[Bug 588] Review Request: rpmfusion-remixes-kickstarts -- Kickstart files for creating distributions or remixes with RPM Fusion packages

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588


NicolasChauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kwizart at gmail.com




--- Comment #11 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-05-17 14:41:35 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I think it should go to the free repo.
> 
> FWIW, I have no strong option, but I more and more tend to say: let's put it
> into the nonfree repo, because the result of what this is building has nonfree
> packages available.
> 
> Alternate solution: Provide rpmfusion-free-remix-kickstarts and
> rpmfusion-nonfree-remix-kickstarts; the later package mainly could just include
> the kickstart files from the former and add the nonfree repo. 
We can also have various kind of kickstart files for differents usages. So
having them splitted does make sense. What I would like, is to use a generic
keyword which would be differents than rpmfusion for the produced iso.

I have in mind to contribute two or three differents kickstarts whom can be
from "fedora + free only" or "fedora + free + nonfree".

Now if the package that redistribute the kickstarts files are named
rpmfusion-*.rpm, it still does make sense as addition kickstart that fedora
doesn't not ship , hence we ship at rpmfusion. But the produced iso should be
named differently, and probaly have a different name for either it is fedora +
freeworld or fedora + free + nonfree.

(I haven't checked which named is written on the iso).


> > Have a closer look at the rpmfusion-nonfree-release package. It neither
> > contains nonfree bits nor does it depend on a nonfree package. Hence I believe
> > that rpmfusion-nonfree-release should be in the free repo too.
> 
> Can't really follow the "Hence I believe..." part. rpmfusion-nonfree-release
> makes nonfree package available to the system and hence is in the nonfree repo,
> even if it itself is free. I think this is a good thing, as it makes it obvious
> "you are crossing a line here", which IMHO is needed, as you might violate
> licenses (like "non-commercial" clauses) if you blindly use stuff from the
> nonfree repo.
+1 to Thorsten.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.