[Bug 310] scid - A chess database application

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310





--- Comment #22 from Mikhail Kalenkov <Mikhail.Kalenkov at gmail.com>  2009-06-18 07:40:53 ---
(In reply to comment #21)

SPEC - http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid.spec
SRPM - http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid-3.7.3-7.fc11.src.rpm

> (In reply to comment #18)
> > I wrote two patches scid-makefile-togaII.patch and
> > scid-makefile-phalanx.patch. Actually I don't like the way I fix optflags
> > issues. Could you recommend a better way?
> > 
> 
> I think this is the best we could do. You could ask upstream why they are not
> honoring the flags defined by OPTIMIZE variable for the compilation of these
> files.
OK.

> > Is it necessary to specify license tag for subpackages?
> > 
> 
> Actually, this is a good question and something that I missed during the
> review. The license tag is inherited from the parent package. You only have to
> define the license tag in a subpackage if it is different from the parent's. 
> 
> Now, correct me if I'm wrong: In this case,
> - the main package is "GPLv2+ and distributable only in Scid"
> - sounds and bases packages are "GPLv2+"
> - books package is "GPL+ and freely distributable"
Done. I found that src/tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/* files have a nonGPL license
(tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/license.txt). I wrote in spec file that they are "freely
distributable". Is it correct?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.