bsnes 0.051+

Julian Sikorski belegdol at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 13:53:25 CET 2009


W dniu 02.11.2009 15:05, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 0.053 brought yet another code separation, libsnesfilter. Having said
>>> that, in the process of severely crippling snesfilter (only zlib
>>> support), I have managed to make it work with system zlib. Spec files
>>> and srpms are available on my fedorapeople page:
>>> http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/snes/
>>> Please have a look. Also, won't these be suitable for Fedora proper
>>> (after removing unrar code, of course)?
> 
> I had only a quick glance:
> 
> * If you have to exclude unrar code because of licensing issue, you
> MUST repack the source:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
> 
> * You should not patch the Makefile with the hard-coded value of
> $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Your "sed -i "s#-O3#$RPM_OPT_FLAGS#"" is not applied
> because it is in conflict with your systemlib patch.
> 
> * Your "sed -i "s/link  := -s/#link  := -s/" Makefile" is not applied
> because it is in conflict with your systemlib patch.
> 
> * To be sure you do not use any file of the local libraries you should
> delete the related source in %prep; i.e. rm -rf zlib etc...
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Andrea.
> 
I'll get to this asap. Also, I was told by upstream that using xz-libs
for 7zip support is impossible. So, would it be allowed to enable the 7z
code? Others can be ignored since the rom images rarely come in these
formats.

Julian



More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list