Where we are and where do we what to go?
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sat Mar 7 15:24:29 CET 2009
On 03.03.2009 08:27, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> - ideally a KDE spin as well, as I would like to prevent "RPM Fusion
>> ignores KDE" fame; related: the name discussion, as the basic name of
>> our first spin should leave room for other spins, hence your spins
>> would need to be something like Omega Desktop or Omega Gnome afaics
> It is already called as Omega Desktop.
Sounds really good, as it leaves room for other omega variants :-)
> I don't have time to maintain another variant right now.
I didn't mean you to do that. That why I wrote "ideally" ;-)
We nevertheless IMHO once again should ask in public (blog and
spins-list maybe?) if somebody want to do a KDE spin with RPM Fusion
before we do one with Gnome -- then we can point users that complain
"why don't you hvae a KDE spin" there and tell them "nobody volunteered".
>> - ideally at least two people that take care of the spins that review
>> the work from each other a bit (IOW: we should at least basically
>> review spins just like we review packages);
> Again and I can only ask for feedback. What do I do if I don't get any?
Note that there is a "ideally" as well.
But again: We don't allow packages that haven't been reviewed. Why
should we allow spins that haven't been reviewed?
>> - Fedora and RPM Fusion packages only
> Does that mean livna libdvdcss cannot be included or that livna
> repository cannot be enabled by default?
I'd say so, because the reasons for not including libdvdcss in a spin
are the same as for not including them in the repo.
Cu
knurd
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list