[Bug 441] Review request: traverso - Multitrack Audio Recording and
Editing Suite
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Apr 28 18:01:51 CEST 2009
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441
--- Comment #18 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-04-28 18:01:51 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > (In reply to comment #13)
> > > * Please delete any internal dependency:
> > > rm -rf src/3rdparty/slv2
> >
> > OK
> But I have:
> -- checking for module 'libslv2>=0.6.1'
> -- package 'libslv2>=0.6.1' not found
> Which was present already in F-10 x86_64 despite slv2-devel is installed.
My bad. I wonder how I missed this. "libslv2" in the CMakeList file must be
patched/sed'ed to "slv2". That's it.
> > > Furthermore i've tried to read the pdf (was fly reading actually) and
> > > found rather hard to see if something needs to be tweaked in
> > > /etc/security/limits.conf.
> Can you tell me which group need to be setup in order to have rt access ?
> Is it the same a pulsert for PA (maybe jackrt?)
> If this is the case, maybe the warning should be explicitely to add the user
> to such group.
>From the manual:
• Traverso can’t set the audio thread to real time priority
Some Linux distributions don’t allow to set the priority of the audio
thread to
real time. However, a too low priority can lead to xruns and dropouts dur-
ing recording and playback. To avoid this, add the following lines to the
file
/etc/security/limits.conf, or if the lines are already there, change the
numbers accordingly:
@audio - rtprio 90
@audio - nice -10
@audio - memlock 3000000
Then restart your computer.
So, what do you think I should do?
>
> * Any other info about the potentially unappropriate use of -DSTATIC_BUILD ?
> (this seems hardcoded within the CMakeLists.txt)
>
I am trying to get a hold of Remon on IRC. I'll ask him about this too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list