kmod-nvidia in rawhide?
Nicolas Chauvet
kwizart at gmail.com
Thu Oct 22 00:49:00 CEST 2009
2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>:
> On 21.10.2009 21:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2009/10/21 Jarod Wilson <jarod at wilsonet.com>:
>>> On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>> 2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik at greysector.net>:
>>>>> Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
>>>>> I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and they've
>>>>> been working fine for the last few days (and they work with F12's Xserver
>>>>> ABI changes).
>>>> Right, but the new packaging scheme is on the way.
>>> New packaging scheme? /me missed something...
>>>> Was delayed because the work on multimedia libs update.
>>>> May I not be the only one to work on rawhide ?!!!!
>>>> Please!
>>> I'll take care of 190.40 drivers for rawhide right now.
>> No that's not What I meant.
>>
>> mplayer and avidemux along with a mass rebuild is needed.
>>
>> Furthermore selinux still isn't compatible with the nvidia drivers yet.
>>
>> What You 've just subscribed is the review request pending for the new review.
>
> Just my 2 cent: I'd much prefer to get the driver in asap, especially if
> any reviews for other packages are needed before that can happen. We are
> running out of time for F12 and users are annoyed that we don't ship the
> drivers.
>
> Or, IOW: Is there any downside in doing what Dominik and Jarod suggested
> and just updated the drivers? If your new scheme gets ready in time we
> can switch over easily -- we need to provide and test the upgrade path
> anyway...
It just
>
>> (nvidia-xsetting and nvidia-xconfig splitted fom the driver at least)
>
> Weren't those reviewed earlier already?
At least there is no cvs created for them.
Shall I request one ?
Nicolas (kwizart)
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list