[Bug 247] Review Request: mac - Monkey's Audio Codec (MAC) utility and library

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Feb 2 18:30:22 CET 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247





--- Comment #8 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-02-02 18:30:22 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Thanks kwizart, but could you address these issues that I pointed as well?
> > 
> > Without this one, I don't think it is appropriate to distribute mac in the
> > first place:
> > > * I'm attaching the email I received from the author. We should probably put it
> If we think the redistribution is a problem, then We will have to wait for the
> license to be added to the source package itsef. As having the text that allow 
> the redistribution not taken from the source package is completely irrelevant
> (specially as the mail comes from an untrusted source not even gpg signed).
> Here are some example of package that was waiting for such addition, even if
> the license was attached to the bugzilla.
> This was the case in the Ralink firmware reviews here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161
> 

Sorry, there is some miscommunication here. I still don't understand
what you need me to do with these firmware packages. I can't do
anything with them even if I want to, because I'm not their owner.

Btw, I sent an email to the MAC author and asked him to include some
text regarding redistribution of MAC.

> If you have found any package that doesn't have the text to allow for
> redistribution added to the source package itself, please warn FE-LEGAL as this
> package shouldn't have been added to the repository.
> 
> 
> > > in %doc's of all packages.
> > > 
> > 
> > Please remove this "fake" license:
> > > * Do we need to ship the COPYING file? Please check its content.
> Why Not ? What is explained here is that License was not LGPL despite written
> as such in the day it was provided from sourceforge. It explains something very
> important, there was never a LGPL version of this mac source code.
> 

Does the end user need to know this? This is more relevant for developers.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list