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 7.0.3-3 - rebuild for python 2.6 pgadmin3-1.8.4-6.fc9 -------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Robert Scheck 1.8.4-6 - Corrected pgadmin3 documentation path to avoid errors (#448) - Re-added the branding directory for some users (RHBZ #473748) php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-1.fc9 --------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 2.1.6-1 - update to 2.1.6 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-1.fc9.1 -------------------------- * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc9 ------------------------ * Sat Mar 28 2009 Chris Nolan - 5.10.79.10-2 - repatched to load lib80211_crypt_tkip module - bug #466 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc9 ---------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.3 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc9 --------------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.2.0130u2 - Updated to 0.130u2 From kwizart at gmail.com Thu Apr 2 20:30:34 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Thu Apr 2 20:30:46 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-02 In-Reply-To: <20090402175904.AED6F2411A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090402175904.AED6F2411A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: 2009/4/2 : > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 23 > > NEW amule-2.2.3-1.fc10 : File sharing client compatible with eDonkey > ? ?blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc10.4 > ? ?buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.19 > ? ?em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.11 > NEW faac-1.28-1.fc10 : Encoder and encoding library for MPEG2/4 AAC > ? ?gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 > ? ?gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 > ? ?iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.17 > ? ?kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.16 > NEW motion-3.2.11-3.fc10 : A motion detection system > ? ?ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.16 > ? ?open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.142982-1.fc10.3 > ? ?qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.15 > NEW rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc10 : Tools for setting up a rpmfusion maintainer environment > ? ?rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.4 > ? ?rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 > ? ?rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-7.fc10.3 > ? ?rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10 > ? ?rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.2 > ? ?sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.2 > ? ?transcode-1.0.7-3.fc10 > ? ?vlc-0.9.9-0.5rc2.fc10 This updates wasn't meant to be available in stable updates for any reason. On the other side I will built the new 0.9.9 asap and thus override this update. But please remove it from the stable-updates if possible. Unfortunately, i've experienced a problem with my internet connection for some reason, and I cannot work on it as easily... Nicolas ( kwizart) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 2 22:46:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 2 22:46:14 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090402204604.CED672C3F6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|2 | Blocks| |2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 2 23:28:18 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 2 23:28:34 2009 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02 Message-ID: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): avidemux compat-python24 lastfm streamripper sysprof ultrastardx vlc Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): felix AT fetzig org ultrastardx giallu AT gmail com sysprof jsteffan AT fedoraproject org compat-python24 kwizart AT gmail com vlc lxtnow AT gmail com streamripper s.adam AT diffingo com avidemux sergio.pasra AT gmail com lastfm ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-i386: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.i386 requires libgpod.so.3 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 sysprof-1.0.12-2.fc11.i386 requires kmod-sysprof >= 0:1.0.12 ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.i586 requires freefont vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.i586 requires libfaad.so.0 vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.i586 requires libx264.so.65 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.ppc requires libgpod.so.3 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.ppc requires freefont vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 vlc-devel-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc64 requires libvlccore.so.0()(64bit) vlc-devel-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc64 requires libvlc.so.2()(64bit) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc64: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.ppc64 requires libgpod.so.3()(64bit) streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.ppc64 requires freefont vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libssl.so.7 compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libcrypto.so.7 compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libdb-4.6.so lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.x86_64 requires libgpod.so.3()(64bit) streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.x86_64 requires freefont vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) From dtimms at iinet.net.au Thu Apr 2 23:19:48 2009 From: dtimms at iinet.net.au (David Timms) Date: Thu Apr 2 23:30:11 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL Message-ID: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: error: Failed build dependencies: qt-devel < 4 is needed by dvbcut-0.6.0-4.svn157.fc10.src On f10-i386: $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 qt-4.4.3-15.fc10.i386 $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 > 3 $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 >3 $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 '>3' qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 no package provides >3 Can rpm answer the (comparison operator) question for me ? Any other hints ? http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/dvbcut/EL-5/dvbcut.spec?root=free&r1=1.3&r2=1.4 might help to show what I've tried. DaveT. From konrad at tylerc.org Thu Apr 2 23:33:08 2009 From: konrad at tylerc.org (Conrad Meyer) Date: Thu Apr 2 23:33:29 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL In-Reply-To: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> References: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <200904021433.08900.konrad@tylerc.org> On Thursday 02 April 2009 02:19:48 pm David Timms wrote: > Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: > > I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and > Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 > BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: > > error: Failed build dependencies: > qt-devel < 4 is needed by dvbcut-0.6.0-4.svn157.fc10.src > > On f10-i386: > $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt > qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 > qt-4.4.3-15.fc10.i386 > $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 > qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 > $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 > 3 > $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 >3 > $ rpm -q --whatprovides qt3 '>3' > qt3-3.3.8b-17.fc10.i386 > no package provides >3 > > Can rpm answer the (comparison operator) question for me ? > > Any other hints ? > > http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/dvbcut/EL-5/dvbcut.spec?root=free&r1=1 >.3&r2=1.4 might help to show what I've tried. > > DaveT. You might try asking on #fedora-kde on freenode. -- Conrad Meyer From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 2 23:38:58 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 2 23:39:18 2009 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02 In-Reply-To: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> References: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <20090402233858.5ec87d02@faldor.intranet> > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: > > avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) > avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) > avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) > avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) > avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) > avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) > compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libssl.so.7 > compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libcrypto.so.7 > compat-python24-2.4.5-3.fc10.i386 requires libdb-4.6.so Due to including the unpushed plague-results (the newer compat-python24 is in there), multilib packages lead to false positives. This could only be handled like it was done for FE on the buildsys machine with the RCNeedsign.py module, which pushes to temporary repos to check them. Not worth the effort IMO. It's better to ignore the x86_64 results. > lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.x86_64 requires libgpod.so.3()(64bit) > streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) > ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.x86_64 requires freefont > vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) > vlc-core-0.9.9-0.4rc2.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 02:08:43 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 02:08:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403000831.98FF82C276@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #4 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-03 02:08:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just continuing the current status here: > > SPEC: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec > SRPM: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu-1.4.0-2.1868svn.src.rpm > > http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec > > (In reply to comment #47) > > (In reply to comment #46) > > > > 1.) Source files > > > > > > > > Please comment on how did you get these: > > > > > > > > > You mean comment where I got it in the spec file? > > > > Exactly. Like: > > > > # Get revision 1234 from SVN: > > # svn co -r1234 http://repoistory-url@1234 dosbox > > # tar --exclude .svn -czf dosbox.tar.gz dosbox > > I see this is done. > > > > > Isn't etc/dosemu.xpm from the source tarball sufficient? > > > > Source3: %{name}.xpm > > > > > > > > > I think I got that idea from the dosbox spec file, I can change it if > > > necessary. > > > > Yup. Just droop the Source3 and replace %{SOURCE3} with etc/dosemu.xpm > > Done as well. > > > > > 2.) FreeDOS image > > > > > > > > I don't believe this is formally allowed (shipping binaries), though other > > > > packages do this (say, qemu includes bochs bios image). I'll ask on packaging > > > > list how to deal with this and let you know. > > Soo, I believe you should add the source for the FreeDOS image to the srpm, so > that we distribute it and therefore comply with GPL. Or ask FreeDOS people for > permission to distribute it w/o source. ok, i'd prefer to ask them if I can just ship the binary image alone, is a copy of an email ok for this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 03:01:20 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 03:01:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403010108.739B92C39D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #3 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-03 03:01:20 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > I guess this package has been reviewed already? > package never got an formal review but yes most of the issues where already > checked > > > however I only see the x86_64.rpm no SRC or i386 rpm? > oops. wrong file uploaed: > > > > SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.src.rpm > SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec > I can't build the package with my test system here but, it seems to look ok, I dont see any obvious errors. This is about as far as I can review this package myself, hoping a sponsor can take it from here.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 05:29:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 05:29:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 310] scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403032955.559032C452@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 05:29:55 --- Here is my initial review for this package. I still have to check the license issue: * rpmlint says: scid.src:71: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This is not GNU configure, so we don't need to use the %configure macro. Also libdir is irrelevant for this package. Thus this warning can be ignored. scid-books.x86_64: W: no-documentation books/readme.txt should be included as a %doc to this subpackage. scid-sounds.x86_64: W: no-documentation There is not much we can do about this. Ignored. * Patches should be explained (as comments in the SPEC file), and, if they are not Fedora specific, should be submitted upstream and the corresponding bug tracker links should be provided. * About the patches: scid-makefile-engines.patch - Please use the -p switch for "install" command to preserve timestamps. In general, we want to conserve the timestamps of all non-compiled files. - You said bases/* is excluded by purpose, and upstream was working on them. Any updates on this latest release (3.7.1)? scid-makefile-phalanx.patch - We don't want this patch. Fedora requires it's own optflags. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags * Please preserve the timestamps of the files for which you fix the encoding. You can use touch -r original_file encoding_fixed_file for this purpose. ! Please make the %description span 80 columns. ? The file engines/Phalanx-XXII/phalanx.h contains occurences of /usr/local/lib. Does this affect anything? * All relevant doc files should be packaged. There are many documentation files scattered around the tarball. Can you go through them and include the relevant ones in %doc ? * Buildroot does not obey Fedora guidelines. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * BR: gcc-c++ can be removed. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * Requires: tk can be removed. rpmbuild will pick this dependency itself. ! We prefer installing the icons under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor. So the %SOURCE3 file should go to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor You will also need to take a look at the icon cache scriptlets after this change: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . You use %{name} at certain locations and scid on other. The former one is preferred (except, possibly in URL). Also, if you want to use %{__mv}, %{__sed} style macros, do it for all the commands in the SPEC file, or just replace them with regular commands, e.g. mv, sed. ! The line --remove-category Application \ is not needed since you already don't have Application as category in the .desktop file you supply. Even if you did, you should just remove it from the .desktop file yourself before compiling the SRPM. * Latest version must be packaged, which is 3.7.1 for the time being. Please update. Also make sure you check the bases/* issue. * Package does not honor Fedora specific optimization flags (see above). You can probably pass OPTIMIZE=%{optflags} to configure to overcome this. (I found this by issuing ./configure --help * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2/paral -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 05:36:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 05:36:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 310] scid - A chess database application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403033605.199BA2C4D5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310 --- Comment #13 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 05:36:05 --- Corrections: (In reply to comment #12) uild will pick this dependency itself. > > ! We prefer installing the icons under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor. So the > %SOURCE3 file should go to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor Should be %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/ * issue. > > * Package does not honor Fedora specific optimization flags (see above). You > can probably pass OPTIMIZE=%{optflags} to configure to overcome this. Should be OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}". Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/objections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Fri Apr 3 05:49:33 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Fri Apr 3 05:49:38 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL In-Reply-To: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> References: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:19 PM, David Timms wrote: > Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: > > I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and > Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 > BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: > > error: Failed build dependencies: > ? ? ? ?qt-devel < 4 is needed by dvbcut-0.6.0-4.svn157.fc10.src > The qt packages in Fedora have Epoch: 1 . I don't know about EPEL. But you could try something like: BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 1:3 BuildRequires: qt-devel < 1:4 Orcan From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 06:03:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 06:03:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403040350.20ABD2C3C8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 06:03:50 --- The links don't seem to respond. Could you check? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 07:26:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 07:26:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403052650.B4BC72C3E1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 07:26:52 --- Here are my notes for this package: * There are many files in the source which are GPLv2 (no later). But there are also GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ files. So it looks like the License field should be License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ But apart from these, this one file: src/filters/2xSaImmx.asm has a different license. I don't know what it should be called. Let's research. ! Not a blocker, but this line gzip -9 < debian/vbam.1 > %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/vbam.1.gz is not really necessary. You can install the file via "install -pm 644 ..." and rpmbuild will take care of the rest. * Package does not build on rawhide! gcc-4.4 issue: /builddir/build/BUILD/vbam-1.8.0/src/sdl/debugger.cpp:948: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' Please patch this up and inform upstream. * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Is the project named vbam or vba-m? * You need to pass VERBOSE=1 to make * Requires: hicolor-icon-theme is not necessary since it will be in the dependency chain. (rpmbuild will automatically create library dependencies, gtk2, libglade etc, and they will pull hicolor-icon-theme) * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-). Also the two %attr(755,root,root) can be removed. * You only use %{name} in URL and everywhere else you use vbam. Actually, it is the other way around. Please make use of the %{name} and %{version} macros extensively, except possibly in URLs. * Package does not honor Fedora specific flags. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Replacing "cmake" with the "%cmake" macro may or may not solve the issue. I didn't check. But using %cmake is a good practice anyway. You can check Fedora specific flags via rpm -E %optflags * Please preserve the time-stamps of the non compiled files. For instance, you can use: sed 's/\r//' doc/License.txt > tmpfile touch -r doc/License.txt tmpfile mv -f tmpfile doc/License.txt Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/objections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 07:30:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 07:30:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403053035.0F56B2C4D5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-03 07:30:36 --- (In reply to comment #4) > ok, i'd prefer to ask them if I can just ship the binary image alone, is a copy > of an email ok for this? Yes, that should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 07:39:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 07:39:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403053940.0E45A2C535@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adrian@lisas.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Adrian Reber 2009-04-03 07:39:41 --- * builds cleanly in mock * rpmlint is happy * no unowned directories * scriptlets look good * source matches upstream * clean installation and removal * works as expected looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 3 07:44:12 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri Apr 3 07:44:18 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-02 In-Reply-To: References: <20090402175904.AED6F2411A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <49D5A22C.2@leemhuis.info> On 02.04.2009 20:30, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2009/4/2: >> ============================================================================ >> Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 23 >> >> NEW amule-2.2.3-1.fc10 : File sharing client compatible with eDonkey >> blcr-kmod-0.8.0-2.fc10.4 >> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.19 >> em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.11 >> NEW faac-1.28-1.fc10 : Encoder and encoding library for MPEG2/4 AAC >> gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 >> gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-1.fc10 >> iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.17 >> kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.16 >> NEW motion-3.2.11-3.fc10 : A motion detection system >> ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.16 >> open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.142982-1.fc10.3 >> qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.15 >> NEW rpmfusion-packager-0.2-1.fc10 : Tools for setting up a rpmfusion maintainer environment >> rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.4 >> rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 >> rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-7.fc10.3 >> rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10 >> rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.2 >> sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.2 >> transcode-1.0.7-3.fc10 >> vlc-0.9.9-0.5rc2.fc10 > This updates wasn't meant to be available in stable updates for any reason. Sorry, I guess you might have told me but it seems I forgot about it. But I anticipated that this would happen sooner or later and said we need a wiki page to track packages that need to remain in testing for a little longer. Julian was kind enough to create one. See http://rpmfusion.org/ManualUpdates (it iirc was also announced on this list but I can't find it in the archives...) Please add vlc to the latter page next time. tia! And while at it: what the status of gpac and x264? Can they be pushed once the new x264 had a bit of testing? > On the other side I will built the new 0.9.9 asap and thus override this update. > But please remove it from the stable-updates if possible. Done, yesterday evening right after I got the mail (but I left the keyboard right after that so I had no time for a reply). > [...] CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 08:08:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 08:08:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403060813.250082C535@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 08:08:15 --- Thanks a lot! I think you should remove blocker #2 and add #4. Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: terminatorX Short Description: Realtime Audio Synthesizer Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From dan at danny.cz Fri Apr 3 08:10:02 2009 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Fri Apr 3 08:10:18 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL In-Reply-To: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> References: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <1238739002.3765.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> David Timms p??e v P? 03. 04. 2009 v 08:19 +1100: > Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: > > I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and > Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 > BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: The BRs can be conditionalized like %if 0%{?fedora} > X BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 %endif %if 0%{?rhel} > Y BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4 %endif and AFAIK the qt-devel package provides qtX-devel, where X in (3, 4) depending on the version. So if you want to use qt3 on both Fedora and EPEL then just add "BR: qt3-devel" Dan From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 09:37:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 09:37:18 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403073713.5F3712C484@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 3 09:42:37 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri Apr 3 09:42:44 2009 Subject: Push the rawhide branches now? (was Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02) In-Reply-To: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> References: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> On 02.04.2009 23:28, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): > > avidemux > compat-python24 > lastfm > streamripper > sysprof > ultrastardx > vlc sysprof should be fixed now, compat-python24 was a false positive. Should I do a push now? The beta is out a few days now, it would fix the gstreamer-plugins-bad file conflict and would give our new packages some testing. Comments? CU knurd From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Fri Apr 3 09:56:37 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Fri Apr 3 09:54:15 2009 Subject: Push the rawhide branches now? (was Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02) In-Reply-To: <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> References: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49D5C135.4000200@hhs.nl> On 04/03/2009 09:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 02.04.2009 23:28, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): >> >> avidemux >> compat-python24 >> lastfm >> streamripper >> sysprof >> ultrastardx >> vlc > > sysprof should be fixed now, compat-python24 was a false positive. > > Should I do a push now? The beta is out a few days now, it would fix the > gstreamer-plugins-bad file conflict and would give our new packages some > testing. Comments? > +1 from me Regards, Hans From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 09:59:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 09:59:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403075928.528302C577@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #13 from Eric Moret 2009-04-03 09:59:31 --- Indeed, I have reorganized my server the links should now be: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1-0.5.63svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kwizart at gmail.com Fri Apr 3 10:22:32 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Fri Apr 3 10:22:40 2009 Subject: Push the rawhide branches now? (was Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02) In-Reply-To: <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> References: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: 2009/4/3 Thorsten Leemhuis : > On 02.04.2009 23:28, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): >> >> ? ? avidemux >> ? ? compat-python24 >> ? ? lastfm >> ? ? streamripper >> ? ? sysprof >> ? ? ultrastardx >> ? ? vlc > > sysprof should be fixed now, compat-python24 was a false positive. > > Should I do a push now? The beta is out a few days now, it would fix the > gstreamer-plugins-bad file conflict and would give our new packages some > testing. Comments? I'm still working on fixing my internet connection to try commit the pending changes with vlc. Hoping to have it solved today... Nicolas (kwizart) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 11:08:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 11:08:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 436] Review request: moonlight - Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403090759.E560B2C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436 --- Comment #27 from Ismael Olea 2009-04-03 11:08:03 --- (In reply to comment #26) > An interesting approach would be finding a way to have this be separate > subpackages (moonlight-nopants and moonlight-ffmpeg). For testing purposes one > might imagine upstream would like confirmation that both are broken also some > users might prefer using the proprietary media pack over ffmpeg (for whatever > reason). I think this could be done in next revisions. OTOH, I think the the present spec is now ready for the RPMFusion approval. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 13:30:38 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 13:30:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403113032.ED4F62C597@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-03 13:30:37 --- openmotif-clients requires openmotif = %{version}-%{version} rather then openmotif = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 13:40:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 13:40:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403114050.CC2082C5A0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-03 13:40:55 --- openmotif-mwm requires openmotif-%{version} rather then openmotif = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 13:55:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 13:55:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403115548.9526B2C5A9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-03 13:55:53 --- While I'm at this, it seems the man-pages of openmotif-devel and lesstif-devel conflict. Sorry for using this bug as a notepad tracking what else needs to be done as I go along with this BTW - I know it causes some spam for some of you :/ == file /usr/share/man/man3/ApplicationShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/Constraint.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/Core.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/Object.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/OverrideShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/Shell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/TopLevelShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/TransientShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/VendorShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmArrowButton.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmArrowButtonGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmBulletinBoard.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmCascadeButton.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmCascadeButtonGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmComboBox.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmCommand.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDialogShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDisplay.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDragContext.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDragIcon.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDrawingArea.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDrawnButton.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmDropTransfer.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmFileSelectionBox.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmForm.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmFrame.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmIconGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmLabel.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmLabelGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmList.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmMainWindow.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmManager.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmMenuShell.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmMessageBox.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmNotebook.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmPanedWindow.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmPrimitive.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmPushButton.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmPushButtonGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmRowColumn.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmScale.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmScreen.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmScrollBar.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmScrolledWindow.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmSelectionBox.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmSeparator.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmSeparatorGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmSpinBox.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmString.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmText.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmTextField.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmToggleButton.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/man/man3/XmToggleButtonGadget.3.gz from install of openmotif-devel-2.3.2-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package lesstif-devel-0.95.0-26.fc10.i386 == -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From jarod at wilsonet.com Fri Apr 3 14:55:42 2009 From: jarod at wilsonet.com (Jarod Wilson) Date: Fri Apr 3 14:54:53 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL In-Reply-To: <1238739002.3765.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> References: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> <1238739002.3765.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> Message-ID: <7D8F0A4B-60DE-42FB-A83F-8DD800A2FAF0@wilsonet.com> On Apr 3, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Dan Hor?k wrote: > David Timms p??e v P? 03. 04. 2009 v 08:19 +1100: >> Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: >> >> I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on >> EPEL and >> Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: >> BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 >> BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: > > The BRs can be conditionalized like > > %if 0%{?fedora} > X > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 > %endif > %if 0%{?rhel} > Y > BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4 > %endif > > and AFAIK the qt-devel package provides qtX-devel, where X in (3, 4) > depending on the version. So if you want to use qt3 on both Fedora and > EPEL then just add "BR: qt3-devel" I thought the same, but I think that's only in Fedora-land. At least on a RHEL5 box here: $ rpm -q --provides qt-devel config(qt-devel) = 1:3.3.6-23.el5 qt-devel = 1:3.3.6-23.el5 -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 15:47:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 15:47:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 487] New: Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 Summary: Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libmimic.spec OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libmimic.spec SRPM: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libmimic-1.0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm libmimic is an open source video encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x- encoded content (fourCC: ML20), which is the encoding used by MSN Messenger for webcam conversations. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Apr 3 16:02:06 2009 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri Apr 3 16:02:19 2009 Subject: BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL In-Reply-To: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> References: <49D52BF4.8090209@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <49D616DE.8060008@math.unl.edu> David Timms wrote: > Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: > > I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and > Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: > BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 > BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: I'd suggest something like this: %if 0%{?fedora} > 6 %define qt3 qt3 %else %define qt3 qt %endif BuildRequires: %{qt3}-devel fedora kde-sig'ers use similar specfile constructs all over. (Similarly for kdelibs vs kdelibs3 too) :) See digikam or koffice in fedora cvs for examples. -- Rex From kwizart at gmail.com Fri Apr 3 18:37:51 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Fri Apr 3 18:38:09 2009 Subject: Push the rawhide branches now? (was Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-02) In-Reply-To: References: <20090402212818.12392.35043@faldor.intranet> <49D5BDED.6090301@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: 2009/4/3 Nicolas Chauvet : > 2009/4/3 Thorsten Leemhuis : >> On 02.04.2009 23:28, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> >>> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): >>> >>> ? ? avidemux >>> ? ? compat-python24 >>> ? ? lastfm >>> ? ? streamripper >>> ? ? sysprof >>> ? ? ultrastardx >>> ? ? vlc >> >> sysprof should be fixed now, compat-python24 was a false positive. >> >> Should I do a push now? The beta is out a few days now, it would fix the >> gstreamer-plugins-bad file conflict and would give our new packages some >> testing. Comments? > I'm still working on fixing my internet connection to try commit the > pending changes with vlc. Hoping to have it solved today... solved for the vlc case http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3432 From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 18:47:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 18:47:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403164724.26DDC2C39B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #14 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 18:47:31 --- Thanks. A few comments: * Upstream provides a tarball on their website: http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/downloads/list Any reason why that one is not used? * Is it really not possible to replace the offending artwork by some free artwork? * Any possible license issues with Sources 3-6 ? You should explain where and how to get them in the SPEC file. * Similarly, the patches should be explained, and if they are not Fedora specific, sent upstream. Links from their upstream should be provided. * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). * Please don't use a --vendor flag on desktop-file-install * %attr(0644,root,root) is not needed ! %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/* can be replaced by just %{_libdir}/%{name}/ * Any reason why you use ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir} instead of just %configure ? * Please update to the latest icon cache scriptlets: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Apr 3 21:05:05 2009 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:05:18 2009 Subject: xine-lib-extras-freeworld build fails, ffmpeg issue? builder wonkiness? Message-ID: <49D65DE1.5030702@math.unl.edu> I can build this just fine locally with mock, but not in rpmfusion's buildsys. Compare/contrast: me: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1_1_16_3-1_fc11/ rpmfusion buildsys: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3433-xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11/x86_64/ failure says: checking for FFMPEG... configure: error: Package requirements (libavcodec >= 51.20.0) were not met: No package 'libavcodec' found The root.log's of each look identical to me, both populating buildroot with ffmpeg-devel-0.5-2.fc11. any ideas? -- Rex From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 3 21:09:58 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:10:13 2009 Subject: orphaning xmms-wma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49D65F06.5060501@leemhuis.info> On 02.04.2009 10:52, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > There is this long standing crasher bug [1] that I couldn't to solve > after spending many hours and days. At the end, as of today, I finally > lost my interest in this package. Instead, I packaged xmms-mplayer [2] > which can play not only wma files, but also whatever mplayer can play > (audio and video). > > If there's anyone who wants to fix the bug and maintain xmms-wma, > (s)he can take it over. I'm pretty much done with this package. When you finally drop it please mark it as dead.package in CVS and tell me to remove it from the rawhide branches. tia! Cu knurd From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Apr 3 21:13:00 2009 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:13:14 2009 Subject: xine-lib-extras-freeworld build fails => builder/repo wonkiness In-Reply-To: <49D65DE1.5030702@math.unl.edu> References: <49D65DE1.5030702@math.unl.edu> Message-ID: <49D65FBC.5080802@math.unl.edu> Rex Dieter wrote: > I can build this just fine locally with mock, but not in rpmfusion's > buildsys. > > Compare/contrast: > > me: > http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1_1_16_3-1_fc11/ > > rpmfusion buildsys: > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3433-xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11/x86_64/ kwizart on irc noticed: Downloading Packages: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/faac/1.28-1.fc11/x86_64/faac-1.28-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found I'll wait, and try again after awhile. -- Rex From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 21:16:44 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:16:45 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 Message-ID: <20090403191644.DF97D2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 131 a52dec-0.7.4-14.fc11 akmods-0.3.6-2.fc11 arcem-1.10-5.cvs_20070611.fc11 audacious-plugins-freeworld-1.5.1-2.fc11 audacity-freeworld-1.3.6-0.4.beta.fc11 autopano-sift-C-2.4.1-0.3.20080220svn.fc11 avbin-7-9.fc11 BasiliskII-1.0-0.20060501.3.fc11.1 blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11 bubbros-1.6-5.fc11 cmus-2.2.0-4.fc11 compat-plone-3.1.4-3.fc11 compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc11 compat-python24-elementtree-1.2.6-7.fc11 compat-python24-feedparser-4.1-6.fc11 compat-python24-imaging-1.1.6-4.fc11 compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.3-3.fc11 compat-python24-setuptools-0.6c7-5.fc11 compat-zope-2.10.6-3.fc11 desmume-0.9.1-3.fc11 devede-3.12c-2.fc11 dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-4.fc11 DVDAuthorWizard-1.4.6-3.fc11 dvdrip-0.98.10-2.fc11 DVDRipOMatic-0.95-6.fc11 faad2-2.7-1.fc11 fakenes-0.5.8-7.fc11 fceultra-0.98.13-0.7.pre.fc11 ffmpeg-0.5-2.fc11 ffmpeg2theora-0.24-1.fc11 freetype-freeworld-2.3.9-2.fc11 gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-2.fc11 gfceu-0.6.0-5.fc11 gltron-0.70-5.fc11 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-2.fc11 gnuboy-1.0.3-14.fc11 gpac-0.4.5-7.fc11 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-3.fc11 gsview-4.8-5.fc11 gtetrinet-0.7.11-4.fc11 h264enc-8.7.2-2.fc11 iscsitarget-0.4.17-3.fc11 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.5 jbigkit-2.0-3.fc11 k3b-extras-freeworld-1.0.5-6.fc11 kino-1.3.3-2.fc11 kmodtool-1-18.fc11 kplayer-0.7.0-2.20081211cvs.fc11 kqemu-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11 lame-3.98.2-3.fc11 libdca-0.0.5-4.fc11 libdvbpsi-0.1.6-4.fc11 libfame-0.9.1-14.fc11 libmad-0.15.1b-11.fc11 libmms-0.4-4.fc11 libmpeg3-1.8-2.fc11 libquicktime-1.1.1-2.fc11 live555-0-0.21.2008.07.25.fc11 ltris-1.0.12-4.fc11 lxdream-0.9-2.fc11 lxdvdrip-1.74-4.fc11 m2vrequantiser-20030929-4.fc11 madplay-0.15.2b-6.fc11 mamory-0.2.25-4.fc11 megamario-1.5-3.fc11 mimms-3.2.1-4.fc11 mixxx-1.6.1-2.fc11 mmsrip-0.7.0-3.fc11 mock-rpmfusion-free-10.1-2.fc11 mp3gain-1.4.6-6.fc11 mpd-0.14.2-2.fc11 mpg321-0.2.10.4-3.fc11 mpgtx-1.3.1-5.fc11 mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11 mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20293.fc11 mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20196.fc11 nailer-0.4.3-4.fc11 ndiswrapper-1.54-2.fc11 Nestopia-1.40h-3.fc11 normalize-0.7.7-5.fc11 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-2.fc11 osmose-0.8.2-5.fc11 pangzero-1.3-3.fc11 perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.08-3.fc11 picard-freeworld-0.11-5.fc11 pyglet-1.1.3-1.fc11 qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.3-3.fc11 rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-11-0.4 rpmfusion-packager-0.2-2.fc11 rt2860-1.8.0.0-3.fc11 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-4.fc11.6 rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc11 rt3070-2.0.1.0-3.fc11 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11 scottfree-1.14-5.fc11 SheepShaver-2.3-0.7.20060514.fc11 smc-music-4.0-4.fc11 smpeg-0.4.5-0.3.fc11 smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc11 snowballz-1.0-0.6.beta1.20090110hg.fc11 stella-2.7.5-1.fc11 sysprof-1.0.12-5.fc11 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11 thoggen-0.7.1-3.fc11 torrentzip-0.2-3.fc11 transcode-1.1.1-5.fc11 twolame-0.3.12-4.fc11 ushare-freeworld-1.1a-7.fc11 vcdimager-0.7.23-10.fc11 vdr-burn-0.1.0-0.18.pre21.fc11 vdrsync-0.1.3-14.PRE1.050322.fc11 vlc-1.0.0-0.1pre1.fc11 vobcopy-1.1.2-3.fc11 wormsofprey-0.4.3-5.fc11 wormsofprey-data-20051221-3.fc11 wxsvg-1.0-7.fc11 x264-0.0.0-0.24.20090319gitc109c8.fc11 xine-0.99.5-6.fc11 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.2-4.fc11 xmltv-0.5.55-2.fc11 xmms-mp3-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc11 xmms-wma-1.0.5-6.fc11 xmms2-freeworld-0.5-6.fc11 xroar-0.21-3.fc11 xvid4conf-1.12-4.fc11 xvidcore-1.2.1-2.fc11 y4mscaler-9.0-8.fc11 yabause-0.9.9-2.fc11 zsnes-1.51-6.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: a52dec-0.7.4-14.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.4-14 - rebuild for new F11 features akmods-0.3.6-2.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.3.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 01 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.10-5.cvs_20070611 - rebuild for new F11 features audacious-plugins-freeworld-1.5.1-2.fc11 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.5.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis 1.5.1-1 - Update to 1.5.1 audacity-freeworld-1.3.6-0.4.beta.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 1.3.6-0.4.beta - wxGTK no longer provides wxGTK2 in Fedora 11 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.6-0.3.beta - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Dec 14 2008 David Timms - 1.3.6-0.2.beta - add Kevin Koflers portaudio patch to allow output via pulseaudio * Sun Nov 23 2008 David Timms - 1.3.6-0.1.beta - update to new upstream beta release - drop libdir patch for now - drop upstreamed fr.po patch - add support for ffmpeg import and export via BR and --with-ffmpeg - add patch to allow selection of ffmpeg library on unix. autopano-sift-C-2.4.1-0.3.20080220svn.fc11 ------------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.1-0.3.20080220svn - rebuild for new F11 features avbin-7-9.fc11 -------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 7-9 - Hardcode ffmpeg revision number (because ffmpeg -version gives incomplete information) * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 7-8 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Jan 15 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 7-7 - Add "sleep 1m" to avoid buildsys failures * Thu Jan 15 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 7-6 - The S24 was actually needed for ffmpeg revision >= 15124. Updated the patch * Thu Jan 15 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 7-5 - Fix license again - Fix description length - Patch for compilation against ffmpeg revision >= 16176 BasiliskII-1.0-0.20060501.3.fc11.1 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0-0.20060501.3.1 - rebuild for new F11 features blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Jan 16 2009 Neal Becker - 0.8.0-1 - Update to 0.8.0 release bubbros-1.6-5.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.6-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Dec 17 2008 Hans de Goede 1.6-4 - Drop no longer needed htmlview requires * Wed Dec 17 2008 Hans de Goede 1.6-3 - Rebuild for new python cmus-2.2.0-4.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.2.0-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Dec 17 2008 Conrad Meyer - 2.2.0-3 - Make more verbosely (V=2). compat-plone-3.1.4-3.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.4-3 - rebuild for new F11 features compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc11 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 02 2009 Hans de Goede 2.4.5-6 - Link db4 module against db-4.7 not 4.6 (oops) * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.5-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.5-4 - rebuild for new ssl compat-python24-elementtree-1.2.6-7.fc11 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.2.6-7 - rebuild for new F11 features compat-python24-feedparser-4.1-6.fc11 ------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.1-6 - rebuild for new F11 features compat-python24-imaging-1.1.6-4.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.1.6-4 - rebuild for new F11 features compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.3-3.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.7.3-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Feb 02 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6c7-5 - rebuild for new F11 features compat-zope-2.10.6-3.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.10.6-3 - rebuild for new F11 features desmume-0.9.1-3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.1-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Feb 14 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.9.1-2 - Made a patch to compile with gcc 4.4 (SF #2599049) devede-3.12c-2.fc11 ------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-2 - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat * Wed Jan 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-1 - Updated to version 3.12c dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-4.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-4 - rebuild for new F11 features DVDAuthorWizard-1.4.6-3.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.6-3 - rebuild for new F11 features dvdrip-0.98.10-2.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.98.10-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Feb 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.98.10-1 - Update to 0.98.10 - Some of our patches got merged upstream. http://www.exit1.org/dvdrip/changes.cipp?version=0.98.10 DVDRipOMatic-0.95-6.fc11 ------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.95-6 - rebuild for new F11 features faad2-2.7-1.fc11 ---------------- * Fri Mar 13 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 1:2.7-1 - update to 2.7 - don't install internal libmp4ff - include manpage - fix build on x86_64 (non-PIC objects in libmp4ff.a) - fix rpaths - make xmms plugin depend on -libs, not the frontend - preserve docs timestamps * Mon Nov 10 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski 1:2.6.1-6 - fix CVE-2008-4201 fakenes-0.5.8-7.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.5.8-7 - rebuild for new F11 features fceultra-0.98.13-0.7.pre.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.98.13-0.7.pre - rebuild for new F11 features ffmpeg-0.5-2.fc11 ----------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 0.5-2 - rebuild for new faad2 and x264 ffmpeg2theora-0.24-1.fc11 ------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart - 0.24-1 - Update to 0.24 * Fri Dec 19 2008 kwizart - 0.23-2 - Fix URL - Fix back description * Fri Dec 19 2008 kwizart - 0.23-1 - Update to 0.23 - Change to build system to Scons freetype-freeworld-2.3.9-2.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Kevin Kofler 2.3.9-2 - Provides freetype-bytecode and freetype-subpixel (rh#155210) gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.5-2.fc11 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features gfceu-0.6.0-5.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.0-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 04 2008 Andrea Musuruane 0.6.0-4 - Fixed unowned directory (BZ #221) gltron-0.70-5.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.70-5 - rebuild for new F11 features gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-2.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features gnuboy-1.0.3-14.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.3-14 - rebuild for new F11 features gpac-0.4.5-7.fc11 ----------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.4.5-7 - Rebuild for faad x264 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-3.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Fri Apr 03 2009 Hans de Goede 0.10.11-3 - Disable mpegdemux plugin as it conflicts with gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux (rf 474) * Sun Mar 29 2009 Hans de Goede 0.10.11-2 - Rebuild for new faad2 and x264 - Enable libass plugin - Move the midi plugins to the -extras package, so that people who do not need / want midi playback support do not have to download 200 MB of wavetable instruments. For people who do want this the automatic gstreamer plugin install should take care of installing them. gsview-4.8-5.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.8-5 - rebuild for new F11 features gtetrinet-0.7.11-4.fc11 ----------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.11-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Dec 28 2008 Matthias Saou 0.7.11-3 - Minor spec file cleanups. - Move binary back to _bindir (#279). h264enc-8.7.2-2.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.7.2-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 22 2009 Conrad Meyer - 8.7.2-1 - Fix license, sed /usr/local to prefix. - Bump to 8.7.2. iscsitarget-0.4.17-3.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2 - rebuild for new ssl iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.5 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2.5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-1.5 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; jbigkit-2.0-3.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features k3b-extras-freeworld-1.0.5-6.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.5-6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Dec 15 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0.5-5 - fix build with current ffmpeg kino-1.3.3-2.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.3-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Jan 30 2009 Dan Hor?k - 1.3.3-1 1.3.3 kmodtool-1-18.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1-18 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Feb 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1-17 - add support for obsoletes to kmodtool kplayer-0.7.0-2.20081211cvs.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.7.0-2.20081211cvs - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Dec 12 2008 Orcan Ogetbil < orcanbahri [AT] yahoo [DOT] com> - 1:0.7.0-1.20081211cvs - kplayer-0.7.0 - License is GPLv3+ and GFDL kqemu-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1 - rebuild for new F11 features kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1 - rebuild for new F11 features lame-3.98.2-3.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.98.2-3 - rebuild for new F11 features libdca-0.0.5-4.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.5-4 - rebuild for new F11 features libdvbpsi-0.1.6-4.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.1.6-4 - rebuild for new F11 features libfame-0.9.1-14.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.1-14 - rebuild for new F11 features libmad-0.15.1b-11.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.15.1b-11 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Jan 28 2009 David Juran - 0.15.1b-10 - fix timestamps (Bz 264) libmms-0.4-4.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4-4 - rebuild for new F11 features libmpeg3-1.8-2.fc11 ------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.8-2 - Rebuild libquicktime-1.1.1-2.fc11 ------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.1.1-2 - Rebuild for faad x264 * Sun Dec 28 2008 kwizart - 1.1.1-1 - Update to 1.1.1 - Disable lqt-config (Fix RPM Fusion #265 ) live555-0-0.21.2008.07.25.fc11 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0-0.21.2008.07.25 - rebuild for new F11 features ltris-1.0.12-4.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-4 - rebuild for new F11 features lxdream-0.9-2.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Tue Oct 28 2008 Julian Sikorski - 0.9-1 - Updated to 0.9 - dcemu.gif is not installed anymore, so don't exclude it lxdvdrip-1.74-4.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.74-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 22 2009 David Juran - 1.74-3 - ppc, second try * Sun Feb 22 2009 David Juran - 1.74-2 - fix build on ppc m2vrequantiser-20030929-4.fc11 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 20030929-4 - rebuild for new F11 features madplay-0.15.2b-6.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.15.2b-6 - rebuild for new F11 features mamory-0.2.25-4.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.25-4 - rebuild for new F11 features megamario-1.5-3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.5-3 - rebuild for new F11 features mimms-3.2.1-4.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.2.1-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Dec 22 2008 Matthias Saou 3.2.1-3 - Rebuild for new python. mixxx-1.6.1-2.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.6.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features mmsrip-0.7.0-3.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features mock-rpmfusion-free-10.1-2.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features mp3gain-1.4.6-6.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.6-6 - rebuild for new F11 features mpd-0.14.2-2.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.14.2-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Feb 20 2009 Adrian Reber - 0.14.2-1 - updated to 0.14.2 mpg321-0.2.10.4-3.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.10.4-3 - rebuild for new F11 features mpgtx-1.3.1-5.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.1-5 - rebuild for new F11 features mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.109.20090329svn - 20090329 snapshot from 1.0rc3 branch - fix RPM_OPT_FLAGS usage - drop obsolete patch * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0-0.108.20090319svn - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Mar 19 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.107.20091319svn - 20090319 snapshot - fix HTML docs generation * Wed Feb 04 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.106.20090204svn - 20090204 snapshot - dropped obsolete patch - dropped obsolete BR - dropped redundant altivec CFLAGS on ppc - fixed build on ppc mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20293.fc11 ------------------------------- * Tue Mar 31 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20293 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20293 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.22-0.2.svn.r20273 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Mar 27 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20273 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20273 * Fri Mar 20 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20232 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20232 * Thu Mar 12 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20196 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision r20196 - Carries work-around for qt 4.5 "everthing is a prepared statement now" bug/quirk (rpmfusion bz#421) * Wed Mar 04 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20107 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20107 - Features misc gcc 4.4 and qt 4.5 build fixage * Mon Mar 02 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20089 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20089 * Wed Feb 18 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20019 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20019 * Wed Feb 11 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19980 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 19980 * Thu Jan 29 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19874 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 19874 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19811 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 19811 - Drop mythcontrols plugin (functionality merged into mythfrontend) - Re-enable building iptv support * Sat Jan 17 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19722 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 19722 - MythPhone plugin is dead as a doornail (MythTV changeset 19702) * Sat Jan 17 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19721 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 19721 mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20196.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.22-0.2.svn.r20196 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Mar 12 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20196 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 20196 * Wed Mar 04 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20107 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 20107 * Mon Mar 02 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r20089 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 20089 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19811 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 19811 * Wed Dec 31 2008 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.1.svn.r19506 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 19506 nailer-0.4.3-4.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4.3-4 - rebuild for new F11 features ndiswrapper-1.54-2.fc11 ----------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Feb 21 2009 Xavier Lamien - 0.54-1 - Update release. Nestopia-1.40h-3.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.40h-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 04 2008 Andrea Musuruane 1.40h-2 - Fixed unowned directory (BZ #216) normalize-0.7.7-5.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.7-5 - rebuild for new F11 features open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-2.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.154848-2 - Updated arches for F-11 osmose-0.8.2-5.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.2-5 - rebuild for new F11 features pangzero-1.3-3.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3-3 - rebuild for new F11 features perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.08-3.fc11 --------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.08-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Jan 21 2009 Paul Howarth 1.08-2 - Include "changes" file in documentation - Use a different delimiter for sed command in %prep to improve readability picard-freeworld-0.11-5.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.11-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Jan 14 2009 Alex Lancaster - 0.11-4 - Remove check target, only useful in the base picard package. pyglet-1.1.3-1.fc11 ------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil 1.1.3-1 - update to 1.1.3 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Orcan Ogetbil 1.1.2-6 - Fix lib-loading-order patch qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.3-3.fc11 ----------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.3-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.2.3-2 - rebuild against new ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-11-0.4 ------------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11-0.4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 25 2008 Stewart Adam 11-0.3 - Add "sleep 3m" to workaround buildsys bug rpmfusion-packager-0.2-2.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2-2 - rebuild for new F11 features rt2860-1.8.0.0-3.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-4.fc11.6 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-4.6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.8.0.0-3.6 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring rt2870-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 --------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - Rebuild for 2.1.0.0 - Move suspend.sh to %doc - Fix description: rt2870 is USB only rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc11 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-2 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - New upstream version - Drop additional-devices patch since it is upstreamed * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-7.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; rt3070-2.0.1.0-3.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 22 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.0.1.0-2 - Fix the 2.6.29 patch scottfree-1.14-5.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.14-5 - rebuild for new F11 features SheepShaver-2.3-0.7.20060514.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.3-0.7.20060514 - rebuild for new F11 features smc-music-4.0-4.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.0-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Dec 17 2008 Hans de Goede 4.0-3 - Fix directory ownership issues (rpmfusion 223) smpeg-0.4.5-0.3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4.5-0.3 - rebuild for new F11 features smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.7-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.7 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Jan 10 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.6-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.6 snowballz-1.0-0.6.beta1.20090110hg.fc11 --------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0-0.6.beta1.20090110hg - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 04 2009 Orcan Ogetbil 1.0-0.5.beta1.20090110hg - Updated description stella-2.7.5-1.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Hans de Goede 2.7.5-1 - New upstream release 2.7.5 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.7.3-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Feb 09 2009 Hans de Goede 2.7.3-1 - New upstream release 2.7.3 sysprof-1.0.12-5.fc11 --------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-5 - s/i386/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 * Thu Apr 02 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-4 - Fix kmod requires and provides according to http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Feb 19 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-2 - make it excludearch i386 instead of ix86, as the latter confuses plague sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 11 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-1 - version update to 1.0.12 - adapt to rpmfusion akmod thoggen-0.7.1-3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.1-3 - rebuild for new F11 features torrentzip-0.2-3.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2-3 - rebuild for new F11 features transcode-1.1.1-5.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.1.1-5 - rebuild for new F11 features twolame-0.3.12-4.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.3.12-4 - rebuild for new F11 features ushare-freeworld-1.1a-7.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.1a-7 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.1a-6 - rebuild against new ffmpeg vcdimager-0.7.23-10.fc11 ------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.23-10 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Jan 15 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.7.23-9 - Rebuild for libcdio vdr-burn-0.1.0-0.18.pre21.fc11 ------------------------------ * Fri Mar 27 2009 Felix Kaechele - 0.1.0-0.18.pre21 - and again * Sat Jan 03 2009 Felix Kaechele - 0.1.0-0.17.pre21 - fixed font deps (once again) vdrsync-0.1.3-14.PRE1.050322.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Felix Kaechele - 0.1.3-14.PRE1.050322 - fixed fonts again * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.1.3-13.PRE1.050322 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Jan 03 2009 Felix Kaechele - 0.1.3-12.PRE1.050322 - fixed font deps (once again) vlc-1.0.0-0.1pre1.fc11 ---------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.0.0-0.1pre1 - Update to 1.0.0-pre1 - Add mozilla plugin with xulrunner-1.9.1. Patch from Alexey Gladkov - Disable xxmc vobcopy-1.1.2-3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.1.2-3 - rebuild for new F11 features wormsofprey-0.4.3-5.fc11 ------------------------ * Wed Apr 01 2009 Hans de Goede 0.4.3-5 - Fix building with gcc 4.4 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4.3-4 - rebuild for new F11 features wormsofprey-data-20051221-3.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 20051221-3 - rebuild for new F11 features wxsvg-1.0-7.fc11 ---------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0-7 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Jan 21 2009 Stewart Adam - 1.0-6 - Add libtool and ffmpeg-devel BR - Package headers & binaries again x264-0.0.0-0.24.20090319gitc109c8.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.0.0-0.24.20090319gitc109c8 - 20090319 snapshot - build with static gpac - fix build on ppc * Tue Feb 10 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.0.0-0.23.20090119git451ba8d - 20090119 snapshot - fix BRs for build-time options xine-0.99.5-6.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.99.5-6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Oct 29 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.99.5-5 - rebuilt xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.2-4.fc11 ----------------------------------------- * Fri Mar 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-4 - rebuild (faad) xmltv-0.5.55-2.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.5.55-2 - rebuild for new F11 features xmms-mp3-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.2.11-3.20071117cvs - rebuild for new F11 features xmms-wma-1.0.5-6.fc11 --------------------- * Tue Mar 31 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 1.0.5-6 - use Patch0 instead of Patch - fix build with current FFmpeg - fix FFmpeg API usage - fix some gcc warnings xmms2-freeworld-0.5-6.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.5-6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Tue Dec 16 2008 John Doe 0.5-5 - Fix typo in the SPEC file xroar-0.21-3.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.21-3 - rebuild for new F11 features xvid4conf-1.12-4.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.12-4 - rebuild for new F11 features xvidcore-1.2.1-2.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.2.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.2.1-1 - 1.2.1 - drop upstreamed compilation fix y4mscaler-9.0-8.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.0-8 - rebuild for new F11 features yabause-0.9.9-2.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.9-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Tue Jan 13 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.9-1 - Updated to 0.9.9 - Re-enabled parallel build zsnes-1.51-6.fc11 ----------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 1.51-6 - fixed ExclusiveArch for F11 * Wed Dec 24 2008 Andrea Musuruane 1.51-5 - used an upstream patch to fix pulseaudio From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 21:19:13 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:19:12 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 Message-ID: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 60 amrwb-7.0.0.3-5.fc11 broadcom-wl-5.10.79.10-2.fc11 bsnes-0.042-1.fc11 Cg-2.1.0017-1.fc11 d1x-1.43-8.fc11 dega-sdl-1.12-5.fc11 dgen-sdl-1.23-5.fc11 doc-2.2.3-4.fc11 doom-shareware-1.9-6.s.fc11 e-uae-0.8.29-0.12.wip4.fc11 Frodo-4.1b-6.fc11 fuse-emulator-roms-0.9.0-3.fc11 gens-2.15.5-2.fc11 gmameui-0.2.2-3.fc11 gnome-video-arcade-0.6.5-2.fc11 jad-1.5.8e-8.fc11 larabie-fonts-0-0.5.20011216.fc11 lha-1.14i-23.fc11 libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc11 livna-config-display-0.0.22-3.fc11 mac-3.99-7.u4b5.fc11 madwifi-0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903.fc11 mednafen-0.8.11-2.0.8.B.fc11 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-10.1-2.fc11 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11 nvidia-kmod-180.37-2.fc11 ogre-cg-1.6.1-2.fc11 OpenEXR_Viewers-nonfree-1.0.1-6.fc11 pdflib-lite-7.0.4-2.fc11 pgadmin3-1.8.4-7.fc11 pgplot-5.2.2-30.fc11 php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-2.fc11 plus4emu-1.2.9.2-2.fc11 qmc2-0.2-0.11.b7.fc11 rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart-11-0.4 sdlmame-0131-0.3.0130u2.fc11 sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc11 sdlmame-data-artwork-0120-3.fc11 sdlmame-data-roms-0120-3.fc11 sdlmame-data-samples-0129-2.fc11 sdlmess-0130-2.fc11 sidplay-libs-2.1.1-9.fc11 slmodem-2.9.11-7.20080817.fc11 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.19 uade-2.09-5.fc11 ufoai-2.2.1-4.fc11 ufoai-data-2.2.1-3 unace-2.50-6.fc11 unrar-3.7.8-4.fc11 vice-2.1-3.fc11 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11 xcpc-0.0-0.9.20070122wip.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-2.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.37-2.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.43.11-2.fc11 xrick-0.0.021212-4.fc11 xv-3.10a.jumbopatch.20070520-8.fc11 yapeSDL-0.32.5-2.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: amrwb-7.0.0.3-5.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 7.0.0.3-5 - rebuild for new F11 features broadcom-wl-5.10.79.10-2.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-2 - rebuild for new F11 features bsnes-0.042-1.fc11 ------------------ * Tue Mar 31 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.042-1 - Updated to 0.042 - Use Qt build on all branches, hiro ui is no more - Updated the strip patch - Updated the URL and Source0 addresses * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.041-2 - rebuild for new F11 features Cg-2.1.0017-1.fc11 ------------------ * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 2.1.0017-1 - Update to 2.1.0017 (February2009) - Re-introduce disttag - Disable strip - Fix some conditionnals * Fri Jan 09 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 2.1.0016-1 - Update to 2.1.0016 (November2008) d1x-1.43-8.fc11 --------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.43-8 - rebuild for new F11 features dega-sdl-1.12-5.fc11 -------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 1.12-5 - fixed ExclusiveArch for F11 dgen-sdl-1.23-5.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.23-5 - rebuild for new F11 features doc-2.2.3-4.fc11 ---------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.2.3-4 - rebuild for new F11 features doom-shareware-1.9-6.s.fc11 --------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.9-6.s - rebuild for new F11 features e-uae-0.8.29-0.12.wip4.fc11 --------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.29-0.12.wip4 - rebuild for new F11 features Frodo-4.1b-6.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 4.1b-6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Nov 02 2007 Andrea Musuruane 4.1b-5 - removed %{?dist} tag from changelog - updated icon cache scriptlets to be compliant to new guidelines fuse-emulator-roms-0.9.0-3.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.9.0-3 - rebuild for new F11 features gens-2.15.5-2.fc11 ------------------ * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.15.5-2 - fixed ExclusiveArch for F11 gmameui-0.2.2-3.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.2-3 - rebuild for new F11 features gnome-video-arcade-0.6.5-2.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Nov 21 2008 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.5-1 - Update to 0.6.5 jad-1.5.8e-8.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 1.5.8e-8 - Fedora 11 is i586, not i386 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.5.8e-7 - rebuild for new F11 features larabie-fonts-0-0.5.20011216.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0-0.5.20011216 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Jan 22 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 0-0.4.20011216 - Remove Provides' to match the guidelines lha-1.14i-23.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.14i-23 - rebuild for new F11 features libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.0-10 - rebuild for new F11 features livna-config-display-0.0.22-3.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.22-3 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 11 2008 Stewart Adam - 0.0.22-2 - Rebuild for python 2.6 mac-3.99-7.u4b5.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.99-7.u4b5 - rebuild for new F11 features madwifi-0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.4-61.r3861_20080903 - ExcludeArch ppc64 mednafen-0.8.11-2.0.8.B.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.11-2.0.8.B - rebuild for new F11 features mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-10.1-2.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-2 - rebuild for new F11 features nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 25 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 96.43.11-1 - Update to 96.43.11 (stable) nvidia-kmod-180.37-2.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.37-2 - rebuild for new F11 features ogre-cg-1.6.1-2.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.6.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features OpenEXR_Viewers-nonfree-1.0.1-6.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.1-6 - rebuild for new F11 features pdflib-lite-7.0.4-2.fc11 ------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 7.0.4-2 - rebuild for new F11 features pgadmin3-1.8.4-7.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.4-7 - rebuild for new F11 features pgplot-5.2.2-30.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.2.2-30 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 06 2008 Sergio Pascual 5.2.2-29 - Fixing bz #228. Multilib conflict produced by pgplot-routines.pdf php-pecl-pdflib-2.1.6-2.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features plus4emu-1.2.9.2-2.fc11 ----------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.2.9.2-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 25 2008 Andrea Musuruane 1.2.9.2-1 - Updated to upstream 1.2.9.2 - Moved to RPM Fusion nonfree - ROM images are now shippend in the source and therefore packaged - Fixed sources to read ROM images from datadir - Desktop files are no longer generated in the spec file - Renamed README.dribble in README.Fedora qmc2-0.2-0.11.b7.fc11 --------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.11.b7 - Handle the template properly - Updated the configs for Fedora 11 Beta * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2-0.10.b7 - rebuild for new F11 features rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart-11-0.4 --------------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11-0.4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Dec 26 2008 Stewart Adam 11-0.3 - Add "sleep 3m" to workaround buildsys bug - Update .channel files for devel sdlmame-0131-0.3.0130u2.fc11 ---------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0131-0.3.0130u2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Mar 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.2.0130u2 - Updated to 0.130u2 sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc11 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 03 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0130-3 - Added cheats back, now in the form of the xml files * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0130-2 - rebuild for new F11 features sdlmame-data-artwork-0120-3.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0120-3 - rebuild for new F11 features sdlmame-data-roms-0120-3.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0120-3 - rebuild for new F11 features sdlmame-data-samples-0129-2.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0129-2 - rebuild for new F11 features sdlmess-0130-2.fc11 ------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0130-2 - rebuild for new F11 features sidplay-libs-2.1.1-9.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1-9 - rebuild for new F11 features * Tue Nov 11 2008 Linus Walleij 2.1.1-8 - CVS checkin mangles the patch so I have to add it as a .gz file instead! * Tue Nov 11 2008 Linus Walleij 2.1.1-7 - Update patch from Debian so we compile again. - Import to RPMFusion and try to build it there. slmodem-2.9.11-7.20080817.fc11 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 2.9.11-7.20080817 - Fedora 11 is i586, not i386 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-6.20080817 - rebuild for new F11 features slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.19 ------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-27.19 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-26.19 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; uade-2.09-5.fc11 ---------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.09-5 - rebuild for new F11 features ufoai-2.2.1-4.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.2.1-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 11 2008 Karel Volny 2.2.1-3 - Fixed unowned directories (bug #225) ufoai-data-2.2.1-3 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.2.1-3 - rebuild for new F11 features unace-2.50-6.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Julian Sikorski - 2.50-6 - Fedora 11 is i586, not i386 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.50-5 - rebuild for new F11 features unrar-3.7.8-4.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.7.8-4 - rebuild for new F11 features vice-2.1-3.fc11 --------------- * Wed Apr 01 2009 Hans de Goede 2.1-3 - Fix building with gcc 4.4 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 27 2008 Hans de Goede 2.1-1 - New upstream release 2.1 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11 ------------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Chris Nolan - 5.10.79.10-2 - repatched to load lib80211_crypt_tkip module - bug #466 xcpc-0.0-0.9.20070122wip.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0-0.9.20070122wip - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Dec 04 2008 Andrea Musuruane 0.0-0.8.20070122wip - Fixed unowned directory (BZ #214) - Removed old Fedora stuff - Cosmetic changes xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sat Mar 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.3 * Sun Feb 22 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.2-2 - Make devel subpackage depend on lib subpackage of the same arch xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-2.fc11 ------------------------------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-2 - rebuild for new F11 features xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.37-2.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.37-2 - rebuild for new F11 features xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.43.11-2.fc11 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Feb 25 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 96.43.11-1 - Update to 96.43.11 (stable) xrick-0.0.021212-4.fc11 ----------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.021212-4 - rebuild for new F11 features xv-3.10a.jumbopatch.20070520-8.fc11 ----------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.10a.jumbopatch.20070520-8 - rebuild for new F11 features yapeSDL-0.32.5-2.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.32.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Dec 03 2008 Andrea Musuruane 0.32.5-1 - Updated to upstream 0.32.5 - Version 0.32.5 ships a small GUI - added a desktop entry and an icon - Removed the name from the summary From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 3 21:48:23 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:48:41 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 In-Reply-To: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <20090403214823.6aed6cb3@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:19:13 +0200 (CEST), rpmfusion-pkgs-report wrote: > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 60 > > mac-3.99-7.u4b5.fc11 multilib-ing for ppc has not worked out yet. Can't reproduce locally - may need a deeper look. Are logs of this push available? (or the output of running ./MultiLib.py manually for "RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development"? From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 21:57:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 21:57:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403195749.981B02C387@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #12 from Dave Straub 2009-04-03 21:57:58 --- (In reply to comment #11) Thanks for the response. I updated the spec at the same URL, but I will have a proper SRPM after I patch it. Responses below: > * There are many files in the source which are GPLv2 (no later). But there are > also GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ files. > So it looks like the License field should be > License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Thanks for pointing this out, I will use GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ since both binary files are built from GPLv2 solo and GPLv2 and above source files. (Unless this does not apply for some reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations ) > But apart from these, this one file: > src/filters/2xSaImmx.asm > has a different license. I don't know what it should be called. Let's research. As far as I can see, assembly files are not touched with the default settings, and I am not specifying to include them. This means that file's license is not important to the binary package, correct? Performance seems good enough using the C++ alternatives, and they should keep it portable. However if you think it would be better, I will could pass the needed flags on the respective architectures to use the assembly files (and ask the author or some Fedora list about that license). > ! Not a blocker, but this line > gzip -9 < debian/vbam.1 > %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/vbam.1.gz > is not really necessary. You can install the file via "install -pm 644 ..." and > rpmbuild will take care of the rest. Okay, I didn't know it will compress man pages on its own. Nifty. > * Package does not build on rawhide! gcc-4.4 issue: > /builddir/build/BUILD/vbam-1.8.0/src/sdl/debugger.cpp:948: error: invalid > conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' > > Please patch this up and inform upstream. I will do this over the weekend. > * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Is the > project named vbam or vba-m? It seems the project is called "VBA-M" in discussions, but the SourceForge project name and all built files are "vbam". I think this makes more sense for the RPM name. > * You need to pass VERBOSE=1 to make Using %cmake generates a verbose Makefile. > * Requires: hicolor-icon-theme is not necessary since it will be in the > dependency chain. (rpmbuild will automatically create library dependencies, > gtk2, libglade etc, and they will pull hicolor-icon-theme) Removed. > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-). Also the two %attr(755,root,root) can be > removed. Done. > * You only use %{name} in URL and everywhere else you use vbam. Actually, it is > the other way around. Please make use of the %{name} and %{version} macros > extensively, except possibly in URLs. I don't see very many occurrences of "vbam" other than the file list. I'd rather not use macros in comment commands as I think they should be copy-and-paste-able. I have used the name macro where applicable in the file list. Is it appropriate to write out the GTK binary's file name "gvbam", or should it have the macro as well ("g%{name}")? > * Package does not honor Fedora specific flags. Please see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > Replacing "cmake" with the "%cmake" macro may or may not solve the issue. I > didn't check. But using %cmake is a good practice anyway. I attempted to use %cmake at first, but it wouldn't link properly with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS enabled. This flag is switched on in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake without an option to disable it. I'm no expert in RPM macros; is there a clean syntax for replacing a substring like for shell variables? (I have no luck in searching for this kind of thing.) For the uploaded spec, I used an ugly hack to remove that flag so it can at least make use of the other options in the macro. Is the proper action here to patch the source so that flag works correctly? > * Please preserve the time-stamps of the non compiled files. For instance, you > can use: > sed 's/\r//' doc/License.txt > tmpfile > touch -r doc/License.txt tmpfile > mv -f tmpfile doc/License.txt I used what you suggested, but from Andrea's link, the only given reason for not using dos2unix is that it might break FC3. There is a single flag for dos2unix to do essentially those three commands. Is anyone actually still targeting FC3, or is there another reason for not using dos2unix? > Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/objections. I think what I ask above covers it. I will post the new SRPM after I add the patch(es), but the same spec URL currently has the noted changes. Thanks for the detailed suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 3 22:00:35 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri Apr 3 22:00:48 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 In-Reply-To: <20090403214823.6aed6cb3@faldor.intranet> References: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <20090403214823.6aed6cb3@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <49D66AE3.6030408@leemhuis.info> On 03.04.2009 21:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:19:13 +0200 (CEST), rpmfusion-pkgs-report wrote: > >> ============================================================================ >> Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 60 >> mac-3.99-7.u4b5.fc11 > > multilib-ing for ppc has not worked out yet. Same for x86_64 and free repo > Can't reproduce locally - may need a deeper look. Actually I noticed this myself already, but haven't found the root cause for it yet. > Are logs of this push available? (or the output of running > ./MultiLib.py manually for "RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development"? $ ./MultiLib.py RPMFusion_Fedora_free development Scanning for multi-compat packages: /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/ppc64/os Scanning for multi-compat packages: /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/i386/os ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc64', 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc'] ['ppc64', 'ppc', 'noarch'] => ppc Reading metadata... Yum error: failure: repodata/7179741d609b78c48aad2b0a5bb3df509c949062-primary.xml.gz from rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. This seems to be the root problem. Same for x86-64: [...] ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386', 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-x86_64'] ['x86_64', 'athlon', 'i686', 'i586', 'i486', 'i386', 'noarch'] => x86_64 Reading metadata... Yum error: failure: repodata/c3d4abca4fb1714cb55519e7699e71abe17f6edb-primary.xml.gz from rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. [...] I guess the local yum in the push-scripts directory yum/ might get confused by the new repodata that the new createrepo (which I had to install for proper SHA256 signatures) created... CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 23:00:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 23:00:04 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403205955.CA72A2C316@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-03 23:00:05 --- schroedinger-devel >= 1.0.6 have been built for Rawhide and should be available soonish -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 3 23:16:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 3 23:16:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090403211646.A4EC32C49F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #13 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-03 23:16:56 --- Thanks for the update! (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > But apart from these, this one file: > > src/filters/2xSaImmx.asm > > has a different license. I don't know what it should be called. Let's > > research. > > As far as I can see, assembly files are not touched with the default settings, > and I am not specifying to include them. This means that file's license is not > important to the binary package, correct? > > Performance seems good enough using the C++ alternatives, and they should keep > it portable. However if you think it would be better, I will could pass the > needed flags on the respective architectures to use the assembly files (and > ask the author or some Fedora list about that license). > Yes, if it is not used, it isn't relevant for the license tag. It's up to your judgement to use the asm files or not. > > > * You only use %{name} in URL and everywhere else you use vbam. Actually, > > it is the other way around. Please make use of the %{name} and %{version} > > macros extensively, except possibly in URLs. > > I don't see very many occurrences of "vbam" other than the file list. I'd > rather not use macros in comment commands as I think they should be > copy-and-paste-able. > > I have used the name macro where applicable in the file list. Is it > appropriate > to write out the GTK binary's file name "gvbam", or should it have the macro > as well ("g%{name}")? > There are occurrences of vbam in %install and in %files that you can replace with %{name}. It is OK to leave the comments as is, but I would use vbam in the URL for the same purpose you use vbam for the comments to fetch the sources. By the way, shouldn't this be the actual URL?: http://vba-m.ngemu.com/ And also g%{name} is OK. > > * Package does not honor Fedora specific flags. Please see: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > Replacing "cmake" with the "%cmake" macro may or may not solve the issue. I > > didn't check. But using %cmake is a good practice anyway. > > I attempted to use %cmake at first, but it wouldn't link properly with > BUILD_SHARED_LIBS enabled. This flag is switched on in /etc/rpm/macros.cmake > without an option to disable it. > > I'm no expert in RPM macros; is there a clean syntax for replacing a substring > like for shell variables? (I have no luck in searching for this kind of > thing.) > For the uploaded spec, I used an ugly hack to remove that flag so it can at > least make use of the other options in the macro. > > Is the proper action here to patch the source so that flag works correctly? > Either patch them, or use this in %prep: sed -i 's|\(CMAKE_C.*_FLAGS\).*|\1 "%{optflags}")|' CMakeLists.txt > > * Please preserve the time-stamps of the non compiled files. For instance, > > you can use: > > sed 's/\r//' doc/License.txt > tmpfile > > touch -r doc/License.txt tmpfile > > mv -f tmpfile doc/License.txt > > I used what you suggested, but from Andrea's link, the only given reason for > not using dos2unix is that it might break FC3. There is a single flag for > dos2unix to do essentially those three commands. Is anyone actually still > targeting FC3, or is there another reason for not using dos2unix? > I know, but dos2unix is non-standard. Besides it pulls an extra BR. I guess it is a matter of convention. There are some people who prefer using it, but I'm not one of them. > > Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/objections. > > I think what I ask above covers it. I will post the new SRPM after I add the > patch(es), but the same spec URL currently has the noted changes. Thanks for > the detailed suggestions. > You're welcome. I'll wait for the next release. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 07:51:21 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 07:51:23 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404055121.465032411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 3 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-3.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.37-3.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.43.11-3.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.18-3.fc11 ------------------------------------------ * Fri Apr 03 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.18-3 - Fix x86 Arch for fedora >= 11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.37-3.fc11 --------------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.37-3 - Fix x86 Arch for fedora >= 11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.43.11-3.fc11 ---------------------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 96.43.11-3 - Fix x86 Arch for fedora >= 11 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 08:02:37 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 08:02:38 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404060237.59A3C2411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11 --------------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.154848-3 - Fixing ExclusiveArch xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11 ----------------------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.3-1 - xine-lib-1.1.16.3, plugin-abi 1.26 From mschwendt at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 08:10:51 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat Apr 4 08:11:03 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 In-Reply-To: <49D66AE3.6030408@leemhuis.info> References: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <20090403214823.6aed6cb3@faldor.intranet> <49D66AE3.6030408@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20090404081051.780f7f54@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:00:35 +0200, Thorsten wrote: > $ ./MultiLib.py RPMFusion_Fedora_free development > Scanning for multi-compat packages: > /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/ppc64/os > Scanning for multi-compat packages: > /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/i386/os > ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc64', > 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc'] > ['ppc64', 'ppc', 'noarch'] => ppc > Reading metadata... > Yum error: failure: > repodata/7179741d609b78c48aad2b0a5bb3df509c949062-primary.xml.gz from > rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc: [Errno 256] No more mirrors > to try. > > This seems to be the root problem. Same for x86-64: > [...] > ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386', > 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-x86_64'] > ['x86_64', 'athlon', 'i686', 'i586', 'i486', 'i386', 'noarch'] => x86_64 > Reading metadata... > Yum error: failure: > repodata/c3d4abca4fb1714cb55519e7699e71abe17f6edb-primary.xml.gz from > rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386: [Errno 256] No more mirrors > to try. > [...] > > I guess the local yum in the push-scripts directory yum/ might get > confused by the new repodata that the new createrepo (which I had to > install for proper SHA256 signatures) created... The local yum/repomd/rpmUtils in the push-scripts directory is not used anymore and can be deleted. Only on EL4 it would be needed. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Apr 4 08:23:35 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat Apr 4 08:23:51 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 In-Reply-To: <20090404081051.780f7f54@faldor.intranet> References: <20090403191913.3EE0E2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <20090403214823.6aed6cb3@faldor.intranet> <49D66AE3.6030408@leemhuis.info> <20090404081051.780f7f54@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <49D6FCE7.5000103@leemhuis.info> On 04.04.2009 08:10, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:00:35 +0200, Thorsten wrote: > >> $ ./MultiLib.py RPMFusion_Fedora_free development >> Scanning for multi-compat packages: >> /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/ppc64/os >> Scanning for multi-compat packages: >> /srv/local_repo/free/fedora/development/i386/os >> ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc64', >> 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc'] >> ['ppc64', 'ppc', 'noarch'] => ppc >> Reading metadata... >> Yum error: failure: >> repodata/7179741d609b78c48aad2b0a5bb3df509c949062-primary.xml.gz from >> rpmfusion_free-development-development-ppc: [Errno 256] No more mirrors >> to try. >> >> This seems to be the root problem. Same for x86-64: >> [...] >> ['rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386', >> 'rpmfusion_free-development-development-x86_64'] >> ['x86_64', 'athlon', 'i686', 'i586', 'i486', 'i386', 'noarch'] => x86_64 >> Reading metadata... >> Yum error: failure: >> repodata/c3d4abca4fb1714cb55519e7699e71abe17f6edb-primary.xml.gz from >> rpmfusion_free-development-development-i386: [Errno 256] No more mirrors >> to try. >> [...] >> >> I guess the local yum in the push-scripts directory yum/ might get >> confused by the new repodata that the new createrepo (which I had to >> install for proper SHA256 signatures) created... > > The local yum/repomd/rpmUtils in the push-scripts directory is not used > anymore and can be deleted. Only on EL4 it would be needed. That's actually what I did half an hour ago and it seems everything worked fine (including multilib). Thx for your help! CU knurd From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 08:52:48 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 08:52:50 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404065248.EC26E2411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc10 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc10 ------------------------ * Sat Apr 04 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0130-3 - Added cheats back, now in the form of the xml files * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0130-2 - rebuild for new F11 features From oget.fedora at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 09:41:12 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Sat Apr 4 09:41:18 2009 Subject: orphaning xmms-wma In-Reply-To: <49D65F06.5060501@leemhuis.info> References: <49D65F06.5060501@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 02.04.2009 10:52, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >> There is this long standing crasher bug [1] that I couldn't to solve >> after spending many hours and days. At the end, as of today, I finally >> lost my interest in this package. Instead, I packaged xmms-mplayer [2] >> which can play not only wma files, but also whatever mplayer can play >> (audio and video). >> >> If there's anyone who wants to fix the bug and maintain xmms-wma, >> (s)he can take it over. I'm pretty much done with this package. > > When you finally drop it please mark it as dead.package in CVS and tell me > to remove it from the rawhide branches. tia! > I'll do this as soon as xmms-mplayer gets approved and imported. Orcan From mschwendt at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 11:38:45 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat Apr 4 11:38:58 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-03 In-Reply-To: <20090403191644.DF97D2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090403191644.DF97D2406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <20090404113845.4458590d@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:16:44 +0200 (CEST), rpmfusion-pkgs-report wrote: > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 131 > > blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11 This one sets "ExclusiveArch: i486 x86_64 ppc ppc64 arm", but no build for i486 was done. Hence no i?86 packages are found in the repo either. With Plague one needs to set BuildArch to override the buildsystem's default list of archs. [...] List of broken deps in "development" free/nonfree coming shortly. Above explains why blcr is not in the i386 report. From mschwendt at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 11:39:20 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat Apr 4 11:39:28 2009 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion nonfree Fedora development - 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404093920.7583.70093@faldor.intranet> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): madwifi xorg-x11-drv-fglrx Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): kwizart AT gmail com madwifi s.adam AT diffingo com xorg-x11-drv-fglrx (1 co-owner) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-development-i386: madwifi-0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903.fc11.i586 requires madwifi-kmod >= 0:0.9.4 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-development-ppc: madwifi-0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903.fc11.ppc requires madwifi-kmod >= 0:0.9.4 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-development-x86_64: madwifi-0.9.4-62.r3861_20080903.fc11.x86_64 requires madwifi-kmod >= 0:0.9.4 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-1.fc11.x86_64 requires fglrx-kmod >= 0:9.3 From mschwendt at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 11:40:20 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat Apr 4 11:40:28 2009 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404094020.7607.85712@faldor.intranet> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): avidemux blcr kqemu lastfm mythtv-themes ndiswrapper open-vm-tools streamripper ultrastardx vdr-dxr3 xine-lib-extras-freeworld Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): denis AT poolshark org open-vm-tools felix AT fetzig org ultrastardx vdr-dxr3 gauret AT free fr xine-lib-extras-freeworld (2 co-owners) jarod AT wilsonet com mythtv-themes kwizart AT gmail com kqemu lxtnow AT gmail com ndiswrapper streamripper ndbecker2 AT gmail com blcr s.adam AT diffingo com avidemux sergio.pasra AT gmail com lastfm ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-i386: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 kqemu-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.noarch requires qemu >= 2:0.10.0 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.i386 requires libgpod.so.3 ndiswrapper-1.54-2.fc11.i586 requires ndiswrapper-kmod >= 0:1.54 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11.i586 requires open-vm-tools-kmod >= 0:0.0.0.154848 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.i586 requires freefont vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-3.fc11.i386 requires em8300-kmod >= 0:0.15.2 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11.i586 requires xine-lib(plugin-abi)(x86-32) = 0:1.26 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libx264.so.65 avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11.ppc requires blcr-kmod >= 0:0.8.0 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.ppc requires libgpod.so.3 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.ppc requires freefont vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-3.fc11.ppc requires em8300-kmod >= 0:0.15.2 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11.ppc requires xine-lib(plugin-abi)(ppc-32) = 0:1.26 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc64: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11.ppc64 requires blcr-kmod >= 0:0.8.0 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.ppc64 requires libgpod.so.3()(64bit) mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20196.fc11.noarch requires mythtv-frontend streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.ppc64 requires freefont vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-3.fc11.ppc64 requires em8300-kmod >= 0:0.15.2 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires xine-lib(plugin-abi)(ppc-64) = 0:1.26 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-cli-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-gtk-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libx264.so.65()(64bit) avidemux-qt-2.4.3-8.fc11.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) blcr-0.8.0-2.fc11.x86_64 requires blcr-kmod >= 0:0.8.0 kqemu-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.noarch requires qemu >= 2:0.10.0 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-3.fc10.x86_64 requires libgpod.so.3()(64bit) ndiswrapper-1.54-2.fc11.x86_64 requires ndiswrapper-kmod >= 0:1.54 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11.x86_64 requires open-vm-tools-kmod >= 0:0.0.0.154848 open-vm-tools-devel-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11.i586 requires libvmtools.so.0 open-vm-tools-devel-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11.i586 requires libguestlib.so.0 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ultrastardx-1.1.1-0.4.20090303.fc11.x86_64 requires freefont vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-3.fc11.x86_64 requires em8300-kmod >= 0:0.15.2 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc11.x86_64 requires xine-lib(plugin-abi)(x86-64) = 0:1.26 From mschwendt at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 12:00:50 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat Apr 4 12:01:03 2009 Subject: repoview at RPM Fusion Message-ID: <20090404120050.025495ce@faldor.intranet> Changelog details in the repoview pages are reverse. Example: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/repoview/vlc.html :-/ This is because in createrepo/Yum, someone either still plays with sorting the entries by timestamp (bad, since the timestamp accuracy is not high enough, they don't contain h:m:s!) or running reverse() on them at least once. If they are reverse() in the repo metadata, any tools that read the changelog entries need to run reverse() once more to fix the order. That is bad, too. Currently, oldest %changelog is at the top in the "other" metadata. Yum upstream tickets #6 and #7 fix such issues, which also mess up repodiff in the daily Rawhide report. Unfortunately, ticket activity has stalled. If anyone knows how to help here, that would be appreciated. From musuruan at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 15:52:41 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Sat Apr 4 15:52:50 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <29fee02b0904040652s367d98b5j4e3fbf4c86177d9c@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi! > > The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: > > gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on > ?http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217-gambatte-0.4.1-2.fc11/ppc I fixed this in CVS, but the builders seem broken for ppc and ppc64. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3442-gambatte-0.4.1-3.fc11/ppc/job.log Bye, Andrea. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Apr 4 16:23:26 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat Apr 4 16:23:36 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <29fee02b0904040652s367d98b5j4e3fbf4c86177d9c@mail.gmail.com> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <29fee02b0904040652s367d98b5j4e3fbf4c86177d9c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49D76D5E.5050307@leemhuis.info> On 04.04.2009 15:52, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: >> gambatte-0_4_1-2_fc11 on >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3217-gambatte-0.4.1-2.fc11/ppc > > I fixed this in CVS, but the builders seem broken for ppc and ppc64. > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3442-gambatte-0.4.1-3.fc11/ppc/job.log That was a hickup that was fixed by a requeuing the job. Part of the problem might have been that the local rawhide tree was updated in the middle of the build process. CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 16:36:55 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 4 16:36:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090404143648.B54662C452@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-04 16:36:55 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Package CVS request done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 16:37:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 4 16:37:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090404143659.5C50B2C452@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From musuruan at gmail.com Sat Apr 4 16:39:22 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Sat Apr 4 16:39:31 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49D76D5E.5050307@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <29fee02b0904040652s367d98b5j4e3fbf4c86177d9c@mail.gmail.com> <49D76D5E.5050307@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <29fee02b0904040739i320460f6sef4506f560d62d9a@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > That was a hickup that was fixed by a requeuing the job. Part of the problem > might have been that the local rawhide tree was updated in the middle of the > build process. Thanks Thorsten for re-queuing it. Andrea. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 18:33:11 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 18:33:10 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404163311.D3AE72411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: sdlmame-data-0130-3.fc9 ----------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0130-3 - Added cheats back, now in the form of the xml files * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0130-2 - rebuild for new F11 features From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 18:53:43 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 18:53:44 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404165343.F02BB2411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc10 vlc-0.9.9-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc9 vlc-0.9.9-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 4 blcr-0.8.0-3.fc11 compat-python24-lxml-2.0.5-3.fc11 gambatte-0.4.1-3.fc11 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc10 --------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-3 - Fix kmod requires and provides according to http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 vlc-0.9.9-1.fc10 ---------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-1 - Update to 0.9.9 final - backport playlist patch - Enable subtitles decoding ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc9 -------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-3 - Fix kmod requires and provides according to http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 vlc-0.9.9-1.fc9 --------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-1 - Update to 0.9.9 final - backport playlist patch - Enable subtitles decoding * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.5rc2 - Use libxml2-static 2.6.2 from the Fedora GA repository * Fri Mar 06 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.4rc2 - Update to 0.9.9-rc2 - Add lua support by default ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: blcr-0.8.0-3.fc11 ----------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-3 - s/i486/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 compat-python24-lxml-2.0.5-3.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.5-3 - rebuild for new F11 features gambatte-0.4.1-3.fc11 --------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Andrea Musuruane - 0.4.1-3 - Added a patch to fix gcc 4.4 errors * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4.1-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Jan 31 2009 Andrea Musuruane - 0.4.1-1 - Updated to upstream 0.4.1 - Changed back to qt4-devel from qt-devel in BR - Changed descriptions to match the one upstream uses - Dropped alsa patch, applied upstream - Changed libname to avoid future collisions with upstream open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Mon Mar 23 2009 - 0.0.0.154848-1 - Update to upstream build 154848 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 20:33:29 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 4 20:33:28 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-04 Message-ID: <20090404183329.41F9C2411B@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 2 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.5 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.3 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.5 ---------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.8.0.0-3.5 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.3 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-2.3 - rebuild From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 22:37:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 4 22:37:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 400] Review request: qtractor - Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090404203738.508C52C4BF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400 --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-04 22:37:48 --- New upstream release: SPEC: http://sites.google.com/site/ogetfedora/files/qtractor.spec SRPM: http://sites.google.com/site/ogetfedora/files/qtractor-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 4 22:59:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 4 22:58:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090404205851.209C82C3D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #6 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-04 22:59:00 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > ok, i'd prefer to ask them if I can just ship the binary image alone, is a copy > > of an email ok for this? > > Yes, that should be fine. > ok, here is the OK, I certainly have no problem with you including FreeDOS. Note that much of the FreeDOS programs are distributed under the GNU GPL or a similarly free license. You should find a way to make FreeDOS source code available to the end-user of this RPM. Maybe a version of FreeDOS based on fdbasecd.iso (binary-only) and another version based on fdfullcd.iso (includes source.) That way, the end-user would have the option to get a version of FreeDOS that includes the source code. Or, I see there is discussion in your bugzilla about including the FreeDOS source in the SRPM, which also makes sense to me. I would be ok with either option, I think - so long as source somehow is made available to users, under the GNU GPL. Thanks, -jh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 5 10:27:58 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 5 10:28:05 2009 Subject: open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: <49D32457.7010106@poolshark.org> References: <49D32457.7010106@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <49D86B8E.6090205@leemhuis.info> Hi! Sorry, I didn#t get around to answer this mail earlier. On 01.04.2009 10:22, Denis Leroy wrote: > > Do yo know what is up with the rebuilds of open-vm-tools ? It seems > currently broken somehow. I've checked in the latest version of the > package, but the akmod package available for rawhide is still very old. > How do I force a akmod package rebuild ? I only have modules for > 'open-vm-tools' and 'open-vm-tools-kmod' in CVS... $ head open-vm-tools-kmod.spec # buildforkernels macro hint: when you build a new version or a new release # that contains bugfixes or other improvements then you must disable the # "buildforkernels newest" macro for just that build; immediately after # queuing that build enable the macro again for subsequent builds; that way # a new akmod package will only get build when a new one is actually # needed %define buildforkernels newest IOW: do s/%define buildforkernels newest/#define buildforkernels newest and the akmods package will get build as well as new kmods. Maybe the wording needs to be improved? CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 5 10:30:31 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 5 10:30:37 2009 Subject: open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: <49D86B8E.6090205@leemhuis.info> References: <49D32457.7010106@poolshark.org> <49D86B8E.6090205@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49D86C27.9030500@leemhuis.info> On 05.04.2009 10:27, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Sorry, I didn#t get around to answer this mail earlier. > On 01.04.2009 10:22, Denis Leroy wrote: >> Do yo know what is up with the rebuilds of open-vm-tools ? It seems >> currently broken somehow. I've checked in the latest version of the >> package, but the akmod package available for rawhide is still very old. >> How do I force a akmod package rebuild ? I only have modules for >> 'open-vm-tools' and 'open-vm-tools-kmod' in CVS... > > $ head open-vm-tools-kmod.spec > # buildforkernels macro hint: when you build a new version or a new release > # that contains bugfixes or other improvements then you must disable the > # "buildforkernels newest" macro for just that build; immediately after > # queuing that build enable the macro again for subsequent builds; that way > # a new akmod package will only get build when a new one is actually > # needed > %define buildforkernels newest > > IOW: do s/%define buildforkernels newest/#define buildforkernels newest > and the akmods package will get build as well as new kmods. Maybe the > wording needs to be improved? Forgot: You are not the first that gets confused. Maybe we should just split all akmods into a seperate source package to avoid that? One could copy the normal foo-kmod.spec file over to the foo-akmod.spec, flip a macro and queue the rebuild. That's a bit more manual work, but more transparent. Cu knurd From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 5 17:32:22 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 5 17:32:22 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-05 Message-ID: <20090405153222.7498C24125@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 1 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-2.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 1 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-2.fc9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-2.fc10 ----------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-2 - Only disable ldconfig when driver is already enabled, always configure xorg.conf even if driver is already enabled ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.3-2.fc9 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-2 - Only disable ldconfig when driver is already enabled, always configure xorg.conf even if driver is already enabled From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 5 18:29:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 5 18:29:11 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090405162903.850782C2F8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #14 from Dave Straub 2009-04-05 18:29:10 --- (In reply to comment #13) > By the way, shouldn't this be the actual URL?: > http://vba-m.ngemu.com/ Probably, I'll use that instead of their project page. > Either patch them, or use this in %prep: > sed -i 's|\(CMAKE_C.*_FLAGS\).*|\1 "%{optflags}")|' CMakeLists.txt I asked upstream to consider supporting the BUILD_SHARED_LIBS flag properly or disable it by force. I have patches to do both, but I am including the one that disables it until they give a response, so as not to change the project's default behavior. The rawhide build is patched in the SRPM, and that is sent upstream as well. Spec: http://dave.is1337.net/sources/vbam.spec SRPM: http://dave.is1337.net/sources/vbam-1.8.0-0.5.20090404svn877.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From chris at cenolan.com Sun Apr 5 22:03:59 2009 From: chris at cenolan.com (Chris Nolan) Date: Sun Apr 5 22:04:23 2009 Subject: wl-kmod/devel not building on i686 (possibly affecting all kmods?) In-Reply-To: <20090405162903.850782C2F8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> References: <20090405162903.850782C2F8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <49D90EAF.9080207@cenolan.com> I've noticed for a little while and mentioned it on IRC that the wl-kmod/devel package is not getting built on i686. It doesn't fail, it just doesn't build at all for i686 - like it doesn't even get queued. See job #3483 for example. All fine on non-rawhide. Seems to be affecting some other rawhide kmods too such as job #3478 which is fglrx-kmod. Anyone know what'd happening with it or if there is something I need to fix in the spec to make it build? Or is this just a buildsys problem? Ta C From maillist at diffingo.com Mon Apr 6 00:05:36 2009 From: maillist at diffingo.com (Stewart Adam) Date: Mon Apr 6 00:05:54 2009 Subject: A warning for Fedora 11 users with xorg-x11-drv-fglrx installed Message-ID: <49D92B30.6080001@diffingo.com> Hi, xorg-x11-drv-fglrx and kmod-fglrx have been updated to the 9.4 beta which is originally found in Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) and have been patched for 2.6.29, so it should be working well with Fedora 11. However, one of the side effects of the 2.6.29 patch is that fglrx repeats the same few errors over and over again into /var/log/messages and /var/log/dmesg (the error itself seems harmless, as the driver continues to function correctly). I recommend that you check on these files every few days to make sure they aren't growing too quickly. Regards, Stewart From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 00:15:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 00:15:15 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090405221505.2BB382C373@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #18 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-06 00:15:15 --- hmm... I've got a couple of error which need fixes. VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : ------------------------------------ 36 unstripped-binary-or-object (easy fix) 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files) 03 setuid on binaries (easy fix) VirtualBox-OSE-devel-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : ----------------------------------------- 17 executable scripts issues (easy fix) VirtualBox-OSE-guest-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : ----------------------------------------- 04 unstripped binary (easy fix) 02 executable files in modules sub-dir /etc/sysconfig/modules Package tree and dependencies : ------------------------------------ Currently -guest and main packages provide the same virtual (-kmod-common's) which's harmless at first sight but, imply to install main package even on the guest system. As kmod package requires -kmod-common, that's sound fair enough as kmod package is shipped with both main vboxdrv and Guest drivers. The current state is when trying to install -guest, it's looking for kmod package which's looking for -kmod-common which pull down main package and -guest's. Also note that udev's rule (kmod common file) which's required by vboxdrv is shipped by main package. Actually, the easiest way to avoid a such thing is to build a kmod-VirtualBox-OSE and kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition packages. That will also avoid to install vboxdrv on guest which is useless. We could also remove virtual on -kmod-common and build them for real by setting up something like this, VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-common providing : %config %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/90-vboxdrv.rules %config %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/modules/%{name}.modules VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition-kmod-common providing : %config %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/modules/%{name}-guest.modules kmod-VirtualBox-OSE providing : vboxdrv kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition : vboxnetflt vboxadd vboxvfs NVR issues : ---------------------- Provides and requires against main or sub packages tree have to be set as follow to avoid brake package dependencies : $package_name = %{version}-%{release} Naming issue : --------------------- I'd prefer you keep the current complete name of guest addition to match with upstream. Package conflict issue : ---------------------------- We need to prevent conflict against VirtualBox closed-source packages Adding some conflicts should be good enough. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 00:35:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 00:35:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090405223538.3BB2D2C39E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-06 00:35:48 --- (In reply to comment #18) > hmm... I've got a couple of error which need fixes. > > VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : > ------------------------------------ > 36 unstripped-binary-or-object (easy fix) I won't call this easy fix. We need to select what to strip and what not. I don't see a nice way to prevent find-debuginfo from stripping what it shouldn't other than chmod -x -ing it and then set it back to executable via %attr, which is not particularly elegant. Do you insist on this? > 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files) I was under impression rpaths are used here (and we are not having only the standard rpaths), but I'll check and see what can be done. > 03 setuid on binaries (easy fix) This was upstream decision and I'd be careful to change that. On the other hand, having the beast completely setuid really doesn't sound much sane to me. What would you do with that? Use consolehelper? (well, you see, PolicyKit is probably not going to happen ;) > VirtualBox-OSE-devel-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : > ----------------------------------------- > 17 executable scripts issues (easy fix) Will take a look. > VirtualBox-OSE-guest-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : > ----------------------------------------- > 04 unstripped binary (easy fix) See above. > 02 executable files in modules sub-dir /etc/sysconfig/modules This makes sense to be executable, no? > Package tree and dependencies : > ------------------------------------ > Currently -guest and main packages provide the same virtual (-kmod-common's) > which's harmless at first sight but, imply to install main package even on the > guest system. > As kmod package requires -kmod-common, that's sound fair enough as kmod package > is shipped with both main vboxdrv and Guest drivers. > The current state is when trying to install -guest, it's looking for kmod > package which's looking for -kmod-common which pull down main package and > -guest's. This sounds like a yum (a bug?) glitch to me. I would not expect such behavior, will need to check. > Also note that udev's rule (kmod common file) which's required by vboxdrv is > shipped by main package. And only main package makes use of vboxdrv. Makes sense to me. > Actually, the easiest way to avoid a such thing is to build a > kmod-VirtualBox-OSE and kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition packages. > That will also avoid to install vboxdrv on guest which is useless. Sounds like too much overhead to me and I'd prefer to avoid as much as I can. > We could also remove virtual on -kmod-common and build them for real > by setting up something like this, > > VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-common providing : > %config %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/90-vboxdrv.rules > %config %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/modules/%{name}.modules > > VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition-kmod-common providing : > %config %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/modules/%{name}-guest.modules > > kmod-VirtualBox-OSE providing : > vboxdrv > > kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition : > vboxnetflt > vboxadd > vboxvfs I'd vehemently protest splitting it up even more. Will have to figure the -common dependency issue though. > NVR issues : > ---------------------- > Provides and requires against main or sub packages tree have to be set as > follow to avoid brake package dependencies : > $package_name = %{version}-%{release} Will fix. > Naming issue : > --------------------- > I'd prefer you keep the current complete name of guest addition > to match with upstream. Which is ...? > Package conflict issue : > ---------------------------- > We need to prevent conflict against VirtualBox closed-source packages > Adding some conflicts should be good enough. We're not shipping VirtualBox closed source in RPMFusion. I'd say file conflicts are enough here (and we indeed do have those). Much thanks for the review so far, I'll work on new packages and post them here in a couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 00:46:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 00:46:29 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090405224619.C4D4E2C382@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@till.name --- Comment #20 from Till Maas 2009-04-06 00:46:30 --- In reply to comment #19 > 03 setuid on binaries (easy fix) This was upstream decision and I'd be careful to change that. On the other hand, having the beast completely setuid really doesn't sound much sane to me. What would you do with that? Use consolehelper? (well, you see, PolicyKit is probably not going to happen ;) File capabilities (man setcap) are afaik what should be used instead of suid binaries if possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From muayyad.alsadi at ojuba.org Mon Apr 6 01:04:52 2009 From: muayyad.alsadi at ojuba.org (=?UTF-8?Q?=D9=85=D8=A4=D9=8A=D8=AF_=D8=A7=D9=84=D8=B3=D8=B9=D8=AF=D9=8A?=) Date: Mon Apr 6 01:11:17 2009 Subject: A warning for Fedora 11 users with xorg-x11-drv-fglrx installed In-Reply-To: <49D92B30.6080001@diffingo.com> References: <49D92B30.6080001@diffingo.com> Message-ID: Not again! thanks, for the warning pulse auto did the same thing before and we patched it to limit logging rate but on fedora ML some people said that we should actually fix the logging system http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/230807-messages-eat-my-harddisk-because-alsa-pulse.html I quote But still, I think the biggest issue here is that rsyslog doesn't enforce any kind of rate limitting and is happy to let random users fill up /var. This is a first-class DoS. Simply do a "cat /dev/urandom | strings | logger" and you can make the whole system go bonkers. And it won't even be accounted to your own disk quota. Yay. EOQ On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:05:36 -0400, Stewart Adam wrote: > Hi, > > xorg-x11-drv-fglrx and kmod-fglrx have been updated to the 9.4 beta > which is originally found in Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) and have been patched > for 2.6.29, so it should be working well with Fedora 11. However, one of > the side effects of the 2.6.29 patch is that fglrx repeats the same few > errors over and over again into /var/log/messages and /var/log/dmesg > (the error itself seems harmless, as the driver continues to function > correctly). I recommend that you check on these files every few days to > make sure they aren't growing too quickly. > > Regards, > Stewart From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 08:01:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 08:01:04 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406060101.3426C2C30B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #15 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-06 08:01:02 --- Actually, it should be enough to add -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF to %cmake . No need to add a patch for this purpose. Let's wait for the upstream's response (but it doesn't look like they intend to make these libraries shared). By the way, make sure that the Fedora specific optflags are passed. They are not honored in the above package either. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From laxathom at fedoraproject.org Mon Apr 6 11:09:54 2009 From: laxathom at fedoraproject.org (Xavier Lamien) Date: Mon Apr 6 11:10:15 2009 Subject: repoview at RPM Fusion In-Reply-To: <20090404120050.025495ce@faldor.intranet> References: <20090404120050.025495ce@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <62bc09df0904060209m5814b99fh9829464731a1352c@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Changelog details in the repoview pages are reverse. Example: > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/repoview/vlc.html > > :-/ > > This is because in createrepo/Yum, someone either still plays with sorting > the entries by timestamp (bad, since the timestamp accuracy is not high > enough, they don't contain h:m:s!) or running reverse() on them at least > once. If they are reverse() in the repo metadata, any tools that read the > changelog entries need to run reverse() once more to fix the order. That > is bad, too. Currently, oldest %changelog is at the top in the "other" > metadata. > > Yum upstream tickets #6 and #7 fix such issues, which also mess up > repodiff in the daily Rawhide report. Unfortunately, ticket activity has > stalled. > > If anyone knows how to help here, that would be appreciated. > Ping ? Any eta for that fix ? -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 11:32:14 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 6 11:32:15 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-06 Message-ID: <20090406093214.369DF24381@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 8 fglrx-kmod-9.4-0.2.beta.fc11.1 gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc11 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11.1 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11.1 nvidia-kmod-180.37-2.fc11.1 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.20 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11.1 xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.4-0.3.beta.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc10 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-2 - Explicitly require libXres-devel to work around a build issue in F-10. * Mon Apr 06 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-1 - Update to 0.6.6 - Update URL tag to GitHub home page. - Update Source tag to download.gnome.org. - Add --with-nplayers-file configure option. - Require sdlmame-data >= 0.130-1 for nplayers.ini (#416). * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: fglrx-kmod-9.4-0.2.beta.fc11.1 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.4-0.2.beta.1 - rebuild for new kernels * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.4-0.2.beta - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Mar 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.4-0.1.beta - Update to Catalyst 9.4 (beta) * Sat Mar 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.3-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.3 * Sat Feb 21 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.2-2 - Fix flush_tlb_page modprobe errors on x86_64 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.2-1 - Update to Catalyst 9.2 - Use Catalyst version for Version tag instead of internal driver version * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.573-1.9.1.2 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Feb 01 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.573-1.9.1.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sat Jan 31 2009 Stewart Adam - 8.573-1.9.1 - Update to Catalyst 9.1 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Jan 18 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.5 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Jan 11 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.4 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Jan 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.3 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Dec 28 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.2 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Sun Dec 21 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-2.8.12.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Tue Dec 16 2008 Stewart Adam - 8.561-2.8.12 - Don't use /lib/modules/$KVER/build, patch in /usr/src/kernels/$KVER instead * Sun Dec 14 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.561-1.8.12.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Wed Dec 10 2008 Stewart Adam - 8.561-1.8.12 - Update to 8.12 - Remove unneeded makefile patch * Sat Nov 22 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.552-1.8.11.3 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; * Wed Nov 19 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis - 8.552-1.8.11.2 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-2 - Explicitly require libXres-devel to work around a build issue in F-10. * Sun Apr 05 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-1 - Update to 0.6.6 - Update URL tag to GitHub home page. - Update Source tag to download.gnome.org. - Add --with-nplayers-file configure option. - Require sdlmame-data >= 0.130-1 for nplayers.ini (#416). nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11.1 ------------------------------------ * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11.1 ---------------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-kmod-180.37-2.fc11.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.37-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.20 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-27.20 - rebuild for new kernels wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels xorg-x11-drv-fglrx-9.4-0.3.beta.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 04 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.4-0.3.beta - Only disable ldconfig when driver is already enabled, always configure xorg.conf even if driver is already enabled * Sat Apr 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 9.4-0.2.beta - s/i386/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 * Sat Mar 28 2009 Stewart Adam - 9.4-0.1.beta - Update to Catalyst 9.4 (beta) From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 11:36:44 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 6 11:36:46 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-06 Message-ID: <20090406093644.CFAE02406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 3 dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc10 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc10 NEW terminatorX-3.82-3.fc10 : Realtime Audio Synthesizer ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 3 dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc9 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc9 NEW terminatorX-3.82-3.fc9 : Realtime Audio Synthesizer ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 9 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-11-0.9 dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc11 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.1 libdvbpsi-0.1.6-5.fc11 NEW motion-3.2.11-5.fc11 : A motion detection system open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11.1 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc11 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11.1 NEW terminatorX-3.82-3.fc11 : Realtime Audio Synthesizer ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc10 -------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sun Apr 05 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc10 ----------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 (use pycurl, display cvs output in realtime, add support for anonymous CVS, add plague-client-rf wrapper) terminatorX-3.82-3.fc10 ----------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-3 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build failure * Thu Apr 02 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-2 - Prepared package for RPMFusion submission (originates from planetccrma) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc9 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sun Apr 05 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc9 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 (use pycurl, display cvs output in realtime, add support for anonymous CVS, add plague-client-rf wrapper) terminatorX-3.82-3.fc9 ---------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-3 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build failure * Thu Apr 02 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-2 - Prepared package for RPMFusion submission (originates from planetccrma) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-11-0.9 ------------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:11-0.9 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:11-0.8 - adjust for Fedora new kenrels scheme - use a different way to generate lists dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc11 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Thu Apr 02 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Sun Mar 29 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Sun Mar 29 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout * Thu Jan 01 2009 David Timms - 0.5.4-6.20090101svn138 - add required alphatag to post release package name - mod License to be GPLv2+ and LGPLv2 - mod -snapshot script to nuke internal ffmpeg source - mod files to use the defined name macro - include .tar.bz2 created with modified snapshot script. Still svn138 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.1 -------------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.1 - rebuild for new kernels libdvbpsi-0.1.6-5.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.1.6-5 - Rebuild motion-3.2.11-5.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-5 - Patch and rebuild for ffmpeg 0.5 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.2.11-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Mar 18 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-3 - Even more corrected init script thanks to Stewart Adam * Sun Mar 15 2009 Steven Moix - 3.2.11-2 - Removed the ffmpeg requires - Corrected the spec file - New init script with a corrected start() function and LSB header support open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11.1 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.154848-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 (use pycurl, display cvs output in realtime, add support for anonymous CVS, add plague-client-rf wrapper) sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels terminatorX-3.82-3.fc11 ----------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-3 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build failure * Wed Apr 01 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-2 - Prepared package for RPMFusion submission (originates from planetccrma) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 13:11:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 13:11:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406111152.6DC8F2C223@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-04-06 13:11:56 --- I now use this spec, maybe it's helpful: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/openmotif.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 15:35:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 15:35:15 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406133509.695782C4E0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #16 from Dave Straub 2009-04-06 15:35:15 --- (In reply to comment #15) > Actually, it should be enough to add -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF to %cmake . > No need to add a patch for this purpose. > > Let's wait for the upstream's response (but it doesn't look like they intend to > make these libraries shared). Alright, I added the overriding flag and removed the patch for CMakeLists.txt. > By the way, make sure that the Fedora specific optflags are passed. They are > not honored in the above package either. They should be. Run `rpm -E %cmake` or `cat /etc/rpm/macros.cmake`. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From mschwendt at gmail.com Mon Apr 6 17:13:02 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Mon Apr 6 17:13:19 2009 Subject: repoview at RPM Fusion In-Reply-To: <62bc09df0904060209m5814b99fh9829464731a1352c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090404120050.025495ce@faldor.intranet> <62bc09df0904060209m5814b99fh9829464731a1352c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090406171302.49dfbd2b@faldor.intranet> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:09:54 +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Changelog details in the repoview pages are reverse. Example: > > > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/repoview/vlc.html > > > > :-/ > > > > This is because in createrepo/Yum, someone either still plays with sorting > > the entries by timestamp (bad, since the timestamp accuracy is not high > > enough, they don't contain h:m:s!) or running reverse() on them at least > > once. If they are reverse() in the repo metadata, any tools that read the > > changelog entries need to run reverse() once more to fix the order. That > > is bad, too. Currently, oldest %changelog is at the top in the "other" > > metadata. > > > > Yum upstream tickets #6 and #7 fix such issues, which also mess up > > repodiff in the daily Rawhide report. Unfortunately, ticket activity has > > stalled. > > > > If anyone knows how to help here, that would be appreciated. > > > > > Ping ? > Any eta for that fix ? > For Rawhide repo metadata this patch for old repoview could be used temporarily: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/repoview-0.5.2-modified-reverse.patch For Fedora <= 10 and EPEL repodata it must not be used, however. I've checked download.fedora.redhat.com repodata files, and they don't reverse() the changelog entries. Remains the question whether RPM Fusion also uses different versions of "createrepo" for different target repos? ;) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 17:51:50 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 17:51:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406155142.C71292C51A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #17 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-06 17:51:47 --- No, see: On my system rpm -E %optflags says: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic ------------------------------------------------------------------------- On the other hand, I see this in the build log of vbam: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEBUG: /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /builddir/build/BUILD/vbam-1.8.0/CMakeFiles 32 DEBUG: [ 3%] Building C object CMakeFiles/vbamcore.dir/src/common/memgzio.o DEBUG: /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_H -DHAVE_ARPA_INET_H -DHAVE_ZLIB_H -DFINAL_VERSION -DSDL -DUSE_OPENGL -DBKPT_SUPPORT -DC_CORE -O3 -Wall -I/usr/include/SDL -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 -I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gtkglextmm-1.2 -I/usr/lib64/gtkglextmm-1.2/include -I/usr/include/gtkglext-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtkglext-1.0/include -I/usr/include/libglademm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/libglademm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DSYSCONFDIR='"/etc"' -DWITH_LIRC='0' -DVERSION='"1.8.0-SVN"' -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/vbam"' -DPACKAGE='' -o CMakeFiles/vbamcore.dir/src/common/memgzio.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/vbam-1.8.0/src/common/memgzio.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above flags are not passed, except -Wall. The sed command I gave before fixes this issue. Note that %optflags should be passed on each usage of the C/C++/Fortran compilers. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 18:15:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 18:15:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406161528.99CA62C4FC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #18 from Dave Straub 2009-04-06 18:15:36 --- (In reply to comment #17) > The above flags are not passed, except -Wall. The sed command I gave before > fixes this issue. Note that %optflags should be passed on each usage of the > C/C++/Fortran compilers. Okay thanks, I've removed their lines that override the environment flags. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 20:16:41 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 6 20:16:40 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-06 Message-ID: <20090406181641.AFA212406F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 1 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.17 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 7 blcr-kmod-0.8.0-5.fc11.2 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-11-0.10 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-3.fc11.15 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.6 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-4.fc11.7 rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc11.1 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.17 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.17 - rebuild ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: blcr-kmod-0.8.0-5.fc11.2 ------------------------ * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.1 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-4.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; buildsys-build-rpmfusion-11-0.10 -------------------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:11-0.10 - use isa to make sure we get the right kernel em8300-kmod-0.17.2-3.fc11.15 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-3.15 - rebuild for new kernels * Tue Mar 31 2009 Felix Kaechele - 0.17.2-3.14 - fixes for 2.6.29 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-2.14 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Mar 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.14 - rebuild for new kernels * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.13 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.6 -------------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2.6 - rebuild for new kernels rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-4.fc11.7 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-4.7 - rebuild for new kernels rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc11.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.0.0-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-3.1 - rebuild for new kernels From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 21:03:17 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 21:03:17 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] New: mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Summary: mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lubek@users.sourceforge.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 The project has been active for more than two years and it is currently actively maintained. The code is dual licensed under LGPLv2 and GPLv2. It cannot be in Fedora due to the valid MPEG Layer X patents. Resources for a potential packager: http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg123-1.7.2-nolibltdl.patch http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg123.spec The spec file is completely new, designed just for RPMFusion. This package requires the updated mpg321 package (see #497). Although I have filled a bug in package reviews, I do not want to be a packager. The main reason was to speed up the process and offer a potential packager something to start with instead of adding a record into the wish list. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 21:13:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 21:13:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406191344.713632C521@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-06 21:13:53 --- Some history behind this: mpg123 was originally non-Free. Thus mpg321 was written as a Free clone of it. But at some point mpg123 got relicensed, and mpg321 was abandoned (maybe because mpg123 became Free, maybe because of other reasons). So now mpg321 is obsolete and the latest mpg123 should be in RPM Fusion Free. It might make sense to drop mpg321 entirely. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 21:44:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 21:44:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406194444.5DCCB2C518@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-06 21:44:53 --- (In reply to comment #1) ... > It might make sense to drop mpg321 entirely. > I may have warned the list few months ago multiple times about this case (despite not knowing the entire history about free/nonfree). So, agreed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 22:21:38 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 22:21:37 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406202128.777E72C214@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-04-06 22:21:37 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > ... > > It might make sense to drop mpg321 entirely. > > > I may have warned the list few months ago multiple times about this case > (despite not knowing the entire history about free/nonfree). > So, agreed. > +1. There's some talk in MPlayer lists about using external libmpg123 for mp3 decoding there too (after all MPlayer fork improvements have been merged back). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 22:40:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 22:40:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 499] New: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499 Summary: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah@fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync-0.6-2.el4.src.rpm Description: zsync is a file transfer program. It allows you to download a file from a remote server, where you have a copy of an older version of the file on your computer already. zsync downloads only the new parts of the file. zsync uses the same algorithm as rsync. However, where rsync is designed for synchronising data from one computer to another within an organisation, zsync is designed for file distribution, with one file on a server to be distributed to thousands of downloaders. zsync requires no special server software just a web server to host the files and imposes no extra load on the server, making it ideal for large scale file distribution. RPMLint-Issues: rpmlint is silent Why not Fedora? zsync includes a modified zlib, we (2 and a half maintainers) tried split out the modification as a seperate function but we couldn't rebuild that against fedora zlib. patching out zlib incl. the zlibchanges fails. included dependencies are not permitted in fedora! I's very ugly but I chatted with knurd (Thorsten Leemhuis) and he said, this is not nice but should be possible for rpmfusion. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 22:40:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 22:40:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406204016.7270A2C184@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 23:03:39 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 23:03:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406210329.7A98D2C522@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #4 from Lubos Stanek 2009-04-06 23:03:39 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > ... > > > It might make sense to drop mpg321 entirely. > > > > +1. There's some talk in MPlayer lists about using external libmpg123 for mp3 > decoding there too (after all MPlayer fork improvements have been merged back). > Well, I do not want to kill your enthusiasm in kicking out a package in the interest of providing another package with the similar or the same functionality but... it is like jumping from one extreme end to the other. The mpg321 package has been proving its functionality over years, it is maintained by the Debian folks (e.g. no maintenance cost except an update once a year or so). And it is substantially smaller when the space matters. It does not interfere. I have provided the solution to distribute both packages for the benefit of the end user. I would not remove it from the distribution unless it could not be built or it would contain serious security or functional bugs. But my vote is not a casting one, the final decision depends on you, packagers. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 6 23:23:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 6 23:23:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 499] zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090406212321.BEA202C44D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-06 23:23:31 --- Having internal dependency should be avoided most, but has nothing related with making it a forbidden item from Fedora. If this package patch zlib , maybe it's patch will be included in the next zlib release. Please submit this package to fedora -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 7 02:41:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 7 02:41:50 2009 Subject: [Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090407004139.9E9C52C4F5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-04-07 02:41:51 --- Got an update. The freej guys redid their entire autotools setup. They are also gearing up for a new release, so this is based on a git checkout for the time being. SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/freej-0.10-12.20090406git.6ab131da4f54.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/freej.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 7 06:46:24 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 7 06:46:26 2009 Subject: [Bug 499] zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090407044623.3D6F92C3DB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-07 06:46:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please submit this package to fedora It was/is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 I'd say it's fine to include it in RPM Fusion *if* someone rejected it for Fedora (seems that hasn't happen yet). Then the packager(s) can work towards getting the zlib patches into the main zlib without pressure. The package can be moved to Fedora after that then. It similar to the "legal issue pending" discussion where we said we allow packages for RPM Fusion if fedora-legal needs more time to come to a final decision -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 7 08:43:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 7 08:43:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090407064355.382E22C3BE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adrian@lisas.de --- Comment #5 from Adrian Reber 2009-04-07 08:43:57 --- I have updated the spec file of mpg321 to the version of Lubos as described in #497. I am listed as the maintainer of mpg321, but I do not really care if it is dropped or not. So if someone really wants to remove it, please go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From dominik at greysector.net Tue Apr 7 18:30:34 2009 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Tue Apr 7 18:30:45 2009 Subject: rpms/mpg321/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 mpg321.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.2, 1.3 In-Reply-To: <20090407063840.A7AD618077@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090407063840.A7AD618077@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <20090407163034.GA28770@mokona.greysector.net> On Tuesday, 07 April 2009 at 08:38, Adrian Reber wrote: > Author: adrian > > Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg321/devel > In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv10712 > > Modified Files: > .cvsignore mpg321.spec sources The diff of this commit is hardly readable. You should've split the cosmetic (whitespace) changes and functional changes into separate commits. I have asked for this on the developers' list a number of times. > Index: mpg321.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/mpg321/devel/mpg321.spec,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 > --- mpg321.spec 29 Mar 2009 13:49:24 -0000 1.3 > +++ mpg321.spec 7 Apr 2009 06:38:40 -0000 1.4 > @@ -1,74 +1,103 @@ [...] > +# alternatives priority > +%define apriority 50 > +# prepare ghost alternatives > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/mpg123 > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/mp3-cmdline > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/mpg123.1 These symlinks are maintained by alternatives, so there's no need to create them explicitly. A simple touch will do. > %clean > -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > - > +%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > > %post > -/usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install %{_bindir}/mp3-cmdline \ > - mp3-cmdline %{_bindir}/mpg321 40 Shouldn't it be %{apriority} instead of 40 here? > @@ -92,6 +121,21 @@ > * Tue Feb 28 2006 Andreas Bierfert > - add dist > > +* Sun Sep 04 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-6.2 > +- Spec update. > + > +* Wed Jul 20 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-6.1 > +- update. > + > +* Mon Jul 4 2005 Matthias Saou 0.2.10-6 > +- Include printf patch to fix CAN-2003-0969 (Jens Koerber). > + > +* Mon Jan 31 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-5.1 > +- fc3 build. > + > +* Sun Sep 05 2004 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-5.1 > +- fc2 build. > + > * Fri Jan 9 2004 Ville Skytt? - 0:0.2.10.3-0.lvn.1 > - Update to 0.2.10.3 (from Debian), fixes CAN-2003-0969. > - Make alsa09 the default output device. Why are you adding old entries in the %changelog? Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From sergio.pasra at gmail.com Tue Apr 7 20:40:27 2009 From: sergio.pasra at gmail.com (Sergio Pascual) Date: Tue Apr 7 20:40:39 2009 Subject: Lastm rebuild failled Message-ID: <89b36810904071140x157cac39yf1627f68f5345e3a@mail.gmail.com> Hello, lastfm currently fails to build in F11. It seems to be a problem with a newer QT. I'm sorry I don't have time to fix this. If somebody is willing to take the bug, it is here http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 08:15:43 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 8 08:15:44 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-08 Message-ID: <20090408061543.4C77824125@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 amrnb-7.0.0.2-5.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: amrnb-7.0.0.2-5.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 7.0.0.2-5 - rebuild for new F11 features From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 08:16:41 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 8 08:16:42 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-08 Message-ID: <20090408061641.6437424125@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 blcr-0.8.1-1.fc10 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 blcr-0.8.1-1.fc9 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 11 blcr-0.8.1-1.fc11 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc11 dvd95-1.4p0-4.fc11 dvdstyler-1.7.2-3.fc11 faac-1.28-1.fc11.1 foo2zjs-0.20080826-2.fc11 k9copy-2.3.1-1.fc11 libmpeg2-0.5.1-7.fc11.1 libtunepimp-extras-freeworld-0.5.3-7.fc11 mpg321-0.2.10.6-1.fc11 mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20317.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: blcr-0.8.1-1.fc10 ----------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-3 - s/i486/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2 - rebuild for new F11 features blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc10 ---------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Neal Becker - 0.8.1-1 - Update to 0.8.1 * Mon Apr 06 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.1 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: blcr-0.8.1-1.fc9 ---------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-3 - s/i486/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-2 - rebuild for new F11 features blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc9 --------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Neal Becker - 0.8.1-1 - Update to 0.8.1 * Mon Apr 06 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.2 - rebuild for new kernels * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-5.1 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: blcr-0.8.1-1.fc11 ----------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.0-3 - s/i486/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc11 ---------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Neal Becker - 0.8.1-1 - Update to 0.8.1 dvd95-1.4p0-4.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4p0-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Nov 19 2008 Matthias Saou 1.4p0-3 - Update license tag. - Add gettext build requirement to get english by default (#114). dvdstyler-1.7.2-3.fc11 ---------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Stewart Adam - 1:1.7.2-3 - Add patch to fix gcc 4.4-related build errors * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:1.7.2-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Mar 08 2009 Stewart Adam - 1:1.7.2-1 - Remove dependency on totem-backend (#366) - Update to 1.7.2 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Stewart Adam - 1:1.7.1-4 - Remove wxsvg_freeworld patch - desktop and icon files now install correctly, don't install them manually - Remove hicolor scriptlets - Update %description faac-1.28-1.fc11.1 ------------------ * Tue Apr 07 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.28-1.1 - rebuild foo2zjs-0.20080826-2.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.20080826-2 - rebuild for new F11 features k9copy-2.3.1-1.fc11 ------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Rex Dieter 2.3.1-1 - k9copy-2.3.1 - optimize scriptlets * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.3.0-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Mar 12 2009 Rex Dieter 2.3.0-1 - k9copy-2.3.0 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Rex Dieter 2.2.0-1 - k9copy-2.2.0 * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter 2.1.0-2 - ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 (still fails) * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter 2.1.0-1 - k9copy-2.1.0 libmpeg2-0.5.1-7.fc11.1 ----------------------- * Wed Apr 08 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.5.1-7 - New attempt * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.5.1-6 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Mar 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.5.1-5 - Rebuild - Fix target_arch conditionals - Provides internal definitions mpeg2_internal.h - Disable ppc altivec optim (TODO improve asm optim later) libtunepimp-extras-freeworld-0.5.3-7.fc11 ----------------------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Rex Dieter - 0.5.3-7 - fix build (port fedora/rawhide build fixes) * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.5.3-6 - rebuild for new F11 features mpg321-0.2.10.6-1.fc11 ---------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10.6-1 - upgrade more than a year old package for several fixes - remove obsoletes to enable the real mpg123 package - rework alternatives to enable the real mpg123 package - use pulse as the default ao output - relevant Debian's changelog: - Add large file support. (Closes: #152392). - Avoid crashing on non mp3 files. (Closes: #458035). - Don't scan file before playback. (Closes: #500102). - Don't leave dangling symlink. (Closes: #227713). - Make AM_PATH_AO XIPH_PATH_AO in configure.ac. - Escape hyphens in manpage. mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20317.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20317 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 20317 From adrian at lisas.de Wed Apr 8 10:05:03 2009 From: adrian at lisas.de (Adrian Reber) Date: Wed Apr 8 10:14:36 2009 Subject: rpms/mpg321/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 mpg321.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.2, 1.3 In-Reply-To: <20090407163034.GA28770@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20090407063840.A7AD618077@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> <20090407163034.GA28770@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <20090408080503.GF4684@lisas.de> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:30:34PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 07 April 2009 at 08:38, Adrian Reber wrote: > > Author: adrian > > > > Update of /cvs/free/rpms/mpg321/devel > > In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv10712 > > > > Modified Files: > > .cvsignore mpg321.spec sources > > The diff of this commit is hardly readable. You should've split > the cosmetic (whitespace) changes and functional changes into > separate commits. I have asked for this on the developers' list > a number of times. You are right and I would have normally done it, but I tried to adapt the changes from the new spec file from the bugreport to the file in CVS and it still had so many changes that I saw no real benefit to do two commits. I was happy enough that somebody cared about mpg321.spec that I thought I rather use his spec file (which seems to be maintained) than the one not really maintained by myself. > > Index: mpg321.spec > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/mpg321/devel/mpg321.spec,v > > retrieving revision 1.3 > > retrieving revision 1.4 > > diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 > > --- mpg321.spec 29 Mar 2009 13:49:24 -0000 1.3 > > +++ mpg321.spec 7 Apr 2009 06:38:40 -0000 1.4 > > @@ -1,74 +1,103 @@ > [...] > > +# alternatives priority > > +%define apriority 50 > > > > +# prepare ghost alternatives > > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/mpg123 > > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/mp3-cmdline > > +%{__ln_s} -f %{name}.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/mpg123.1 > > These symlinks are maintained by alternatives, so there's no need > to create them explicitly. A simple touch will do. I will look into that. > > %clean > > -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > - > > +%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > > > > %post > > -/usr/sbin/update-alternatives --install %{_bindir}/mp3-cmdline \ > > - mp3-cmdline %{_bindir}/mpg321 40 > > Shouldn't it be %{apriority} instead of 40 here? Sounds like you are right. Will fix it. > > @@ -92,6 +121,21 @@ > > * Tue Feb 28 2006 Andreas Bierfert > > - add dist > > > > +* Sun Sep 04 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-6.2 > > +- Spec update. > > + > > +* Wed Jul 20 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-6.1 > > +- update. > > + > > +* Mon Jul 4 2005 Matthias Saou 0.2.10-6 > > +- Include printf patch to fix CAN-2003-0969 (Jens Koerber). > > + > > +* Mon Jan 31 2005 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-5.1 > > +- fc3 build. > > + > > +* Sun Sep 05 2004 Lubo? Stan?k - 0.2.10-5.1 > > +- fc2 build. > > + > > * Fri Jan 9 2004 Ville Skytt? - 0:0.2.10.3-0.lvn.1 > > - Update to 0.2.10.3 (from Debian), fixes CAN-2003-0969. > > - Make alsa09 the default output device. > > Why are you adding old entries in the %changelog? At one point I just copied the whole spec file from Lubo? instead of cherry picking almost everything. Adrian From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:46:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:46:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] New: Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Summary: Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: MLT is an open source multimedia framework, designed and developed for television broadcasting. It provides a toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders, web streamers and many more types of applications. The functionality of the system is provided via an assortment of ready to use tools, xml authoring components, and an extendible plug-in based API. This package hardly depend on ffmpeg library (without them is mostly useless), so this is the main reason why I put them here. rpmlint - mlt -------------- mlt.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmiracle.so.0.3.7 exit@GLIBC_2.0 mlt.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmiracle.so.0.3.7 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This warning will be removed by the author of MLT source in next release (for two weeks from now) No more warnings in source and binary RPMs. Package tested with mock for i386 and x86_64 architectures. This is one of my first packages on RPM Fusion. On Fedora I put four packages last month. But I'm not yet sponsored there, so I seeking for sponsor here. kind regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:57:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:57:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 528] New: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Summary: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 527 Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt++.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt++-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This mlt sub-project provides a C++ wrapping for the MLT library. MLT is an open source multimedia framework, designed and developed for television broadcasting. It provides a toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders, web streamers and many more types of applications. The functionality of the system is provided via an assortment of ready to use tools, xml authoring components, and an extendible plug-in based API. This package hardly depend on ffmpeg library (without them is mostly useless), so this is the main reason why I put them here. rpmlint -mlt++ -------------- mlt++-devel.i386: W: no-documentation mlt++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. There is no documentations provided by the author for devel package No more warnings in source and binary RPMs. Package tested with mock for i386 and x86_64 architectures. This is one of my first packages on RPM Fusion. On Fedora I put four packages last month. But I'm not yet sponsored there, so I seeking for sponsor here. kind regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:57:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:57:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408105730.3FCE52C4B4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |528 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:57:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:57:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408105730.EA60F2C50D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |528 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:58:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:58:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408105837.356122C2B2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |30 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 12:58:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 12:58:43 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408105837.672F82C2B2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |527 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 13:08:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:08:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 528] Review request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408110836.C44EE2C506@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the |Review request: mlt++ - C++ |MLT library |wrapper for the MLT library -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 13:09:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:09:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 528] Review request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408110901.422DA2C535@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |529 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 13:09:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:09:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408110901.173892C534@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |529 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 13:09:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:09:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] New: Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 Summary: Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 527,528 Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/kdenlive.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/kdenlive-0.7.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Kdenlive is an intuitive and powerful multi-track video editor, including most recent video technologies. Based on MLT Framework This package hardly depend on ffmpeg library, via MLT Framework and itself, using ffmpeg for webcam capturing (without them is mostly useless), so this is the main reason why I put them here. rpmlint -kdenlive ----------------- 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is clean! Package tested with mock for i386 and x86_64 architectures. This is one of my first packages on RPM Fusion. On Fedora I put four packages last month. But I'm not yet sponsored there, so I seeking for sponsor here. kind regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 13:09:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:09:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408110902.0FF942C535@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |529 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From zarko.pintar at gmail.com Wed Apr 8 13:26:01 2009 From: zarko.pintar at gmail.com (Zarko Pintar) Date: Wed Apr 8 13:26:08 2009 Subject: Kdenlive packages Message-ID: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> Hello, My name is Zarko and I bring to RPM Fusion three packages: MLT, MLT++ and Kdenlive Links are here: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 I am new here and I did not sponsored yet. On Fedora I put four packages last month but nobody yet sponsored me there. Why? I do not know, maybe my packages isn't important enough. So, Kdenlive and MLT Framework are on RPM Fusion Wishlist and these packages using ffmpeg libraries for coding/encoding, and without ffmpeg all of this staff are mostly useless. ffmpeg can not be added separatly (only at build time). All of these I checked with mock on i386 and x86_64 architectures... Also, I'm a member of development team at Kdenlive as bugreporter, translator and potentialy Fedora packager. Currently these packages are on my private Fedora repository for testing purposes. kind regards, Zarko Pintar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090408/959d8c91/attachment.html From oget.fedora at gmail.com Wed Apr 8 16:40:45 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Wed Apr 8 16:40:55 2009 Subject: Kdenlive packages In-Reply-To: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> References: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Zarko Pintar wrote: > Hello, > My name is Zarko and I bring to RPM Fusion three packages: MLT, MLT++ and > Kdenlive > Links are here: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 > > I am new here and I did not sponsored yet. On Fedora I put four packages > last month but nobody yet sponsored me there. Why? I do not know, maybe my > packages isn't important enough. > > So, Kdenlive and MLT Framework are on RPM Fusion Wishlist and these packages > using ffmpeg libraries for coding/encoding, and without ffmpeg all of this > staff are mostly useless. ffmpeg can not be added separatly (only at build > time). > > All of these I checked with mock on i386 and x86_64 architectures... > > Also, I'm a member of development team at Kdenlive as bugreporter, > translator and potentialy Fedora packager. > Currently these packages are on my private Fedora repository for testing > purposes. > > kind regards, > Zarko Pintar > Thank you for taking the step to bring these packages to RPMFusion. These packages (mlt and mlt++) have open review requests in Fedora's bugzilla but I don't think anything will come out of them. Things are going pretty slow there. Orcan From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 8 16:47:34 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 8 16:47:44 2009 Subject: Kdenlive packages In-Reply-To: References: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2009/4/8 Orcan Ogetbil : ... > > Thank you for taking the step to bring these packages to RPMFusion. > These packages (mlt and mlt++) have open review requests in Fedora's > bugzilla but I don't think anything will come out of them. Things are > going pretty slow there. But on the other side, the reason of the bug to be slow was written in the bug itself: "Nobody wanted to take care of another package splitted between fedora and another third part repository." So in order to have a package full featured, it will become RPM Fusion only. > Orcan > From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 8 17:02:40 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 8 17:02:50 2009 Subject: Kdenlive packages In-Reply-To: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> References: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2009/4/8 Zarko Pintar : > Hello, > My name is Zarko and I bring to RPM Fusion three packages: MLT, MLT++ and > Kdenlive Hi Zarko, and welcome in RPM Fusion team. > Links are here: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 As I was involved in the related review in Fedora and nobody wanted to take care of another splitted package between repositories, I can review them for RPM Fusion. Actually I'm not a sponsor in Fedora, so techically... I can only pre-review them. I'm quite experienced in this > I am new here and I did not sponsored yet. On Fedora I put four packages > last month but nobody yet sponsored me there. Why? I do not know, maybe my > packages isn't important enough. Can you send the link to your Fedora review also ? > kind regards, > Zarko Pintar > From zarko.pintar at gmail.com Wed Apr 8 19:46:51 2009 From: zarko.pintar at gmail.com (Zarko Pintar) Date: Wed Apr 8 19:47:03 2009 Subject: Kdenlive packages In-Reply-To: References: <549863200904080426j4e922cbfrc1308bcc1118c757@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <549863200904081046l14f10d9cn37543b02d279958f@mail.gmail.com> > > > Can you send the link to your Fedora review also ? > > > Of course :) photoprint: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 photoprint-borders: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 imgtarget: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 camcardsync: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 This packages I prepared for Fedora repo, but nobody yet sponsored me.... bye Zarko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090408/9261eb5f/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 20:39:24 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 20:39:24 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408183915.CB55A2C292@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-08 20:39:24 --- A few initial notes: * Can't we enable mmx at least for x86_64 ? * Please make use of the %{name} macro for consistency. For instance, %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/mlt in %files is not good. * Please make the description span 80 columns. * In %files devel %doc docs/ should probably be %doc docs/* -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 20:42:55 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 20:42:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 440] Review request: vbam - Nintendo Gameboy, Gameboy Color, and Gameboy Advance Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408184246.8BA1B2C50D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 --- Comment #19 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-08 20:42:54 --- Well, after the optflag issue is solved, the package is pretty much done. Now you need to get sponsored. For this purpose, you may want to do some unofficial reviews. Please check bug #2 for a list. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 20:47:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 20:47:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408184742.B4D212C38C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 alsadi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alsadi@ojuba.org --- Comment #1 from alsadi 2009-04-08 20:47:51 --- please feel free to make any use of http://www.ojuba.org/downloads/updates/2/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.1-0.2.svn1180.oj2.src.rpm http://www.ojuba.org/downloads/updates/2/SRPMS/mlt++-0.3.0-1.oj2.src.rpm http://www.ojuba.org/downloads/updates/2/SRPMS/kdenlive-0.7-1.oj2.src.rpm I'm not suggesting that they are better, it's just those I packed for our Fedora 10 based distro -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 21:46:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 21:46:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] New: Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 Summary: Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms2-nonfree.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms2-nonfree-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: XMMS2 is an audio framework, but it is not a general multimedia player - it will not play videos. It has a modular framework and plugin architecture for audio processing, visualisation and output, but this framework has not been designed to support video. Also the client-server design of XMMS2 (and the daemon being independent of any graphics output) practically prevents direct video output being implemented. It has support for a wide range of audio formats, which is expandable via plugins. It includes a basic CLI interface to the XMMS2 framework, but most users will want to install a graphical XMMS2 client (such as gxmms2 or esperanza). rpmlint: xmms2-nonfree.x86_64: E: no-binary This is a meta package. Therefore this warning can be ignored. why rpmfusion? This one depends on mac, which is in the nonfree repo. Note that this package is just a slightly modified version of the already approved xmms2-freeworld. Currently it contains only the nonfree mac plugin. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 21:51:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 21:51:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408195121.D78EB2C53C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-08 21:51:31 --- I don't understand the reason why to split out one sub-package if only one library is provided. the mac library could be provided by xmms-nonfree, why not ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 21:55:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 21:55:50 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408195541.C20B42C4A3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-08 21:55:51 --- I wasn't sure what would be the best approach. There are 3 ways of doing this 1- The way I did: 1 meta package, 1 mac package 2- The way you told me: 1 nonfree package containing the mac plugin 3- Just one xmms2-mac package I picked the first choice to stay consistent with the xmms2-freeworld package, but I agree that it is not a necessity for this case. Should I just change it to #2? I'm fine either way. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 22:02:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 22:02:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408200242.35D0B2C4C0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-08 22:02:51 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I wasn't sure what would be the best approach. There are 3 ways of doing this > > 1- The way I did: 1 meta package, 1 mac package > 2- The way you told me: 1 nonfree package containing the mac plugin > 3- Just one xmms2-mac package I expect using nonfree will suggest the related package will not be installed by the freeworld meta-package. whereas using xmms2-mac may not tell that, since that will just be another sub-package. now xmmm-nonfree can eventually provides xmms-mac and the description can state that only the mac xmms nonfree plugin is provided. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 22:12:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 22:12:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408201156.3A6492C3C8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-08 22:12:05 --- alright then SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms2-nonfree.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms2-nonfree-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 22:46:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 22:46:22 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408204613.5DC0B2C460@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #2 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-08 22:46:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > please feel free to make any use of > > > I'm not suggesting that they are better, it's just those I packed for our > Fedora 10 based distro Your .spec files are based (inherited) from yandex .spec files (also written for F10). I was using these (yandex's) .spec files for my builds, but I improved its with new versions of sources (MLT 0.36 and Kdenlive 0.7.2.1), resolved Rpaths in Kdenlive and added other improvements. But thanks for help! bye, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 8 23:04:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 8 23:04:10 2009 Subject: [Bug 487] Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408210401.586122C449@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-08 23:04:11 --- Two things: - Why this: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' if you are disable static at %configure (and you are!)? - Why RPM Fusion? There is nothing inside what is forbidden at Fedora repo... LGPLv2 license is free on Fedora... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From solarflow99 at gmail.com Thu Apr 9 01:11:49 2009 From: solarflow99 at gmail.com (solarflow99) Date: Thu Apr 9 01:12:04 2009 Subject: bug #2 search Message-ID: <7020fd000904081611n41f8fb5kfc5d558630ff42c0@mail.gmail.com> what is the proper way to get this listing again? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090409/6a98e02f/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 01:24:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 01:24:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 487] Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090408232428.AE4C42C54D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede 2009-04-09 01:24:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Two things: > > - Why this: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' if you are > disable static at %configure (and you are!)? > --disable static disables the building of a static (.a) file, not the building of so called libtool archives. > - Why RPM Fusion? There is nothing inside what is forbidden at Fedora repo... > LGPLv2 license is free on Fedora... > Because the mimic compression algorithm most likely is patented. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Thu Apr 9 01:30:41 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Thu Apr 9 01:30:57 2009 Subject: bug #2 search In-Reply-To: <7020fd000904081611n41f8fb5kfc5d558630ff42c0@mail.gmail.com> References: <7020fd000904081611n41f8fb5kfc5d558630ff42c0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:11 PM, solarflow99 wrote: > what is the proper way to get this listing again? > > thanks > Come again? This is the bug #2 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 It is a tracker bug for new package review requests. Each new review request must block this bug. So, what do you need from this bug? Orcan From solarflow99 at gmail.com Thu Apr 9 02:12:03 2009 From: solarflow99 at gmail.com (solarflow99) Date: Thu Apr 9 02:12:19 2009 Subject: bug #2 search In-Reply-To: References: <7020fd000904081611n41f8fb5kfc5d558630ff42c0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7020fd000904081712w72c87b38rcab19e18a57b7252@mail.gmail.com> Its the search for new package review requests RF_NEW, I must have wasted an hour trying to search for the bug list. On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:11 PM, solarflow99 wrote: > > what is the proper way to get this listing again? > > > > thanks > > > > Come again? This is the bug #2 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 > > It is a tracker bug for new package review requests. Each new review > request must block this bug. > So, what do you need from this bug? > > Orcan > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090409/cec08aa5/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 05:51:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 05:51:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409035110.EAB432C54B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 --- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-09 05:51:11 --- This package definitely needs some work. Here are some blockers: * Please remove the precompiled binary(ies) in %prep, e.g. xcode/English.lproj/MainMenu.nib/designable.nib * These files have "usr/lib/" and/or "usr/local/" hardcoded. Please fix these via sed or patch: src/context.cpp src/plugger.cpp xcode/config.h * Package does not build against gcc4.4: DEBUG: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../src/include -I../lib -I../lib/ccvt -I../lib/shout -I../lib/lo -I../lib/sdl_image -I../lib/sdl_gfx -I../lib/sdl_ttf -I../lib/flash -I../lib/goom -I../lib/cwiid -I/usr/include/slang -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/unicap -I/usr/include/ffmpeg -I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libavcodec -I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libavformat -I/usr/include/ffmpeg/libswscale -I../lib/javascript -I../lib/javascript/obj -freg-struct-return -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share\" -pipe -D_REENTRANT -freg-struct-return -fPIC -O2 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=nocona -O2 -MT frei0r.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/frei0r.Tpo -c frei0r.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/frei0r.o DEBUG: frei0r.cpp: In member function 'int Freior::open(char*)': DEBUG: frei0r.cpp:102: error: 'snprintf' was not declared in this scope DEBUG: frei0r.cpp: In member function 'void Freior::print_info()': DEBUG: frei0r.cpp:122: error: 'snprintf' was not declared in this scope Please patch this up and try to build your packages in mock/rawhide beforehand to see if they compile. * rpmlint says: freej.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 5) which can be fixed easily * You need to remove .la files from the final binary RPM. * These need not be specified explicitly: Requires: SDL SDL_ttf freetype slang Requires: fftw jack-audio-connection-kit Requires: unicap these dependencies will be added automatically by rpmbuild. * There are many libraries in the lib/ directory which are already present in Fedora. You need to patch freej to use system libraries instead of those in the lib/ directory. Even those that are not in Fedora should be packaged separately and be submitted to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 05:57:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 05:57:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409035743.454022C55A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-09 05:57:44 --- * Additionally, these files /usr/lib64/libfreej.so.0 /usr/lib64/libfreej.so.0.0.0 belong to the main package, not to the devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 08:27:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 08:27:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409062747.182EC2C566@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #2 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 08:27:49 --- (In reply to comment #1) > A few initial notes: > > * Can't we enable mmx at least for x86_64 ? Yes we can :) Enabled is now > > * Please make use of the %{name} macro for consistency. For instance, > > * Please make the description span 80 columns. > > should probably be > %doc docs/* It is done. New spec and source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.6-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 08:37:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 08:37:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 487] Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409063658.911ED2C57C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 --- Comment #3 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 08:37:00 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > > - Why RPM Fusion? There is nothing inside what is forbidden at Fedora repo... > > LGPLv2 license is free on Fedora... > > > > Because the mimic compression algorithm most likely is patented. > Hmmm, but nowhere in source is notified this patented algorithm...? COPYING file has only LGPLv2 licensing information. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 08:48:38 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 08:48:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409064835.9FCE42C575@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 08:48:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I can't build the package with my test system here but, it seems to look ok, I > dont see any obvious errors. This is about as far as I can review this package > myself, hoping a sponsor can take it from here.. > I'm not a sponsor, but I tried your package with mock under i386 and x86_64 architectures, and seems to be ok. mock - passed (i386, x86_64) rpmlint - clean. Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 08:53:29 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 08:53:29 2009 Subject: [Bug 479] Review Request: xmms-mplayer - MPlayer plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409065326.84AEF2C585@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 08:53:28 --- (In reply to comment #0) > SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms-mplayer.spec > SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/xmms-mplayer-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm > > Hmm, correct paths to spec and rpm must be this: SPEC: http://6mata.com/review/xmms-mplayer.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com/review/xmms-mplayer-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm I can not open files via :8014!! Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:25:29 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:25:29 2009 Subject: [Bug 534] New: scourge-Rogue-like RPG Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 Summary: scourge-Rogue-like RPG Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://scourgeweb.org/tiki-index.php OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leadgolem@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge-0.21.1-2.src.rpm http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge.spec S.C.O.U.R.G.E. is a rogue-like game in the fine tradition of NetHack and Moria It sports a graphical front-end, similar to glHack or the Falcon's eye. I tried to design the 3D UI as a best of both worlds from old to new: It lets you rotate the view, zoom in/out, view special effects, etc. On the other hand I've always liked the old-school isometric games like Exult or Woodward. The above description makes it sound like I developed the code in this program. I didn't. The scourge-data package which is required for this to run is licensing mess. None of it is actually ripped off, as far as I can tell. However many of the content files are either undocumented or no license is actually stated. There are no rpmlint errors or warnings from spec, src.rpm, or binary rpms. This is my first rpmfusion package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:25:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:25:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409092526.064232C581@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Gregory Schick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |534 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:31:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:31:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 535] New: Review request:scourge-Data files for scourge Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535 Summary: Review request:scourge-Data files for scourge Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://scourgeweb.org/tiki-index.php OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leadgolem@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 534 Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge-data-0.21.1-2.src.rpm http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge-data.spec Data files for scourge. The scourge-data package is a licensing mess. None of it is actually ripped off, as far as I can tell. However many of the content files are either undocumented or no license is actually stated. There are no rpmlint errors or warnings from spec, src.rpm, or binary rpms. This is my first rpmfusion package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:31:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:31:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 534] scourge-Rogue-like RPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409093112.468822C346@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 Gregory Schick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |535 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:31:17 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:31:18 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409093113.08CBD2C581@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Gregory Schick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |535 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:40:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:40:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 534] scourge-Rogue-like RPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409094026.6774B2C58A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar@gmail.com Blocks|535 | --- Comment #1 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 11:40:30 --- Hey, I am not a sponsor, but I can give you some initial clues in spec. 1st. Under %install /bin/... change with %{_bindir}/... You have .desktop file. According Fedora Guidelines you must validate .desktop files See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files If your .desktop file contain mimeinfo check this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo and you have icon, so you must update icon cache, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache regards, Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:40:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:40:31 2009 Subject: [Bug 535] Review request:scourge-Data files for scourge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409094026.A67352C58C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535 Zarko Pintar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|534 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:43:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:43:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 534] scourge-Rogue-like RPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409094352.DA8E22C598@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 --- Comment #2 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-09 11:43:56 --- Hello, Why data files are distribute separately from binary? too large, or something else? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 11:46:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 11:46:31 2009 Subject: [Bug 534] scourge-Rogue-like RPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409094626.A16482C5A5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-04-09 11:46:30 --- (In reply to comment #0) > http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge-0.21.1-2.src.rpm > http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge.spec > > S.C.O.U.R.G.E. is a rogue-like game in the fine tradition of NetHack > and Moria It sports a graphical front-end, similar to glHack or the > Falcon's eye. I tried to design the 3D UI as a best of both worlds > from old to new: It lets you rotate the view, zoom in/out, view > special effects, etc. On the other hand I've always liked the > old-school isometric games like Exult or Woodward. > > The above description makes it sound like I developed the code in this program. > I didn't. Therefore please change it. > The scourge-data package which is required for this to run is licensing mess. > None of it is actually ripped off, as far as I can tell. However many of the > content files are either undocumented or no license is actually stated. Before accepting this in RPM Fusion, I'd like that you ask upstream clarification about the license. We do not want things in RPM Fusion that can go in Fedora. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 15:31:21 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 15:31:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409133115.C27862C35A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-09 15:31:21 --- Ok... Please reduce the remove line at %install stage : rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_bindir} \ etc \ and so on mock tested on rawhide-x86_64 and rpmbuild on x86_64 F-10 - Good The xmms2 package is GPLv2+ while you are linking to a library which is not compatible with the GPLv2+ license and thus, that would be a GPL violation if the package got redistributed. For the record, RPM Fusion doesn't allow non redistributable content. Now what could be possible, is to redistribute the src.rpm only (no binaries rpm) so end-users could rebuild their own plugins. But the resulting binaries rpm would remain not redistributable. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 16:48:37 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 16:48:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409144830.95DBA2C328@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-09 16:48:37 --- Ok , as I had assumed wrong that the license is GPLv2+ whereas it is LGPLv2+ for the mac plugin, this package is APPROVED, (please fix the license to LGPLv2+ for mac/nonfree plugin) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 16:48:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 16:48:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409144852.C6E7F2C308@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |kwizart@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 16:49:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 16:49:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409144900.549D62C470@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 16:55:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 16:55:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409145535.B13C52C570@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-09 16:55:42 --- Thanks Nicolas Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: xmms2-nonfree Short Description: Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 18:59:01 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 9 18:59:01 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-09 Message-ID: <20090409165901.443612433E@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 1 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 1 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 kmediafactory-0.7.1-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc10 ----------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.3-1 - xine-lib-1.1.16.3, plugin-abi 1.26 * Fri Mar 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-4 - rebuild (faad) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.fc9 ---------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.3-1 - xine-lib-1.1.16.3, plugin-abi 1.26 * Fri Mar 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-4 - rebuild (faad) * Mon Mar 16 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-3 - Requires: xine-lib(plugin-abi)%{?_isa} = ... * Thu Mar 12 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-2 - respin for newer rpm/hashes ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: kmediafactory-0.7.1-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 08 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.7.1-1 - new upstream version: 0.7.1 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.0-0.3.rc2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Sep 04 2008 Sebastian Vahl - 0.7.0-0.2.rc2 - fix url From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 9 19:36:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 9 19:36:22 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090409173615.02FDD2C2EE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-09 19:36:22 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Package CVS request done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 10 10:25:09 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 10 10:25:10 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090410082506.5C61F2C55F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #3 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-10 10:25:09 --- Hmm, when validate whestleypreview.desktop file, I'm getting this issues: westleypreview.desktop: error: file contains key "CacheThumbnail" in group "Desktop Entry", but keys extending the format should start with "X-" westleypreview.desktop: error: file contains key "IgnoreMaximumSize" in group "Desktop Entry", but keys extending the format should start with "X-" westleypreview.desktop: error: key "MimeType" is present in group "Desktop Entry", but the type is "Service" while this key is only valid for type "Application" But, if I ignore them then this previewer works OK in KDE... I must validate .desktop files in packages, so how I can handle this type of issues? (maybe this isn't a issue, maybe it is a KDE specificum ??) Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 10 11:57:00 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 10 11:57:00 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-10 Message-ID: <20090410095700.538A92433D@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc10 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc9 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc10 --------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.7-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.7 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features vlc-0.9.9-2.fc10 ---------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-2 - Add Patch vlc-0.9.9-0.9.10git20090409.patch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc9 -------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.7-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.7 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features vlc-0.9.9-2.fc9 --------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-2 - Add Patch vlc-0.9.9-0.9.10git20090409.patch From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 10 13:28:19 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 10 13:28:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090410112814.BDFD82C51A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #4 from alsadi 2009-04-10 13:28:19 --- will they work in KDE as expected if X- is added(X-CacheThumbnail, X-IgnoreMaximumSize or X-KDE-CacheThumbnail, X-KDE-IgnoreMaximumSize) http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s08.html in the next link http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/apb.html some extensions that do not have X-KDE prefix: > For historical reasons KDE is using some KDE-specific extensions that are currently not prefixed by a X-KDE- prefix. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 10 13:42:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 10 13:42:28 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090410114223.085172C5E3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-10 13:42:27 --- I'd suggest just ignoring those complaints and skipping the validation, that .desktop file is installed into a KDE-specific directory, it is never used outside of KDE and the file works as is in KDE. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 10 13:45:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 10 13:45:04 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090410114458.A66C92C5E3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-10 13:45:03 --- FWIW, KDE's own thumbnailers also have CacheThumbnail=, IgnoreMaximumSize= and MimeType= entries. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 10:40:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 10:40:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411084052.9139B2C490@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 --- Comment #4 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-11 10:40:55 --- libkate has been APPROVED in fedora yesterday it will be available soon. This package is ready to be reviewed. ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 10:48:17 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 10:48:18 2009 Subject: [Bug 436] Review request: moonlight - Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411084814.344212C49D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436 --- Comment #28 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-11 10:48:17 --- Do you need changes with moonlight being enabled in the mono fedora package ? Does mono have been downgraded in fedora? (wasn't working for ppc). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 10:55:50 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 10:55:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 436] Review request: moonlight - Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411085547.1B1302C49F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436 --- Comment #29 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-11 10:55:50 --- I still don't like the way the spec sort it's different part. Specially having %file section before the %install ones Why are theses options not using the usual %configure macro ? %{?env_options} %{?configure_options} Why aren't you using a dist tag. Please use one. it definitely make sense to have a dist tag for binary package. (even for a noarch packages that was built using a special version of rpm) About this: >rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libmoon.so >rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/moon/plugin/*.la >rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/pkgconfig * Why this symlink is deleted ? * You should probably use that to remove .la in subdirectory (if any). find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' * Why are you removing pkgconfig ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 11:02:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 11:02:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 539] New: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539 Summary: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola@iki.fi CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status-0.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description This Perl script will display the current status of your MythTV system at the command line. It can optionally append it to the system message of the day (MOTD) on a regular basis. The package is not eligible for Fedora, since mythtv is in RPMFusion. This is my first RPMFusion package. I am a Fedora Packager, see links at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jussilehtola for my packages & reviews. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 21:12:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 21:12:17 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411191209.CF7412C36F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-11 21:12:18 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > A few initial notes: > > > > * Can't we enable mmx at least for x86_64 ? > > Yes we can :) Enabled is now > Okay, but we don't want that for ppc/ppc64 architectures. Now, looking at the configure script I don't see a --enable-mmx flag. It is already enabled by default. You just need to disable it for certain architectures, which would be ppc and ppc64. Additionally you may want to disable sse for older ix86 architectures (i586 and below). We will probably need something like ExclusiveArch: i586 i686 x86_64 ppc ppc64 Rathann and Nicolas are more experienced in these things. I hope they will give a more complete information. Btw, is the demo/ directory worth including in the %doc of the devel subpackage? The group for the main package should probably be System Environment/Libraries. Right? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 22:08:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 22:08:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411200833.1EAB02C300@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #7 from Dave Straub 2009-04-11 22:08:42 --- You might want to try replacing your cmake line with the %cmake macro. It includes the necessary cmake flags, and it will define environment variables for Fedora-specific build flags that make should use. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 11 23:17:17 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 11 23:17:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090411211707.3D0C92C328@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #4 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-11 23:17:17 --- > > Okay, but we don't want that for ppc/ppc64 architectures. Now, looking at the > configure script I don't see a --enable-mmx flag. It is already enabled by > default. You just need to disable it for certain architectures, which would be > ppc and ppc64. Additionally you may want to disable sse for older ix86 > architectures (i586 and below). We will probably need something like > > ExclusiveArch: i586 i686 x86_64 ppc ppc64 OK, I can make something like this: %configure \ --enable-gpl \ --enable-motion-est \ %ifarch ppc ppc64 --disable-mmx \ %endif --qimage-libdir=%{_qt4_libdir} \ --qimage-includedir=%{_qt4_headerdir} \ --avformat-swscale Zarko -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 11:34:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 11:34:27 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412093422.6E1FF2C363@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-12 11:34:25 --- If there's no runtime detection, enabling MMX on i586 breaks old 586-class CPUs (e.g. the original Pentium). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 11:46:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 11:47:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412094655.7BB692C303@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-12 11:46:59 --- Actually, this is a KDE 4 application, so it should be using %cmake_kde4. Please also use our _kde4_* macros in the file list where possible, in particular you should use %{_kde4_appsdir} instead of %{_datadir}/kde4/apps. The full list of our path macros can be found in the kde-filesystem specfile: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kde-filesystem/devel/kde-filesystem.spec?revision=1.38&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 12:08:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 12:08:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 540] New: Review Request: elisa-plugins-ugly - Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 Summary: Review Request: elisa-plugins-ugly - Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: matthias@rpmforge.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-ugly/elisa-plugins-ugly.spec http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-ugly/elisa-plugins-ugly-0.5.30-1.src.rpm This package contains the ugly set of plugins for the Elisa Media Center, plugins which might present licensing or other similar issues. Not in Fedora : Currently there are no license issue AFAICS, but there could be at any time. The current plugins are probably considered "ugly" because they access remote services in non standard ways (flickr, shoutcast, youtube), which could present issues. Not having it in Fedora also helps put in the "gstreamer-plugins-ugly" dependency here. rpmlint output : elisa-plugins-ugly.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint output reason : There is no documentation shipped with this package, not even a copy of the GPL (though all of the sources have their headers mentioning the GPL properly). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 12:18:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 12:18:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 540] Review Request: elisa-plugins-ugly - Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412101850.550E12C33A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-12 12:18:54 --- Oh, I just realized that it requires python-twill, which I need to submit for inclusion in Fedora, since the original request has been abandoned. See : Old: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 New: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 12:24:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 12:24:01 2009 Subject: [Bug 540] Review Request: elisa-plugins-ugly - Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412102357.259A92C346@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-12 12:24:01 --- This package iirc was in freshrpms and an older version even was imported (but never built?) for RPM Fusion. Not sure if it need a new review, but I'd tend to say "no", as all the other packages that came from only one repo went in RPM Fusion without a special review when RPM Fusion was formed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 14:15:09 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 12 14:15:09 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (EL - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-12 Message-ID: <20090412121509.CE54924358@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (EL - free) testing/5: 2 dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.el5 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.el5 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (EL - free) testing/5: dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.el5 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sun Apr 05 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.3-1.el5 ---------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 04 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.3-1 - xine-lib-1.1.16.3, plugin-abi 1.26 * Fri Mar 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-4 - rebuild (faad) * Mon Mar 16 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-3 - Requires: xine-lib(plugin-abi)%{?_isa} = ... * Thu Mar 12 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.2-2 - respin for newer rpm/hashes From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 14:17:48 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 12 14:17:48 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-12 Message-ID: <20090412121748.B7D0A24358@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) testing/5: 1 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.el5 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) testing/5: pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.el5 ------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 12 14:43:31 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 12 14:43:44 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed, but there are still some to go. Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: # opened changed component summary 469 2009-03-29 Tue 18:26 avidemux avidemux has failed the mass rebuild 502 Tue 18:41 Tue 18:41 snes9x failed during massrebuild for F11 503 Tue 18:42 Tue 18:42 raine failed during massrebuild for F11 504 Tue 18:43 Tue 18:43 comical failed during massrebuild for F11 505 Tue 18:45 Tue 18:45 sidplay failed during massrebuild for F11 507 Tue 19:01 Tue 19:01 mjpegtoo failed during massrebuild for F11 508 Tue 19:08 Tue 19:08 streamri failed during massrebuild for F11 510 Tue 19:09 Tue 19:09 subtitle failed during massrebuild for F11 513 Tue 19:14 Tue 19:14 gcube failed during massrebuild for F11 514 Tue 19:14 Tue 19:14 streamdv failed during massrebuild for F11 516 Tue 19:16 Tue 19:16 flvtool2 failed during massrebuild for F11 521 Tue 19:21 Tue 19:21 libdlna failed during massrebuild for F11 522 Tue 19:21 Tue 19:21 smc failed during massrebuild for F11 523 Tue 19:22 Tue 20:19 dvdstyle failed during massrebuild for F11 518 Tue 19:18 Tue 21:58 lastfm failed during massrebuild for F11 519 Tue 19:19 22:39:20 vdr-mp3 failed during massrebuild for F11 Up2date list: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=501&hide_resolved=1 Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. Cu knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 18:35:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 18:35:33 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412163526.685002C3B8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #21 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-12 18:35:33 --- (In reply to comment #19) > > 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files) > > I was under impression rpaths are used here (and we are not having only the > standard rpaths), but I'll check and see what can be done. /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so uses RPATH to locate other .so-s in /usr/lib/virtualbox. I'm not going to remove those. > > 03 setuid on binaries (easy fix) > > This was upstream decision and I'd be careful to change that. On the other > hand, having the beast completely setuid really doesn't sound much sane to me. > What would you do with that? Use consolehelper? (well, you see, PolicyKit is > probably not going to happen ;) > > > VirtualBox-OSE-devel-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : > > ----------------------------------------- > > 17 executable scripts issues (easy fix) > > Will take a look. Fixed. > > VirtualBox-OSE-guest-2.1.4-2.fc11.i586 : > > ----------------------------------------- > > 04 unstripped binary (easy fix) > > See above. > > > 02 executable files in modules sub-dir /etc/sysconfig/modules > > This makes sense to be executable, no? > Yes, other files there are executable as well. > > Package tree and dependencies : > > ------------------------------------ > > Currently -guest and main packages provide the same virtual (-kmod-common's) > > which's harmless at first sight but, imply to install main package even on the > > guest system. > > As kmod package requires -kmod-common, that's sound fair enough as kmod package > > is shipped with both main vboxdrv and Guest drivers. > > The current state is when trying to install -guest, it's looking for kmod > > package which's looking for -kmod-common which pull down main package and > > -guest's. > > This sounds like a yum (a bug?) glitch to me. I would not expect such behavior, > will need to check. > > > Also note that udev's rule (kmod common file) which's required by vboxdrv is > > shipped by main package. > > And only main package makes use of vboxdrv. Makes sense to me. > > > Actually, the easiest way to avoid a such thing is to build a > > kmod-VirtualBox-OSE and kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-GuestAddition packages. > > That will also avoid to install vboxdrv on guest which is useless. > > Sounds like too much overhead to me and I'd prefer to avoid as much as I can. So I tried that and I could not reproduce your problem: [root@localhost vboxrepo]# yum install VirtualBox-OSE-guest ... Installing: VirtualBox-OSE-guest i586 2.1.4-2.fc11 vbox 483 k Installing for dependencies: kmod-VirtualBox-OSE i586 2.1.4-1.fc11 vbox 2.9 k kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-2.6.29.1-54.fc11.i586 i586 2.1.4-1.fc11 vbox 134 k I'm not going to split the 134k package even more, hope you understand that :) Given you haven't replied on the rest, I'm assuming you don't object. Also, new version is out, but I'm not going to update the reviewed package since I've already wasted too much time doing that four times without a single line of feedback from you. I hope you understand that. (In reply to comment #20) > In reply to comment #19 > > 03 setuid on binaries (easy fix) > > This was upstream decision and I'd be careful to change that. On the other > hand, having the beast completely setuid really doesn't sound much sane to me. > What would you do with that? Use consolehelper? (well, you see, PolicyKit is > probably not going to happen ;) > > File capabilities (man setcap) are afaik what should be used instead of suid > binaries if possible. Finally this. I did nothing here as well :) I've prepared spec file that would set capabilities on file and got this: RPM build errors: File capability support not built in File capability support not built in File capability support not built in What VirtualBox does with the setuid bit is dropping the all the capabilities besides raw network access for nat and icmp with "all-eip cap_net_raw+ep" and then drops setuid. I believe filesystem capabilities would be nicer, but this is not all that bad and I'd prefer to stick with it before our rpm gains filesystem capabilities support. Not deviating from upstream is a strong argument as well. Sooooo... the new package (no big changes, everything explained though) Main package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/VirtualBox-OSE.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-3.fc11.src.rpm Kernel module (stays the same): SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 19:35:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 19:35:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 540] Review Request: elisa-plugins-ugly - Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412173541.152172C3AF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-12 19:35:49 --- You're absolutely right! I'll proceed to importing the required versions in CVS then, though I probably won't build them until python-twill has been reviewed and is available in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 20:01:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 20:01:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 539] Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412180149.6B79A2C170@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-12 20:01:57 --- Fixed sysconfig file location and motd update. Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status-0.9.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 12 23:55:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 12 23:55:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412215542.25E052C33B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #9 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-12 23:55:52 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually, this is a KDE 4 application, so it should be using %cmake_kde4. > > Please also use our _kde4_* macros in the file list where possible, in > particular you should use %{_kde4_appsdir} instead of %{_datadir}/kde4/apps. I just converted spec file to use kde4 macros. http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/kdenlive.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/kdenlive-0.7.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 01:59:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 01:59:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090412235902.F276A2C30C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 --- Comment #5 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-04-13 01:59:14 --- Sorry for the delay, (In reply to comment #4) > You have packaged cuda like if it was a library, but it is a more a compiler > than a library. I don't think using a -devel will make sense. Yes, I was unsure about this, I've removed the -devel subpackage now. > Usually, Fedora guideline are pretty clear on the name of the package, it need > to be the name of the "source tarball". In this case, it should be cudatoolkit. > I would agree to use only cuda (which is the kown product name), but having the > package named cudatoolkit and eventually provides cuda seems the prefered way. > I'm aware that historically, the package name has changed. (and may change with > newer version also). Done, although I'd note that the general rule is "tarball name OR project name". > - Does the package need to be (can be) multilib compliant or multiarch > compliant. At this time it is neither mutlilibs nor multiarches compliant. > (it may not be relevant) I've split the libraries into a -libs subpackage, so this is now multilib. Multiarch doesn't make sense IMO. > - There is also a cuda-sdk (cuda-devel ?) > http://www.nvidia.com/object/thankyou_linux.html?url=/compute/cuda/2_1/SDK/cuda-sdk-linux-2.10.1215.2015-3233425.run > Is it needed along with cuda ? No, it isn't, it contains mostly code samples. I do not find it worth packaging now. > * - Development/Languages seems more accurate to describe the rpm Group. Done > * - Does Cg is needed (bundled within) for this package ? > And which version it might work best with ? Where do you see it bundled? Maybe I just misunderstood the question... > * - The package are binary only, but nvidia currently only certify it on F-9 > and EL-5. Also with the rpm strongerHash feature, rpm built on F-10 and beyond > could not be compatible with older distro. Thus I think the disttag must be > re-enabled. Of course, just didn't notice it is missing. Added, thanks. > > * For the debuginfo, You can have a look on the rar review at rpmfusion to see > how debuginfo can be disabled without touching binaries, or with > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia\* to override the build id while extracting debuginfo. > Thanks for hint, used the method from xorg...nvidia. > * please use %{version} for the Source0/1. Done. > * Please use install with -p whenever it is possible to prevent timestamp > change. (for example, when installing the initscript or when you convert the > doc in utf8). That will avoid. Done, converting has been already done by touch -r. > * scriplets need to end with || : to avoid rpm transaction to be canceled if > something went wrong for any reason. (i don't know why an initscript would be > needed - will check later) > Fixed, there were also others like "mv" which must be appended with ||: so as not to fail on 32bit (moving into same dir). See the new SPEC file and SRPM in http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 04:17:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 04:17:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413021704.F421A2C326@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-13 04:17:03 --- (In reply to comment #5) > If there's no runtime detection, enabling MMX on i586 breaks old 586-class CPUs > (e.g. the original Pentium). > Yes, but the question is: Does this software need to support such old hardware? Is it worth? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 05:23:04 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 05:23:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413032304.256742C3BD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jarod@wilsonet.com --- Comment #7 from Jarod Wilson 2009-04-13 05:23:04 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > If there's no runtime detection, enabling MMX on i586 breaks old 586-class CPUs > > (e.g. the original Pentium). > > > > Yes, but the question is: Does this software need to support such old hardware? > Is it worth? My $.02 USD: enable MMX, screw the 586 users. Anyone still using 586-class hardware really has no business running a video editor. Hell, at least enabling MMX might make it bearable to use on a P-III or something... Of course, I'm a 64-bit snob -- I'm still amazed how many people don't run 64-bit hardware yet. ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 07:26:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 07:26:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413052559.E45512C331@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-13 07:26:01 --- I reviewed this. I have 2 cosmetics suggestions and there are 3 blockers: ! Please make the description span evenly, to 80 columns. It'll look nicer. ! You can pass mandir=PREFIX/share/man to "scons install" line to save yourself from the trouble * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. * Compiler flags must be appropriate. The Fedora specific flags are not passed during the linking phase. Afaik, at least -g -Wall needs to be passed. * More importantly, during "scons install" the code gets rebuilt, which is bad. Moreover, this time it gets built without optflags at all, even during the compilation. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 09:55:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 09:55:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413075549.BD17B2C296@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 09:55:52 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > If there's no runtime detection, enabling MMX on i586 breaks old 586-class CPUs > > > (e.g. the original Pentium). > > > > > > > Yes, but the question is: Does this software need to support such old hardware? > > Is it worth? > > My $.02 USD: enable MMX, screw the 586 users. Anyone still using 586-class > hardware really has no business running a video editor. Hell, at least enabling > MMX might make it bearable to use on a P-III or something... Of course, I'm a > 64-bit snob -- I'm still amazed how many people don't run 64-bit hardware yet. > ;) I agree. MMX is found on everything from Pentium MMX up. If there is still someone running an original Pentium (max freq 200MHz), s/he'll be happy with Fedora still being able to install [in less than 24 hours]. The hardware's 13 years old! Of course, if you want to be extra courteous, you can make a -nommx package, although I severely doubt whether anyone would be using it :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 10:39:20 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 10:39:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 539] Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413083916.9958F2C3DC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 10:39:19 --- Now motd update really works. Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status-0.9.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 11:30:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 11:30:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413093030.436532C28A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #9 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-13 11:30:33 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > If there's no runtime detection, enabling MMX on i586 breaks old 586-class CPUs > > (e.g. the original Pentium). > > > > Yes, but the question is: Does this software need to support such old hardware? > Is it worth? > MLT, Kdenlive, Video editing are things bonded to new class processors (newer then old 586s). My standing is disable MMX only on PPC and PPC64 architectures... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 14:52:24 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 13 14:52:25 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-13 Message-ID: <20090413125224.2A3012433D@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 1 devede-3.12c-3.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 devede-3.12c-3.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 7 devede-3.12c-3.fc11 libdlna-0.2.3-12.fc11 lxdream-0.9-3.fc11 SheepShaver-2.3-0.8.20060514.fc11 ultrastardx-1.1.1-1.7.20090411.fc11 vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-4.fc11 vlc-1.0.0-0.2pre1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: devede-3.12c-3.fc10 ------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-3 - Fixed greek translation (BZ #494) * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-2 - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: devede-3.12c-3.fc9 ------------------ * Tue Apr 07 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-3 - Fixed greek translation (BZ #494) * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-2 - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: devede-3.12c-3.fc11 ------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-3 - Fixed greek translation (BZ #494) libdlna-0.2.3-12.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Apr 12 2009 Eric Tanguy - 0.2.3-12 - rebuild * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.3-11 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.2.3-10 - rebuild against new ffmpeg lxdream-0.9-3.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Apr 12 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9-3 - s/i386/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 SheepShaver-2.3-0.8.20060514.fc11 --------------------------------- * Sun Apr 12 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.3-0.8.20060514 - s/i386/i586/ in ExclusiveArch for F11 ultrastardx-1.1.1-1.7.20090411.fc11 ----------------------------------- * Sat Apr 11 2009 Felix Kaechele - 1.1.1-1.7.20090411 - new snapshot - fixed typos * Wed Apr 01 2009 Felix Kaechele - 1.1.1-1.6.20090331 - new snapshot and reworked ffmpeg headers * Tue Mar 31 2009 Felix Kaechele - 1.1.1-1.5.20090303 - fixed font deps * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.1.1-1.4.20090303 - rebuild for new F11 features vdr-dxr3-0.2.8-4.fc11 --------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2.8-4 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Dec 20 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski - 0.2.8-3 - rebuild against new ffmpeg vlc-1.0.0-0.2pre1.fc11 ---------------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.0.0-0.2pre1 - Re-enable xxmc - Remove libmpeg2 out From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 14:54:24 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 13 14:54:23 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-13 Message-ID: <20090413125424.2B0642433D@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 3 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc10 sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc10 NEW xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc10 : Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 3 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc9 sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc9 NEW xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc9 : Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 2 sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc11 NEW xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc11 : Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc10 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 11 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.4.0130u3 - Updated to 0.130u3 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0131-0.3.0130u2 - rebuild for new F11 features xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc10 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 10 2009 John Doe 0.5-3 - License is LGPLv2+ - Some SPEC file cosmetics * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-1 - Initial package for RPMFusion (SPEC file is a slightly modified version of xmms2-freeworld) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc9 --------------------------- * Sat Apr 11 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.4.0130u3 - Updated to 0.130u3 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0131-0.3.0130u2 - rebuild for new F11 features xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc9 ----------------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 John Doe 0.5-3 - License is LGPLv2+ - Some SPEC file cosmetics * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-1 - Initial package for RPMFusion (SPEC file is a slightly modified version of xmms2-freeworld) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: sdlmame-0131-0.4.0130u3.fc11 ---------------------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.4.0130u3 - Updated to 0.130u3 xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc11 ------------------------ * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-3 - License is LGPLv2+ - Some SPEC file cosmetics * Wed Apr 08 2009 John Doe 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage * Wed Apr 08 2009 John Doe 0.5-1 - Initial package for RPMFusion (SPEC file is a slightly modified version of xmms2-freeworld) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 16:09:12 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 16:09:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413140906.047E42C47F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #10 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-13 16:09:12 --- Now I reslove MMX problem, and demo files. > The group for the main package should probably be System Environment/Libraries. > Right? MLT is a framework, so it is a development staff. I think that group for MLT must stay Development/Libraries instead of System Environment. New spec and source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.6-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 19:01:04 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 19:01:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] New: Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 Summary: Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola@iki.fi CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport-0.5-1.0.20090412.svn.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: nuvexport.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency id3lib nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/MP4.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/cli.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DVCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/XviD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/NUV_SQL.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/VCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/mencoder.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/generic.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/PSP.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/ASF.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/ui.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/shared_utils.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/mencoder/XviD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/mythtv/recordings.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/SVCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/task.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/help.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DivX.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/VCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/XviD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/DVD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/DVCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/SVCD.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/MP3.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/mythtv/nuvinfo.pm nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DVD.pm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 29 errors, 0 warnings. The explicit lib dependency error is caused by the name of id3lib, and doesn't cause any concern. The rest are script-without-shebang warnings, which shouldn't cause any concern. In fact, two of the files (export/ffmpeg/MP4.pm and nuv_export/help.pm) have shebangs "#!/usr/bin/perl -w" but still cause rpmlint errors. The ffmpeg and transcode dependencies are in development but not yet in F10. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 21:57:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 21:57:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413195731.81C6F2C3E7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier@bachelot.org --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-13 21:57:40 --- You can fix all the script-without-shebang errors by removing the executable bit on the corresponding files. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 22:15:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 22:14:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413201451.A831A2C4AB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-13 22:15:01 --- Done, seems to work still. Also, the last SRPM had the wrong release tag; the first number must be 0 since this is a svn release. Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport-0.5-0.2.0.20090412.svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 23:12:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 23:12:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413211224.91EE72C4DF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 Chris Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lists@forevermore.net --- Comment #3 from Chris Petersen 2009-04-13 23:12:34 --- I'm the upstream maintainer of this package.. Just curious where those executable bits are coming from, since they're not present in my own package. Anyway, I've applied most of these changes to my upstream package to make future updates a bit easier. I'll try to tackle the rest once I have some free time outside of work. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 23:30:10 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 23:30:09 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413213000.766752C4EB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@till.name --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2009-04-13 23:30:10 --- The Makefile installs the modules with executable permissions: 75 .???# Install the modules 76 .???@for i in ${MODULES} ; do \ 77 .??? ${INSTALL} -Dv ${OWNER} -m 0755 $$i ${MODDIR}/$$i; \ 78 .???done -m 0755 should be -m 0644 to remove the executable bits. This would be easy to spot in the build.log, if there was not "@" in front of the for. ;-) Therefore a patch to the Makefile is a nicer solution, than to remove the executable bits afterwards. This also applies for the config files. Btw. you should also add INSTALL="install -p" to the %makeinstall command to preserve the timestamps of the files. Also I would patch the Makefile to support DESTDIR, i.e. change the install lines to ${INSTALL} -Dv ${OWNER} -m 0755 $$i $(DESTDIR)${MODDIR}/$$i and similiar. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 13 23:39:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 13 23:39:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413213943.E71152C47B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 --- Comment #5 from Chris Petersen 2009-04-13 23:39:53 --- Hah. That's what I get for just assuming I was using Makefile.PL like I do for the mythtv perl bindings. The nuvexport makefile was written by someone else a long time ago. I guess I'll have to go through and modernize it a bit (it's causing some weird rpmlint error on my own stuff complaining about directories with 02755 perms, although I don't see where that's coming from). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 00:37:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 00:37:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090413223729.8316B2C4F5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 --- Comment #6 from Chris Petersen 2009-04-14 00:37:40 --- Yeah, I'll get these fixed up on my end tonight/tomorrow (I have some non-computer-related plans tonight that may delay things). The Makefile was written for me by a contributor a long time ago. I suspect the 0755 was added because it's set up to have install create the directories instead of doing `mkdir -p`. I'll just switch it over to call mkdir directly (and remove the @ stuff). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 11:50:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 11:50:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 48] Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414095031.412522C522@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 11:50:34 --- freir0-plugins is now available in fedora. According to our packaging standard, there is a need to search for 64bit dso in /usr/lib64. But the freir0 api doesn't obbey to this rule. This probably need to be tweaked in the related application... (I can have a look if needed). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296849 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 11:55:39 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 11:55:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414095535.050E92C52B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 11:55:38 --- freir0-plugins is now available in fedora. According to our packaging standard, there is a need to search for 64bit dso in /usr/lib64. But the freir0 api doesn't obbey to this rule. This probably need to be tweaked in the related application... (I can have a look if needed). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1296849 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 12:02:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 12:02:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414100252.05EDA2C500@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #12 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-14 12:02:55 --- (In reply to comment #11) > freir0-plugins is now available in fedora. > Good! :) So, I'll add frei0r-plugins into mlt build. Currently, I'm preparing my development environment (mock and other staff) for use with upcoming Fedora 11 and gcc 4.4. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 12:12:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 12:12:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414101231.EC40F2C511@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-14 12:12:35 --- Chris: if you're upstream, then maybe you'd like to take over this package? I'm just interested in getting a working nuvexport rpm on my MythTV box :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 12:41:04 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 12:41:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414104059.E81D82C534@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 12:41:04 --- SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/ffmpeg2dirac/ffmpeg2dirac.spec SRPMS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/ffmpeg2dirac/ffmpeg2dirac-0.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Summary : Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora Cchangelog - Better scons scheme - Better description if scons environnement get changed between build and install step, the content get rebuild. Issuing the same env will prevent any rebuild at install step. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 14:30:15 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 14 14:30:16 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-14 Message-ID: <20090414123015.4FCB524367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 1 mythtv-0.21-18.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 gcube-0.4-8.fc11 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: mythtv-0.21-18.fc10 ------------------- * Tue Apr 14 2009 Jarod Wilson - 0.21-18 - Update release-0-21-fixes patches (r20373) - Slide Requires: wget into more appropriate places (rfbz#384) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: gcube-0.4-8.fc11 ---------------- * Mon Apr 13 2009 David Timms 0.4-8 - fix conflicting types in types.h by using * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.4-7 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Sep 28 2008 David Timms 0.4-6 - mod asm compile logic to retry build on ppc64 builder {adrian, rathann} - remove excludearch ppc64 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc11 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 Xavier lamien - 1.54.4 - Fix pool_controller against kernel-2.6.29. * Thu Apr 23 2009 Xavier lamien - 1.54.3 - Disable iw-event drv patch (inclued by upstream). * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-2.19 - rebuild for new kernels * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-2.18 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sat Feb 21 2009 Xavier Lamien - 1.54-1 - Update release. * Sun Feb 15 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.18 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 18:47:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 18:47:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] New: review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 Summary: review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: david@hlacik.eu CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Hello guys, I have finally prepared patched libraries for Fedora, which will provide beautiful fonts experience from Ubuntu to Fedora. I am writing about LCD patches which are applied to cairo, libXft and fontconfig libraries and bring us patented subpixel hinting technology for drawing beautiful fonts on LCD . Little history : David Tuner of freetype created some excellent patches which provide superior subpixel redering which very much improves the appearance of fonts. At one time, these patches were readily available and could be applied to the packages of the day. Since then, David Turner made the decision that these patches could infringe on patents and so since then, these patches have not been maintained and upgraded to the latest packages. The freetype portion of the patches does exist in current freetype packages, but is shipped disabled. Unfortunately, there are 2 other areas where patches are needed and these are not maintained: cairo and Xft. Without the cairo and Xft patches, I could not get acceptable subpixel rendering. Here are the sample screens from my desktop Fedora 10 on Gnome http://power.polarion.com/_review/screen1.png http://power.polarion.com/_review/screen2.png I prepared four packages, freetype-lcd , cairo-lcd, libXft-lcd, fontconfig-lcd. As all packages are required they do depend on self. Of course to met package guidelines i am not replacing any current packages nor files in Fedora. Instead of this I am overriding paths to libraries using ld.so.conf.d (some as freetype-freeworld does) freetype-lcd SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/freetype-lcd.spec SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/freetype-lcd-2.3.9-4.1.fc10.src.rpm cairo-lcd SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/cairo-lcd.spec SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/cairo-lcd-1.8.6-1.2.fc10.src.rpm libXft-lcd SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/libXft-lcd.spec SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/libXft-lcd-2.1.13-3.1.fc10.src.rpm fontconfig-lcd SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/fontconfig-lcd.spec SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/fontconfig-lcd-2.6.0-1.12.fc10.src.rpm I believe this is a revolutionary enhancement for us. Why? Try those packages by yourself : http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/freetype-lcd-2.3.9-4.1.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/libXft-lcd-2.1.13-3.1.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/cairo-lcd-1.8.6-1.2.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/fontconfig-lcd-2.6.0-1.12.fc10.x86_64.rpm After installed, log out and log in, go to Gnome System -> Preferences -> Look and Feel -> Appearance . Go to Fonts Tab and enable Subpixel smoothing (LCDs) I would like to have an short wiki page on rpmfusion.org where I will describe all possible font settings, hintings (slight,medium,full) as well as other configurations to make fonts look superb. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 18:47:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 18:47:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414164741.9F2A62C55E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 David Hlacik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |547 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From david at hlacik.eu Tue Apr 14 18:54:25 2009 From: david at hlacik.eu (=?ISO-8859-2?B?RGF2aWQgSGzh6Glr?=) Date: Tue Apr 14 18:54:37 2009 Subject: Fwd: how to add a packages to rpmfusion: cairo, libXft, freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi guys, I have finally finished my LCD patched packages which provides "clear-type like" experience for Fedora Users. Please have a look at https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 I need a sponsor as I am a new there. To describe myself : I am 24 years Linux IT administrator, freelance developer (I already have 3 commercially attractive projects) . I am open source enthusiast, working with Fedora since FC6 . I am working for very well known company which develops application management software. I am preparing Linux RPM packages for our products there. Thanks, David ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Hl??ik Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:49 PM Subject: how to add a packages to rpmfusion: cairo, libXft, freetype To: rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org Hi, long time ago I promised to create packages suitable for rpmfusion for following : Request: freetype (with patches to support subpixel rendering and bytecode interpreter) Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine URL: http://www.freetype.org Why not in Fedora: Patent issues regarding cleartype filtering and bytecode interpreter Notes: this package should be part of a logical group of other patched packages supporting better subpixel rendering in Fedora, to bring up the font rendering to the level of Ubuntu, Windows XP/Vista and MacOS/X. These packages are: cairo, freetype, fontconfig, libXft (and maybe pixman, this should be checked). Source packages already exist with patches supporting these features for all the above packages at: ftp://brebs.me.uk/fedora/10/. Further info: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-186789.html Request: cairo (with patches to support cleartype filtering) Summary: A vector graphics library URL: http://cairographics.org Why not in Fedora: Patent issues regarding cleartype filtering Notes: this package should be part of a logical group of other patched packages supporting better subpixel rendering in Fedora, to bring up the font rendering to the level of Ubuntu, Windows XP/Vista and MacOS/X. These packages are: cairo, freetype, fontconfig, libXft (and maybe pixman, this should be checked). Source packages already exist with patches supporting these features for all the above packages at: ftp://brebs.me.uk/fedora/10/. Further info: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-186789.html Request: libXft (with cleartype filtering patches) Summary: X.Org X11 libXft runtime library URL: http://www.x.org Why not in Fedora: Patent issues regarding cleartype filtering Notes: this package should be part of a logical group of other patched packages supporting better subpixel rendering in Fedora, to bring up the font rendering to the level of Ubuntu, Windows XP/Vista and MacOS/X. These packages are: cairo, freetype, fontconfig, libXft (and maybe pixman, this should be checked). Source packages already exist with patches supporting these features for all the above packages at: ftp://brebs.me.uk/fedora/10/. Further info: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-186789.html I would like to implement them the same way as freetype-freeworld is implemented (by owerriding library in ld.so.config). Those packages will come from original fedora cairo,libXft,freetype packages and will be patched with LCD filter patch , named afterwards as freetype-freeworld, cairo-freeworld, libXft-freeworld. So we can catch the Ubuntu and have the nice fonts afterwards :). I am using those packages on my own, have them prepared (not overriding libraries now) for fedora 10 and it looks awesome. How should I proceed with this, to be sure, that my effort invested to development this packages will by payed by including those packages to rpmfusion-nonfree repository (and writing short howto on rpmfusion.org wiki) to make people aware of that. Thanks, David Hlacik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090414/ecdd39d9/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:03:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:03:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414170255.753E02C530@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-14 19:03:03 --- I really don't understand this whole deal. I have been using LCD for quite a while and I never found the Fedora fonts ugly at all. I don't think I did anything special to font rendering other than installing standard Fedora packages. My fonts are just as beautiful as the ones that are in your screenshots. But I use KDE, not Gnome. Does KDE handle things differently? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:08:45 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:08:44 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414170837.D25A22C530@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #2 from David Hlacik 2009-04-14 19:08:45 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I really don't understand this whole deal. I have been using LCD for quite a > while and I never found the Fedora fonts ugly at all. I don't think I did > anything special to font rendering other than installing standard Fedora > packages. > My fonts are just as beautiful as the ones that are in your screenshots. > > But I use KDE, not Gnome. Does KDE handle things differently? > Yes, KDE is based on qt , which has its own rendering, and does not depends on cairo as GTK apps. Of course you are used to them for many years, please try the packages and tell me about the difference ... Br, David -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:12:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:12:40 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414171232.C94232C56C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 19:12:40 --- It would be better to provide a separate review for each packages. It is also "preferred" to use the -freeworld namespace for rpmfusion_free alternative of fedora package. Furthermore, you need to work with the freetype-freeworld maintainer to have the patches "eventually" merged in the freetype-freeworld package. If not doable, your package will need to conflict the freetype-freeworld once. (which leads to a new problem, we do not package conflicting package "whenever it is possible"). Then i guess it will be easier to have another keyworld for such replacement package. (lcd isn't a clear enought keyworld for me as it suggests the replaced packages are less usefull on lcd). (which works reasonably well for me as a Gnome user - Indeed , I don't see any difference between the two images.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:20:39 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:20:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414172031.5FEEC2C553@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-14 19:20:39 --- Everything seems nicer now, except the optflags are still not used during the linking. You should be able to use the APPEND_LINKFLAGS variable to fix it. Otherwise this is good to go: --------------------------------------------- This package ffmpeg2dirac is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:35:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:35:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414173458.0C36E2C46C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 --- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 19:35:06 --- where do you see any flags are needed at linking ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 19:56:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 19:56:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414175613.849152C563@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |33 --- Comment #9 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-14 19:56:21 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: ffmpeg2dirac Short Description: Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora Owners: kwizart Branches: devel InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free Reminder, this package is only requested on F-11 because of the high dependencies it needs. (the LDFLAGS question might be interesting to be asked on fedora-devel). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 20:45:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 20:45:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414184521.106C02C50F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-14 20:45:29 --- ping Justin: Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 21:29:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 21:29:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 545] Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414192944.DE3482C3E6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545 --- Comment #8 from Chris Petersen 2009-04-14 21:29:53 --- I'd say "sure" except that my (in)ability to find time to even maintain the few things I do in Fedora would indicate that I'm a bad choice. However, I'm happy to backport changes to my upstream spec to make sure that it works here with minimal effort (also one of the main reason that Jarod and I took over maintaining the spec for MythTV itself -- to make sure it matched rpmfusion). I'll try to be better about posting "nuvexport updated" notes to the mythtv list, though. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 14 22:27:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 14 22:27:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090414202737.346292C542@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-14 22:27:46 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (which works reasonably well for me as a Gnome user - Indeed , I don't see any > difference between the two images.) > Me too, maybe because they show a different content. Can you please attach a couple of screenshots with the same content before and after installing these packages? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 15 06:47:54 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 15 06:47:59 2009 Subject: Heads-up to kmod packagers: 2.6.29 heading to updates-testing Message-ID: <49E566FA.3070806@leemhuis.info> Hi! See $SUBJECT. Details: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.29.1-30.fc10 If you are packaging kmods: Please check if your kmod builds against this kernel and update/sync with devel if necessary (ndiswrapper for example needs it iirc). I'll of course and as usually build and push the rebuilds for above kernel once bodhi sends it on the way to the repos. CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 06:48:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 06:48:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415044822.86E692C3D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|33 | --- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-15 06:48:23 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Package CVS request done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 15 07:06:11 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 15 07:06:17 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion (was: Re: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux) In-Reply-To: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> On 02.04.2009 09:20, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 > >> - lkundrak, will your sponsor Justin? > Yes, I can sponsor him, provided someone upgrades my rpmfusion account to > sponsor. (I'm already a sponsor in Fedora) We haven't discussed "how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor" yet iirc, but I'd say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you are a sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd just say the one that wants to become sponsor for RPM Fusion once states his intention in public to make sure everybody is aware of it. Is that fine for everybody? If I get a few "+1" and if nobody yell's I'd like to give lkundrak sponsor status in a few days. CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 09:05:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:05:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415070553.E63282C4E5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin.kofler@chello.at --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 09:05:56 --- You should compare your freetype-lcd specfile with the freetype-freeworld one. What I see: * missing Provides: freetype-bytecode and Provides: freetype-subpixel (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=155210 ) * missing memcpy-fix patch * missing enable-valid patch (not sure if that one is needed here though) * missing "umask 0022" * unneeded multilib snippet - that header isn't being installed anyway * missing licenses as %doc files (docs/LICENSE.TXT, docs/FTL.TXT and docs/GPL.TXT) There's also that 99-DejaVu-autohinter-only.conf in freetype-freeworld, but maybe that one should be dropped anyway. DejaVu upstream wants the BCI used for their fonts, the problem is that it changes the font weight and that not all characters are hinted (or at least that was the case last I checked). I'm the current freetype-freeworld maintainer. I'm willing to let you take over maintainership of freetype-freeworld. I don't even use it myself. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 09:09:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:09:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415070937.A93B92C355@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 09:09:40 --- Oh, and I forgot: your %description is missing a paragraph explaining that: * the package is built with bytecode interpreter and subpixel rendering enabled (see the freetype-freeworld blurb) and * additional subpixel rendering patches from Ubuntu are being applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Apr 15 09:17:30 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:14:08 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion In-Reply-To: <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49E58A0A.6000109@hhs.nl> On 04/15/2009 07:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 02.04.2009 09:20, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 > > >>> - lkundrak, will your sponsor Justin? >> Yes, I can sponsor him, provided someone upgrades my rpmfusion account to >> sponsor. (I'm already a sponsor in Fedora) > > We haven't discussed "how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor" yet iirc, but > I'd say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you > are a sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd > just say the one that wants to become sponsor for RPM Fusion once states > his intention in public to make sure everybody is aware of it. > > Is that fine for everybody? If I get a few "+1" and if nobody yell's I'd > like to give lkundrak sponsor status in a few days. > +1 And I would like to add, that I would even like to see some procedure for people to become rpmfusion sponsor only. We've a few people who are doing very good work, which are not Fedora sponsors (yet?) and we sure could use more rpmfusion sponsors. Regards, Hans p.s. I know I have 2 FTBFS bugs, they are on my todo, sorry about the delay :) From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Apr 15 09:19:42 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:16:16 2009 Subject: Heads-up to kmod packagers: 2.6.29 heading to updates-testing In-Reply-To: <49E566FA.3070806@leemhuis.info> References: <49E566FA.3070806@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49E58A8E.1030405@hhs.nl> On 04/15/2009 06:47 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi! > > See $SUBJECT. Details: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.29.1-30.fc10 > > If you are packaging kmods: Please check if your kmod builds against > this kernel and update/sync with devel if necessary (ndiswrapper for > example needs it iirc). > > I'll of course and as usually build and push the rebuilds for above > kernel once bodhi sends it on the way to the repos. > Hmm, How are we going to handle this wrt qc-usb ? I guess someone should ask the Fedora kernel maintainers to add an Obsoletes for that to the 2.6.29 rpm ? Thinking of it we may want to do that for the F-11 2.6.29 kernel too, right ? Regards, Hans From musuruan at gmail.com Wed Apr 15 09:34:46 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:34:53 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion (was: Re: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux) In-Reply-To: <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <29fee02b0904150034x5cee4f39k69facf70d0ff9e8f@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > We haven't discussed "how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor" yet iirc, but I'd > say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you are a > sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd just say > the one that wants to become sponsor for RPM Fusion once states his > intention in public to make sure everybody is aware of it. > > Is that fine for everybody? If I get a few "+1" and if nobody yell's I'd > like to give lkundrak sponsor status in a few days. AFAIR we agreed that the only way to be a sponsor in RPM Fusion is to be a sponsor in Fedora: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2009-January/003530.html I think that before permitting non Fedora sponsors to became sponsors here, we need to know how many Fedora sponsors are active in RPM Fusion. Bye, Andrea. From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 15 09:58:06 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 15 09:58:15 2009 Subject: Heads-up to kmod packagers: 2.6.29 heading to updates-testing In-Reply-To: <49E58A8E.1030405@hhs.nl> References: <49E566FA.3070806@leemhuis.info> <49E58A8E.1030405@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <49E5938E.2070007@leemhuis.info> On 15.04.2009 09:19, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 04/15/2009 06:47 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> See $SUBJECT. Details: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.29.1-30.fc10 >> >> If you are packaging kmods: Please check if your kmod builds against >> this kernel and update/sync with devel if necessary (ndiswrapper for >> example needs it iirc). >> >> I'll of course and as usually build and push the rebuilds for above >> kernel once bodhi sends it on the way to the repos. > > How are we going to handle this wrt qc-usb ? I guess someone should ask > the Fedora kernel maintainers to add an Obsoletes for that to the > 2.6.29 rpm ? The kmod and the matching userland package will get uninstalled by yum automatically sooner or later together with the old kernels. So only akmod package would been to be obsoleted. But I'm not sure if that's worth the trouble and it might create more problems then it solves for those that want to keep the kmods for the older kernels around in case they boot them again... CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 15 10:02:52 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:02:58 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion In-Reply-To: <29fee02b0904150034x5cee4f39k69facf70d0ff9e8f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> <29fee02b0904150034x5cee4f39k69facf70d0ff9e8f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49E594AC.2010607@leemhuis.info> On 15.04.2009 09:34, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> We haven't discussed "how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor" yet iirc, but I'd >> say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you are a >> sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd just say >> the one that wants to become sponsor for RPM Fusion once states his >> intention in public to make sure everybody is aware of it. >> >> Is that fine for everybody? If I get a few "+1" and if nobody yell's I'd >> like to give lkundrak sponsor status in a few days. > > AFAIR we agreed that the only way to be a sponsor in RPM Fusion is to > be a sponsor in Fedora: > http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2009-January/003530.html Well, that's the case here (it was in the part that was quoted in my mail) > I think that before permitting non Fedora sponsors to became sponsors > here, [...] I for one would say we wait with discussing that until there is a more pressing need. CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 15 10:04:05 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:04:12 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion In-Reply-To: <49E58A0A.6000109@hhs.nl> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> <49E58A0A.6000109@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <49E594F5.8080904@leemhuis.info> On 15.04.2009 09:17, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 04/15/2009 07:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 02.04.2009 09:20, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: >>> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 > > And I would like to add, that I would even like to see some procedure for > people to become rpmfusion sponsor only. Cut'n'paste from a mail I just sent: I for one would say we wait with discussing that until there is a more pressing need. > We've a few people who are doing > very good work, which are not Fedora sponsors (yet?) and we sure could > use more rpmfusion sponsors. The need for reviewers in general is more pressing imho. CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 10:27:08 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:27:11 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415082704.C29A02C4B3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #7 from David Hlacik 2009-04-15 10:27:07 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Oh, and I forgot: your %description is missing a paragraph explaining that: > * the package is built with bytecode interpreter and subpixel rendering enabled > (see the freetype-freeworld blurb) and > * additional subpixel rendering patches from Ubuntu are being applied. > Hi Kevin, thank you for this. I would love to take over freetype-freeworld. Now about the difference : My idea was to have completely same experience as on Ubuntu Jaunty. Because of that, i have dropped all the Fedora/Upstream patches and added those from Ubuntu. I have used same sources of freetype/cairo/libXft as in Ubuntu Jaunty as well. Yes , the Fedora has subpixel rendering and bytecode interpreter patches, which are enabled in freetype-freeworld. It works fine with my cairo, libXt as well, but those patches are slightly different and final font rendering experience is different - mainly visible when M$ fonts are used - fonts are missing some glymphs. If you will allow me to, I will rename those packages to have -freeworld suffix and merge freetype-freeworld and my freetype-lcd according to your comments #5,#6. I will create new requests per package as suggested in comment #3 Oh and of course I am about to provide screenshots for you all to see how fedora loooks before / and after Thanks again. D. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 10:33:58 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:33:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 447] Review Request: ffmpeg2dirac - Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415083354.E108E2C328@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 10:48:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:48:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415084844.E137E2C32C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 10:48:47 --- > My idea was to have completely same experience as on Ubuntu Jaunty. > Because of that, i have dropped all the Fedora/Upstream patches and added those > from Ubuntu. IMHO this is not acceptable. Fedora is not Ubuntu. Fedora's patches fix actual bugs (e.g. the memcpy patch you dropped from freetype definitely fixes a serious bug). Please readd the Fedora patches. Adding Ubuntu's subpixel rendering patches makes sense, removing the Fedora patches doesn't, and whether adding patches other than subpixel rendering from Ubuntu makes sense or not has to be decides on a case by case basis (but in most cases the patches should go into the Fedora package and/or upstream, not be specific to the RPM Fusion package! E.g. I don't see what sense it makes to carry an armel fix in freetype-lcd/freeworld, we don't even support that architecture in RPM Fusion. If anybody cares, it would be the Fedora ARM team, and they'd want it in the Fedora freetype first of all. And that's just one of the patches you added, similar arguments may apply to others). > I have used same sources of freetype/cairo/libXft as in Ubuntu Jaunty as well. You most likely have to use the same version used in the Fedora release you're targeting to guarantee 100% binary compatibility (which is necessary because we're not going to rebuild all of Fedora against your patched packages). You may get away with a newer one (though I wouldn't recommend it - try to find a package with a matching version in Ubuntu and apply the patches from there instead), but not an older one. You'll also have to check any patches you apply for binary compatibility issues. (Note that the freetype version already matches Rawhide, but I haven't checked the other libs.) > mainly visible when M$ fonts are used - fonts are missing some glymphs. Which patch is fixing that? The enable-full-bytecode-interpreter patch? According to the comment in the header file it patches, it should have no effect at all (when the bytecode interpreter is already enabled): it turns off TT_CONFIG_OPTION_UNPATENTED_HINTING, for which the header file says: > Note that the TT_CONFIG_OPTION_UNPATENTED_HINTING macro is *ignored* if you > define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER The other patch (freetype-2.1.10-enable-ft2-bci.patch in freetype-freeworld, freetype-bytecode-interpreter.patch in your SRPM) enables TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER, so disabling TT_CONFIG_OPTION_UNPATENTED_HINTING is useless, it already happens automatically. So I don't see how that patch would make any difference. I don't see anything in your freetype-lcd.spec which is 1. related to subpixel rendering in any way and 2. not already in freetype-freeworld. So I think freetype-freeworld should stay as it is (possibly modulo the 99-DejaVu-autohinter-only.conf file for which I still don't know what to do with it, whether we use that or not, we'll always make somebody unhappy). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 10:58:13 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 10:58:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415085809.6E0872C4F1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 10:58:12 --- I looked through cairo and libXft: * in cairo, the relevant patch is 04_lcd_filter.patch. That patch actually REMOVES code which may be infringing some patents from Cairo, making it use the freetype LCD filter instead (which is better than the simple one Cairo contained). So why is that patch not upstream? This should go both upstream and in the Fedora package, a -freeworld package is not needed at all. * in libXft, the relevant patch is libXft-2.1.10-lcd-filter-3.patch. Again, this replaces hardcoded filtering by using the freetype LCD filter and actually REMOVES potentially infringing code. This should also go upstream and into Fedora. All the other patches being applied have absolutely nothing to do with subpixel rendering. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 11:07:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 11:07:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415090728.4048F2C2BB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 11:07:31 --- Your fontconfig has 2 relevant patches: > Patch2: 04_ubuntu_monospace_lcd_filter_conf.patch > Patch5: 06_ubuntu_lcddefault.patch (There's also the 05_lcdfilterlegacy.patch, but all that does is accept lcdfilterlegacy as an alias for lcdlegacy in the config files, I don't see why we need or want that at all.) Both those patches just add fontconfig .conf files. Those files could be added to freetype-freeworld instead, or maybe even to the Fedora fontconfig (I think the options will be ignored if subpixel rendering is disabled), in any case it makes no sense to ship a fontconfig-freeworld package for those (especially not one which overrides the library, as these changes are only to the config file). So to sum up your review requests: * freetype-lcd: not needed, all relevant patches are in freetype-freeworld * cairo-lcd, libXft-lcd: one relevant patch (the others should be dropped and the Fedora patches used instead) and I really don't see why that cannot go into Fedora instead. Please get those 2 patches (1 per package) accepted by upstream and by the Fedora maintainers, pointing out they actually REMOVE potentially patented code and leave it up to freetype whether to provide it or not (and Fedora's freetype doesn't). * fontconfig-lcd: the config files from the patches 04 and 06 should be provided by freetype-freeworld instead, fontconfig-lcd should be dropped entirely -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Apr 15 11:16:44 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed Apr 15 11:13:20 2009 Subject: Heads-up to kmod packagers: 2.6.29 heading to updates-testing In-Reply-To: <49E5938E.2070007@leemhuis.info> References: <49E566FA.3070806@leemhuis.info> <49E58A8E.1030405@hhs.nl> <49E5938E.2070007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49E5A5FC.1070705@hhs.nl> On 04/15/2009 09:58 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 15.04.2009 09:19, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 04/15/2009 06:47 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> See $SUBJECT. Details: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.29.1-30.fc10 >>> >>> If you are packaging kmods: Please check if your kmod builds against >>> this kernel and update/sync with devel if necessary (ndiswrapper for >>> example needs it iirc). >>> >>> I'll of course and as usually build and push the rebuilds for above >>> kernel once bodhi sends it on the way to the repos. >> >> How are we going to handle this wrt qc-usb ? I guess someone should ask >> the Fedora kernel maintainers to add an Obsoletes for that to the >> 2.6.29 rpm ? > > The kmod and the matching userland package will get uninstalled by yum > automatically sooner or later together with the old kernels. So only > akmod package would been to be obsoleted. But I'm not sure if that's > worth the trouble and it might create more problems then it solves for > those that want to keep the kmods for the older kernels around in case > they boot them again... > Ok, good to know this will sort out itself. Regards, Hans From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 12:09:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 12:09:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415100929.CBA422C4E9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-15 12:09:33 --- I don't know where you got the cudatoolkit initscript but it is totally undeed. Once the nvidia driver is loaded, the /dev/nvidia? and /dev/nvidiactl are automatically created. Furthermore this script assume the module name to be hardcoded to nvidia.ko which won't be garanted in the near future for all nvidia driver branches (even only cuda capables branches). Once the initscript is removed, please only update the spec file as the src.rpm is quite big. - License: The License is nVidia proprietary, and can be redistributed according to : quoting EULA.txt "2.1.2 Linux/FreeBSD Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section 2.1.1, SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux or FreeBSD operating systems, or other operating systems derived from the source code to these operating systems, may be copied and redistributed, provided that the binary files thereof are not modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files). " So this pretty well fit with our: Redistributable, no modification permitted - You need a ExclusiveArch since cudatoolkit is only provided as i386 i586 x86_64 That will lead to have: %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64 %else ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 %endif - Please use the full source url when possible for SOURCE0/1 - cuda virtual provides can probably be versioned (version-release.) - Post scripts, since libraries are provided by the -libs sub-package, you need to have: %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig - According to the cuda download page. The cudatoolkit highly depend on a certified nvidia driver version. (specially for EL-5, where they are multiple version). I can bump the nvidia driver to that version, but i guess that once cuda 2.2 will be here, It will be possible to have two differents certified cuda version on a Fedora 9 plateform. That will lead to work with alternative, so different version of the cudatoolkit can co-exist. (like there is with different version of the jdk compiler). (I don't like to use version in the name of the package ) - It would be better to fix the package in %prep (iconv, sed, etc) and then to cp -pR the whole directories to a versioned prefix in %install (like /usr/lib/cudatoolkit-%{version}-%{_target_cpu} which is the best suitable for compiler according to the FHS ) Then everything could be versioned as appropriate using alternative in %post %postun . But this probably needs more experiments (what is the default installation prefix btw ?) Whatever the decision to use a better prefix, I don't like cuda headers to be available in the standard include path. This could be tweaked from /usr/bin/nvcc.profile. On the other side, I will probably introduce pkg-config support for cudart.pc provided within the nvidia driver. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 13:09:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 13:09:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415110902.850B22C3F2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: nvidia-cuda-|Review request: cudatoolkit |toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA |- NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit |Toolkit libraries | --- Comment #7 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-15 13:09:06 --- updated package - summary -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 13:16:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 13:16:26 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415111620.CCE512C471@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #11 from David Hlacik 2009-04-15 13:16:25 --- > > So to sum up your review requests: > * freetype-lcd: not needed, all relevant patches are in freetype-freeworld > * cairo-lcd, libXft-lcd: one relevant patch (the others should be dropped and > the Fedora patches used instead) and I really don't see why that cannot go into > Fedora instead. Please get those 2 patches (1 per package) accepted by upstream > and by the Fedora maintainers, pointing out they actually REMOVE potentially > patented code and leave it up to freetype whether to provide it or not (and > Fedora's freetype doesn't). > * fontconfig-lcd: the config files from the patches 04 and 06 should be > provided by freetype-freeworld instead, fontconfig-lcd should be dropped > entirely > Hi Kevin, thank you for your review. Let me provide you with something else later this day, which will cover your requirements. Currently I am busy. Thanks David -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 15:48:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 15:48:44 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415134838.3F4702C31F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #10 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-15 15:48:44 --- - New Kdenlive version 0.7.3 - Tested for upcoming Fedora 11 - Rpmlint - clean! Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SPECS/kdenlive.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SRPMS/kdenlive-0.7.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 15:52:55 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 15:52:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415135249.3A0B72C33E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-15 15:52:55 --- small item, but you can drop -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=true now that you're using %{cmake_kde4} macro -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 15:55:38 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 15:55:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415135531.C3AC42C3B1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #13 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-15 15:55:37 --- - New MLT version 0.3.8 - Tested for upcoming Fedora 11 - Rpmlint: mlt.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmiracle.so.0.3.8 exit@GLIBC_2.0 mlt-devel.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mlt-devel-0.3.8/demo/demo mlt-devel.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/mlt-devel-0.3.8/demo/demo /bin/bash Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 15:58:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 15:58:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 528] Review request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415135834.F36052C3BA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 --- Comment #1 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-15 15:58:41 --- - New MLT++ version 0.3.8 - Tested for upcoming Fedora 11 - Rpmlint: mlt++-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt++.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt++-0.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 16:06:20 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 16:06:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415140613.F06302C2AD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #12 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-15 16:06:20 --- (In reply to comment #11) > small item, but you can drop > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=true > now that you're using %{cmake_kde4} macro > And RPATHs, too? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 16:22:56 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 16:22:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415142250.3EC902C359@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-15 16:22:56 --- yep, try rpm --eval "%{cmake_kde4}" to see all that it does and includes -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 16:46:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 16:46:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415144652.B095F2C471@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #12 from David Hlacik 2009-04-15 16:46:56 --- > > Hi Kevin, > > thank you for your review. Let me provide you with something else later this > day, which will cover your requirements. Currently I am busy. > > Thanks > > David > Hi Kevin, Yes, you are right. This is Fedora not Ubuntu. My approach to drop all Fedora Patches and use only Ubuntu is wrong. Thank you for your time on reviewing. The needed patches are following : 1) for libXft - (a) libXft-2.1.10-lcd-filter-3.patch 2) for cairo - (b) 04_lcd_filter.dpatch - (c) cairo-respect-fontconfig.patch The patch (c) fixes problem, where cairo ignores font hinting configuration defined in fonts configuration files. 3) however I would like to see 06_ubuntu_lcddefault.patch in fontconfig. Now after reading your recommendations I suggest to at first contact cairo and libXft package maintainers to add (a)(b)(c) patches with your point. How should I contact them? Should i issue bug in Redhat's bugzilla? Br, D. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 16:51:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 15 16:51:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415145105.2494E2C4B3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 16:51:11 --- Yes, bugzilla.redhat.com is the best place to report those to. For the fontconfig configurations: * 04_ubuntu_monospace_lcd_filter_conf.patch is probably needed too. * If you can't get those merged into the Fedora fontconfig, freetype-freeworld is probably the best place to ship them in. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 21:04:52 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 15 21:04:52 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-15 Message-ID: <20090415190452.20E722437A@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 2 NEW gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc10 : GNOME Video Arcade is a MAME front-end for GNOME slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.17 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 6 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10.2 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-1.fc10.3 nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10.4 nvidia-kmod-180.29-1.fc10.3 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.18 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc10.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: gnome-video-arcade-0.6.6-2.fc10 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-2 - Explicitly require libXres-devel to work around a build issue in F-10. * Mon Apr 06 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.6-1 - Update to 0.6.6 - Update URL tag to GitHub home page. - Update Source tag to download.gnome.org. - Add --with-nplayers-file configure option. - Require sdlmame-data >= 0.130-1 for nplayers.ini (#416). * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.17 ------------------------------ * Wed Mar 25 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-26.17 - rebuild for new kernels ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-1.fc10.2 ------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-1.2 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-1.fc10.3 ---------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10.4 ----------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.11.02-1.4 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-kmod-180.29-1.fc10.3 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.29-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.18 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-26.18 - rebuild for new kernels wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc10.1 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 15 21:07:09 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 15 21:07:08 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-15 Message-ID: <20090415190709.554E224351@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 10 NEW compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc10 : An interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc10 gpac-0.4.5-3.fc10 pyglet-1.1.3-1.fc10 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc10 sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc10 NEW terminatorX-3.82-3.fc10 : Realtime Audio Synthesizer vagalume-0.7.1-1.fc10 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc10 NEW x264-0.0.0-0.20.20080905.fc10 : H264/AVC video streams encoder ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 10 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc10.1 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.20 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.12 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc10.6 kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.17 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.18 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.6 rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10.1 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.4 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.3 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 7 dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc9 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc9 sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc9 NEW terminatorX-3.82-3.fc9 : Realtime Audio Synthesizer vagalume-0.7.1-1.fc9 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc9 x264-0.0.0-0.17.20080613.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 6 NEW elisa-plugins-ugly-0.5.35-1.fc11 : Ugly Plugins for the Elisa Media Center NEW ffmpeg2dirac-0.1.0-3.fc11 : Convert any file that ffmpeg can decode to dirac or theora gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11 mjpegtools-1.9.0-1.fc11 smc-music-4.1-1.fc11 stella-2.7.6-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: compat-python24-2.4.5-6.fc10 ---------------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Hans de Goede 2.4.5-6 - Link db4 module against db-4.7 not 4.6 (oops) * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.5-5 - rebuild for new F11 features dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc10 -------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sun Apr 05 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout gpac-0.4.5-3.fc10 ----------------- * Sun Dec 28 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.4.5-3 - Fix -devel doc timestamp which leads to multilib conflict ( RPM Fusion #270 ) pyglet-1.1.3-1.fc10 ------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil 1.1.3-1 - update to 1.1.3 rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc10 ----------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 (use pycurl, display cvs output in realtime, add support for anonymous CVS, add plague-client-rf wrapper) sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc10 --------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-3 - Fix kmod requires and provides according to http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 terminatorX-3.82-3.fc10 ----------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-3 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build failure * Thu Apr 02 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-2 - Prepared package for RPMFusion submission (originates from planetccrma) vagalume-0.7.1-1.fc10 --------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Michel Salim - 0.7.1-1 - Update to 0.7.1 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc10 ---------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-2 - Add Patch vlc-0.9.9-0.9.10git20090409.patch * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-1 - Update to 0.9.9 final - backport playlist patch - Enable subtitles decoding x264-0.0.0-0.20.20080905.fc10 ----------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.0.0-0.20.20080905 - build against gpac-devel-static by default, x264 needs just a small part of gpac ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc10.1 ------------------------ * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.1-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.20 -------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:10-0.20 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.29.1-30.fc10 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.12 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.12 - rebuild for new kernels iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc10.6 -------------------------------- * Mon Apr 06 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2.6 - rebuild for new kernels * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2.5 - rebuild for new F11 features kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.17 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.0-0.42.17 - rebuild for new kernels ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.18 ------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.18 - rebuild for new kernels * Tue Apr 07 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.17 - rebuild rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.6 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-3.6 - rebuild for new kernels * Thu Mar 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.8.0.0-3.5 - Bugfix: kmod doesn't compile when the kernel version has a "2.4" substring rt2870-kmod-2.1.0.0-2.fc10.1 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.0.0-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-2.fc10.4 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-2.4 - rebuild for new kernels * Sun Apr 05 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-2.3 - rebuild sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-1.fc10.3 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-1.3 - rebuild for new kernels ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: dvbcut-0.6.0-7.svn157.fc9 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-7.svn157 - mod QTDIR configure.in patch to match newer configure.in revision * Sun Apr 05 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-6.svn157 - use distro conditional to determine name of BR qt3-devel * Sat Apr 04 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-5.svn157 - use another BR qt3 variant to work on both fedora and epel * Fri Apr 03 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-4.svn157 - adjust BR for qt3 to work on both fedora and epel * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-3.svn157 - add gcc4 patch for rawhide * Mon Mar 30 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-2.svn157 - update to latest post release svn checkout for minor fixes - improve dvbcut-snapshot script to not use the checkout date - del the debian packaging files from the snapshot archive - mod spec to use svnver rather svndate, to make it easier to confirm sources - del lines from DISTFILES that reference removed files * Sat Feb 07 2009 David Timms - 0.6.0-1.20090207svn156 - update to 0.6.0 release, still using post release svn checkout rpmfusion-packager-0.3-1.fc9 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Stewart Adam - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 (use pycurl, display cvs output in realtime, add support for anonymous CVS, add plague-client-rf wrapper) sysprof-1.0.12-3.fc9 -------------------- * Fri Apr 03 2009 Gianluca Sforna - 1.0.12-3 - Fix kmod requires and provides according to http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2 terminatorX-3.82-3.fc9 ---------------------- * Sun Apr 05 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-3 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build failure * Thu Apr 02 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 3.82-2 - Prepared package for RPMFusion submission (originates from planetccrma) vagalume-0.7.1-1.fc9 -------------------- * Tue Mar 24 2009 Michel Salim - 0.7.1-1 - Update to 0.7.1 vlc-0.9.9-2.fc9 --------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-2 - Add Patch vlc-0.9.9-0.9.10git20090409.patch * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-1 - Update to 0.9.9 final - backport playlist patch - Enable subtitles decoding * Mon Mar 16 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.5rc2 - Use libxml2-static 2.6.2 from the Fedora GA repository * Fri Mar 06 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.9-0.4rc2 - Update to 0.9.9-rc2 - Add lua support by default x264-0.0.0-0.17.20080613.fc9 ---------------------------- * Thu Mar 26 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.0.0-0.17.20080613 - build against gpac-devel-static by default, x264 needs just a small part of gpac ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: elisa-plugins-ugly-0.5.35-1.fc11 -------------------------------- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Matthias Saou 0.5.35-1 - Update to 0.5.35. - Drop the useless --single-version-externally-managed option. ffmpeg2dirac-0.1.0-3.fc11 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 14 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.1.0-3 - Better scons scheme - Better description * Mon Mar 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.1.0-2 - Bump schroedinger-devel to 1.0.6 * Tue Mar 17 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.1.0-1 - Initial Build gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Wed Apr 15 2009 Hans de Goede 0.10.11-4 - Rebuild for new mjpegtools mjpegtools-1.9.0-1.fc11 ----------------------- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Hans de Goede 1.9.0-1 - Update to upstream 1.9.0 final release * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.9.0-0.7.rc3 - rebuild for new F11 features smc-music-4.1-1.fc11 -------------------- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Hans de Goede 4.1-1 - New upstream release 4.1 stella-2.7.6-1.fc11 ------------------- * Wed Apr 15 2009 Hans de Goede 2.7.6-1 - New upstream release 2.7.6 From zarko.pintar at gmail.com Wed Apr 15 22:40:09 2009 From: zarko.pintar at gmail.com (Zarko Pintar) Date: Wed Apr 15 22:40:23 2009 Subject: my Fedora sponsorship Message-ID: <549863200904151340t348ddc33r21b17cb15cc6feda@mail.gmail.com> My Fedora sponsorship status is just changed! I got sponsorship on Fedora. You can check this link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 regards, Zarko Pintar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090415/39c10bfa/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 01:58:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 01:58:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415235813.DDDDD2C514@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #8 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-16 01:58:25 --- (In reply to comment #7) > ping > Justin: Any progress here? > hi, yes i've been doing some package reviews, and just waiting until they can make you a sponsor like you asked. Do you know if there is anything else I should be doing? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From solarflow99 at gmail.com Thu Apr 16 02:02:39 2009 From: solarflow99 at gmail.com (solarflow99) Date: Thu Apr 16 02:02:54 2009 Subject: Sponsors in RPM Fusion (was: Re: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux) In-Reply-To: <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> References: <20090402072045.1FA742C39A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <49E56B43.1070305@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <7020fd000904151702q6167574drdf5540485f9e7a2b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 02.04.2009 09:20, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 >> > > > >> - lkundrak, will your sponsor Justin? >>> >> Yes, I can sponsor him, provided someone upgrades my rpmfusion account to >> sponsor. (I'm already a sponsor in Fedora) >> > > We haven't discussed "how to become a RPM Fusion sponsor" yet iirc, but I'd > say we follow the same patter we use in other places as well: If you are a > sponsor in Fedora then you can become a sponsor in RPM Fusion. I'd just say > the one that wants to become sponsor for RPM Fusion once states his > intention in public to make sure everybody is aware of it. > > Is that fine for everybody? If I get a few "+1" and if nobody yell's I'd > like to give lkundrak sponsor status in a few days. +1 here so I can get my package in :) Sounds like a reasonable procedure though.. Justin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090416/18438f78/attachment.html From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 06:46:20 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 16 06:46:22 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-16 Message-ID: <20090416044620.D9ABD2433D@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 3 NEW iscsitarget-0.4.17-3.fc10 : Utilities for iSCSI Enterprise Target open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-1.fc10 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: iscsitarget-0.4.17-3.fc10 ------------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-3 - rebuild for new F11 features open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-1.fc10 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.154848-1 - Update to upstream build 154848 - Some renames and config simplification - Added plugin directory - Fixed rpath issue - Reenabled unity open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc10 -------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.154848-1 - Update to upstream build 154848 * Thu Apr 16 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.142982-1.4 - rebuild for new kernels From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 07:21:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 07:21:26 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416052122.0175E2C4EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-16 07:21:23 --- Since you got sponsored, things can go faster now. Here is a more thorough review: * rpmlints: mlt.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmiracle.so.0.3.8 exit@GLIBC_2.0 So this isn't removed in this release. What happened? mlt-devel.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mlt-devel-0.3.8/demo/demo mlt-devel.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/mlt-devel-0.3.8/demo/demo /bin/bash These two can be eliminated by doing a chmod -x demo/demo in %prep. * Shouldn't group tag for the main package be System Environment/Libraries ? ! All relevant doc files should be packaged. ./src/modules/motion_est/README can go to the %doc of the main package * Please add BuildRequires: frei0r-devel * src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. ? Why do you rename all the executables but "inigo"? * rawhide buildlog says: - libquicktime not found: only enabling dv avi support This is because it can't find lqt-config. See: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265 http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/libquicktime/devel/libquicktime.spec?root=free&r1=1.6&r2=1.7 You need to patch this up so it can find the libquicktime properly. * Similarly, mlt-config shouldn't be packaged (the file itself says it is deprecated) or it will break multilib. You can use %exclude in %files to exclude it. * I don't think you need these lines in the SPEC: BuildRequires: prelink and # clear-execstack execstack -c $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/libmltgtk2.so * I also think that you don't need this BuildRequires: alsa-lib-devel * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . Please make use of the %{name} macro extensively (except maybe URL), or do not use it at all. * Running mlt-miracle gives "segmentation fault" ! SPEC file improvement: You don't needs these lines install -d docs/demo cp -p demo/* docs/demo Adding "demo" after "docs/*" will be sufficient. i.e. ... %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc docs/* demo ... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 07:24:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 07:24:14 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416052412.3BA6C2C549@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 07:24:13 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Do you know if there is anything else I > should be doing? You need to modify the package to include the freedos source (adding a Source: that is not used is ok) (In reply to comment #6) > Or, I see there is discussion in your bugzilla about including the > FreeDOS source in the SRPM, which also makes sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 10:21:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 10:21:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416082155.EA4262C3A5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #15 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-16 10:21:57 --- * >* src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa >hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. The same would be needed for frei0r-plugins * I'm not fund of extensive usage of the %{name} macro. >* Similarly, mlt-config shouldn't be packaged (the file itself says it is >deprecated) or it will break multilib. You can use %exclude in %files to >exclude it. I other words; you need to use pkg-config libquicktime.pc -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 10:57:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 10:57:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416085703.389462C4A8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #16 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-16 10:57:04 --- (In reply to comment #14) > * rpmlints: > mlt.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmiracle.so.0.3.8 > exit@GLIBC_2.0 > > So this isn't removed in this release. What happened? > * Running mlt-miracle gives "segmentation fault" I forwarded this problems to author of upstream One of solution is dropping mlt-miracle from package... > ? Why do you rename all the executables but "inigo"? > This renaming happened earlier, when MLT was on Fedora repo. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979#c10 but, I can rename inigo to mlt-inigo, too. > * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section > of Packaging Guidelines . > Please make use of the %{name} macro extensively (except maybe URL), or do not > use it at all. > Hmm, I don't understand well, where I exactly did not use %{name} macro, except at renaming and renamed binaries... I'll apply your suggestions and update MLT revision very soon... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 11:04:24 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 11:04:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 529] Review request: kdenlive - Non-linear video editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416090421.45D7F2C3EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 --- Comment #14 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-16 11:04:24 --- (In reply to comment #11) > small item, but you can drop > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=true > now that you're using %{cmake_kde4} macro > Resolved... http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SPECS/kdenlive.spec Source: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SRPMS/kdenlive-0.7.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 11:44:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 11:44:01 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416094356.BFB552C4AA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |kwizart@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | --- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-16 11:44:00 --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 11:44:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 11:44:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416094411.6675F2C4B0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 12:11:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 12:11:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416101148.814222C3CA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #8 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-16 12:11:51 --- Ok, ogmtools is now in Fedora, I just need a reviewer here... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From giallu at gmail.com Thu Apr 16 12:25:31 2009 From: giallu at gmail.com (Gianluca Sforna) Date: Thu Apr 16 12:25:39 2009 Subject: Review swap Message-ID: If you have a package in the review queue and want to swap reviews with ogmrip, feel free to ping me. http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Cheers G. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna From fedora at leemhuis.info Thu Apr 16 12:46:16 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Thu Apr 16 12:46:24 2009 Subject: Review swap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49E70C78.1060801@leemhuis.info> On 16.04.2009 12:25, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > If you have a package in the review queue and want to swap reviews > with ogmrip, feel free to ping me. FWIW, If nobody reacts here on the list then it might be best if you directly ask for a review exchange in one of the bugs from this list: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=2&hide_resolved=1 Note sure, but I'd for one would say that doing above might be even better/quicker/more efficient then asking on lists like this (but YMMV). > http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 That one is blocking Bug 3 (Packages under review) and not 2 (New packages awaiting review). Is that intentional? CU knurd From giallu at gmail.com Thu Apr 16 12:56:14 2009 From: giallu at gmail.com (Gianluca Sforna) Date: Thu Apr 16 12:56:23 2009 Subject: Review swap In-Reply-To: <49E70C78.1060801@leemhuis.info> References: <49E70C78.1060801@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Note sure, but I'd for one would say that doing above might be even > better/quicker/more efficient then asking on lists like this (but YMMV). Ok, I will wait a bit then use your suggestion > >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 > > That one is blocking Bug 3 (Packages under review) and not 2 (New packages > awaiting review). Is that intentional? My mistake probably. thanks a lot -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 12:57:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 12:57:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416105701.9CD982C4E6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 15:06:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 15:06:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416130601.D4F742C55F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #22 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-16 15:06:07 --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > > 26 rpath issues (you'll need to check kbuild files) > > > > I was under impression rpaths are used here (and we are not having only the > > standard rpaths), but I'll check and see what can be done. > > /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so uses RPATH to locate other .so-s in > /usr/lib/virtualbox. I'm not going to remove those. Why not remove rpath and add custom search path into /etc/ld.so.conf.d? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 15:25:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 15:25:28 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416132522.0AAE42C2FD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #23 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-16 15:25:27 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Why not remove rpath and add custom search path into /etc/ld.so.conf.d? Why should that be worth the work here? And which of the two solutions is more reliable and fool-proof against miss-configuration or other problems? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 17:12:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 17:12:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416151219.155112C368@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #17 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-16 17:12:25 --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section > > of Packaging Guidelines . > > Please make use of the %{name} macro extensively (except maybe URL), or do not > > use it at all. > > > > Hmm, I don't understand well, where I exactly did not use %{name} macro, except > at renaming and renamed binaries... > > Yes, that's what I'm talking about (In %install and in %files sections). The thing is, macros have to be used consistently. Either use %{name} everywhere or mlt everywhere. I prefer the former one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 17:14:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 17:14:24 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416151415.7E5C12C389@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #18 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-16 17:14:22 --- (In reply to comment #15) > * > >* src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa > >hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. > The same would be needed for frei0r-plugins > Which file? Why do you think so? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 19:56:24 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 19:56:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416175616.504552C364@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier@bachelot.org --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-16 19:56:24 --- A couple comments : - the .desktop file is not validated - I'd rather use something like "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.la -exec rm {}';'" and remove the "%exclude %{_libdir}/*.la" line in %files - http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-1.fc10.src.rpm is 404, so I can't comment more. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 22:05:39 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 22:05:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416200530.4B2E52C35B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #19 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-16 22:05:39 --- Here is the answer from MLT developer about renaming binaries: Citation: > Please, can you look at: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 If you rename executables, esp. inigo, it will break kdenlive and confuse users. A rename is coming very soon, but I don't plan to follow Fedora's guidelines. The next version will have this new name (melt) and get rid of miracle in the mlt package. Maybe we can make a change in kdenlive to use different executable names to deal with this upcoming change and Fedora's decision to rename everything. So, I suggest that we do not renaming MLT binaries in spec file. Kdenlive is primary application which using MLT, and we can not allow that renamed MLT breaks kdenlive! This is answer about 64bit problems in MLT: Citation: I can add paths for ladspa 64bit plugins as already. I will also change usage of lqt-config to pkg-config. I will ask Den for some patches because I will not package SVN releases, only stables! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 22:16:46 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 22:16:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416201637.1DD0A2C35F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #20 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-16 22:16:46 --- Well, you can match kdenlive to use the correct binaries if that's the problem. Just out of curiousity, how many miracles do we have in Fedora? :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 22:45:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 22:45:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416204547.1822A2C3A6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #21 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-16 22:45:56 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Well, you can match kdenlive to use the correct binaries if that's the problem. > Yes, but isn't is a so-called "bypass". Renaming original binaries file names is dangerous because we are losing original file names, and if someone want to use MLT for his own development, than can be confused with un-original file names of binaries. So, I still think that abandon renaming in spec file is better solution. > Just out of curiousity, how many miracles do we have in Fedora? :) > Many! This is one of the reasons why I like Fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 22:53:02 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 22:53:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416205252.B80922C3CB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #22 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-16 22:53:02 --- (In reply to comment #21) > > So, I still think that abandon renaming in spec file is better solution. > > I'm fine with that. I don't think "miracle" is too common of a name. There are many more common names we already have, like "/usr/bin/play" of the sox package, or "/usr/bin/convert" of ImageMagick. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 23:02:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 23:02:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416210153.1B0322C355@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #23 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-16 23:02:03 --- > > I'm fine with that. I don't think "miracle" is too common of a name. There are > many more common names we already have, like "/usr/bin/play" of the sox > package, or "/usr/bin/convert" of ImageMagick. > OK than, I will exclude renaming from spec file. BTW, with miracle we have Segmentation fault, and Dan said that it will be exclude in this version of MLT (what is not happened). I can exclude "miracle" from package until Dan resolve this binary in next SVN. I can patch MLT than.... Or, if you have some better solution? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 16 23:25:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 16 23:25:40 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416212530.72AD62C368@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #24 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-04-16 23:25:40 --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > Why not remove rpath and add custom search path into /etc/ld.so.conf.d? > > Why should that be worth the work here? Because guidelines strictly forbid the usage of rpath. And solution seems pretty simple. > And which of the two solutions is more reliable and fool-proof against > miss-configuration or other problems? It works for a bunch of packets in Fedora. And it will be more difficult to override any lib there with rpath in case of need. Anyway, review ticket is not the place for such discussions, I think. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 01:18:21 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 01:18:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416231810.4E8032C397@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #24 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 01:18:21 --- (In reply to comment #23) > > I can exclude "miracle" from package until Dan resolve this binary in next SVN. > I can patch MLT than.... > > Or, if you have some better solution? > I don't know what it does, or whether disabling it will affect kdenlive. If the impact will be minimal, you can disable it for now, and patch it up when it is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 03:26:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 03:26:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417012646.BE6A22C32B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #11 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 03:26:57 --- SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/traverso.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/traverso-0.49.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.49.1-2 - Change the default number of periods from 3 to 2 - Give a more verbose output if sound doesn't work - Add the manual Hopefully, this will fix the sound issues with ALSA. Please (re)move the ~/.traverso folder before testing this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 05:32:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 05:32:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417033243.D8F602C374@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #25 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 05:32:44 --- * I also missed this: These lines # Don't optimize (breaks debugging) sed -i -e '/fomit-frame-pointer/d' configure sed -i -e '/ffast-math/d' configure should go to %prep -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 06:33:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 06:33:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 528] Review request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417043313.666812C341@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 06:33:14 --- This one is simpler. Here are my notes: * rpmlint: mlt++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation See below. mlt++.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmlt++.so.0.3.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 This shouldn't be hard to fix. Please report this upstream. * Group tag for the main package should be System Environment/Libraries * From their contents, it looks like the doc files CUSTOMISING HOWTO README belong to the devel subpackage * The license notes in the header of the files look weird. It is a mixture of GPL and LGPL. Can you ask upstream to clarify this? * I don't think you need this line find ./ -name configure -exec chmod 755 {} \; (You should check for such changes yourself when there is a new release.) * From the installed header files, I can tell that mlt++-devel must require mlt-devel = %{version} * Requires: pkgconfig can be removed. Package does not install a .pc file. * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} . Is there a reason to have an exception here? ? Shouldn't we build and package what is inside the swig directory? ? How about the test directory? Shall we package it in the %doc of the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 09:13:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 09:13:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417071305.4B0D02C33D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #14 from David Hlacik 2009-04-17 09:13:07 --- (In reply to comment #13) > Yes, bugzilla.redhat.com is the best place to report those to. > > For the fontconfig configurations: > * 04_ubuntu_monospace_lcd_filter_conf.patch is probably needed too. > * If you can't get those merged into the Fedora fontconfig, freetype-freeworld > is probably the best place to ship them in. > Hi Kevin, I have created 2 bugs so far in RedHat's bugzilla ; 1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496191 , for cairo 2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496192, for libXft -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 09:37:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 09:37:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417073732.C8A962C38D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #10 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-17 09:37:35 --- (In reply to comment #9) > - http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-1.fc10.src.rpm is 404, so I > can't comment more. > Yeah, sorry it was -2: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 11:01:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 11:01:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417090151.158B02C495@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #11 from Lubos Stanek 2009-04-17 11:01:54 --- The spell checking is missing. The development package must drag in its dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 13:18:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 13:18:15 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417111802.97EF02C49F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #26 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 13:18:07 --- (In reply to comment #14) > > * src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa > hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. > > This can be resoved with setting enviornment LADSPA_PATH variable to correct value: export LADSPA_PATH=%{_libdir}/ladspa in %install section, because program, at run-time check this variable, and it will set internal variable to hardcoded only if LADSPA_PATH is empty! > # clear-execstack > execstack -c $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/libmltgtk2.so This is necessary, else rpmlint gives warning... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 13:27:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 13:27:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417112701.61F7B2C4EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #27 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-17 13:27:04 --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > > * src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa > > hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. > > > > > This can be resoved with setting enviornment LADSPA_PATH variable to correct > value: This is not acceptable, please DO patch the source in order to have the correct multilib 64bit dso path by default. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 13:29:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 13:29:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417112918.AF6182C4EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #28 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 13:29:23 --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > > > > > * src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > > > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa > > > hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. > > > > > > > > This can be resoved with setting enviornment LADSPA_PATH variable to correct > > value: > This is not acceptable, please DO patch the source in order to have the correct > multilib 64bit dso path by default. > Why is not acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 14:43:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 14:43:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] New: pick up cairo-dock from fedora? Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 Summary: pick up cairo-dock from fedora? Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cje@btinternet.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 cairo-dock's been dropped from fedora - possible concerns over patents. can it be picked up by rpmfusion? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 14:47:09 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 14:47:09 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417124703.7A2BF2C33A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-17 14:47:09 --- can? yes will? not until someone commits to maintain it, is that you? :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 14:59:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 14:59:33 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417125928.6A29F2C3A0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #2 from whyohwhyohwhyoh 2009-04-17 14:59:34 --- garn. but i'm allergic to making commitments. maybe we can persuade the existing fedora maintainer to defect to rpmfusion! ;-) for now i'll just have to add this to my list of "things i'd quite like to maintain if i can ever get over the commitment thing". sorry about that. thanks for the v quick response! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 15:15:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 15:15:14 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417131508.33EC62C374@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-17 15:15:13 --- (In reply to comment #2) > garn. but i'm allergic to making commitments. maybe we can persuade the > existing fedora maintainer to defect to rpmfusion! ;-) Did you try to ask the Fedora maintainer? Tell him that isn't not that much work to get this package into RPM Fusion -- no review is needed and he doesn't need a sponsor if he's sponsored for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 15:38:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 15:38:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417133851.2DD222C304@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 15:38:57 --- BTW, there's also kooldock in the same boat, though that one still uses KDE 3 libs so maybe now is the right time to EOL it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 15:41:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 15:41:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417134126.7C3502C320@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #25 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 15:41:32 --- > Because guidelines strictly forbid the usage of rpath. Yet there isn't really a better solution for libraries in nonstandard directories and AFAIK there are already packages using rpath for that purpose. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 15:45:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 15:45:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417134529.3BB122C320@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 15:45:35 --- Because it's your job as a packager to make things work out of the box. Requiring the user to set environment variables is just plain not acceptable. You could set them in /etc/profile.d, but that's a suboptimal solution because the new environment variables will only be picked up by newly-started shells, so the software doesn't work right after installation. Patching the source code is the more robust solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 15:52:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 15:52:00 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417135153.BB2362C1A5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #30 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 15:51:58 --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > > * src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c has > > /usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa > > hardcoded, which won't work on 64bit systems. Please fix this. > > > > > This can be resoved with setting enviornment LADSPA_PATH variable to correct > value: > > export LADSPA_PATH=%{_libdir}/ladspa > > in %install section, because program, at run-time check this variable, and it > will set internal variable to hardcoded only if LADSPA_PATH is empty! > and what will set the LADSPA_PATH during runtime? No, just patch (or sed) it up, and there won't be no worries. > > > # clear-execstack > > execstack -c $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/libmltgtk2.so > > This is necessary, else rpmlint gives warning... > Please describe me the steps to get this rpmlint warning, with that line removed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 16:07:19 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 16:07:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417140712.C61B12C2E0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #31 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 16:07:18 --- > > and what will set the LADSPA_PATH during runtime? No, just patch (or sed) it > up, and there won't be no worries. My mistake... but if I put in spec some like this: %post /sbin/ldconfig export LADSPA_PATH=%{_libdir}/ladspa Then, will yum after installing package execute this export line and setup LADSPA_PATH to correct value? But if you want patch, I'll make a patch, but before them I must know how to solve this multilib path (Currently I do not have enough knowledge about multilibs :( ) (Nobody is perfect :) ) > > Please describe me the steps to get this rpmlint warning, with that line > removed. > After building package with mock and checked packages under mocsk's result dirs with rpmlint, and without execstack line, I'm getting this warning in i386 package: mlt.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 16:12:08 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 16:12:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417141201.84E4F2C354@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #32 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-17 16:12:07 --- Re:%post hack for env variables That'll set it only for the *install* environment, not runtime for all users. ie, won't work (as-is). fixing properly as suggested is a much preferred route to take. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 16:14:27 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 16:14:28 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417141420.E72E92C354@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #33 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 16:14:27 --- (In reply to comment #32) > Re:%post hack for env variables > > That'll set it only for the *install* environment, not runtime for all users. > ie, won't work (as-is). fixing properly as suggested is a much preferred route > to take. > OK, thanks, now I understand... I'll go in battle with patching this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 16:35:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 16:35:28 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417143521.607C62C3DC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #5 from whyohwhyohwhyoh 2009-04-17 16:35:27 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Did you try to ask the Fedora maintainer? Tell him that isn't not that much > work to get this package into RPM Fusion -- no review is needed and he doesn't > need a sponsor if he's sponsored for Fedora i have asked now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:09:30 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:09:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417150923.8D4A42C4E6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #34 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 17:09:30 --- (In reply to comment #31) > > > > and what will set the LADSPA_PATH during runtime? No, just patch (or sed) it > > up, and there won't be no worries. > > My mistake... > but if I put in spec some like this: > > %post > /sbin/ldconfig > export LADSPA_PATH=%{_libdir}/ladspa > > Then, will yum after installing package execute this export line and setup > LADSPA_PATH to correct value? > > But if you want patch, I'll make a patch, but before them I must know how to > solve this multilib path (Currently I do not have enough knowledge about > multilibs :( ) (Nobody is perfect :) ) > > It's okay, you learn with experience. It will be enough to change the line ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); in src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c to ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); You can then send this patch upstream. > > > > Please describe me the steps to get this rpmlint warning, with that line > > removed. > > > > After building package with mock and checked packages under mocsk's result dirs > with rpmlint, and without execstack line, I'm getting this warning in i386 > package: > > mlt.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so > I confirm this to happen only in i386 package. x86_64 doesn't have the problem. You can use the attached patch to solve the issue permanently. You can send this upstream too. Other then these, I found that the installed package gives the rpmlint mlt.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmlt.so.0.3.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 which can easily be fixed too. Check the LDFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:10:50 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:10:50 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417151043.B62F72C50D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #35 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 17:10:50 --- Created an attachment (id=163) --> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=163) adds .note.GNU-stack section -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:13:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:13:46 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417151340.75DB82C55A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-17 17:13:47 --- Hi: I am current cairo-dock maintainer on Fedora. As cje commented cairo-dock is removed on F-11+ because RH legal felt cairo-dock may infrindge a patent owned by Apple. I don't know well how rpmfusion think of patent issue, however if rpmfusion can allow cairo-dock and if it is *not so much hard* to maintain cairo-dock on rpmfusion, I can import cairo-dock into rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:26:02 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:26:01 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417152555.566602C35B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #36 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-17 17:26:02 --- (In reply to comment #34) ... > It's okay, you learn with experience. It will be enough to change the line > ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); > in src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c to > ladspa_path = g_strdup > ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); I would have picked lib64 first on lib64 system (and eventually on lib system also since the lib64 directory may not exist which is less important than trying to load a 32bit dso from a 64bit program. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:37:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:37:44 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417153737.630F22C4B5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 17:37:44 --- RPM Fusion does not care about software patents, that's one of the reasons it exists. There are already many patent-encumbered packages in RPM Fusion. Assuming there are no other licensing issues, the package can go into RPM Fusion Free. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:40:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:40:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417153956.9F8362C4E6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #37 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-17 17:40:03 --- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #34) > ... > > It's okay, you learn with experience. It will be enough to change the line > > ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); > > in src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c to > > ladspa_path = g_strdup > > ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); > I would have picked lib64 first on lib64 system (and eventually on lib system > also since the lib64 directory may not exist which is less important than > trying to load a 32bit dso from a 64bit program. I would use "sed -i 's|/usr/lib|%{_libdir}|'" on that file or a get_plugin_dir()-like function from a library (if possible). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:43:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:43:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417154346.35EDA2C50D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #38 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 17:43:53 --- Searching both lib and lib64 won't work if both the 32-bit and the 64-bit version of the library are installed. The correct solution is to write a patch which looks *only* in the lib64 directories, then apply it with: %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" %patch0 -p1 -b .lib64 %endif It can also be done with a sed as Dan Hor?k suggests. And no, this cannot be upstreamed. The only way upstream can handle this is to set some #define based on the libdir detected by the build system (autotools in this case). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:44:55 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:44:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417154447.E76642C577@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #39 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 17:44:55 --- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #34) > ... > > It's okay, you learn with experience. It will be enough to change the line > > ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); > > in src/modules/jackrack/plugin_mgr.c to > > ladspa_path = g_strdup > > ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); > I would have picked lib64 first on lib64 system (and eventually on lib system > also since the lib64 directory may not exist which is less important than > trying to load a 32bit dso from a 64bit program. > You mean two patches, one for lib and one for lib64 system? So, first will change: ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); and second (lib64): ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa:/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); or I miss your thoughts :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:48:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:48:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417154829.3B2AA2C187@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #40 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-17 17:48:36 --- (In reply to comment #38) > Searching both lib and lib64 won't work if both the 32-bit and the 64-bit > version of the library are installed. > > The correct solution is to write a patch which looks *only* in the lib64 > directories, then apply it with: > %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" > %patch0 -p1 -b .lib64 > %endif and in this case patch must change this: ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa"); into this: ladspa_path = g_strdup ("/usr/local/lib64/ladspa:/usr/lib64/ladspa"); is that correctly? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:52:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:52:31 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417155224.85B3B2C573@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-17 17:52:31 --- Yes, that's what I mean. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 17:55:24 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 17:55:24 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417155516.D57132C29F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #42 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-17 17:55:24 --- (In reply to comment #38) > Searching both lib and lib64 won't work if both the 32-bit and the 64-bit > version of the library are installed. > This is the plugin directory. No ladspa or lv2 plugins are multilib in Fedora. I doubt that they will ever be. The patch will work. sed will work too. It's a matter of taste. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 18:52:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 18:52:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417165226.939EF2C3A4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-17 18:52:34 --- Well, now I am reading this: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors Reading this comment: (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > garn. but i'm allergic to making commitments. maybe we can persuade the > > existing fedora maintainer to defect to rpmfusion! ;-) > > Did you try to ask the Fedora maintainer? Tell him that isn't not that much > work to get this package into RPM Fusion -- no review is needed and he doesn't > need a sponsor if he's sponsored for Fedora Now I applied for rpmfusion cvsextras membership but it is not needed? And is it sufficient that I write CVS request for cairo-dock here (after I am sponsored on rpmfusion if needed)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 17 22:42:37 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 17 22:42:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417204227.6A4C62C2BF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-17 22:42:37 --- Blocking RF_NEW for now... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 00:28:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 00:27:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417222749.B30502C557@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #43 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-18 00:28:00 --- > ! All relevant doc files should be packaged. ./src/modules/motion_est/README > can go to the %doc of the main package How I can elegantly solve this? I tried with this: %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING GPL NEWS README motion_est src/modules/motion_est/README but I'm getting this error (what is logically), so how I can create subdir with %doc, like in -devel example (%doc doc/* demos): cp: will not overwrite just-created `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mlt-0.3.8-2.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/mlt-0.3.8/README' with `src/modules/motion_est/README' I was finding this explanations in Guidelines and other packaging documentations, but nothing found! > * Please add BuildRequires: frei0r-devel In Fedora 10 frei0r-devel do not exist (in F11 exist!) > > * rawhide buildlog says: > - libquicktime not found: only enabling dv avi support > > > You need to patch this up so it can find the libquicktime properly. > I'm little confusing with this. What exactly I must patch? In F10 build.log do not report "not found" problem (only in F11) > > * Running mlt-miracle gives "segmentation fault" I asked for this, but the answer is little weird. Citation: > 2) Can we exclude miracle from MLT (is that action break kdenlive)? kdenlive does not need miracle, but currently the way the source is structured, mlt++ includes the miracle and valerie classes, which depends on the respective libs, and kdenlive uses mlt++. It is like a knot at the moment :-/ > Because > miracle gives Segmentation fault and this warning: > > mlt.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmiracle.so.0.3.7 Why does it say 0.3.7 instead of 0.3.8? > exit@GLIBC_2.0 > You told me that it will be exclude in this version, so if this is not so I said it will be done on the _next_ release. > simply to exclude, can you make some patch? No, it is not trivial. The next release will be done as soon as I reorganize the source trees and stabilize the build. Many things make me a little headache, but I'll survive :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 01:26:46 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 01:26:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417232635.071312C330@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #44 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-18 01:26:46 --- (In reply to comment #43) > > ! All relevant doc files should be packaged. ./src/modules/motion_est/README > > can go to the %doc of the main package > > How I can elegantly solve this? Quite simple actually, in %install: mv src/modules/motion_est/README README.motion_est and in %files: %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING GPL NEWS README* > > > * Please add BuildRequires: frei0r-devel > > In Fedora 10 frei0r-devel do not exist (in F11 exist!) > It does exist in F-10. It is in the testing repo (for now). > > > > > * rawhide buildlog says: > > - libquicktime not found: only enabling dv avi support > > > > > > You need to patch this up so it can find the libquicktime properly. > > > > I'm little confusing with this. What exactly I must patch? In F10 build.log do > not report "not found" problem (only in F11) > That is because libquicktime in F-11 does not have lqt-config. Patch it up to use pkg-config instead. It will be compatible for both F-10 and F-11. > > > > > * Running mlt-miracle gives "segmentation fault" > > I asked for this, but the answer is little weird. > > Citation: > > 2) Can we exclude miracle from MLT (is that action break kdenlive)? > > kdenlive does not need miracle, but currently the way the source is > structured, mlt++ includes the miracle and valerie classes, which > depends on the respective libs, and kdenlive uses mlt++. It is like a > knot at the moment :-/ > > > Because > > miracle gives Segmentation fault and this warning: > > I built kdenlive from the SRPM's you provided. kdenlive also gives me segfaults. I didn't try to debug it yet, but perhaps it is related to this miracle issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 01:29:17 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 01:29:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417232906.6BCA72C352@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #45 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-18 01:29:17 --- > How I can elegantly solve this? [snip] > cp: will not overwrite just-created > `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mlt-0.3.8-2.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/mlt-0.3.8/README' > with `src/modules/motion_est/README' In %prep: mv -f src/modules/motion_est/README src/modules/motion_est/README.motion_est then in %files: %doc src/modules/motion_est/README.motion_est An alternative is to explicitly install your documentation in %install with any path structure you like, then you can list the installed documentation: %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > In Fedora 10 frei0r-devel do not exist (in F11 exist!) It's in updates-testing now. > I'm little confusing with this. What exactly I must patch? In F10 build.log do > not report "not found" problem (only in F11) You apparently need to use pkg-config libquicktime instead of lqt-config. That said, IMHO libquicktime should be shipping an lqt-config which calls pkg-config, that has been done in several packages in Fedora to prevent multilib conflicts. Dropping lqt-config entirely makes the package incompatible with upstream and is a really bad idea. I reopened the libquicktime bug to complain about that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 01:34:13 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 01:34:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090417233401.8C7362C352@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwizart@gmail.com |rpmfusion-package- | |review@rpmfusion.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #8 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-04-18 01:34:12 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I don't know where you got the cudatoolkit initscript but it is totally undeed. > Once the nvidia driver is loaded, the /dev/nvidia? and /dev/nvidiactl are > automatically created. Furthermore this script assume the module name to be > hardcoded to nvidia.ko which won't be garanted in the near future for all > nvidia driver branches (even only cuda capables branches). Well, I found the info about it on NVidia website ("might be necessary") and it was present in the Mandriva package. Unfortunately I don't have any CUDA-enabled GPU card available (...in fact, I've no Nvidia around at all, just realizing:), hence I'm sorry but I couldn't test. I have one tester among Fedoras BOINC users who however is not able to find out such things of course. > > - You need a ExclusiveArch since cudatoolkit is only provided as i386 i586 > x86_64 > That will lead to have: > %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 > ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64 > %else > ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 > %endif Done. > - Please use the full source url when possible for SOURCE0/1 Done, sorry, I thought there is no direct link, but finally I found one indeed. > - cuda virtual provides can probably be versioned (version-release.) Done. > - Post scripts, since libraries are provided by the -libs sub-package, you need > to have: > %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig Done. > - According to the cuda download page. The cudatoolkit highly depend on a > certified nvidia driver version. (specially for EL-5, where they are multiple > version). I can bump the nvidia driver to that version, but i guess that once > cuda 2.2 will be here, It will be possible to have two differents certified > cuda version on a Fedora 9 plateform. > That will lead to work with alternative, so different version of the > cudatoolkit can co-exist. (like there is with different version of the jdk > compiler). > (I don't like to use version in the name of the package ) Done too, hope in the right way. > - It would be better to fix the package in %prep (iconv, sed, etc) > and then to cp -pR the whole directories to a versioned prefix in %install > (like /usr/lib/cudatoolkit-%{version}-%{_target_cpu} which is the best suitable > for compiler according to the FHS ) Done. > But this probably needs more experiments (what is the default installation > prefix btw ?) > Whatever the decision to use a better prefix, I don't like cuda headers to be > available in the standard include path. This could be tweaked from > /usr/bin/nvcc.profile. I used %{_includedir}/cudart which is one of the upstream solutions. Updated SPEC file as previously on: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/cudatoolkit.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 04:38:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 04:38:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090418023831.D13B32C217@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |kwizart@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | --- Comment #9 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-04-18 04:38:31 --- Ops, sorry...somehow I managed to de-assign the bugreport. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 04:38:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 04:38:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090418023847.260812C297@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 13:00:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 13:00:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090418110014.3FBD82C2F5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #15 from David Hlacik 2009-04-18 13:00:18 --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Yes, bugzilla.redhat.com is the best place to report those to. > > > > For the fontconfig configurations: > > * 04_ubuntu_monospace_lcd_filter_conf.patch is probably needed too. > > * If you can't get those merged into the Fedora fontconfig, freetype-freeworld > > is probably the best place to ship them in. > > > > Hi Kevin, > > I have created 2 bugs so far in RedHat's bugzilla ; > > 1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496191 , for cairo > 2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496192, for libXft > Hi Kevin, my question is, are we going to wait till guys from upstream,fedora will decide what to do? Can I create package requests to have them in rpmfusion for now (with ld.so.conf) ? Thanks, David -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 19:48:02 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 19:48:01 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090418174754.4AB672C3C9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-18 19:48:02 --- I guess we can have RPM Fusion builds with these patches until they get upstreamed. By the way, Qt 4.5 has a similar patch already upstream, but we currently had to disable it because it displays garbage with VRGB/VBGR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490377 Any help getting this fixed would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 18 23:42:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 18 23:42:14 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090418214204.764DB2C30D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #46 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-18 23:42:14 --- Here are the newest files: Spec: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt.spec SRPM: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.8-2.fc10.src.rpm I resolved mostly all review items except next: * Other then these, I found that the installed package gives the rpmlint mlt.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmlt.so.0.3.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 I will... :) (must a study this a little bit) *Segmentation faults at miracle and inigo binaries. This is something hard to resolve by myself. I'll must contact author... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 19 19:53:58 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 19 19:53:57 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090419175349.F36D52C473@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |4 --- Comment #26 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-19 19:53:58 --- Sorry for the late on that one but i had to install a complete set of host/Guest to try all those things out. The packages dependencies are fine in my side now. I'm not completely for a one kmod package but it doesn't really matter and doesn't brake anything. well, go ahead and import those packages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dominik at greysector.net Sun Apr 19 22:10:15 2009 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Sun Apr 19 22:10:29 2009 Subject: rpms/live555/devel live.2009.03.22-unified.patch, NONE, 1.1 live555.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.4, 1.5 In-Reply-To: <20090417115846.BC87218032@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090417115846.BC87218032@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <20090419201014.GA13427@mokona.greysector.net> On Friday, 17 April 2009 at 13:58, NicolasChauvet wrote: > Author: kwizart > > Update of /cvs/free/rpms/live555/devel > In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv22364 > > Modified Files: > live555.spec sources > Added Files: > live.2009.03.22-unified.patch > Log Message: > Unified patches version > > Index: live555.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/live555/devel/live555.spec,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 > --- live555.spec 7 Apr 2009 19:31:08 -0000 1.4 > +++ live555.spec 17 Apr 2009 11:58:46 -0000 1.5 [...] > Group: System Environment/Libraries > License: LGPLv2+ > URL: http://live555.com/liveMedia/ > Source0: http://live555.com/liveMedia/public/live.%{date}.tar.gz > -# http://live555.com/liveMedia/public/changelog.txt > -Source1: changelog.txt Why did you drop changelog.txt? [...] > @@ -191,7 +180,7 @@ > > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > -%doc COPYING README changelog.txt > +%doc COPYING README > %{_libdir}/libBasicUsageEnvironment.so > %{_libdir}/libgroupsock.so > %{_libdir}/libliveMedia.so And here. Please revert these two changes. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 19 22:28:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 19 22:28:17 2009 Subject: [Bug 562] New: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam@diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 1.0 Description: The catalyst 9.4 display driver kernel module. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod-9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: akmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation > No documentation needs to be included in these packages kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized catalyst kernel module(s) for 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 > due to kmodtool kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64-9.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > Not a big deal: the file can be renamed if it's going to be used on Joliet-formatted media. kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64/extra/catalyst/fglrx.ko > Set this intentionally as part of the debuginfo workaround: sed -i -e 's|strict=true|strict=false|' find-debuginfo.sh -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 19 22:35:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 19 22:35:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 562] Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090419203544.DA8642C231@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 --- Comment #1 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-19 22:35:54 --- Also, I forgot to mention the problem with kernel 2.6.29: 9.4 is compatible with Xserver 1.6, however not with kernel 2.6.29. A patch is readily available to make the 9.4 drivers compile against 2.6.29 but this patch has not been included due to the large amount of errors it puts into the system logs (once every few minutes idle, up to every few seconds when the graphics card is in heavy use). Instead, an akmod package with this patch included will be provided in F-10 and F-9 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing for those who wish to update to 2.6.29 (it will be enabled in devel by default). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 19 22:45:27 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 19 22:45:27 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] New: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 Summary: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam@diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 1.0 Description: This package provides the most recent proprietary AMD display driver which allows for hardware accelerated rendering with ATI Mobility, FireGL and Desktop GPUs. Some of the Desktop and Mobility GPUs supported are the Radeon HD 2000 series to the Radeon HD 4800 series. For the full product support list, please consult the release notes for release 9.4. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes > This file does not need to be set as %config. xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ati/signature > Immovable file, required by the driver xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided catalyst-kmod > Unimportant, users are asked to install "(a)kmod-foo" and not "foo-(a)kmod" xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ati/amdpcsdb.default xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ati/atiogl.xml xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ati/control xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ati/logo.xbm.example xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ati/logo_mask.xbm.example > noreplace has been intentionally left out, these files should be replaceable. xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/atieventsd xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/catalyst > This is OK, the driver should be enabled after installation xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/catalyst $name > This os OK, name="catalyst" xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation > All documentation is in the main package xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-libs.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/dri/fglrx_dri.so > Binary-only file, nothing we can do -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 01:50:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 01:50:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090419235010.87A5C2C45E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #47 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-20 01:50:21 --- The package looks a lot better in shape now. The remaining problems are: 1- shared-lib-calls-exit 2- the segfaults 3- unused-direct-shlib-dependency You could do the fixes yourself but I think these are rather upstream's job. When are they making the next release? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Mon Apr 20 05:56:28 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Mon Apr 20 05:56:46 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) Message-ID: I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks in fedoraforum are asking about it. Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or maybe it can be thought as an alternative. Orcan From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 08:22:58 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 08:22:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420062256.28A882C4C0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #48 from Zarko Pintar 2009-04-20 08:22:57 --- (In reply to comment #47) > The package looks a lot better in shape now. The remaining problems are: > > 1- shared-lib-calls-exit > 2- the segfaults > 3- unused-direct-shlib-dependency > > You could do the fixes yourself but I think these are rather upstream's job. > When are they making the next release? > One interesting thing! At F11 miracle and inigo do NOT produce Segmentation faults !! I know that MLT and kdenlive needs Qt library for work, the differences between F10 (Qt 4.5 is not yet in official repo) and F11 is in Qt version, and in the kernel itself... I know that people complained for Kdenlive's crashes in F10, but not in F11... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 08:28:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 08:28:19 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420062816.925302C4C7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #49 from Dan Hor?k 2009-04-20 08:28:18 --- (In reply to comment #47) > The package looks a lot better in shape now. The remaining problems are: > > 1- shared-lib-calls-exit I usually ask upstream whether it is intended behaviour > 2- the segfaults > 3- unused-direct-shlib-dependency see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency > > You could do the fixes yourself but I think these are rather upstream's job. > When are they making the next release? > -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From musuruan at gmail.com Mon Apr 20 09:29:44 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Mon Apr 20 09:29:49 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <29fee02b0904200029p7932300dp92e5a8eedd68149@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who > made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks > in fedoraforum are asking about it. > > Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or > maybe it can be thought as an alternative. What's the problem of getting it in Fedora? Bye, Andrea. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Mon Apr 20 09:35:48 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Mon Apr 20 09:36:09 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) In-Reply-To: <29fee02b0904200029p7932300dp92e5a8eedd68149@mail.gmail.com> References: <29fee02b0904200029p7932300dp92e5a8eedd68149@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who >> made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks >> in fedoraforum are asking about it. >> >> Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or >> maybe it can be thought as an alternative. > > What's the problem of getting it in Fedora? > > Bye, > > Andrea. > OSS has hardware drivers. It comes with bunch of kernel modules. Orcan From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 20 10:53:54 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 20 10:59:39 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) In-Reply-To: References: <29fee02b0904200029p7932300dp92e5a8eedd68149@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: 2009/4/20 Orcan Ogetbil : > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who >>> made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks >>> in fedoraforum are asking about it. >>> >>> Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or >>> maybe it can be thought as an alternative. >> >> What's the problem of getting it in Fedora? >> >> Bye, >> >> Andrea. >> > > OSS has hardware drivers. It comes with bunch of kernel modules. That would mean backport of already present oss kernel modules or are theses OSS kernel modules was removed previously and only the compat layer was available ? What is the "userland" needs for that ? In my case (vlc), Iv'e disabled the oss support (along with v4l1) by F-11 I'm not against to have some experiments done externally from rpmfusion (read: I would allow it a "tobedefined" rpmfusion-experimental), but not if this mean recompilation of userland applications. Nicolas (kwizart) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 11:48:57 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 11:48:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420094853.80A102C4C6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 David Hlacik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david@hlacik.eu --- Comment #1 from David Hlacik 2009-04-20 11:48:57 --- Is this a replacement for fglrx ? Thanks, David -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:33:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:33:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420103347.B89BF2C4B4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |kwizart@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | --- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-20 12:33:51 --- No, this is another package, fglrx is aimed to stay at 9.3 until it works. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:33:58 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:34:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420103354.1834D2C4D3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:43:04 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:43:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 562] Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420104259.79AB02C4D0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |kwizart@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | --- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-20 12:43:03 --- - starting review - -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:43:12 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:43:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 562] Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420104307.9F2502C4DC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:44:08 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:44:09 2009 Subject: [Bug 562] Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420104404.225FE2C4D4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 12:45:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 12:45:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420104514.01B452C1D8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 14:13:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 14:13:54 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420121347.B54B02C4D9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #27 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-20 14:13:52 --- Thanks for the review Xavier Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: VirtualBox-OSE Short Description: - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware Owners: lkundrak, laxathom Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 15:08:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 15:08:56 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420130848.D19FA2C454@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-20 15:08:54 --- 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on /dev/dri/card? ) the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test for this feature. This problem itself is a blocker for later improvement of the packaging scheme of the binary GPU drivers. Now this is not a problem as we will stay with the previous scheme until this is solved. In general we need to check if every file remains necessary. 2* Having this directory provided as multilibs is a very evil bug. No i386 userland application should use this directly on a x86_64 system. %files libs .. %{atilibdir}/libAMDXvBA.cap %{_libdir}/dri/ ^^ mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64 owns this directory, but we aren't supposed to requires any other dri modules, so it is fine to have the directory owned by the package itself. (btw, please note that only mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64 is provided in x86_64 repository, not the i386 version) 3* -devel subpackage %{atilibdir}/*.a %{_libdir}/xorg/modules/*.a %{_includedir}/GL/ %{_includedir}/X11/extensions/*.h Theses files conflict with mesa-ones, the nVidia driver have them installed in /usr/include/nvidia which the package should have them installed probably in /usr/include/catalyst. That needs to be changed with the package converted to the new scheme. This could be dropped as a consequence: Requires: %{_includedir}/X11/extensions, %{_includedir}/GL 4* ||: or everyline with scriplets. This tweak is aimed to avoid error that might prevents rpm transaction if ever the scriptlet failed for any reason. That's prevent package to fail to install/uninstall, so it only make sense at the end (un-conditional) of a scriplet. 5* %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig ^^ This is uneeded, (read evil) as the main package doesn't provide any system wide shared objects,that need to be registered with ldconfig. (only xorg libraries that are meant to be dlopened). 6* Missing conflicts : Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx (legacy new name supposed to be re-introduced at a later time once nVidia support new xorg-server). Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-custom 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history: This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped in fglrx also actually.) Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv < %{version}-%{release} Provides: ati-x11-drv = %{version}-%{release} ... Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv-devel < %{version}-%{release} Provides: ati-x11-drv-devel = %{version}-%{release} ... %ifarch %{ix86} Provides: %{name}-libs-32bit = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-libs-32bit <= %{version}-%{release} %endif ... Requires: %{atilibdir}/libGL.so.1.2 ^^ this one is not needed along with the use of Requires: %{name}-libs-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release} (for the main package) 8* %config need to be appended for earch file using /etc There is a need to verify if this is still relevant for some files that may even not be relevant to have in /etc but where ati/amd uses some hardcoded path which prevent us to use that. So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 (F-9?). Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few tweaks from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I really think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 18:44:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 18:44:42 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420164434.AAA752C4D5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-20 18:44:42 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * This macro seems not to be used: > > > > %define blend blender-freeworld > > > > * In this macro blender-nonfree needs to be changed to blender-freeworld: > > > > %define plugins %{_libdir}/blender-nonfree/plugins > > > > It would be easier to use the name macro in this way: > > > > %define plugins %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins > This is not as easy, so I tend to disagree, this content from blender-nonfree > shoudln't override the content fromm blender itself. so for some part, it > should use the blender compiled shared object. > > This is a dumb assumption at this time as I've just look at the spec file > itself. Please be aware, that the access to the diretories whill be come from ~/.blender/plugins. This directories contains symlinks which are created from the blender wrapper script and point to the shared objects in %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins. > Use libGL-devel and libGLU-devel instead of harcoded mesa vendor ones. This is a good idea. > - I never understood why ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_bindir} was used instead of > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}; but this is trivial. (and also more aesthetic: it > suggest that you know that %{_bindir} already have a "/" at the beginning). Bad habit. > BTW, - You need to remove the x264 sources along with ffmpeg ones from the > fedora source archive. Done. > - Are you sure to have solve the problem with the blender binary/noarch script > directory (where blender plugins will store their content and temporary files)? Should be fixed. Next Release: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld-2.48a-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 18:56:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 18:56:17 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420165610.1560D2C2EB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #10 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-20 18:56:17 --- I was passing by and just wanted to stop to say that the new guidelines prefer usage of %global instead of %define. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 19:13:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 19:13:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420171257.2C2E42C3D3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3 --- Comment #11 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-20 19:13:05 --- (In reply to comment #10) > I was passing by and just wanted to stop to say that the new guidelines prefer > usage of %global instead of %define. Yep, but in some case, it doesn't work as expected. @Jochen BTW, don't forget to update the F-11 branch also and to request the F-11 package to get tagged as F-11 Final. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 20 19:23:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 20 19:23:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420172255.3A56D2C3D2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-20 19:23:03 --- Next Release: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-freeworld/blender-freeworld-2.48a-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From orion at cora.nwra.com Mon Apr 20 22:44:08 2009 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Mon Apr 20 22:52:38 2009 Subject: Install foo2* packages by default? Message-ID: <49ECDE98.8040902@cora.nwra.com> Do we really want to install the foo2* packages by default? Isn't there some kind of automatic printer driver download feature these days that maybe can be used? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 05:15:15 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 05:15:17 2009 Subject: [Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421031515.4F1402C2EE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 --- Comment #50 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-21 05:15:15 --- If the package was built against Qt 4.5, it won't run against 4.4. This is going to become a non-issue very soon as Qt 4.5 is now queued for stable. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 06:47:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 06:47:33 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421044729.B70C62C328@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #28 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-21 06:47:30 --- Thanks for the review Xavier Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: VirtualBox-OSE Short Description: - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware Owners: lkundrak, laxathom Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 License tag: free Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: VirtualBox-OSE-kmod Short Description: Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE Owners: lkundrak, laxathom Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 07:03:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 07:03:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421050329.B23662C334@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | --- Comment #29 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21 07:03:30 --- CVS done, a few comments: (In reply to comment #28) > Owners: lkundrak, laxathom * each package can only have one owner; I assume it's you and added laxathom as InitialCC > Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 * we haven't branched for F-11 yet; I assume we'll do it a few days before F-11 comes out, as everything else makes a lot of work to configure the builders that likely is not worth it * I didn't branch for EL-5 yet; see comment #2; In short * I'm still inclined to drop the whole idea with the EL repo if nobody steps up and feel responsible for it * we need to work out how to deal with kmods in EL land; we have three choices afaics: 1) go with the stuff from EL-5 (no akmods, a bit different from the stuff we use for recent Fedora versions) 2) use the same stuff we use in recent Fedora versions 3) a mix of what's in EL-5 and recent Fedora versions I (right now) prefer solution 3, but that option might change when looking at the details -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From oget.fedora at gmail.com Tue Apr 21 07:05:22 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Tue Apr 21 07:05:41 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) In-Reply-To: References: <29fee02b0904200029p7932300dp92e5a8eedd68149@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2009/4/20 Orcan Ogetbil>: >> OSS has hardware drivers. It comes with bunch of kernel modules. > That would mean backport of already present oss kernel modules or are > theses OSS kernel modules was removed previously and only the compat > layer was available ? > I think the latter, but I'm not very sure. I was wondering if anyone here did some tests. > What is the "userland" needs for that ? > In my case (vlc), Iv'e disabled the oss support (along with v4l1) by F-11 > I disabled OSS in some of my packages too. But if OSSv4 works better than ALSA for some users, it is worth considering. I guess we need to do more research. > I'm not against to have some experiments done externally from rpmfusion > (read: I would allow it a "tobedefined" rpmfusion-experimental), but > not if this mean recompilation of userland applications. > > Nicolas (kwizart) > I agree. Orcan From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 21 07:21:57 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 21 07:22:03 2009 Subject: Return of the King? (OSSv4) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49ED57F5.6040802@leemhuis.info> On 20.04.2009 05:56, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who > made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks > in fedoraforum are asking about it. > > Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or > maybe it can be thought as an alternative. FWIW, I don't like the idea very much and it feel a lot like "wasting time" and "confusing users" to me. But I if someone really wants to package and maintain it I'm fine with it (but I'd be way more glad if we wouldn't provide it). If somebody wants to do something cool for Fedora in regards of sound support I'd say: package the creative driver for the X-Fi. ;-) CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 21 07:25:31 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 21 07:25:36 2009 Subject: Install foo2* packages by default? In-Reply-To: <49ECDE98.8040902@cora.nwra.com> References: <49ECDE98.8040902@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <49ED58CB.3020202@leemhuis.info> On 20.04.2009 22:44, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Do we really want to install the foo2* packages by default? I for one prefer if things "just work" which way more often is the case if packages and driver get installed by default, even if they are unused. That option (with the current packaging style) doesn't make sense everywhere (fglrx and nvidia for example), but in the foo2* case it doesn't do much harm besides wasting a bit of bandwith and disk space, so I'd say it makes sense to install foo2* by default. > Isn't there > some kind of automatic printer driver download feature these days that > maybe can be used? Not that I'm aware of. Cu knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 07:27:18 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 07:27:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421052716.D12D62C24E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@leemhuis.info --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-21 07:27:18 --- Thorsten, would you tell me the proper procedure for this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kevin.kofler at chello.at Tue Apr 21 08:14:07 2009 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Tue Apr 21 08:14:24 2009 Subject: Install foo2* packages by default? References: <49ECDE98.8040902@cora.nwra.com> <49ED58CB.3020202@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Isn't there >> some kind of automatic printer driver download feature these days that >> maybe can be used? > > Not that I'm aware of. system-config-printer has PackageKit integration these days. That said, last I checked all that PackageKit integration into programs didn't work with KPackageKit, only gnome-packagekit (KPackageKit doesn't implement the D-Bus interface which is used for this), and I haven't checked whether the KDE printer applet (which is based on the system-config-printer libraries) implements its part either. So at this point it's probably a GNOME-only feature. Kevin Kofler From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 11:08:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 11:08:18 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421090812.E46EC2C330@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #30 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-21 11:08:16 --- (In reply to comment #28) > Owners: lkundrak, laxathom > * each package can only have one owner; I assume it's you and added laxathom as > InitialCC Added second owner. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 11:26:45 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 11:26:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421092641.2B79E2C34E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #31 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21 11:26:44 --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #28) > > Owners: lkundrak, laxathom > > * each package can only have one owner; I assume it's you and added laxathom as > > InitialCC > Added second owner. /me looks at http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=free&view=markup and finds Fedora|VirtualBox-OSE|A [...]hardware|lkundrak@v3.sk,lxtnow@gmail.com|| That afaik does not work and breaks the bugzilla sync script from mschwendt, as every package can only have one owner in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 11:40:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 11:40:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421094018.86AE52C37B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #32 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-21 11:40:22 --- Imported and built for Raw Hide. F-10 is pending the stable kBuild update. Will upgrade to 2.2 this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 12:48:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 12:48:53 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421104847.48E6F2C364@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #33 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-21 12:48:51 --- Can i have a look on that script ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 13:01:37 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 13:01:37 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421110132.C91AB2C3D9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #34 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21 13:01:36 --- (In reply to comment #33) > Can i have a look on that script ? mschwendt reads the list, but asking him directly for it might be best and safest -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 15:23:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 15:23:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421132300.EBBBF2C460@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #35 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21 15:23:06 --- @lkundrak, VirtualBox-OSE.spec contains ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 that makes Plague build the package for athlon and several other "x86-archs"; see http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3589-VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-3.fc11/ http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_free/3590-VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-3.fc10/ We normally don't want that, hence please change above line to "ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64" on F-10 and "ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64" for F11 (or ExcludeArch ppc, ppc64 and others) to avoid that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From the.masch at gmail.com Tue Apr 21 15:25:46 2009 From: the.masch at gmail.com (Mario Chacon) Date: Tue Apr 21 15:26:10 2009 Subject: F11 - ATI RADON 3200 freeze Message-ID: <93d66b780904210625m7ae4977dnb2a584dbec96cfa2@mail.gmail.com> HI: I had problem that whole machine freezing up with an ATI Radeon HD 3200 video card. Once I login into gnome and wait a few seconds the system freeze. Salu2... masch... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090421/f31ebdf5/attachment.html From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 21 19:16:15 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 21 19:16:27 2009 Subject: Heads up: Did some changes to the build servers, please check the results Message-ID: <49EDFF5F.7030104@leemhuis.info> Hi! I created a script (I'll add it to CVS later) that writes proper mock config files for all the different RPM Fusion builders. That should make things a whole lot easier when it comes to creating configs for new releases/builders or other adjustments to the config files. After that I * reconfigured (see archives for reasons why) mock on builder.wilsonet.com with the new config files and enabled the builder again * updated the mock configs on the ppc builder to the new ones * disabled the two other x86 builders to give builder.wilsonet.com some more testing over the next few days If there are any problems let me know via mail; it would be nice if you guys could check the logs and results of your builds carefully. If nothing shows up over the next two days I'll update mock and the mock configs on the two other x86 builders as well. CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 19:49:34 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 19:49:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421174926.619C32C4BB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-21 19:49:33 --- New release: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 20:03:50 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 20:03:50 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421180342.1890B2C4B6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #11 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-21 20:03:50 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thorsten, would you tell me the proper procedure for this? Sorry, was busy with other stuff. I sponsored you in FAS and created the branches (F9, F-10, devel) for cairo-dock. You now need to set up the plague on your system (see http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors), checkout "cairo-dock" from cvs-free and import and build it just like you would do for a new package in Fedora. We have no bodhi, so you don't need to take care of filing a update request once the build finished. The package gets pushed to testing with the next push and moved to stable about 8 to 14 days later if nobody tells me "don't move it please". HTH -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 20:23:34 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 21 20:23:33 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-21 Message-ID: <20090421182334.5223E2402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 3 bsnes-0.045-1.fc11 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc11 sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc10 ---------------------------- * Fri Apr 17 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.5.0130u4 - Updated to 0.130u4 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc9 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 17 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.5.0130u4 - Updated to 0.130u4 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: bsnes-0.045-1.fc11 ------------------ * Mon Apr 20 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.045-1 - Updated to 0.045 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 sdlmame-0131-0.5.0130u4.fc11 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 16 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-0.5.0130u4 - Updated to 0.130u4 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 20:24:03 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 21 20:24:02 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-21 Message-ID: <20090421182403.619E02402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 7 live555-0-0.23.2009.04.07.fc11 mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20317.fc11 rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 smc-1.8-1.fc11 NEW VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-3.fc11 : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware NEW VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-1.fc11 : Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 --------------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 -------------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: live555-0-0.23.2009.04.07.fc11 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 17 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0-0.23.2009.04.07 - Unified patches. (unrelevant fixes dropped). * Tue Apr 07 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 0-0.22.2009.04.07 - 2009.04.07 - use new debian patchset mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20317.fc11 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20317 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20317 * Tue Mar 31 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20293 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20293 - Add BuildRequires: phonon-devel rt2860-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 --------------------- * Mon Apr 20 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.0.0-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 20 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.0.0-1 - version update (2.1.0.0) smc-1.8-1.fc11 -------------- * Sat Apr 11 2009 Hans de Goede 1.8-1 - New upstream release 1.8 * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.7-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Thu Jan 01 2009 Hans de Goede 1.7-1 - New upstream release 1.7 - Rebuild for new boost VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-3.fc11 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 12 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-3 - Fix SDK permissions - Fix SDK requires * Mon Mar 30 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-2 - Fix the swab fix so that we don't break pre-2.6.29 build VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-1.fc11 -------------------------------- * Sat Mar 14 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-1 - Update to 2.1.4 - Enable VBOX_USE_INSERT_PAGE (VirtualBox #3403) - Use packed source code tarball From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 21:16:26 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 21:16:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421191617.9AD942C4D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 --- Comment #4 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-21 21:16:26 --- BTW - For those who are looking at the bug and want to know what kwizart and I mean by old/new scheme, "old scheme" refers to the current setup with livna-config-display where all configuration files are simply included in the driver packages. "New scheme" refers to a future setup with rpmfusion-config-display where configuration files are generated on-demand, making driver switches much easier. (In reply to comment #3) > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least) > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on > /dev/dri/card? ) > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test for > this feature. Will test at home tonight. > This problem itself is a blocker for later improvement of the packaging scheme > of the binary GPU drivers. Now this is not a problem as we will stay with the > previous scheme until this is solved. I saw in the last git commit you made from rpmfusion-config-display you added a structure so we could create/destroy these files using r-c-d... I will try to continue working on this soon, and if it works then the need for files like the blacklist, udev configuration or power scripts will no longer be a problem. > In general we need to check if every file remains necessary. +1 > 3* -devel subpackage > %{atilibdir}/*.a > %{_libdir}/xorg/modules/*.a > %{_includedir}/GL/ > %{_includedir}/X11/extensions/*.h > Theses files conflict with mesa-ones, the nVidia driver have them installed in > /usr/include/nvidia which the package should have them installed probably in > /usr/include/catalyst. That needs to be changed with the package converted to > the new scheme. > This could be dropped as a consequence: > Requires: %{_includedir}/X11/extensions, %{_includedir}/GL Will fix + test compiling software against the relocated headers tonight as well. > 4* ||: or everyline with scriplets. > This tweak is aimed to avoid error that might prevents rpm transaction if ever > the scriptlet failed for any reason. That's prevent package to fail to > install/uninstall, so it only make sense at the end (un-conditional) of a > scriplet. Done > 5* %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > ^^ This is uneeded, (read evil) as the main package doesn't provide any system > wide shared objects,that need to be registered with ldconfig. (only xorg > libraries that are meant to be dlopened). Done > 6* Missing conflicts : > Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx (legacy new name supposed to be > re-introduced at a later time once nVidia support new xorg-server). > Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-custom Done > 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history: > This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped in > fglrx also actually.) > Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: ati-x11-drv = %{version}-%{release} > ... > Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv-devel < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: ati-x11-drv-devel = %{version}-%{release} > ... If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will have no upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it for F-9/F-10. > %ifarch %{ix86} > Provides: %{name}-libs-32bit = %{version}-%{release} > Obsoletes: %{name}-libs-32bit <= %{version}-%{release} > %endif > ... > Requires: %{atilibdir}/libGL.so.1.2 > ^^ this one is not needed along with the use of > Requires: %{name}-libs-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release} > (for the main package) Fixed > 8* %config need to be appended for earch file using /etc > There is a need to verify if this is still relevant for some files that may > even not be relevant to have in /etc but where ati/amd uses some hardcoded path > which prevent us to use that. Done > So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 (F-9?). F-10 and F-11 right away (will migrate from old to new scheme eventually), and F-9 afterwards (but kept at the old scheme). > Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few tweaks > from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I really > think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11. +1 - this is partially my fault, I don't have much time... I'm finishing the semester mid-may, at that point I'll have much more time to finish the last bits of r-c-d. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 21 21:24:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 21 21:24:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090421192422.509F82C4E4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-21 21:24:31 --- Thank you for CVS procedure! Now - rebuilt for devel-free branch: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3593 - F-10/9 cairo-dock is still in Fedora, so I won't build this on rpmfusion-free. Now closing. Thank you, everyone. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From the.masch at gmail.com Tue Apr 21 21:39:25 2009 From: the.masch at gmail.com (Mario Chacon) Date: Tue Apr 21 21:47:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: <20090421191617.9AD942C4D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> References: <20090421191617.9AD942C4D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <93d66b780904211239y47ebc351r3c7812d2ddb9dec2@mail.gmail.com> HI: I had problem that whole machine freezing up with an ATI Radeon HD 3200 video card and fglrx. Once I login into gnome and wait a few seconds the system freeze. Is it fix it? Salu2... masch... On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:16 PM, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 > > > > > > --- Comment #4 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-21 > 21:16:26 --- > BTW - For those who are looking at the bug and want to know what kwizart > and I > mean by old/new scheme, "old scheme" refers to the current setup with > livna-config-display where all configuration files are simply included in > the > driver packages. "New scheme" refers to a future setup with > rpmfusion-config-display where configuration files are generated on-demand, > making driver switches much easier. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at > least) > > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes > > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on > > /dev/dri/card? ) > > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to > test for > > this feature. > Will test at home tonight. > > > This problem itself is a blocker for later improvement of the packaging > scheme > > of the binary GPU drivers. Now this is not a problem as we will stay with > the > > previous scheme until this is solved. > I saw in the last git commit you made from rpmfusion-config-display you > added a > structure so we could create/destroy these files using r-c-d... I will try > to > continue working on this soon, and if it works then the need for files like > the > blacklist, udev configuration or power scripts will no longer be a problem. > > In general we need to check if every file remains necessary. > +1 > > > 3* -devel subpackage > > %{atilibdir}/*.a > > %{_libdir}/xorg/modules/*.a > > %{_includedir}/GL/ > > %{_includedir}/X11/extensions/*.h > > Theses files conflict with mesa-ones, the nVidia driver have them > installed in > > /usr/include/nvidia which the package should have them installed probably > in > > /usr/include/catalyst. That needs to be changed with the package > converted to > > the new scheme. > > This could be dropped as a consequence: > > Requires: %{_includedir}/X11/extensions, %{_includedir}/GL > Will fix + test compiling software against the relocated headers tonight as > well. > > > 4* ||: or everyline with scriplets. > > This tweak is aimed to avoid error that might prevents rpm transaction if > ever > > the scriptlet failed for any reason. That's prevent package to fail to > > install/uninstall, so it only make sense at the end (un-conditional) of a > > scriplet. > Done > > > 5* %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > ^^ This is uneeded, (read evil) as the main package doesn't provide any > system > > wide shared objects,that need to be registered with ldconfig. (only xorg > > libraries that are meant to be dlopened). > Done > > > 6* Missing conflicts : > > Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx (legacy new name supposed to be > > re-introduced at a later time once nVidia support new xorg-server). > > Conflicts: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-custom > Done > > > 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history: > > This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped > in > > fglrx also actually.) > > Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv < %{version}-%{release} > > Provides: ati-x11-drv = %{version}-%{release} > > ... > > Obsoletes: ati-x11-drv-devel < %{version}-%{release} > > Provides: ati-x11-drv-devel = %{version}-%{release} > > ... > If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will > have no > upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new > branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it > for > F-9/F-10. > > > %ifarch %{ix86} > > Provides: %{name}-libs-32bit = %{version}-%{release} > > Obsoletes: %{name}-libs-32bit <= %{version}-%{release} > > %endif > > ... > > Requires: %{atilibdir}/libGL.so.1.2 > > ^^ this one is not needed along with the use of > > Requires: %{name}-libs-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release} > > (for the main package) > Fixed > > > 8* %config need to be appended for earch file using /etc > > There is a need to verify if this is still relevant for some files that > may > > even not be relevant to have in /etc but where ati/amd uses some > hardcoded path > > which prevent us to use that. > Done > > > So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 > (F-9?). > F-10 and F-11 right away (will migrate from old to new scheme eventually), > and > F-9 afterwards (but kept at the old scheme). > > > Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few > tweaks > > from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I > really > > think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11. > +1 - this is partially my fault, I don't have much time... I'm finishing > the > semester mid-may, at that point I'll have much more time to finish the last > bits of r-c-d. > > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090421/be8da92d/attachment.html From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Apr 22 00:01:28 2009 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed Apr 22 00:01:50 2009 Subject: Google Earth? Message-ID: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 22 00:52:42 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 22 00:52:57 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: 2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski : > Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable. You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to redistribute googleearth, I haven't the GoogleEarth license in mind. Last time I've checked, Ville Skytta did some experiments, maybe they still remain on his personal repository. Once that said, having a "nosource" rpm package redistributed by rpmfusion would be awesome. As the same with the flash-plugin, we could eventually redistribute such nosource rpm within the SRPM rpmfusion_nonfre repository. I don't know if this could be handled properly from the builder side. Nicolas (kwizart) From maillist at diffingo.com Wed Apr 22 04:48:03 2009 From: maillist at diffingo.com (Stewart Adam) Date: Wed Apr 22 04:48:12 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <49EE8563.607@diffingo.com> On 4/21/09 6:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? Among other sections, this section of licensing is a bit tricky: "1. USE OF SOFTWARE; RESTRICTIONS Use of Software. For an individual end user, the Software is made available to and may be used by you only for your personal, non-commercial use according to these Terms of Service and the Software documentation" (from http://earth.google.com/intl/en/download-earth.html) Stewart From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 07:47:52 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 22 07:47:54 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-22 Message-ID: <20090422054752.57DF624367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 1 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 NEW cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc11 : Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc10 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 22 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-3 - Added patch fixing breaking nautilus translation from SVN * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc11 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 18 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.0-0.4.rc3 - 2.0.0 rc3 - Move to rpmfusion - Enable mail plugin, license is now changed to GPL+ - borrow some missing files from svn trunk for rc3 - Drop "fedora-" prefix from desktop file gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc11 -------------------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-3 - Added patch fixing breaking nautilus translation from SVN From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 07:50:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 07:50:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422055009.31B232C492@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #13 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-22 07:50:10 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thank you for CVS procedure! np > Now [...] > - F-10/9 cairo-dock is still in Fedora, so I won't build this > on rpmfusion-free. If you sooner or later want to build a update feel free to do it for RPM Fusion. We normally don't replace packages from Fedora, but in cases like this (Package gets dropped from Fedora, but is still available in the "everything" repos for curret releases) is fine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Apr 22 09:25:34 2009 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed Apr 22 09:21:39 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski: >> Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? > Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable. > You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to > redistribute googleearth, Ack, If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision about giving us redistribution permission. I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context stuff), and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience. Regards, Hans From rpmfusion at ml.shredzone.de Wed Apr 22 09:23:31 2009 From: rpmfusion at ml.shredzone.de (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Richard_K=F6rber?=) Date: Wed Apr 22 10:34:35 2009 Subject: tp_smapi? Message-ID: <49EEC5F3.2000900@ml.shredzone.de> Hi! Would someone here like to add tp_smapi [1] to rpmfusion? It's a kernel module for accessing the SMAPI BIOS on ThinkPads, which provides some more hardware control on those notebooks. I'd like to provide a package for rpmfusion myself, but I only have very basic skills in RPM packaging. I'm afraid building a kernel module is too difficult for me. [1] http://tpctl.sourceforge.net/ Regards -- Richard K?rber From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 12:48:53 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 22 12:48:54 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-22 Message-ID: <20090422104853.5820A24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 2 nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 2 nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc10 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) - Add 71xx/beta/catalyst Conflicts - Don't Obsoletes the beta serie anymore (only the newest) * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.37-3 - Fix x86 Arch for fedora >= 11 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.37-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Mar 09 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.37-1 - Update to 180.37 (prerelease) * Thu Feb 26 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.35-2 - Fix Conflicts/Provides with beta - Obsoltes/Provides for devel * Wed Feb 25 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.35-1 - Update to 180.35 (prerelease) - Obsoletes opengl 3.0 beta nserie. * Sun Feb 22 2009 Stewart Adam - 180.29-2 - Make devel subpackage depend on lib subpackage of the same arch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc11 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 22 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) - Don't Obsoletes the beta serie anymore (only the newest) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc11 --------------------------------- * Wed Apr 22 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) - Add 71xx/beta/catalyst Conflicts - Don't Obsoletes the beta serie anymore (only the newest) From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 13:31:32 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 22 13:31:35 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-22 Message-ID: <20090422113133.5003A24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: gnome-mplayer-0.9.5-3.fc9 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 22 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.9.5-3 - Added patch fixing breaking nautilus translation from SVN * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.5-2 - rebuild for new F11 features From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 13:32:10 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 13:32:11 2009 Subject: [Bug 566] New: lastfm-1.5.1.31879 failed during rebuild on F11 Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: lastfm-1.5.1.31879 failed during rebuild on F11 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: m.gansser@t-online.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 build of lastfm-1.5.1-31879 fails on Fedora 11 with the following error message: g++ -IlibMoose/QtOverrides -c -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -w -D_REENTRANT -DNBREAKPAD -DLINUX -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I/usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include/QtXml -I/usr/include -Ilib -IlibFingerprint/recommendation-commons -IlibMoose -IlibUnicorn -I. -I../build -I../build/last.fm/release -I../build -o ../build/last.fm/release/container.o container.cpp In file included from container.h:27, from container.cpp:24: ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:22:39: error: phonon/Phonon::VolumeSlider: No such file or directory In file included from container.h:27, from container.cpp:24: ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:34: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'VolumeSlider' with no type ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:34: error: expected ';' before '*' token ../build/ui_playcontrols.h: In member function 'void Ui_PlayControls::setupUi(QWidget*)': ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:62: error: 'volume' was not declared in this scope ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:62: error: expected type-specifier before 'VolumeSlider' ../build/ui_playcontrols.h:62: error: expected ';' before 'VolumeSlider' people from archlinux found a workaround (patch), but i don't know how to apply this patch in the rpm build. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lastfm-msk/lastfm-msk/makefile-qt45.patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 13:37:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 13:37:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 566] lastfm-1.5.1.31879 failed during rebuild on F11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422113717.AFBEF2C484@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 --- Comment #1 from Martin 2009-04-22 13:37:22 --- you will find the rpm source package lastfm-1.5.1.31879-2.fc10.src.rpm from F10 on http://www.sendspace.com/file/ri6i48 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 13:41:33 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 13:41:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 566] lastfm-1.5.1.31879 failed during rebuild on F11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422114128.1BD872C495@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-22 13:41:32 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 526 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From felix at fetzig.org Wed Apr 22 17:12:21 2009 From: felix at fetzig.org (Felix Kaechele) Date: Wed Apr 22 17:12:33 2009 Subject: tp_smapi? In-Reply-To: <49EEC5F3.2000900@ml.shredzone.de> References: <49EEC5F3.2000900@ml.shredzone.de> Message-ID: <49EF33D5.8060809@fetzig.org> I already made a package for tp_smapi. Maybe I submit it for review. Felix Am 22.04.2009 09:23, schrieb Richard K?rber: > Hi! > > Would someone here like to add tp_smapi [1] to rpmfusion? It's a kernel > module for accessing the SMAPI BIOS on ThinkPads, which provides some > more hardware control on those notebooks. > > I'd like to provide a package for rpmfusion myself, but I only have very > basic skills in RPM packaging. I'm afraid building a kernel module is > too difficult for me. > > [1] http://tpctl.sourceforge.net/ > > Regards From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 18:59:59 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 18:59:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422165951.02E952C53C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nagy.martin@gmail.com Blocks| |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |nagy.martin@gmail.com |review@rpmfusion.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 20:16:50 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 22 20:16:49 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-22 Message-ID: <20090422181650.B98E624367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 2 nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10.1 nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10.1 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc10.2 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 21:56:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 21:56:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422195643.BCE482C52E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Martin Nagy 2009-04-22 21:56:52 --- For %description: s/Mosaic is the/Mosaic is a/ Missing BR: libXmu-devel rpmlint output: Mosaic-debuginfo.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/Mosaic-src/src/bitmaps/busy_9.xbm Mosaic-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/Mosaic-src/libnut/url-utils.c These can be fixed by chmod-ing those files to 644. Mosaic.desktop: s/Broswser/Browser [1] Claims that new packages should not have the vendor tag applied. Remainder: In Comment #8 you mentioned plans to change the license name to "Mosaic" [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 22 22:42:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 22 22:42:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 558] pick up cairo-dock from fedora? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090422204231.82AFF2C495@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558 --- Comment #14 from whyohwhyohwhyoh 2009-04-22 22:42:40 --- HUGE thanks folks! Mamoru, you are super awesome! :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kevin.kofler at chello.at Wed Apr 22 23:55:36 2009 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Wed Apr 22 23:56:17 2009 Subject: Qt 4.5 (LGPL) now in F9 and F10 updates Message-ID: Hi, FYI, Qt 4.5 is now in the updates for F9 and F10, so if you have non-Free packages wanting to build against Qt (I know there's at least one), you can do that now (assuming the terms of the LGPL are being followed, of course). Kevin Kofler From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 06:48:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 06:48:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423044810.43DC42C457@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Andrew Ziem changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ahz001@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Andrew Ziem 2009-04-23 06:48:11 --- I've seen the green for some of my YUV2MPEG. Is this a solution? https://init.linpro.no/pipermail/skolelinux.no/cinelerra/2009-March/015578.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 09:07:33 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 09:07:33 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423070730.6EF7F2C47C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 --- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-23 09:07:32 --- Thanks for the review. New packages (I believe all issues were addressed): SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/Mosaic.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 09:27:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 09:27:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423072737.7C6F82C444@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #16 from Martin Nagy 2009-04-23 09:27:39 --- All raised issues have been fixed, thanks. rpmlint now complains only about the License tag. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 10:19:33 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 10:19:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423081930.8AC842C540@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|4 |33 --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-23 10:19:32 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: Mosaic Short Description: Web Browser Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 15:55:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 15:55:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 393] Package review - perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423135542.4A3C02C566@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2009-04-23 15:55:48 --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 16:20:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 16:20:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423142034.D6C982C542@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|30 | --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-23 16:20:41 --- Justin, I've sponsored your account. Please add source to the package as described above and apply for CVS. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 16:20:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 16:20:46 2009 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423142035.1212B2C542@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|478 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 23 20:30:05 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 23 20:30:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090423182956.C23612C566@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | --- Comment #18 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-23 20:30:04 --- (In reply to comment #17) > Package CVS request done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 07:42:28 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 24 07:42:29 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-24 Message-ID: <20090424054228.42C022402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.5.svn1677_trunk.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.5.svn1677_trunk.fc11 --------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - rev 1677 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 07:44:52 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 24 07:44:54 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-24 Message-ID: <20090424054452.C5FB42402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 3 bsnes-0.045-1.fc10 qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc10 sdlmame-0131-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 3 bsnes-0.045-1.fc9 qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc9 sdlmame-0131-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 2 qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc11 sdlmame-0131-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: bsnes-0.045-1.fc10 ------------------ * Tue Apr 21 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.045-1 - Updated to 0.045 * Wed Apr 01 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.042-1 - Updated to 0.042 - Use Qt build on all branches, hiro ui is no more - Updated the strip patch - Updated the URL and Source0 addresses * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.041-2 - rebuild for new F11 features qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc10 --------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.12.b8 - Updated to 0.2b8 - Updated the ini patch - Dropped the upstreamed gcc44 patch - Dropped the F11 Beta workaround * Tue Mar 31 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.11.b7 - Handle the template properly - Updated the configs for Fedora 11 Beta * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2-0.10.b7 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Mar 09 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.9.b7 - Updated to 0.2b7 - Dropped the rawhide fedora-release workaround - Overhauled for sdlmess support - Desktop files now come with the tarball and use the shipped icon - Updated Summary and %description (M.A.M.E. ? M.A.M.E./M.E.S.S.) - Updated the ini patch - Avoid installing qmc2.ini.new - Dropped hicolor-icon-theme from Requires - Switched to system-wide Qt translations - No longer force Windows Qt style - Updated the URL - Added libXmu-devel to BuildRequires - Added gcc-4.4 fix from SVN sdlmame-0131-1.fc10 ------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated to 0.131 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: bsnes-0.045-1.fc9 ----------------- * Tue Apr 21 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.045-1 - Updated to 0.045 * Wed Apr 01 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.042-1 - Updated to 0.042 - Use Qt build on all branches, hiro ui is no more - Updated the strip patch - Updated the URL and Source0 addresses * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.041-2 - rebuild for new F11 features qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc9 -------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.12.b8 - Updated to 0.2b8 - Updated the ini patch - Dropped the upstreamed gcc44 patch - Dropped the F11 Beta workaround * Tue Mar 31 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.11.b7 - Handle the template properly - Updated the configs for Fedora 11 Beta * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.2-0.10.b7 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Mar 09 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.9.b7 - Updated to 0.2b7 - Dropped the rawhide fedora-release workaround - Overhauled for sdlmess support - Desktop files now come with the tarball and use the shipped icon - Updated Summary and %description (M.A.M.E. ? M.A.M.E./M.E.S.S.) - Updated the ini patch - Avoid installing qmc2.ini.new - Dropped hicolor-icon-theme from Requires - Switched to system-wide Qt translations - No longer force Windows Qt style - Updated the URL - Added libXmu-devel to BuildRequires - Added gcc-4.4 fix from SVN sdlmame-0131-1.fc9 ------------------ * Fri Apr 24 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated to 0.131 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: qmc2-0.2-0.12.b8.fc11 --------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.12.b8 - Updated to 0.2b8 - Updated the ini patch - Dropped the upstreamed gcc44 patch - Dropped the F11 Beta workaround sdlmame-0131-1.fc11 ------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated to 0.131 From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 09:04:19 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 24 09:04:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 467] Package Review: Mosaic - Web Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424070416.E9FE72C5AA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-24 09:04:18 --- Imported and built. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 20:12:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 24 20:11:59 2009 Subject: [Bug 547] review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424181151.6BB0D2C60B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-24 20:11:59 --- FYI, Qt 4.5.1-3 will support Freetype LCD filters if freetype-freeworld is available at runtime. The VRGB/VBGR bug got fixed in Qt 4.5.1, and we patched Qt to support the LCD filters even if Qt was built against a freetype (such as the Fedora freetype) which doesn't support them (4.5.1 checks again at runtime anyway). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 22:30:39 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 24 22:30:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424203029.2E4A12C73D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #36 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-24 22:30:38 --- (In reply to comment #35) Done. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 24 22:44:53 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 24 22:44:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424204443.766E42C760@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 01:17:16 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 01:17:15 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424231705.57A5E2C86A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 --- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-25 01:17:16 --- (In reply to comment #4) ... > (In reply to comment #3) > > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least) > > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes > > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on > > /dev/dri/card? ) > > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test for > > this feature. > Will test at home tonight. What tell the testing ? > structure so we could create/destroy these files using r-c-d... I will try to > continue working on this soon, and if it works then the need for files like udev creation and other power management files shoudn't be the priority for now. > > 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history: > > This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped in > > fglrx also actually.) ... > If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will have no > upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new > branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it for > F-9/F-10. Wrong., only fglrx should have kept them, not catalyst. We could also assume users have upgraded since now. Furthermore, according that F-11 users aren't supposed to upgrade from F-9 (but from a step by F-10), we can even drop it from F-11 fglrx package. > > So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 (F-9?). > F-10 and F-11 right away (will migrate from old to new scheme eventually), and > F-9 afterwards (but kept at the old scheme). > > > Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few tweaks > > from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I really > > think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11. > +1 - this is partially my fault, I don't have much time... I'm finishing the > semester mid-may, at that point I'll have much more time to finish the last > bits of r-c-d. Okay, so we need to keep it the old way, and to convert eventually convert it later (keeping Conflicts for now) I'm still testing the new scheme on Rawhide with nvidia. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 01:18:27 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 01:18:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090424231815.BF7252C83A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 --- Comment #9 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-25 01:18:27 --- this bug should be closed -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 02:55:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 02:54:58 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425005447.B50262C8DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #11 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-25 02:54:59 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Justin, I've sponsored your account. > Please add source to the package as described above and apply for CVS. > > Thanks! > ok, its been completed, from the info page it says I have to wait for it to be approved now. Here is the link for the updated files: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 03:54:42 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 03:54:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425015429.E80A22C8EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 --- Comment #6 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-25 03:54:42 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > ... > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least) > > > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes > > > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on > > > /dev/dri/card? ) > > > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test for > > > this feature. > > Will test at home tonight. > What tell the testing ? 9.4 works well without the udev configuration file, and overall the driver seems to run much more smoothly. > > If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will have no > > upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new > > branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it for > > F-9/F-10. > Wrong., only fglrx should have kept them, not catalyst. We could also assume > users have upgraded since now. Furthermore, according that F-11 users aren't > supposed to upgrade from F-9 (but from a step by F-10), we can even drop it > from F-11 fglrx package. Okay, that makes sense - provides/obsoletes removed in the package below. > Okay, so we need to keep it the old way, and to convert eventually convert it > later (keeping Conflicts for now) That will be best for now, we can implement the new scheme for fglrx once the power management script integration in r-c-d is finished. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst-9.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jarod at wilsonet.com Sat Apr 25 03:59:43 2009 From: jarod at wilsonet.com (Jarod Wilson) Date: Sat Apr 25 04:00:13 2009 Subject: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free In-Reply-To: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> On Friday 24 April 2009 21:45:55 rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote: > Job failed on arch x86_64 > > > Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3629-mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11/ > > > ------------------------------------------------- [...] > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't write moc_scanwizard.o: No space left on device > {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't close moc_scanwizard.o: No space left on device > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs/libmythtv' > make[2]: *** [moc_scanwizard.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs' > make[1]: *** [sub-libmythtv-make_default] Error 2 > make: *** [sub-libs-make_default-ordered] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UJHjrN (%build) Seems the lisas.de builder is out of disk space... http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3629 -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 05:30:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 05:30:43 2009 Subject: [Bug 532] Review Request: xmms2-nonfree - Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425033040.E3ACA3C009@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 05:30:41 --- There you go.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 05:31:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 05:31:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 475] Review Request: terminatorX - Realtime Audio Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425033127.8325D2C1A9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 05:31:28 --- Package in repos. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 07:05:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 07:05:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 32] Review request: vdr-dvd - DVD playback plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425050547.0D8D73C006@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-25 07:05:48 --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 07:24:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 07:24:27 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425052423.9D0E73C020@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #15 from Eric Moret 2009-04-25 07:24:24 --- Thank you for spending the time reviewing this package. Please see inline below. (In reply to comment #14) > Thanks. A few comments: > > * Upstream provides a tarball on their website: > http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/downloads/list > Any reason why that one is not used? Upstream posted its first file on March 25th while this package was submitted in February. I have since moved to using upstream?s release. > * Is it really not possible to replace the offending artwork by some free > artwork? I would like to think so, there is an open request for icon replacement at the fedora wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_replacement > * Any possible license issues with Sources 3-6 ? You should explain where and > how to get them in the SPEC file. I created a script to extract those icons. > * Similarly, the patches should be explained, and if they are not Fedora > specific, sent upstream. Links from their upstream should be provided. It *seems* to me the change to using upstream?s tarball has taken care of this patch therefore I have removed this patch but I do not currently have access to an x86_64 box to test. Prior to including this patch I had also created an upstream bug as seen at the following link: http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/issues/detail?id=20 > * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for > directory ownership and usability). ok > * Please don't use a --vendor flag on desktop-file-install I had to include this for me to be able to build on CentOS5 which is one of my target systems. What is the workaround there? > * %attr(0644,root,root) is not needed > > ! %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} > %{_libdir}/%{name}/* > > can be replaced by just > > %{_libdir}/%{name}/ ok > * Any reason why you use > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir} > instead of just > %configure > ? The configure script provided by upstream only supported the above 2 options (has moved to only supporting --prefix now) > * Please update to the latest icon cache scriptlets: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ok -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 07:26:07 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 07:26:07 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425052605.3CE9A3C024@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-25 07:26:06 --- I already approved this (see bottom of comment #1, and it blocks bug #4, which means it is accepted). So, to reiterate: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From adrian at lisas.de Sat Apr 25 10:47:27 2009 From: adrian at lisas.de (Adrian Reber) Date: Sat Apr 25 10:47:34 2009 Subject: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free In-Reply-To: <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> References: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> Message-ID: <20090425084727.GB8307@lisas.de> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:59:43PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Friday 24 April 2009 21:45:55 rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote: > > Job failed on arch x86_64 > > > > > > Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3629-mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > [...] > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't write moc_scanwizard.o: No space left on device > > {standard input}:51908: Fatal error: can't close moc_scanwizard.o: No space left on device > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs/libmythtv' > > make[2]: *** [moc_scanwizard.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mythtv-0.22/mythtv-0.22/libs' > > make[1]: *** [sub-libmythtv-make_default] Error 2 > > make: *** [sub-libs-make_default-ordered] Error 2 > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UJHjrN (%build) > > Seems the lisas.de builder is out of disk space... > > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3629 Correct. I think with the update to the newest version of mock it started to use caching (buildroot and ccache). I will delete the mock caches for now to get it working again. To we want mock to use caching? Because then I have to increase the disk space (which is no problem). Adrian From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Apr 25 12:14:22 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat Apr 25 12:14:31 2009 Subject: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free In-Reply-To: <20090425084727.GB8307@lisas.de> References: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> <20090425084727.GB8307@lisas.de> Message-ID: <49F2E27E.5000104@leemhuis.info> On 25.04.2009 10:47, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:59:43PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On Friday 24 April 2009 21:45:55 rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org wrote: >>> Job failed on arch x86_64 >>> Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3629-mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11/ > [...] >>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UJHjrN (%build) >> Seems the lisas.de builder is out of disk space... >> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3629 > Correct. I think with the update to the newest version of mock it > started to use caching (buildroot and ccache). I will delete the mock > caches for now to get it working again. > > To we want mock to use caching? I'd say we want a root_cache, as it seems to speed things up a bit. I guess we could/should disable the yum_cache, as all builders have nearby mirrors. Or we enable it and stop maintaining those nearby mirrors. Or we chose depending on builder. I'm not sure if ccache is worth the trouble. I tend to say "no". Does anyone know if Fedora handles those different caching strategies on its builders? > Because then I have to increase the disk space (which is no problem). FYI, /var/cache/mock/ grew up to 13G on j-rod's builder over the past few days (which is not building EL). But I guess it'll grow even more over time. Cu knurd From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 12:30:27 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 25 12:30:27 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-25 Message-ID: <20090425103027.50F0C24344@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) testing/5: 1 NEW Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.el5.1 : Web Browser ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) testing/5: Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.el5.1 ----------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.7-0.3.b5.1 - Fix desktop file install on el5 * Fri Apr 24 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.7-0.3.b5 - Grammar fixes - Fix buildrequires - Correct license tag - Strip executable bits off source files - Don't use vendor tag for desktop menu entry * Mon Mar 30 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.7-0.2.b5 - Fix build for Fedora 11 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 13:41:33 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 25 13:41:33 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-25 Message-ID: <20090425114133.075BB24344@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 3 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc10 NEW xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc10 : Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 2 pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc9 NEW xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc9 : Nonfree plugins for XMMS2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 NEW Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11 : Web Browser ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc10 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 10 2009 John Doe 0.5-3 - License is LGPLv2+ - Some SPEC file cosmetics * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-1 - Initial package for RPMFusion (SPEC file is a slightly modified version of xmms2-freeworld) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.51-1.fc10 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.51-1 - Update to 180.51 (stable) - Add 71xx/beta/catalyst Conflicts - Don't Obsoletes the beta serie anymore (only the newest) * Sat Apr 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.37-3 - Fix x86 Arch for fedora >= 11 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.37-2 - rebuild for new F11 features * Mon Mar 09 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.37-1 - Update to 180.37 (prerelease) * Thu Feb 26 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.35-2 - Fix Conflicts/Provides with beta - Obsoltes/Provides for devel * Wed Feb 25 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.35-1 - Update to 180.35 (prerelease) - Obsoletes opengl 3.0 beta nserie. * Sun Feb 22 2009 Stewart Adam - 180.29-2 - Make devel subpackage depend on lib subpackage of the same arch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: pdflib-lite-7.0.4p1-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Thu Mar 19 2009 Remi Collet 7.0.4p1-1 - update to 7.0.4p1 xmms2-nonfree-0.5-3.fc9 ----------------------- * Fri Apr 10 2009 John Doe 0.5-3 - License is LGPLv2+ - Some SPEC file cosmetics * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-2 - Kill the -mac subpackage * Thu Apr 09 2009 John Doe 0.5-1 - Initial package for RPMFusion (SPEC file is a slightly modified version of xmms2-freeworld) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11 ---------------------- * Thu Apr 23 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.7-0.3.b5 - Grammar fixes - Fix buildrequires - Correct license tag - Strip executable bits off source files - Don't use vendor tag for desktop menu entry * Sun Mar 29 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.7-0.2.b5 - Fix build for Fedora 11 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 13:44:56 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 25 13:44:56 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-25 Message-ID: <20090425114456.B5C4924344@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 3 devede-3.12c-3.fc10 mythtv-0.21-18.fc10 smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 4 amule-2.2.4-1.fc10 desmume-0.9.2-1.fc10 NEW VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-4.fc10 : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware NEW VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc10 : Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 2 devede-3.12c-3.fc9 smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 desmume-0.9.2-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 7 amule-2.2.4-1.fc11 desmume-0.9.2-1.fc11 foo2zjs-0.20080826-3.fc11 mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11 mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11 VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-4.fc11 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: devede-3.12c-3.fc10 ------------------- * Tue Apr 07 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-3 - Fixed greek translation (BZ #494) * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-2 - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat mythtv-0.21-18.fc10 ------------------- * Tue Apr 14 2009 Jarod Wilson - 0.21-18 - Update release-0-21-fixes patches (r20373) - Slide Requires: wget into more appropriate places (rfbz#384) smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc10 --------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.7-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.7 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: amule-2.2.4-1.fc10 ------------------ * Thu Apr 16 2009 Felix Kaechele - 2.2.4-1 - upstream 2.2.4 - spec fixup desmume-0.9.2-1.fc10 -------------------- * Mon Apr 20 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.9.2-1 - Updated to upstream version 0.9.2 - Removed no longer needed patch to compile with gcc 4.4 - Added a patch from upstream to compile on 64 bit systems (SF #2755952) * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.1-3 - rebuild for new F11 features VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-4.fc10 --------------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-4 - Adjust architecture list for plague * Mon Apr 13 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-3 - Fix SDK permissions - Fix SDK requires * Tue Mar 31 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-2 - Fix the swab fix so that we don't break pre-2.6.29 build VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc10 -------------------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-2 - Fix akmod requires ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: devede-3.12c-3.fc9 ------------------ * Tue Apr 07 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-3 - Fixed greek translation (BZ #494) * Sat Mar 28 2009 Andrea Musuruane 3.12c-2 - Fix font Requires: dejavu-fonts-compat smplayer-0.6.7-1.fc9 -------------------- * Mon Mar 30 2009 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.7-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.7 * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-2 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: desmume-0.9.2-1.fc9 ------------------- * Mon Apr 20 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.9.2-1 - Updated to upstream version 0.9.2 - Removed no longer needed patch to compile with gcc 4.4 - Added a patch from upstream to compile on 64 bit systems (SF #2755952) * Mon Mar 30 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.9.1-3 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: amule-2.2.4-1.fc11 ------------------ * Wed Apr 15 2009 Felix Kaechele - 2.2.4-1 - upstream 2.2.4 - spec fixup desmume-0.9.2-1.fc11 -------------------- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.9.2-1 - Updated to upstream version 0.9.2 - Removed no longer needed patch to compile with gcc 4.4 - Added a patch from upstream to compile on 64 bit systems (SF #2755952) foo2zjs-0.20080826-3.fc11 ------------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Lubomir Rintel 0.20080826-3 - Add proper scriptlet requires mythtv-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11 ------------------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20448 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20448 - Add BR: pulseaudio-libs-devel to enable proper pulseaudio support (rfbz#567) * Mon Apr 13 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20371 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, revision 20371 - Relocate Requires: wget to the sub-packages where necessary (rfbz#384) - Don't use a52dec, mythtv has its own internal support these days mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.22-0.2.svn.r20448 - Update to pre-0.22 svn trunk, rev 20448 VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-4.fc11 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-4 - Adjust architecture list for plague VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc11 -------------------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Lubomir Rintel - 2.1.4-2 - Fix akmod requires From dominik at greysector.net Sat Apr 25 13:52:29 2009 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Sat Apr 25 13:52:38 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> On Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 09:25, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski: > >>Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? > >Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable. > >You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to > >redistribute googleearth, > > Ack, > > If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging > I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I > can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision > about giving us redistribution permission. > > I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I > checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context > stuff), > and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience. If someone wants it, here's a specfile I use personally: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/nosrc/ The issue of bundled libs needs ironing out, though (nothing in Fedora provides libssl.so.0.9.8). Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From adrian at lisas.de Sat Apr 25 17:21:03 2009 From: adrian at lisas.de (Adrian Reber) Date: Sat Apr 25 17:21:14 2009 Subject: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free In-Reply-To: <49F2E27E.5000104@leemhuis.info> References: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> <20090425084727.GB8307@lisas.de> <49F2E27E.5000104@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20090425152103.GC8307@lisas.de> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:14:22PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> To we want mock to use caching? > > I'd say we want a root_cache, as it seems to speed things up a bit. > > I guess we could/should disable the yum_cache, as all builders have > nearby mirrors. Or we enable it and stop maintaining those nearby > mirrors. Or we chose depending on builder. > > I'm not sure if ccache is worth the trouble. I tend to say "no". > > Does anyone know if Fedora handles those different caching strategies on > its builders? > >> Because then I have to increase the disk space (which is no problem). > > FYI, /var/cache/mock/ grew up to 13G on j-rod's builder over the past > few days (which is not building EL). But I guess it'll grow even more > over time. Then I will add 20G under /var/cache/mock/ and restart the builder. Does that sound right? Adrian From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 25 18:08:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 25 18:08:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 393] Package review - perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090425160806.B94D43C1A6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-25 18:08:13 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ping? Thanks for the ping. Forgot about that. http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-IP-Country/perl-IP-Country-2.26-2.fc7.src.rpm and http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-IP-Country/perl-IP-Country.spec are updated according to your suggestions. About the package split: The usecase for the package is to enable country lookup for spamassassin as an additional feature. Most people will never use it for manual lookups or even rebuilding the database. Thus I considered the split as I remember it being done for some other perl packages in (then) Core. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 26 10:17:50 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 26 10:17:57 2009 Subject: ppc64 and one of the x86 builders broken Message-ID: <49F418AE.70308@leemhuis.info> tried to fix, but ran out of time; will look at it later today, don't know yet when. CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 26 13:23:52 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 26 13:24:00 2009 Subject: ppc64 and one of the x86 builders broken In-Reply-To: <49F418AE.70308@leemhuis.info> References: <49F418AE.70308@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49F44448.9060300@leemhuis.info> On 26.04.2009 10:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > tried to fix, but ran out of time; will look at it later today, don't > know yet when. PPC64 working again (after getting rawhide from a up2date mirror). The x86 problem is still there, but the builder that hits it is disabled, so it should not cause any trouble. BTW, if there are build problems with a builder/one arch please don't try to work around them by doing things like "ExcludeArch: ppc64"; getting the root issue fixed is the way better solution ;-) Cu knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 26 13:44:14 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 26 13:44:22 2009 Subject: Build Error (Job 3629): mythtv-0_22-0_2_svn_r20448_fc11 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free In-Reply-To: <20090425152103.GC8307@lisas.de> References: <20090425014555.E54E32402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> <200904242159.43411.jarod@wilsonet.com> <20090425084727.GB8307@lisas.de> <49F2E27E.5000104@leemhuis.info> <20090425152103.GC8307@lisas.de> Message-ID: <49F4490E.5090600@leemhuis.info> On 25.04.2009 17:21, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:14:22PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> To we want mock to use caching? >> I'd say we want a root_cache, as it seems to speed things up a bit. >> >> I guess we could/should disable the yum_cache, as all builders have >> nearby mirrors. Or we enable it and stop maintaining those nearby >> mirrors. Or we chose depending on builder. >> >> I'm not sure if ccache is worth the trouble. I tend to say "no". >> >> Does anyone know if Fedora handles those different caching strategies on >> its builders? Nobody? >>> Because then I have to increase the disk space (which is no problem). >> FYI, /var/cache/mock/ grew up to 13G on j-rod's builder over the past >> few days (which is not building EL). But I guess it'll grow even more >> over time. > Then I will add 20G under /var/cache/mock/ and restart the builder. Does > that sound right? Wait a bit; I disabled package-caching and ccache on your builder for now, so I guess we won't run into space problems soon again. And I really would like to discuss the proper way for building and caching on our builders. Right now we have a local mirror on each system; those sometimes are out of date or broken, resulting in problems like the one with the ppc64 builder earlier today, which makes life difficult for everyone. Maybe we should just use MirrorManger where possible and rely on the package cache from mock? That might solve above problems, but create others... CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 26 14:13:20 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 26 14:13:28 2009 Subject: Massrebuild status In-Reply-To: <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed: > A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed, And some more have have been fixed over the past few days :-) > but there are still some to go. Still the case. > Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: 502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x 503 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 raine 505 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 sidplay 508 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamri 510 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 subtitle 514 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamdv 516 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 flvtool2 519 2009-04-07 2009-04-11 vdr-mp3 469 2009-03-29 Tue 20:58 avidemux > Up2date list: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=501&hide_resolved=1 Note that Avidemux is afaics (kind of) fixed by excluding ppc/ppc64; see http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3639 A real fix is afaics needed, but firewing1 is working on that afaics. > Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days (19 days now) > old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages in the repo. Options? Cu knurd From oget.fedora at gmail.com Sun Apr 26 20:43:55 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Sun Apr 26 20:44:22 2009 Subject: dssi-vst: RPMFusion material? Message-ID: What is VST? VST's and VSTi's are audio plugins and instruments usually written for Windows. They are professionallyand widely used in Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs), such as Cubase. In fact, they are mostly nonfree (I found some free (as in beer) VST's but I didn't encounter a free (as in freedom) VST's yet). Here is more information in case you are interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Studio_Technology There is a dssi plugin wrapper designed for using these Windows VST plugins in Linux. And I packaged it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 In order to use dssi-vst on x86_64, it needs to be built against 32bit wine + 64bit other libraries. Now here are my questions: 1- Does our buildsys support such builds? Fedora's x86_64 buildsys does not contain wine, and I'm reluctant to submit this package just i386, because it won't be much useful with x86_64 audio software (ardour, rosegarden etc) 2- Since there are no known free VST plugins which one can use with dssi-vst, I am also not sure if this is Fedora material. What do you folks think? Cheers, Orcan From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 26 20:51:13 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 26 20:51:12 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-26 Message-ID: <20090426185113.94A1A24031@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 7 comical-0.8-11.fc11 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11.2 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11.2 nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc11.1 sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc11 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.21 wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc10 ------------------------ * Mon Apr 27 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated mameinfo.dat to 0.131 - Updated history.dat to 0.131 - Updated catver.ini to 0.131 - Updated nplayers.ini to 0.131 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc9 ----------------------- * Mon Apr 27 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated mameinfo.dat to 0.131 - Updated history.dat to 0.131 - Updated catver.ini to 0.131 - Updated nplayers.ini to 0.131 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: comical-0.8-11.fc11 ------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Andreas Thienemann - 0.8-11 - Fixed wxGTK2 buildrequire * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8-10 - rebuild for new F11 features * Sun Oct 26 2008 Andreas Thienemann - 0.8-9 - Removed use of private miniunzip copy, use system-wide minizip library. nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.18-2.fc11.2 ------------------------------------ * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.18-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.11-2.fc11.2 ---------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.11-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels nvidia-kmod-180.51-1.fc11.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 180.51-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels sdlmame-data-0131-1.fc11 ------------------------ * Sun Apr 26 2009 Julian Sikorski - 0131-1 - Updated mameinfo.dat to 0.131 - Updated history.dat to 0.131 - Updated catver.ini to 0.131 - Updated nplayers.ini to 0.131 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-27.fc11.21 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.9.11-27.21 - rebuild for new kernels wl-kmod-5.10.79.10-2.fc11.2 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.10.79.10-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 26 20:55:12 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 26 20:55:11 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426185503.C27452D2EA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-26 20:55:12 --- Ping Nicolas -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 26 20:56:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 26 20:56:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 461] Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426185627.8EA342D2F9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-26 20:56:36 --- Ping Jeroen -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 26 21:04:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 26 21:04:27 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426190419.74A2B2D301@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #16 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-26 21:04:28 --- Thanks Eric! (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > * Please don't use a --vendor flag on desktop-file-install > > I had to include this for me to be able to build on CentOS5 which is one of my > target systems. What is the workaround there? > I don't think it will pass a Fedora review with a vendor flag. Why don't you make a separate SPEC file for CentOS? Now the artwork is on its way, could you submit this package to Fedora and give us the bug link? I can review it there if you want me to. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 26 21:12:32 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 26 21:12:31 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-26 Message-ID: <20090426191232.7DF5024031@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 15 avidemux-2.4.4-6.fc11 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc11.1 cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.5.svn1689_trunk.fc11 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-3.fc11.16 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.7 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.2 lastfm-1.4.2.58240-6.fc11 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc11.1 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11.2 rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc11 rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc11 rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc11.1 rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11.2 sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11.2 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc11.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 --------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 27 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 -------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Mon Apr 27 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: avidemux-2.4.4-6.fc11 --------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Stewart Adam - 2.4.4-6 - Rebuild, disable ppc* for now * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.4.4-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Wed Mar 25 2009 Dominik Mierzejewski - 2.4.4-4 - Fix gcc 4.4 patch - Improve dca patch * Sun Mar 22 2009 Stewart Adam - 2.4.4-3 - Apply the patch * Sun Mar 22 2009 Stewart Adam - 2.4.4-2 - Fix build errors when compiling with gcc 4.4 (#386) (thanks to Rathann) * Wed Feb 18 2009 Stewart Adam - 2.4.4-1 - Update to 2.4.4 final, update patches accordingly - Move Qt translation files to qt subpackage * Sun Dec 14 2008 Dominik Mierzejewski - 2.4.3-8 - Fix build with current x264 blcr-kmod-0.8.1-1.fc11.1 ------------------------ * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.8.1-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.5.svn1689_trunk.fc11 --------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - rev 1689 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-3.fc11.16 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-3.16 - rebuild for new kernels iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.17-2.fc11.7 -------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.17-2.7 - rebuild for new kernels kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc11.2 -------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.2 - rebuild for new kernels lastfm-1.4.2.58240-6.fc11 ------------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Sergio Pascual 1.4.2.58240-6 - Fixes problem with Phonon::VolumeSlider (bz #518) * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.2.58240-5 - rebuild for new F11 features * Fri Mar 27 2009 Sergio Pascual 1.4.2.58240-4 - Rebuilt to catch up soname bump in libgpod * Sat Nov 15 2008 Sergio Pascual 1.4.2.58240-3 - Fixing libdir contains debug files (bz #160) ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc11.1 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.1 - rebuild for new kernels open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.154848-1.fc11.2 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.154848-1.2 - rebuild for new kernels rt2860-2.1.1.0-1.fc11 --------------------- * Fri Apr 24 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) rt2860-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.0.0-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc11.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-1.1 - rebuild for new kernels * Fri Apr 24 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) rt3070-kmod-2.0.1.0-3.fc11.2 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.1.0-3.2 - rebuild for new kernels sysprof-kmod-1.0.12-2.fc11.2 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.0.12-2.2 - rebuild for new kernels VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-2.1.4-2.fc11.1 ---------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.4-2.1 - rebuild for new kernels From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 27 00:03:48 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 27 00:04:03 2009 Subject: dssi-vst: RPMFusion material? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2009/4/26 Orcan Ogetbil : > What is VST? > VST's and VSTi's are audio plugins and instruments usually written for > Windows. They are professionallyand ?widely used in Digital Audio > Workstations (DAWs), such as Cubase. > In fact, they are mostly nonfree (I found some free (as in beer) VST's > but I didn't encounter a free (as in freedom) VST's yet). > Here is more information in case you are interested: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Studio_Technology > > There is a dssi plugin wrapper designed for using these Windows VST > plugins in Linux. And I packaged it: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 > > In order to use dssi-vst on x86_64, it needs to be built against 32bit > wine + 64bit other libraries. Now here are my questions: > > 1- Does our buildsys support such builds? Fedora's x86_64 buildsys > does not contain wine, and I'm reluctant to submit this package just > i386, because it won't be much useful with x86_64 audio software > (ardour, rosegarden etc) If this is a buildsys question, it would matters to ask at a buildsys admin, and/or the wine maintainer. If wine got prevented from the Fedora buildsys, that's not to prevent building with it, but more likely to prevent linking against 32bit libraries on 64bit builder. Maybe it can be allowed to have wine.i386 in some override repository, or to build the -devel subpackage (where the headers live), as noarch so it can ends in the x86_64buildroot. > 2- Since there are no known free VST plugins which one can use with > dssi-vst, I am also not sure if this is Fedora material. What do you > folks think? This is a question for FE-Legal for a first step, then for us if it get refused. My opinion is that it should be accepted by FE-Legal. as soon as we don't provides theses binary only vst plugins. (users can do whatever they want after Fedora is installed, that shouldn't be our problem). Nicolas (kwizart) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 00:37:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 00:37:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426223712.149792D3CD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 --- Comment #13 from solarflow99@gmail.com 2009-04-27 00:37:22 --- (In reply to comment #12) > I already approved this (see bottom of comment #1, and it blocks bug #4, which > means it is accepted). So, to reiterate: > > APPROVED > Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: dosemu Short Description: DOS Emulator for Linux Owners: solarflow99@gmail.com Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: solarflow99@gmail.com ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 00:44:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 00:44:00 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426224350.46C162D422@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 solarflow99@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 00:56:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 00:56:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426225636.4F15C2D419@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-27 00:56:47 --- why are you still using %{_libdir}/blender-freeworld/ ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 01:01:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 01:01:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426230129.01A4C2D425@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #15 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-27 01:01:40 --- do you really needs to have : %files -n blenderplayer-freeworld ? Why you cannot use the blender version instead ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 01:38:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 01:38:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090426233837.BBC822D43F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | --- Comment #14 from Xavier Lamien 2009-04-27 01:38:48 --- cvs done. FYI, branch F-11 has not been setup yet. It'll be available soonish. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 02:39:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 02:39:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427003941.EF0E52D465@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #12 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-27 02:39:53 --- kwizart, sorry I was away for a little. I'll answer your questions here: > %ifarch %{ix86} > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING="${CXXFLAGS} \ > this "sounds" weird > you are using a %{cmake} macro, so it shoudn't be necessary > or the usual way to pass this is to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS, which should be > passed in ppc/ppc64 also %cmake macro doesn't define CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS. But the CMakelist file uses CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS instead of just CXXFLAGS. That's why I have to set CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS to CXXFLAGS. > isn't -DHOST_SUPPORTS_SSE=TRUE -DIS_ARCH_X86_64=TRUE enough instead of > tweaking the CXXFLAGS ? Looking at the code, I found that this is the only way of getting things compiled. Remove any of them and you will see what happens. Yes, the upstream CMakelist file is a little non-standard. > oget, is it possible to tweak the docdir with cmake instead of the hack you > are using ? > you should be able to (the same there is the autotools --docdir directory) The CMakelist file foes not support it. @DOC_FILE@ is something that I have introduced by hand so that the program will guide Fedora users to the right documentation for setting up the /etc/security/limits.conf file. It's not a bad hack (check the patch traverso-warnings.patch). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 06:35:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 06:35:37 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427043535.09AF42D54D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #17 from Eric Moret 2009-04-27 06:35:35 --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 07:07:45 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 27 07:07:49 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-04-27 Message-ID: <20090427050746.7A14A2402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 gnome-video-arcade-0.6.7-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 gnome-video-arcade-0.6.7-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: gnome-video-arcade-0.6.7-1.fc10 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 27 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.7-1 - Update to 0.6.7 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: gnome-video-arcade-0.6.7-1.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sun Apr 26 2009 Matthew Barnes - 0.6.7-1 - Update to 0.6.7 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 07:08:33 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 27 07:08:35 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-27 Message-ID: <20090427050833.B50412402C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 1 rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.6.svn1689_trunk.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc10 -------------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: rt2870-kmod-2.1.1.0-1.fc9 ------------------------- * Sat Apr 25 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.1.0-1 - version update (2.1.1.0) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.6.svn1689_trunk.fc11 --------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - rev 1689 * Mon Apr 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.0-0.6.svn1689_trunk - Kill AutoProv on -themes subpackage to avoid unneeded desktop prov - Build -themes subpackage as noarch From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 11:30:29 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 11:30:30 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427093025.6D0992D692@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #13 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-27 11:30:28 --- * Please delete any internal dependency: rm -rf src/3rdparty/slv2 (Rememeber that cmake list slv2 to be >=0.6.1 ) * Please append a versioned BuildRequirement when relevant. * QT_PHONON_LIBRARY_RELEASE QT_PHONON_LIBRARY_RELEASE-NOTFOUND I'm not sure traverso will use photo, unless it needs qt 4.5.1. same for QT_QTMOTIF_LIBRARY_RELEASE QT_QTMOTIF_LIBRARY_RELEASE-NOTFOUND I don't know if it is relevant. * Optims, I"ve successfully have built traverso using: %{cmake} \ -DWANT_MP3_ENCODE=ON \ -DUSE_SYSTEM_SLV2_LIBRARY=ON \ . And our CFLAGS were used. But it has also used some "not always available" asm optim such as 3dnow. Vector optims seems MacOSX related (not linux on ppc), so the only important feature is SSE on x86(_64) (possible with IA64 in theory?) According to CMakeLists.txt , the DETECT_HOST_CPU_FEATURES rely on /proc/cpuinfo and set various definition. It would be better to patch it to use a cmake option, so sse can be enabled by a switch, and the various needed options to be set. According to the Fedora guideline, using SSE on x86 is illegal as not all CPU have this feature on x86 (despite x86_64 at least have SSE2). If I let you build a SSE enabled binary, at least I want a "cmake option" that will avoid SSE without disabling x86 conditionalized code. Please forward this upstream if necessary. To sum-up: buildtime autodetection should remains disabled. x86(_64) should be automatically detected according to the _target_cpu been used. SSE should be enabled by a cmake switch (default on x86_64) * -DSTATIC_BUILD - This is used despite not been what we call a static library built. This is weird since the code is conditionalized with STATIC_BUILD in two places: src/core/InputEngine.cpp src/traverso/Main.cpp * (In reply to comment #12) ... > The CMakelist file foes not support it. @DOC_FILE@ is something that I have > introduced by hand so that the program will guide Fedora users to the right > documentation for setting up the /etc/security/limits.conf file. It's not a bad > hack (check the patch traverso-warnings.patch). Good god! that's an horrible hack!!! Please avoid bundling pre-built pdf documentation , prefer to use the url instead!!! Furthermore i've tried to read the pdf (was fly reading actually) and found rather hard to see if something needs to be tweaked in /etc/security/limits.conf. If something like this is needed, you might need to tweak it in %post from traverso like jack-audio-connection-kit does. It could be improved by only adding it on install, checks if the hack is present already and remove the hack on uninstall. * Fedora hacking. %{name}-defaults.patch I don't understand why changing the number of period would solve things for Fedora? Does it, really ? (of course, as i'm using PA, it doesn't solve anything). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 12:51:49 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 12:51:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427105144.B91862C366@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #6 from Lubos Stanek 2009-04-27 12:51:49 --- The http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg123.spec file has been updated to the latest version. The http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg321.spec has been updated as well due to a mistake in the post script Since there are no takers, would you be so kind and dust off the draft for staging and replacement repositories? This package can go directly to any of them. The end users would benefit from it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 13:08:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 13:08:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] Review request: mpg123 - Fast console MPEG Audio Player and decoder library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427110818.E4CC12C330@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2 Summary|mpg123 - distribute the |Review request: mpg123 - |package in the free repo |Fast console MPEG Audio | |Player and decoder library --- Comment #7 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-27 13:08:23 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Since there are no takers, would you be so kind and dust off the draft for > staging and replacement repositories? > This package can go directly to any of them. > The end users would benefit from it. The package itself isn't eligible for such repository. It has to be reviewed by a fedora packager as it is aimed to end in a rpmfusion stable repository. (Changes summary to reflect that the bug is a Review Request). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 13:09:10 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 13:09:11 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427110905.98B912C382@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Summary|Review request: mpg123 - |mpg123 - distribute the |Fast console MPEG Audio |package in the free repo |Player and decoder library | --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-27 13:09:10 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Since there are no takers, This bug is neither blocking RF_NEW (Bug 2) nor RF_REVIEW (Bug 3), so it's not obvious that this is a review at all. Please block 2 if you wait for a reviewer and 3 if there is one already. > would you be so kind and dust off the draft for staging and replacement > repositories? This package can go directly to any of them. > The end users would benefit from it. Statements like that are IMHO a reason not do do them. Either a package has somebody that is willing to take care of them or it has not. if not then it shouldn't be in our repos IMHO. IWO: If you want your package reviewed and in the repos please consider to become a package maintainer and try to exchange a review with someone else. If you don't want to become a packager and if nobody picks this package up then I'd suggest we close this bug as "WONTFIX" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 13:11:08 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 13:11:08 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427111103.26E282C393@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #9 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-27 13:11:07 --- hmmm, bugzilla removed the blocking for Bug 2 again that Nicolas added in parallel. I considered readding it, but it likely doesn't make much sense from reading the first comment in this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 13:13:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 13:13:26 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427111320.B9E362C393@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #10 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-27 13:13:25 --- (In reply to comment #9) > hmmm, bugzilla removed the blocking for Bug 2 again that Nicolas added in > parallel. > > I considered readding it, but it likely doesn't make much sense from reading > the first comment in this bug. True, I've missed that the spec was made from "whoever takes it". This is definitly not a Review Request... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 16:12:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 16:12:32 2009 Subject: [Bug 498] mpg123 - distribute the package in the free repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427141224.BD1E02C3A7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Lubos Stanek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #11 from Lubos Stanek 2009-04-27 16:12:30 --- I expressed the intention not to become a packager right in the first comment. My reasons are not worth mentioning in this bug report. The only reason to start this bug report was to speed things up. I am sorry for making hassles. Thank you for your time guys. Please also revert the change to mpg321.spec in the CVS, it is useless. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 18:07:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 18:07:25 2009 Subject: [Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427160717.C61292C3B7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563 --- Comment #7 from Stewart Adam 2009-04-27 18:07:24 --- As per discussion on IRC, this update fixes: * no longer obsoletes/provides libs-32bit (no need to on a new series) * uses ||: correctly in scriptlets * appends .conf to the blacklist filename * ExclusiveArch: only enabled for F11 SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-catalyst.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 27 18:47:46 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 27 18:47:47 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427164739.19E9A2C3C3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #14 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-27 18:47:46 --- (In reply to comment #13) > * Please delete any internal dependency: > rm -rf src/3rdparty/slv2 OK > (Rememeber that cmake list slv2 to be >=0.6.1 ) > > * Please append a versioned BuildRequirement when relevant. > I don't think we ever had slv2 < 0.6.1 in Fedora but I'll add the versioned dependency anyways. > * QT_PHONON_LIBRARY_RELEASE QT_PHONON_LIBRARY_RELEASE-NOTFOUND > I'm not sure traverso will use photo, unless it needs qt 4.5.1. > same for > QT_QTMOTIF_LIBRARY_RELEASE QT_QTMOTIF_LIBRARY_RELEASE-NOTFOUND > I don't know if it is relevant. > I think these are standard cmake checks. Nothing to do with traverso though. > > * Optims, I"ve successfully have built traverso using: > %{cmake} \ > -DWANT_MP3_ENCODE=ON \ > -DUSE_SYSTEM_SLV2_LIBRARY=ON \ > . > And our CFLAGS were used. But it has also used some "not always available" asm > optim such as 3dnow. > Vector optims seems MacOSX related (not linux on ppc), so the only important > feature is SSE on x86(_64) (possible with IA64 in theory?) > Yes. Sorry, my explanation was wrong. This should be the correct explanation: In order to pass the SSE related flags to the compiler, I need to add to the CXX_FLAGS, that's why I use: -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING="${CXXFLAGS} \ \ " \ Hint: Look at the quotes. Obviously, I can't use the DETECT_HOST_CPU_FEATURES feature. I found that the way I do it is the shortest way. If you have a better solution, please post the appropriate %cmake command here. > According to CMakeLists.txt , the DETECT_HOST_CPU_FEATURES rely on > /proc/cpuinfo and set various definition. It would be better to patch it to > use a cmake option, so sse can be enabled by a switch, and the various > needed options to be set. > > According to the Fedora guideline, using SSE on x86 is illegal as not all CPU > have this feature on x86 (despite x86_64 at least have SSE2). If I let you > build a SSE enabled binary, at least I want a "cmake option" that will avoid > SSE without disabling x86 conditionalized code. Please forward this upstream > if necessary. > If I can solve this issue without a patch, why should I make one? As for the SSE on x86: this is a DAW, intended for professional use. The software will not be useful at all for people with older hardware without SSE. Even my old 32bit AMD Athlon 2000, can't handle DAW usage properly when I enable multiple tracks and multiple (ladspa, lv2, etc) plugins at once. I don't think it is worth considering even older hardware. There are more lightweight programs (such as audacity) for those people. > To sum-up: > buildtime autodetection should remains disabled. > x86(_64) should be automatically detected according to the _target_cpu been > used. > SSE should be enabled by a cmake switch (default on x86_64) > Okay, I can make a patch. But again, why a patch when there is no need? > Please avoid bundling pre-built pdf documentation , prefer to use the url > instead!!! > Okay, I'll remove the pdf and add the url. > Furthermore i've tried to read the pdf (was fly reading actually) and found > rather hard to see if something needs to be tweaked in > /etc/security/limits.conf. It is at the last pages of the pdf file. It involves creation of an audio group if it is not present, giving special permissions to that group and adding your username to that group. I don't think adding usernames automatically to a group in %post is a good idea. > > * Fedora hacking. %{name}-defaults.patch > I don't understand why changing the number of period would solve things for > Fedora? Does it, really ? (of course, as i'm using PA, it doesn't solve > anything). > I don't know why. But it works :) A similar situation happened with qsynth, where I had to tweak with one of the default parameters, otherwise it won't work properly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 01:00:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 01:00:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427230003.365BF2C463@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #12 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-04-28 01:00:13 --- (In reply to comment #9) > A couple comments : > - the .desktop file is not validated > - I'd rather use something like "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.la -exec rm > {}';'" and remove the "%exclude %{_libdir}/*.la" line in %files these were fixed (In reply to comment #11) > The spell checking is missing. I'm a bit confused: I require tesseract for spell checking, isn't that enough? > The development package must drag in its dependencies. > done http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/ogmrip-0.12.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 05:06:33 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 05:06:34 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428030632.F00712C48B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #15 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 05:06:32 --- I made the patch you asked and sent it upstream. Here you go: SPEC: http://6mata.com/review/traverso.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com/review/traverso-0.49.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.49.1-3 - Remove the supplied slv2 library in %%prep - Add versioned BR to slv2 (>= 0.6.1) - Drop the pdf manual - Introduce new patch to handle the sse optimizations -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 11:56:37 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 11:56:38 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428095633.77FCC2C3AE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 --- Comment #13 from Lubos Stanek 2009-04-28 11:56:37 --- Sorry, I have not noticed that enchant is present. The find pattern should be quoted to prevent the shell expansion of wildcards. I think that the package is well done. I hope that plugins will follow, they importantly extend ogmrip functions. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 12:41:48 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 12:41:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428104144.2F2B92C1F4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #16 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-28 12:41:48 --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > * Please delete any internal dependency: > > rm -rf src/3rdparty/slv2 > > OK But I have: -- checking for module 'libslv2>=0.6.1' -- package 'libslv2>=0.6.1' not found Which was present already in F-10 x86_64 despite slv2-devel is installed. > > SSE should be enabled by a cmake switch (default on x86_64) > > > > Okay, I can make a patch. Nice work. > > Furthermore i've tried to read the pdf (was fly reading actually) and found > > rather hard to see if something needs to be tweaked in > > /etc/security/limits.conf. Can you tell me which group need to be setup in order to have rt access ? Is it the same a pulsert for PA (maybe jackrt?) If this is the case, maybe the warning should be explicitely to add the user to such group. > It is at the last pages of the pdf file. It involves creation of an audio group > if it is not present, giving special permissions to that group and adding your > username to that group. I don't think adding usernames automatically to a group > in %post is a good idea. yep, specially as the accurate longer term fix would be to add PolicyKit support for that purpose. (but I won't require this for the review). * Any other info about the potentially unappropriate use of -DSTATIC_BUILD ? (this seems hardcoded within the CMakeLists.txt) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:24:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:24:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] New: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 Summary: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andreas@bawue.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn-0.0.0.070518-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn.spec Description: S3 Texture Compression (S3TC) (sometimes also called DXTn or DXTC) is a group of related lossy image compression algorithms originally developed by S3 Graphics, Ltd. Currently, s3tc is supported by libtxc_dxtn on all graphic cards which use the radeon, r200, i830 and i915 driver. Other DRI drivers are not supported, even if the hardware could do it, at least not until someone writes the code for it. Not eligible for fedora: S3TC is patented. rpmlint: [andreas@workstation result]$ rpmlint -v *.rpm libtxc_dxtn.i586: I: checking libtxc_dxtn.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libtxc_dxtn.so libtxc_dxtn.src: I: checking libtxc_dxtn-debuginfo.i586: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. no-soname is a shame, but I didn't want to meddle with upstream code as the version number is horrible anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:39:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:39:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428113930.BDCF12C4A6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 13:39:35 --- I'd suggest using 070518 as Version rather than 0.0.0.070518, for 2 reasons: 1. That's really the version upstream uses. They don't use any 0.0.0. And it doesn't look like they're planning to use another versioning scheme any time soon. 2. Fabrice Bellet (the rpmfind.net admin (not to be confused with Fabrice Bellard, the QEMU guy)) has libtxc_dxtn packages with Version set to 050908, so 0.0.0.x versioning breaks upgrade paths from that repo. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:40:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:40:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428114042.D42342C4B2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 13:40:47 --- As for the "no-soname" warning, it can be ignored, this is a plugin, it's designed to be dlopened only, never linked, so it doesn't make sense to version it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:43:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:43:22 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428114316.F2F672C4CE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 13:43:21 --- You have to use --vendor="" to install the .desktop file without setting a vendor. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:51:00 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:51:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428115055.6E48E2C3C4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-28 13:51:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'd suggest using 070518 as Version rather than 0.0.0.070518, for 2 reasons: > 1. That's really the version upstream uses. They don't use any 0.0.0. And it > doesn't look like they're planning to use another versioning scheme any time > soon. Interestingly the source code itself contains a 0.1 version identifier. Thus the 0.0.0.070518 version just to be able to raise it if the need arrises without using an epoch. (even if epoch is not as bad as some people claim it to be...) > 2. Fabrice Bellet (the rpmfind.net admin (not to be confused with Fabrice > Bellard, the QEMU guy)) has libtxc_dxtn packages with Version set to 050908, so > 0.0.0.x versioning breaks upgrade paths from that repo. Yeah. That is a more acceptable reason than 1. Thus I'd see on problem to possible change the version id, but this shouldn't prevent a review and could be changed during import anyway. (In reply to comment #2) > As for the "no-soname" warning, it can be ignored, this is a plugin, it's > designed to be dlopened only, never linked, so it doesn't make sense to > version it. I concur with that. The current user of this library is Mesa. It could potentially be the case that another piece of software is linking directly against the library, but I've not known of any such program. If this should be the case, one could always consider hacking in a soname later. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 13:58:21 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 13:58:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428115816.AC7502C4BB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 13:58:21 --- > check the patch traverso-warnings.patch Ugh, that patch is horribly inappropriate, the program should be fixed to support non-mmap ALSA access instead. It's needed even for some hardware! And PulseAudio also requires it, at least until the native PulseAudio backend works. If the PortAudio backend works, please enable that one, as PortAudio now supports non-mmap ALSA. As for SSE, the rule is that i586 packages need to work on all i586 CPUs, period. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kevin.kofler at chello.at Tue Apr 28 14:04:40 2009 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Tue Apr 28 14:05:06 2009 Subject: dssi-vst: RPMFusion material? References: Message-ID: Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > In order to use dssi-vst on x86_64, it needs to be built against 32bit > wine + 64bit other libraries. Now here are my questions: > > 1- Does our buildsys support such builds? Fedora's x86_64 buildsys > does not contain wine, and I'm reluctant to submit this package just > i386, because it won't be much useful with x86_64 audio software > (ardour, rosegarden etc) You need to build the i386 and x86_64 portions separately and the end user will have to install them both. You can't stuff 32-bit stuff into an x86_64 package. See the nspluginwrapper package for how this needs to be done. Kevin Kofler From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 14:27:04 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 14:27:03 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428122658.B72EE2C47C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-28 14:27:02 --- I've also made one: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/8/i386/libtxc_dxtn-070518-1.fc8.kwizart.i386.rpm http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/8/SRPMS/libtxc_dxtn-070518-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Starting from your spec: You aren't using our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Harcoding mesa-liBGL should be avoided. (despite it is clear that this is aimed to be used with mesa). Of course, there is a need to have runtime tests done, specially to see if the features still works. AFAIR, this kind of library only makes sense when the related application was wrongly coded, because most hardware support s3tc compress in hardware despite this is disabled by default (can be enabled with driconf). This library implement this feature in software as a fallback for wrongly codec application. So, we need names for such wrongly coded application and eventually a bugreport. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 15:04:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 15:04:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428130416.770142C47D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 --- Comment #10 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-28 15:04:21 --- Packaging a compiler isn't as trivial as any other packages. I think it would be fine to have a project using the cuda compiler packaged as an experiment. Do you have some candidate for this? (I may have two cases, schroedinger-nonfree and nvidia-texture-tools). Then I have few questions... I have improved the spec file, but it remains two ways of improvements with some related questions: - Does binaries/libraries compiled with cuda 1.1 works with cuda 2.1 (2.2) - Does the packaging scheme will work also for cuda 1.1 (which may remains suitable for older systems/drivers), and forthcoming 2.2 (in other words, shall we have version in the name, the same as java-1.6.0-{openjdk,sun} are versionned). - How the cuda compiler should works with the nvidia drivers Requirements. (buildtime/runtime). That will make the cuda enabled libraries/(binaries?) to be enabled once the driver support cuda with an additional sub-directory (the same as glibc use dso from _libdir/sse2 when cpu support this feature). So either this sub-directory need to be versioned (sugegstion: _libdir/cudart-2.1) either we do not need that, (_libdir/cuda). In Any case, produced libraries/binaries seems to be linked with the cudart library from the cuda compiler, so this last needs to be splitted from the compiler package to be installed independently.(as multilibs). Produced binaries/libraries seems also to use symbols from the libcuda library (provided from the nvidia driver) but aren't using -lcuda at link time, so there are a lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol. Then there is a need to mind the pkg-config buildtime behaviour along the WIP improvements about nvidia drivers packaging. (I will submit a new spec soon). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 15:37:27 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 15:37:27 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428133721.A32652C4D6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 15:37:27 --- > AFAIR, this kind of library only makes sense when the related application was > wrongly coded, because most hardware support s3tc compress in hardware despite > this is disabled by default (can be enabled with driconf). This library > implement this feature in software as a fallback for wrongly codec application. Huh? What the hardware does is texture *de*compression. The point of texture compression is that you compress the textures before uploading them to the hardware to save bus bandwidth. The only way you don't need S3TC compression support in the driver is to store the already compressed textures in your program (in addition to the uncompressed ones, as not all hardware supports S3TC). Very few apps do that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 16:13:36 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 16:13:36 2009 Subject: [Bug 582] Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428141330.43C432C45C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-04-28 16:13:36 --- (In reply to comment #4) > You aren't using our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Right. Fixed > Harcoding mesa-liBGL should be avoided. (despite it is clear that this is aimed > to be used with mesa). Why then? > Of course, there is a need to have runtime tests done, specially to see if the > features still works. Yes, it does. > AFAIR, this kind of library only makes sense when the related application was > wrongly coded, because most hardware support s3tc compress in hardware despite > this is disabled by default (can be enabled with driconf). This library > implement this feature in software as a fallback for wrongly codec application. You're wrong. Please read carefully, specifically the "How to install" part. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 17:37:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 17:37:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428153728.14F922C3DB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-28 17:37:34 --- I have done a rpmdiff beetween blender and blender-freeworld. All the files, which was detected as diferent was moved to a special place in the blender-freeworld package. I hope this will answers the last two comments. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 18:01:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 18:01:52 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428160144.0BD112C3F6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #18 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 18:01:51 --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > (In reply to comment #13) > > > * Please delete any internal dependency: > > > rm -rf src/3rdparty/slv2 > > > > OK > But I have: > -- checking for module 'libslv2>=0.6.1' > -- package 'libslv2>=0.6.1' not found > Which was present already in F-10 x86_64 despite slv2-devel is installed. My bad. I wonder how I missed this. "libslv2" in the CMakeList file must be patched/sed'ed to "slv2". That's it. > > > Furthermore i've tried to read the pdf (was fly reading actually) and > > > found rather hard to see if something needs to be tweaked in > > > /etc/security/limits.conf. > Can you tell me which group need to be setup in order to have rt access ? > Is it the same a pulsert for PA (maybe jackrt?) > If this is the case, maybe the warning should be explicitely to add the user > to such group. >From the manual: ? Traverso can?t set the audio thread to real time priority Some Linux distributions don?t allow to set the priority of the audio thread to real time. However, a too low priority can lead to xruns and dropouts dur- ing recording and playback. To avoid this, add the following lines to the file /etc/security/limits.conf, or if the lines are already there, change the numbers accordingly: @audio - rtprio 90 @audio - nice -10 @audio - memlock 3000000 Then restart your computer. So, what do you think I should do? > > * Any other info about the potentially unappropriate use of -DSTATIC_BUILD ? > (this seems hardcoded within the CMakeLists.txt) > I am trying to get a hold of Remon on IRC. I'll ask him about this too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 18:15:23 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 18:15:23 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428161515.BD2892C21B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #19 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 18:15:22 --- (In reply to comment #17) > > check the patch traverso-warnings.patch > > Ugh, that patch is horribly inappropriate, the program should be fixed to > support non-mmap ALSA access instead. It's needed even for some hardware! And > PulseAudio also requires it, at least until the native PulseAudio backend > works. > The author might add support for it in the future. However, as I, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, and other audio creation related folks said, Jack is what you need for an audio session with a DAW. This is not an mp3 or avi player that everybody can use. It has a specific target audience. People who use DAW's have appropriate hardware (semi-pro or pro sound cards) most of the time. > If the PortAudio backend works, please enable that one, as PortAudio now > supports non-mmap ALSA. > > The author explicitly asked us to remove it from a Linux package. > As for SSE, the rule is that i586 packages need to work on all i586 CPUs, > period. > I heard that before too. But I can't find it in the guidelines. I also asked folks at #fedora-devel on IRC. Multiple people said, SSE should be enabled on ix86. Can you point me to the guideline that says the opposite? However, I do believe that my explanation in comment #14 is pretty valid. In short: I do do audio recording. My experience says older hardware is useless for such purposes. They create too much latency. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 18:25:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 18:25:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428162543.A1E932C49E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #17 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-28 18:25:51 --- (In reply to comment #16) > I have done a rpmdiff beetween blender and blender-freeworld. All the files, > which was detected as diferent was moved to a special place in the > blender-freeworld package. > > I hope this will answers the last two comments. no -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 18:38:20 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 18:38:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428163812.E47352C4AF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #19 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 18:38:20 --- (In reply to comment #18) > You have to use --vendor="" to install the .desktop file without setting a > vendor. > Nope, not anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 19:03:03 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 19:03:02 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428170255.03B212C4BE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 19:03:02 --- > The author explicitly asked us to remove [PortAudio support] from a Linux > package. He didn't know our PortAudio supports non-mmap ALSA unlike his native ALSA backend. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 19:05:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 19:05:43 2009 Subject: [Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428170536.47F152C374@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 19:05:44 --- The old desktop-file-install in CentOS 5 (which he wants to support) requires it, and it won't break on Fedora either. Nor will it make any actual difference as long as the vendor is "", the files will still get installed with no vendor prefix. (But it's great that desktop-file-install finally got fixed not to require --vendor.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 21:11:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 21:11:05 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428191057.AFCA42C492@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #21 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 21:11:06 --- I can add the relevant lines to /etc/security/limits.conf . Should I remove the traverso-warning.patch and add a README.Fedora file that gives the information that I had put in the patch? This is the way it is done in jack-audio-connection-kit package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 22:38:25 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 22:38:24 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428203815.AD0E82C447@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #22 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-28 22:38:25 --- (In reply to comment #21) > I can add the relevant lines to /etc/security/limits.conf . which lines exactly -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 28 22:51:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 28 22:51:39 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090428205130.82ED02C3A8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #23 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-28 22:51:40 --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > I can add the relevant lines to /etc/security/limits.conf . > which lines exactly > >From comment#18: @audio - rtprio 90 @audio - nice -10 @audio - memlock 3000000 I don't want to use "audio" as the group. I'm thinking of changing it to "traversouser" or something like that. Btw, Remon told me that the STATIC_BUILD is used only for internal traverso libraries. So it will either be a couple .so files vs one larger binary. I'll go with one larger binary as it is the upstream choice. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 05:01:47 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 05:01:49 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429030147.4A4572C446@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #24 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-29 05:01:47 --- * I did some reading about pam. It seems that you were right. By default limits are taken from the /etc/security/limits.conf config file. Then individual files from the /etc/security/limits.d/ directory are read. The files are parsed one after another in the order of "C" locale. The effect of the individual files is the same as if all the files were concatenated together in the order of parsing. So the lastest one wins. * I also made tests with realtime priorities. Currently the jackuser and pulse-rt realtime priorities are set to 20, which is unfortunately not enough for traverso. Traverso needs 90, otherwise it complains. Therefore I created a usergroup "traversouser" and added a limits file into /etc/security/limits.d/ with the requirements of traverso. * Meanwhile, Remon also told me: "The hardware buffer in the soundcard has to be divided into at least 2 'periods' one that is being played from, the other then is free to write new data to. However, there are some drivers (Intel notably) that don't support this, and need at least 3 periods to work properly. If 3 periods does not work for you, then it means we can't make everyone happy with just one configuration." There is no single setup that will be valid for all hardware. Therefore I removed the defaults patch which was customized for my system only. So here is the update: SPEC: http://6mata.com/review/traverso.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com/review/traverso-0.49.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.49.1-4 - Drop the defaults patch - Fix slv2 library detection - Add traversouser group - Install limits config file in /etc/security/limits.d/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From lists at forevermore.net Wed Apr 29 06:08:40 2009 From: lists at forevermore.net (Chris Petersen) Date: Wed Apr 29 06:14:32 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <49F7D2C8.9010108@forevermore.net> What's wrong with google's own repository? http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/yum.html -Chris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090428/032f82b2/signature.bin From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 29 08:44:51 2009 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 29 08:44:56 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: 2009/4/25 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > On Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 09:25, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski: >> >>Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package? >> >Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable. >> >You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to >> >redistribute googleearth, >> >> Ack, >> >> If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging >> I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I >> can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision >> about giving us redistribution permission. >> >> I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I >> checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context >> stuff), >> and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience. > > If someone wants it, here's a specfile I use personally: > http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/nosrc/ This seems still ge4. have you tried with ge5 ? libssl.so.0.9.8{g,k} is present in F-10 F-11, but it shouldn't matter as the real SONAME for this library is libssl.so.7. Nicolas (kwizart) From rpmfusion at ml.shredzone.de Wed Apr 29 09:28:29 2009 From: rpmfusion at ml.shredzone.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Richard_K=F6rber?=) Date: Wed Apr 29 09:28:35 2009 Subject: Google Earth? In-Reply-To: <49F7D2C8.9010108@forevermore.net> References: <49EE4238.7070401@cora.nwra.com> <49EEC66E.9090705@hhs.nl> <20090425115229.GC12777@mokona.greysector.net> <49F7D2C8.9010108@forevermore.net> Message-ID: <49F8019D.5040202@ml.shredzone.de> Hi! > What's wrong with google's own repository? Repository Contents * Picasa for Linux 2.7 * Google Desktop Linux 1.2 No Google Earth in there. -- Richard From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 29 11:27:57 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 29 11:28:05 2009 Subject: RFC: drop FTBFS packages? (was: Re: Massrebuild status) In-Reply-To: <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> (trying with a different topic) On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [...] >> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: > 502 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 snes9x > 503 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 raine > 505 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 sidplay > 508 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamri > 510 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 subtitle > 514 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 streamdv > 516 2009-04-07 2009-04-07 flvtool2 > 519 2009-04-07 2009-04-11 vdr-mp3 > [...] >> Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days > (19 days now) >> old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. > > I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that > remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to > announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And > we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages > in the repo. > > Options? Nobody? Should I take that as agreement or disagreement to "let's drop what doesn't build anymore" idea? CU knurd From oget.fedora at gmail.com Wed Apr 29 12:22:30 2009 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Wed Apr 29 12:23:01 2009 Subject: RFC: drop FTBFS packages? (was: Re: Massrebuild status) In-Reply-To: <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > (trying with a different topic) > > On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> >>> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> [...] >>> >>> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: >> >> 502 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?snes9x >> 503 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?raine >> 505 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?sidplay >> 508 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?streamri >> 510 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?subtitle >> 514 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?streamdv >> 516 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?flvtool2 >> 519 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-11 ? ? ?vdr-mp3 >> [...] >>> >>> Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days >> >> (19 days now) >>> >>> old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. > >> >> >> I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that >> remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to >> announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And >> we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages >> in the repo. >> >> Options? > > Nobody? Should I take that as agreement or disagreement to "let's drop what > doesn't build anymore" idea? > +1 (to agreement) Orcan From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 12:24:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 12:24:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429102439.E74A22C4F5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #25 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-29 12:24:44 --- (In reply to comment #24) ... > Therefore I created a usergroup "traversouser" and added a limits file into > /etc/security/limits.d/ with the requirements of traverso. Did I suggested here or on IRC that it was the right thing to do ? You seems to want to tweak things before to understand how it works. While I'm talking about conflicting value I don't mean other than what would be the final value once a user belong both to the jackuser group and such traversouser group? Could the traversouser values conflict with jack since they are not the same ? It seems better to tweak the jackuser ones in that file instead of creating a new user. Specially if the software is meant to be used on a jack audio server. Then if the values needs manual installation, it would be better to leave the choice to the users, and have it documented in a README.Fedora.(along with a better warning message). About the SSE asm optimization. The reason of the patch is that: If one (for a weird reason) wants to disable SSE on x86, there is a need for x86 specific code to remain enabled. Once that said we cannot try to improve realtime behaviour and at the same time, disable hardware CPU acceleration, that doesn't make sense. The Fedora Guideline is designed for General usage, not for specific case and usage. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From musuruan at gmail.com Wed Apr 29 12:24:45 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Wed Apr 29 12:24:52 2009 Subject: RFC: drop FTBFS packages? (was: Re: Massrebuild status) In-Reply-To: <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <29fee02b0904290324r5257e0e6m4a5b2d1d0fca6aac@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild: Adding maintainers below. >> 502 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?snes9x matthias...rpmforge.net >> 503 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?raine lxtnow...gmail.com >> 505 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?sidplay triad...df.lth.se >> 508 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?streamri lxtnow...gmail.com >> 510 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?subtitle lxtnow...gmail.com (subtitleripper? there is no package called subtitle) >> 514 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?streamdvd lxtnow...gmail.com >> 516 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-07 ? ? ?flvtool2 matthias...rpmforge.net >> 519 ? ? 2009-04-07 ? ? ?2009-04-11 ? ? ?vdr-mp3 felix...fetzig.org >> [...] >>> >>> Just to point out the obvious: A few bugs are five days >> >> (19 days now) >>> >>> old and the maintainer didn't even replied yet. Adding them in CC. >> I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that >> remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to >> announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And >> we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages >> in the repo. >> >> Options? > > Nobody? Should I take that as agreement or disagreement to "let's drop what > doesn't build anymore" idea? I think we should open bugs in bugzilla for these and then follow the standard "Non Responsive Maintainers" policy that Fedora has: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers Bye, Andrea. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 12:36:28 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 12:36:29 2009 Subject: [Bug 584] New: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584 Summary: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish-1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish.spec Summary: Squish DXT compression library The package was refused on Fedora according that DXT is patented: http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patsearch.cgi?patnum=US+5956431#show https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407561 This package is elligible for rpmfusion-free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 29 12:52:04 2009 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 29 12:52:12 2009 Subject: RFC: drop FTBFS packages? In-Reply-To: <29fee02b0904290324r5257e0e6m4a5b2d1d0fca6aac@mail.gmail.com> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> <29fee02b0904290324r5257e0e6m4a5b2d1d0fca6aac@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49F83154.4000807@leemhuis.info> On 29.04.2009 12:24, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: >>> I'd wondering if we in should drop the packages from the devel repo that >>> remain unfixed in one or two weeks from now; of course we would need to >>> announce that in the bug report a few days before we actually do it. And >>> we'd need to check if the packages we drop are needed by other packages >>> in the repo. >>> Options? >> Nobody? Should I take that as agreement or disagreement to "let's drop what >> doesn't build anymore" idea? > I think we should open bugs in bugzilla Why open new bugs? The bugs are there already (see Bugs taht are blocking #501) and IMHO can be used for further discussions (and are the best place for them IMHO). That's why I didn't CC people and why I said "of course we would need to announce that in the bug reports a few days before we actually do it". ;-) Sorry, should have clearer from the start. > for these and then follow the > standard "Non Responsive Maintainers" policy that Fedora has: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS would be the proper way here IMHO. I tend to say "NonResponsiveMaintainers" would have to much impact. Especially as we know that most (all) of them are in fact around and are still maintaining other packages. CU knurd From musuruan at gmail.com Wed Apr 29 13:10:59 2009 From: musuruan at gmail.com (Andrea Musuruane) Date: Wed Apr 29 13:11:07 2009 Subject: RFC: drop FTBFS packages? In-Reply-To: <49F83154.4000807@leemhuis.info> References: <49D1B1BF.80905@leemhuis.info> <49E1E1F3.6060908@leemhuis.info> <49F44FE0.2080402@leemhuis.info> <49F81D9D.2070705@leemhuis.info> <29fee02b0904290324r5257e0e6m4a5b2d1d0fca6aac@mail.gmail.com> <49F83154.4000807@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <29fee02b0904290410s480a140ch790454995dbedadf@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> I think we should open bugs in bugzilla > > Why open new bugs? The bugs are there already (see Bugs taht are blocking > #501) and IMHO can be used for further discussions (and are the best place > for them IMHO). That's why I didn't CC people and why I said "of course we > would need to announce that in the bug reports a few days before we actually > do it". ;-) Sorry, should have clearer from the start. I was referring to the first step of the "Non Responsive Maintainers" policy: "When a Fedora member notices that a maintainer isn't answering their bugs, not answering rebuild requests, emails or the like, they need to file a bug against the package in bugzilla asking for the maintainer to respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address. This is a must. Note: Be sure to check the Vacation page before opening the bug, to verify that the maintainer is not away on vacation. " I should have specified it more clearly. >> for these and then follow the >> standard "Non Responsive Maintainers" policy that Fedora has: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS would be the proper way here IMHO. I > tend to say "NonResponsiveMaintainers" would have to much impact. Especially > as we know that most (all) of them are in fact around and are still > maintaining other packages. I don't know. If maintainers cannot handle some packages they should orphan them. Bye, Andrea. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 14:50:54 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 14:50:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] New: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 Summary: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpmfusion-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Z-push is an implementation of the ActiveSync protocol which is used 'over-the-air' for multi platform ActiveSync devices, including Windows Mobile, iPhone, Sony Ericsson and Nokia mobile devices. With Z-push any groupware can be connected and synced with these devices. For use cases of Z-push with the Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration, please use the prepared package zarafa-z-push. I'll add the spec file and source rpm this evening or so, then I also will set RF_NEW blocker. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 is a blocker dependency as well. Before that, this package unluckily doesn't make that much sense. Of course z-push is nice with IMAP and so as well, but the main purpose is with Zarafa. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 15:01:45 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 15:01:45 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429130139.F3DA12C467@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-04-29 15:01:45 --- Please, *always* say why the package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-0df093adde5a77a5e0569b2460ff49d078007ae3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 15:03:19 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 15:03:20 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429130313.8AA322C511@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-29 15:03:19 --- Z-Push is "GPLv2 with exceptions" according to Tom Callaway and the exception is, that Zarafa is not allowed in the US, thus this has to reach RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Wed Apr 29 17:04:57 2009 From: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Mamoru Tasaka) Date: Wed Apr 29 17:11:55 2009 Subject: i586 build server Message-ID: <49F86C99.6070507@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Hello. Would some investigate i586 build server? I tried build twice, however it still seems to be hanging. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3677 Regards, Mamoru From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 18:48:55 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 18:48:55 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429164847.49EBD2C52E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-04-29 18:48:54 --- I have take an closer look on blenderplayer-freeworld.bin. A ldd shows dependency agains lame and other libraries provied by rpmfussion. So there is a need for inclussion of a blenderplayer-freeworld subpackage in rpmfusion. By the content of the %{_libdir}/blender-freeworld/plugins the files show differents agains the corresponding files of %{_libdir}/blender/plugins, but I can't find out the reason. A ldd shows no references to libraries only provided by rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 19:08:51 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 19:08:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429170843.338362C551@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #26 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-29 19:08:50 --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > ... > > Therefore I created a usergroup "traversouser" and added a limits file into > > /etc/security/limits.d/ with the requirements of traverso. > Did I suggested here or on IRC that it was the right thing to do ? > You seems to want to tweak things before to understand how it works. > While I'm talking about conflicting value I don't mean other than what would > be the final value once a user belong both to the jackuser group and such > traversouser group? Could the traversouser values conflict with jack since > they are not the same ? > It seems better to tweak the jackuser ones in that file instead of creating a > new user. Specially if the software is meant to be used on a jack audio > server. > What do you mean by conflict? The only difference is, jackuser has 20 realtime priority, whereas traversouser has 90. If a user is a member of both groups, he will have a realtime priority of 90, which is a higher priority, so jack using applications will be even happier. Jack using applications won't stop working, if you are asking that. My own username priority is set to 90 from almost the beginning, and I never had trouble with jack. > Then if the values needs manual installation, it would be better to leave the > choice to the users, and have it documented in a README.Fedora.(along with a > better warning message). > I lost the count of how many times I asked you this question about README.Fedora. You don't give direct answers. > About the SSE asm optimization. > The reason of the patch is that: If one (for a weird reason) wants to disable > SSE on x86, there is a need for x86 specific code to remain enabled. > > Once that said we cannot try to improve realtime behaviour and at the same > time, disable hardware CPU acceleration, that doesn't make sense. > The Fedora Guideline is designed for General usage, not for specific case and > usage. > Again, reading the above, I don't understand your point. You want me to disable SSE on ix86? Please be direct. What is "x86 specific code"? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 19:10:22 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 19:10:21 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429171014.073942C550@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #27 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-29 19:10:21 --- (In reply to comment #25) > > Then if the values needs manual installation, it would be better to leave the > choice to the users, and have it documented in a README.Fedora.(along with a > better warning message). > What is a "better warning message"? I can't predict what you have in mind. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 19:27:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 29 19:27:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429172658.227D92C52E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 --- Comment #19 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-29 19:27:06 --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have take an closer look on blenderplayer-freeworld.bin. A ldd shows > dependency agains lame and other libraries provied by rpmfussion. So there is a > need for inclussion of a blenderplayer-freeworld subpackage in rpmfusion. This is possible, but does it worth it ? It will Requires handleling the namespace of blender-player with alternatives. (and possibly registering blenderplayer with the blender mime-type with a .desktop file). Also, you should better use ldd -u -r in case of the linking to be done despite the library is not needed ... > By the content of the %{_libdir}/blender-freeworld/plugins the files show > differents agains the corresponding files of %{_libdir}/blender/plugins, but I > can't find out the reason. A ldd shows no references to libraries only provided > by rpmfusion. That would be really kind not to duplicate this directory then. Specially to avoid to register plugins once with blender and another time with blender-freeworld. About this, I would appreciate that you review the LuxRender so we are sure that the plugin directory works as expected: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 BTW, Please also check that the .so files in the plugin directory are set exectuable so they are stripped. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 29 20:28:51 2009 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 29 20:28:50 2009 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-04-29 Message-ID: <20090429182851.7CEEA24031@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 3 a52dec-0.7.4-15.fc11 cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.7.rc5.fc11 kqemu-1.4.0-0.3.pre1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: a52dec-0.7.4-15.fc11 -------------------- * Tue Apr 28 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.7.4-15 - rebuild cairo-dock-2.0.0-0.7.rc5.fc11 ----------------------------- * Wed Apr 29 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.0-0.7.rc5 - 2.0.0 rc5 * Mon Apr 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.0-0.6.svn1689_trunk - Kill AutoProv on -themes subpackage to avoid unneeded desktop prov - Build -themes subpackage as noarch kqemu-1.4.0-0.3.pre1.fc11 ------------------------- * Tue Apr 28 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.4.0-0.3.pre1 - Fix wrong version (epoch was accurate) - RPMFusion #572 From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Wed Apr 29 20:46:13 2009 From: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Mamoru Tasaka) Date: Wed Apr 29 20:46:31 2009 Subject: i586 build server In-Reply-To: <49F86C99.6070507@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> References: <49F86C99.6070507@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Message-ID: <49F8A075.5010009@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 04/30/2009 12:04 AM +9:00: > Hello. > > Would some investigate i586 build server? > I tried build twice, however it still seems to be hanging. > > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=3677 Now it seems to be working. I retried build and it succeeded. Thank you. Mamoru From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 00:47:11 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 00:47:12 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090429224700.05BC02C569@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-30 00:47:08 --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/z-push.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/z-push-1.2.1-1.src.rpm rpmlint output: z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/z-push/state apache z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/z-push/state apache zarafa-z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zarafa/z-push/state apache zarafa-z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zarafa/z-push/state apache 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Well, these directories have to be writable by the webserver user. This is not my first package in Fedora nor do I need a sponsor. Rest of default questions should be already satisfied with comments before. Please understand how z-push works and why z-push and zarafa-z-push packages are required before claiming the schema. Note, that both packages do not exclude each else necessarily, so no conflict is needed, there are no real overlaps. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 04:39:46 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 04:39:48 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430023946.419952C4B5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-30 04:39:46 --- Hmmm, I wouldn't call that "GPLv2 with exceptions", but rather "GPLv2 with extra restrictions". The way this is worded bans even distribution to the US from outside the US, which makes us non-US folks responsible for enforcing US patent law, I wouldn't call this acceptable (and I'm not sure this is really compliant with section 8 of the GPLv2 either, but if it's not, it'd just make the license contradictory and the program entirely undistributable). In particular, how is RPM Fusion or its mirrors to prevent US users from downloading the software? By letting US users download the software, they'll be violating the license! I don't understand why they have to write this in the license at all, pretty much all the other patent-encumbered software does fine without such a clause (Xvid removed theirs, most others never had it in the first place). If this goes anywhere, it definitely needs to go to non-free. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 07:27:12 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 07:27:13 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430052711.50D0E2C4B2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-04-30 07:27:11 --- Personally, I don't care what the exact license tag string is. Maybe even and simply "GPLv2 without US"? Tom agreed in IRC some time ago, that z-push is something for RPM Fusion as a non-free package only. The basic issue is IMHO similar to MP3, but I'm not a lawyer. And there, we allow downloads from the US for that too, right? Point behind this clause is, that "ActiveSync over-the-air" is maybe covered in the US by Microsoft etc. As Z-push is written by a German company (!), they could be made directly legal responsible for their work, so their lawyer checked the situation for non-US and suggested exclusion of US via licensing, at least is that what I know and understood when talking to them. The clause 8 itself allows such additions, if I got Tom correct. I think, it's unnecessary to say, Tom == Fedora Legal, but just documentation reason here. As far as I know, most RPM Fusion mirrors are anyway in Europe, not in the US. If you think, that we need legal clarification here, introduce RF_LEGAL blocker and inherit e.g. Fedora Legal here. I'm pretty sure, Tom is willing to help - otherwise please let us continue :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 08:59:14 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 08:59:16 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430065911.9B8652C493@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-30 08:59:13 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Personally, I don't care what the exact license tag string is. Maybe even and > simply "GPLv2 without US"? > > Tom agreed in IRC some time ago, that z-push is something for RPM Fusion as > a non-free package only. The basic issue is IMHO similar to MP3, but I'm not > a lawyer. And there, we allow downloads from the US for that too, right? MP3 case means: the code itself is redistributed in a FOSS valid License despite the mp3 codec mechanism idea is patented. Here, the license is worded in a sense that it restricts the GPL which makes it theoretically not redistributable even for us, since it would be a GPL violation. (we refused to redistribute some version of faad some time ago, which fall under this case). Now I wouldn't abuse anyone (IANAL), but the american low, by qualifiying as illegal FOSS that implement patented idea, already restricts the GPL. In this case, z-push only puts this in license words. One could say, if the American law is modified (dreaming), the z-push "GPL restriction" also fall. But the fact that the "restriction" is written within the license suggest it will be inherited within other version. This is unfortunate. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 11:09:41 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 11:09:41 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430090937.7E0222C4DE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #28 from NicolasChauvet 2009-04-30 11:09:40 --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #24) ... > What do you mean by conflict? The only difference is, jackuser has 20 realtime > priority, whereas traversouser has 90. If a user is a member of both groups, he > will have a realtime priority of 90, which is a higher priority, so jack using > applications will be even happier. > > Jack using applications won't stop working, if you are asking that. My own > username priority is set to 90 from almost the beginning, and I never had > trouble with jack. So, that's an information, indeed. But why jack isn't set as 99 then since all is about been happier ? > > Then if the values needs manual installation, it would be better to leave the > > choice to the users, and have it documented in a README.Fedora.(along with a > > better warning message). > > > > I lost the count of how many times I asked you this question about > README.Fedora. You don't give direct answers. I have no directive to give you, you will remain responsible for the package. All is about knowing how things behave, then one can tell how things need to be packaged. > > About the SSE asm optimization. ... > Again, reading the above, I don't understand your point. You want me to disable > SSE on ix86? Please be direct. I think I am pretty clear. You doesn't seem to be attentive enough. > What is "x86 specific code"? This file : 'src/common/fpu.cc' is conditionalized with #ifndef ARCH_X86 which has nothing to deal with been SSE or not. I do think this will be a problem on ppc (or ia64) and it should have be: #ifndef ARCH_X86 return; -#endif +#else ... +#endif (somewhere) Now i don't see much difference between USE_XMMINTRIN and SSE at least traverso.cpp use that: #ifdef __SSE__ #include #endif Which suggest one or the other should be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 30 13:13:07 2009 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 30 13:13:15 2009 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2009-04-30 Message-ID: <20090430111307.5068.39645@faldor.intranet> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): mythtv-themes streamripper Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): jarod AT wilsonet com mythtv-themes lxtnow AT gmail com streamripper ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-i386: streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.i386 requires libfaad.so.0 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc: streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc requires libfaad.so.0 streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-ppc64: mythtv-themes-0.22-0.2.svn.r20448.fc11.noarch requires mythtv-frontend streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.ppc64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: streamripper-1.62.3-8.fc10.x86_64 requires libfaad.so.0()(64bit) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 16:03:31 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 16:03:31 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430140325.3674B2C589@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-30 16:03:31 --- Figured I'd chime in here to clarify things a bit: The z-push license is an odd duck, because it invokes clause 8 of the GPLv2: "8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License." Thus, strictly speaking, the z-push license is not non-free, at least according to the FSF, because they're invoking clause 8 explicitly for the US. Unfortunately, Fedora can't distribute anything under those terms because we're based in the US. So, this is very similar to the MP3 situation, where the code is FOSS licensed, but due to US patents, we cannot include it in the US (which is why the upstream invoked clause 8). If those patents were to expire, or the patent laws were to change somehow in the US, I think it is extremely likely that the z-push upstream would drop their clause 8 invocation. I'd suggest tagging this as: License: GPLv2 with clause 8 invoked (distribution in the US is forbidden) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 16:13:06 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 16:13:06 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430141300.4460E2C3B3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-30 16:13:06 --- > Point behind this clause is, that "ActiveSync over-the-air" is maybe covered > in the US by Microsoft etc. "Maybe" is not enough to invoke clause 8, they need to prove that there's a patent banning it in the US. Otherwise they're not compliant with the GPL and thus their licensing is contradictory. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 16:14:44 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 16:14:44 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430141438.032852C4B7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-30 16:14:44 --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Point behind this clause is, that "ActiveSync over-the-air" is maybe covered > > in the US by Microsoft etc. > > "Maybe" is not enough to invoke clause 8, they need to prove that there's a > patent banning it in the US. Otherwise they're not compliant with the GPL and > thus their licensing is contradictory. I have a high degree of confidence that there are Microsoft-held patents in the US. If this came in without clause 8 today, I would still reject it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 16:15:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 16:15:35 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430141528.C93602C4B7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-30 16:15:35 --- (In reply to comment #9) > I have a high degree of confidence that there are Microsoft-held patents in the > US. If this came in without clause 8 today, I would still reject it. Heh, that didn't come out very clear. I have a high degree of confidence that z-push _infringes_ existing active Microsoft patents in the US. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 16:45:40 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 16:45:40 2009 Subject: [Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430144533.45FCF2C56B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 --- Comment #11 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-04-30 16:45:39 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Figured I'd chime in here to clarify things a bit: thx spot > [...] > Thus, strictly speaking, the z-push license is not non-free, at least according > to the FSF, because they're invoking clause 8 explicitly for the US. > Unfortunately, Fedora can't distribute anything under those terms because we're > based in the US. I for one would nevertheless would say this should go to RPM Fusion's nonfree repo, as nonfree implies "you should check the license to make sure you are actually allowed to use this software" (which might be the case if you are in the US) > License: GPLv2 with clause 8 invoked (distribution in the US is forbidden) Sounds good, as this will make it possible to get the relevant information using tools like repoquery without getting the software (and violating the license) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 21:29:52 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 21:29:51 2009 Subject: [Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and Editing Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430192942.BCDF42C59F@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441 --- Comment #29 from Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-30 21:29:51 --- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #26) > > Jack using applications won't stop working, if you are asking that. My own > > username priority is set to 90 from almost the beginning, and I never had > > trouble with jack. > So, that's an information, indeed. But why jack isn't set as 99 then since all > is about been happier ? > Good question. I don't know the answer. I don't maintain jack. Which way do you prefer? A README.Fedora file or a limits file? I prefer the latter one but I'll be OK with both. > > > > Then if the values needs manual installation, it would be better to leave > > > the choice to the users, and have it documented in a README.Fedora. > > > (along with a better warning message). > > > > > > > I lost the count of how many times I asked you this question about > > README.Fedora. You don't give direct answers. > I have no directive to give you, you will remain responsible for the package. > All is about knowing how things behave, then one can tell how things need to > be packaged. > kwizart, I've been trying to guess what you actually mean by what you are saying since the beginning and obviously I don't guess it the right way always. We can avoid passing the ball back and forth, and avoid the possibility of misinterpretations by minimal ambiguity. > > > What is "x86 specific code"? > This file : 'src/common/fpu.cc' is conditionalized with #ifndef ARCH_X86 which > has nothing to deal with been SSE or not. > I do think this will be a problem on ppc (or ia64) and it should have be: > #ifndef ARCH_X86 > return; > -#endif > +#else > ... > +#endif (somewhere) > Yes, thanks for pointing this out. As the author told me, this part of the code is directly taken from ardour. It looks like they made a typo when they were transferring (#else needs to be used instead of #endif), and they are going to fix this in the next release. I'll update my sseopt patch to incorporate this change. > Now i don't see much difference between USE_XMMINTRIN and SSE > at least traverso.cpp use that: > #ifdef __SSE__ > #include > #endif > Which suggest one or the other should be avoided. > As for USE_XMMINTRIN, again this is the way done in ardour. XMMINTRIN implies SSE and vice versa both in ardour and in traverso. I know it is redundant but there is no need to modify the code just to change the variable names. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 23:13:35 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 23:13:33 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430211325.051B72C5AB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-30 23:13:34 --- +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ogmrip.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ogmrip.schemas ogmrip-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 11a52e5d9d7f936ae3a1925b5ab51b72 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 23:14:32 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 23:14:31 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430211422.1B3C12C5AB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |xavier@bachelot.org |review@rpmfusion.org | Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 30 23:16:01 2009 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 30 23:16:00 2009 Subject: [Bug 281] Review Request: ogmrip - DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090430211551.794EA2C5AB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.