[Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Jun 23 21:05:11 CEST 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396





--- Comment #47 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-06-23 21:05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give more
> emphasis to the following text (taken from
> http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository):
> 
> "We have two separate software repositories:
> 
>     * "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing
> Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons
>     * "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software
> (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with
> publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions"
> 
> Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as
> defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree.
> 

There is also the case:
A "free" package that depends on a "nonfree" package goes to the "nonfree"
repo.
(This is not relevant to paintdotnet)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list