[RPM Fusion] Update of "Goals" by AndreaMusuruane

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Sure, but do we have the manpower to mentor someone and will Google think we
> have it/accept us as project? I wouldn't do the latter if I would have to
> chose; I'd tell us "realize your ideas as GSoC project within the Fedora
> project"

I just noticed that Xavier was a mentor last year for GSoC. Maybe he
can share his thought about this.

BTW, I have absolutely nothing against realizing our ideas within the
Fedora project if it is feasible.

>>>> + + [musuruan: can we look for more contributors in the
>>>> fedora-docs-list?]
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>
>> Do somebody in RPM Fusion know them and can contact them?
>
> And what exactly would we ask for? Same question btw reg. the 3rd party docs
> site idea above...

One reason why our docs are not the best you can find is because we
are not content writers, we are packagers, sysadmins or developers. We
need some of these profiles too.

My idea is just to ask if there are content writers in
fedora-docs-list with some spare time to improve the documentation in
RPM Fusion.

The same can be asked to content writers for 3rd party doc sites.

Moreover, we can also find some way not to duplicate the same
information over different sites (and maybe with errors in it). A
clear goal of each doc site should be defined. Each sites should
reference the others when needed.

>> I'm not sure but I don't think that we can host applications whose
>> licenses do not follow the Fedora Guidelines in Fedora Hosted.
>
> No, of course not. Maybe I was not clear enough: The tools we need might
> deal with non-free software, but I assume the tools itself (like
> rpmfusion-config-display, kmodtool, ...) will be open-source and thus should
> acceptable for Fedora Hosted as long as the Fedora project doesn't say "no".

If that is feasible I'm all for it.

Bye,

Andrea.