[Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Thu Aug 6 18:42:34 CEST 2009
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459
--- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> 2009-08-06 18:42:33 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Nicolas, thank you for your considerations very much:
...
>
> Could you submit the SPEC file so that we can move forward with this?
>
Sorry for been that late, the general idea was to move the prefix from /usr to
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-%{version}-$(uname -m) so that we can respect the FHS WRT
packaging compiler.
There is a need to take a look how it is done for java (openjdk/sun) for some
example.
You shouldn't wait for my spec anymore as I tend to have explored more than
necessary (mulitple cuda toolkit installed).
I think the spec should be cuda.spec, because we didn't use the toolkit keyword
for Cg either.
@Duncan, thx for you interest. One way to have usefull info is to package an
application using the cuda compiler. But other infor about the matching drivers
and other testing are very valuable feedbacks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list