[Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET
image editor
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Jun 23 21:05:11 CEST 2009
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #47 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-06-23 21:05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give more
> emphasis to the following text (taken from
> http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository):
>
> "We have two separate software repositories:
>
> * "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing
> Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons
> * "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software
> (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with
> publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions"
>
> Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as
> defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree.
>
There is also the case:
A "free" package that depends on a "nonfree" package goes to the "nonfree"
repo.
(This is not relevant to paintdotnet)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list