[Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248





--- Comment #15 from Lubos Stanek <lubek at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-03-18 10:47:08 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> @Lubos
> - Why do you think anything got stripped once debuginfo subpackage are disabled?

See /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note.
I sent you my .spec file for a reference. Maybe it is sitting in your spam
folder.

> - Where to get the sfx modules ? Where to store them ?

I am packaging sfxs into %{_libdir} and symlinking them into /usr/local/etc
(the binary expects them there). Maybe the %{_libexecdir} would be more
appropriate instead of %{_libdir}.
Otherwise it is possible to include the full path to the sfx module on the
command line.

bsd.sfx - default.sfx in the package for FreeBSD (rarbsd-*)
dosx.sfx - default.sfx in the package for MS DOS (rarx*)
linux-x86.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Linux (rarlinux-*)
linux-x86_64.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Linux x64 (rarlinux-x64-*)
osx.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Mac OS X (rarosx-*)
windows-console.sfx - WinCon.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*)
windows.sfx - Default.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*)
windows-zip.sfx - Zip.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*)

Some packages are compressed by rar. It would be possible to extract them by
rar_static in the build time (it would limit the build to work only on %{ix86}
and x86_64).

Maybe it would be useful to package modules in a standalone package (rar-sfx)
to speed up the review of the main rar package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.