From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 1 07:35:14 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 1 07:35:15 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-01 Message-ID: <20100401053514.6F25E2438E@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: 3 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12 ---------------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 173.14.25-1 - Update to 173.14.25 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12 -------------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 96.43.16-1 - Update to 96.43.16 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 1 22:04:39 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 1 22:04:52 2010 Subject: [Bug 1030] Review request: xbmc - Media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100401200443.EDBD5684F1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 --- Comment #169 from Rolf Fokkens 2010-04-01 22:04:38 --- (In reply to comment #167) > I wonder if you'd be willing to emulate how it is done for other libraries like > ffmpeg. A patch like stands a better chance of being accepted upstream > because it wouldn't affect the default behaviour. If I'd understand what I was doing, I'd be more than willing to create a better upstream patch. However I don't know anything of automake and autoconf, and learning these is beyond my goal to help get XBMC in RPMfusion. So for the moment I'd hope that the upstream guys pick it up. If not, I may try to do so in the future if I somehow find the time.... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 2 07:06:41 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 2 07:06:47 2010 Subject: [Bug 1122] Review request: mame - Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100402050642.7BFDB684A8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 --- Comment #24 from Chen Lei 2010-04-02 07:06:40 --- (In reply to comment #23) > Ralf, is the package good to go? Maybe you need to contact cvs admin directly. The package is OK for replacing sdlmame in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 4 20:49:32 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 4 20:49:45 2010 Subject: [Bug 1141] Review Request: xtables-addons-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100404184936.A9285684D7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaio@fedoraproject.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-04 20:49:30 --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] - passed. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . - passed. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] - passed. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] - passed. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] - passed. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] - passed. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - passed. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] - passed. MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] - passed. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - passed. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] - passed. MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] - passed. MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] - passed. MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] - passed. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] - passed. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] - passed. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] - passed. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] - passed. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] - passed. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] - passed. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] - passed. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] - passed. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] - passed. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [21] - passed. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] - passed. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [22] - passed. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [23] - passed. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [24] - passed. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [25] - passed. [PASSED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 4 20:50:53 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 4 20:51:08 2010 Subject: [Bug 1141] Review Request: xtables-addons-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100404185057.B2B56684A5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 4 21:00:14 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 4 21:00:27 2010 Subject: [Bug 1129] Review Request: xtables-addons - Extensions targets and matches for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100404190018.CCF66684C2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaio@fedoraproject.org Blocks|2 |4 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-04 21:00:14 --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] - passed. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . - passed. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - passed. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] - passed. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] - passed. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] - passed. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] - passed. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - passed. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] - passed. MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] - passed. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - passed. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] - passed. MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] - passed. MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] - passed. MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] - passed. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] - passed. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] - passed. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] - passed. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] - passed. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] - passed. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] - passed. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] - passed. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] - passed. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] - passed. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] - passed. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [21] - passed. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] - passed. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [22] - passed. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [23] - passed. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [24] - passed. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [25] - passed. [PASSED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From belegdol at gmail.com Mon Apr 5 00:44:29 2010 From: belegdol at gmail.com (Julian Sikorski) Date: Mon Apr 5 00:44:54 2010 Subject: CVS admin request (Was: mame review request) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: W dniu 26.03.2010 21:34, Julian Sikorski pisze: > Dear Ralf, > > you have recently revoked the approval for mame due to using non-verbose > make. I have fixed that, so I would kindly ask you to grant the approval > again, unless you think that something more needs to be improved. > > Regards, > Julian > > Dear CVS admins, since I got no response from Ralf, I assume he is OK with the fix - we cannot wait forever. Please do the necessary CVS magic. Thanks, Julian From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 03:57:16 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 03:57:32 2010 Subject: [Bug 1129] Review Request: xtables-addons - Extensions targets and matches for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100405015721.726B8683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-04-05 03:57:15 --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xtables-addons Short Description: Xtables-addons provides extra modules for iptables not present in the kernel, and is the successor of patch-o-matic. Owners: supercyper Branches: F-13 F-12 F-11 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 03:59:03 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 03:59:19 2010 Subject: [Bug 1141] Review Request: xtables-addons-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100405015909.01DF0683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-04-05 03:59:03 --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xtables-addons-kmod Short Description: Kernel modules parts for the xtables-addons Owners: supercyper Branches: F-13 F-12 F-11 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 14:02:49 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 5 14:02:50 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-05 Message-ID: <20100405120249.3A33324370@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 4 NEW amap-5.2-4.fc13 : Network tool for application protocol detection nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc13 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc13 NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.15-1.fc13 : NVIDIA's proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: amap-5.2-4.fc13 --------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-4 - more flexible pcre cflags to build also on RHEL4 * Sat Mar 20 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-3 - License changed to AMAP license to avoid confusion - patch makefile to link to amap6 instead of copy nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 * Fri Mar 12 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-3 - Bump Epoch - Fan problem in recent release * Mon Mar 08 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-2 - Revert to 190.53 version http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/announcement.php?f=14 * Sat Feb 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 195.36.08-1 - Update to 195.36.08 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel * Thu Feb 11 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Feb 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Jan 30 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Jan 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc13 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.15-1.fc13 ------------------------------------ * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 - Use macro for Epoch * Sun Mar 14 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-4 - Fix multilibs requirements * Fri Mar 12 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-2 - Bump Epoch - Fan problem in recent release http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/announcement.php?f=14 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 14:15:59 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 5 14:16:00 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-05 Message-ID: <20100405121559.CF60124114@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 11 NEW cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-2.fc13 : Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock NEW compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 : An interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language NEW devede-3.16.6-1.fc13 : A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD) NEW mythtv-0.23-0.3.rc1.fc13 : A digital video recorder (DVR) application NEW mythtv-themes-0.23-0.3.rc1.fc13 : Additional themes for mythtv's frontend NEW ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 : DVD ripping and encoding graphical user interface NEW vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc13 : Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo NEW VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc13 : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware NEW VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13 : Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE NEW vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 : Multi-platform MPEG, DVD, and DivX player NEW xbmc-9.11-18.fc13 : Media center ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 14:39:56 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 14:40:05 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] New: Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Summary: Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://code.google.com/p/scholarzhang/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kaio@fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/west-chamber.spec SRPM: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12.src.rpm A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file). West-chamber is extensions named after the famous Chinese ancient friction - Romance of the West Chamber for iptables. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. It consists of kernel module. The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. $ rpmlint SRPMS/west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12.x86_64.rpm west-chamber.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iptables -> potables, portables, timetables west-chamber.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables -> potables, portables, timetables west-chamber.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user space, user-space, users pace west-chamber.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kmod -> mod, k mod, Kodak west-chamber.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://scholarzhang.googlecode.com/files/west-chamber-20100405.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found west-chamber.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iptables -> potables, portables, timetables west-chamber.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables -> potables, portables, timetables west-chamber.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user space, user-space, users pace west-chamber.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kmod -> mod, k mod, Kodak 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Spellings are all correct. URL of Source0 is correct which I could download from that. Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. This is my first RPM Fusion package. Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I am a Fedora sponsored packager already. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 16:09:06 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 16:09:16 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] New: Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Summary: Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://code.google.com/p/scholarzhang/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kaio@fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/west-chamber-kmod.spec SRPM: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12.src.rpm West-chamber is extensions named after the famous Chinese ancient friction - Romance of the West Chamber for iptables. This is not eligible to be included in Fedora because this is a kernel module. $ rpmlint SRPMS/west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/kmod-west-chamber-* west-chamber-kmod.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iptables -> potables, portables, timetables west-chamber-kmod.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://scholarzhang.googlecode.com/files/west-chamber-20100405.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found kmod-west-chamber.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-west-chamber.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fc -> cf, dc, f kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C west-chamber kernel module(s) for 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fc -> cf, dc, f kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_CUI.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_gfw.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_ZHANG.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_CUI.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_gfw.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber/xt_ZHANG.ko kmod-west-chamber-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64.x86_64: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64/extra/west-chamber 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 11 warnings. Spellings are correct. URL is correct which I could download without problem. Summary is capitalized. Binary package has binary is correct. Documentation is available on wiki of project page. Kernel modules are not default ones so located in other directories. This is my first RPM Fusion package. I am a Fedora sponsored packager. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 16:10:21 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 16:10:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100405141024.7345E6848C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1149 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 5 16:10:21 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 5 16:10:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100405141024.A40146848C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1150 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 00:08:19 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 00:08:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1127] Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100405220824.4E7B7685C9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms@iinet.net.au --- Comment #5 from David Timms 2010-04-06 00:08:18 --- (In reply to comment #4) > * Remove repositories which provides non-open-source software only. > * Remove Livna repository. > * Remove ATrpms repository. Hi Homer, I'm pretty sure that messing with people's software repository configuration is not acceptable in a package. (I haven't taken a look at how this was achieved in this package). An example why this might be bad: eg user installs package A from (removed repo), that requires current versions of libraries. They then install this package, which disables the repo. Fedora offers security patches for the libs that package A requires (specific version). Now the user can never successfully update to the security fixed packages because yum sees that the installed package would break. ps. I haven't performed a normal review. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 04:47:39 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 04:47:43 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406024740.6A59368594@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|1149 | Blocks|2 |3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 04:47:40 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 04:47:43 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406024740.C0DD168595@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1150 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 04:48:23 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 04:48:25 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406024824.0C3FB68594@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 04:48:29 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 04:48:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406024829.9C56668595@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |supercyper@163.com Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:00:05 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:00:10 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406030005.D700E68655@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei 2010-04-06 05:00:04 --- formal review here: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. <> [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. <>38d1503a1df5d8b5fa6823e3e0ed4982 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [N/A] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [N/A] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [N/A] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [N/A] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N/A] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:00:41 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:00:43 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406030042.0F6AC68644@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |supercyper@163.com |review@rpmfusion.org | Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:01:12 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:01:18 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406030113.4120868644@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:05:55 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:05:59 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406030555.837DA68405@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |supercyper@163.com |review@rpmfusion.org | Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Chen Lei 2010-04-06 05:05:54 --- formal review here: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. <> [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. <>38d1503a1df5d8b5fa6823e3e0ed4982 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [N/A] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:10:37 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:10:39 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406031037.CA9F968408@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-04-06 05:10:36 --- Note: Please set "%define buildforkernels current" instead of "%define buildforkernels newest" the first time you import a module into rpmfusion. See http://rpmfusion.org/Packaging/KernelModules/Kmods2#head-998f6964b3188f6a2ac6e757ff14f0511b79ffb5 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 05:51:00 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 05:51:04 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406035100.E2C0668618@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 rc040203@freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@freenet.de --- Comment #2 from rc040203@freenet.de 2010-04-06 05:50:59 --- Comment: I find the package description non-understandable. May-be it's "self explaining" to people who have a use for this package, but to me this all reads as "Greek". Please rework the description such that people who have no idea what this package does can get an understanding of what it is. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 15:10:02 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 15:10:11 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406131005.7544E68669@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-06 15:10:01 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: west-chamber-kmod Short Description: Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber Owners: kaio supercyper Branches: F-12 F-13 ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 15:10:15 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 15:10:24 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406131017.A21906866A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-06 15:10:14 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: west-chamber Short Description: xtensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables Owners: kaio supercyper Branches: F-12 F-13 ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 16:09:05 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 16:09:14 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - iptables extension for offsetting censorship firewall. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406140907.BB6446866D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review request: west-chamber|Review request: west-chamber |- Extensions named after |- iptables extension for |Romance of the West Chamber |offsetting censorship |for iptables |firewall. --- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-06 16:09:04 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: west-chamber Short Description: iptables extension for offsetting censorship firewall. Owners: kaio supercyper Branches: F-12 F-13 ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 16:09:24 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 16:09:34 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - iptables extension for offsetting censorship firewall. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406140927.9A3B56866D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 6 16:59:28 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 6 16:59:38 2010 Subject: [Bug 1127] Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100406145931.A5E5B68662@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 --- Comment #6 from Homer Xing 2010-04-06 16:59:28 --- > Hi Homer, > > I'm pretty sure that messing with people's software repository configuration is > not acceptable in a package. (I haven't taken a look at how this was achieved > in this package). > > An example why this might be bad: eg user installs package A from (removed > repo), that requires current versions of libraries. They then install this > package, which disables the repo. Fedora offers security patches for the libs > that package A requires (specific version). Now the user can never successfully > update to the security fixed packages because yum sees that the installed > package would break. > > ps. I haven't performed a normal review. > Dear David, You are right. Installing a package from third-party repository will lock down the versions of libraries, for example, when the maintainer of the third-party repository forgets to upgrade the package. However, I have not found out a solution yet. Should I completely remove all third-party repositories from Ailurus? Best regards, Homer -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 7 10:16:57 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 7 10:23:25 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-05 In-Reply-To: <20100405121559.CF60124114@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20100405121559.CF60124114@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: 2010/4/5 > > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 11 > > NEW cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-2.fc13 : Light eye-candy fully themable animated > dock > NEW compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 : An interpreted, interactive, > object-oriented programming language > NEW devede-3.16.6-1.fc13 : A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, > sVCD or CVD) > NEW mythtv-0.23-0.3.rc1.fc13 : A digital video recorder (DVR) application > NEW mythtv-themes-0.23-0.3.rc1.fc13 : Additional themes for mythtv's > frontend > NEW ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 : DVD ripping and encoding graphical user > interface > NEW vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc13 : Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo > NEW VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc13 : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC > hardware > NEW VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13 : Kernel module for VirtualBox-OSE > NEW vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 : Multi-platform MPEG, DVD, and DivX player > NEW xbmc-9.11-18.fc13 : Media center > > > > ============================================================================ > Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: > Can we have this pushed in updates-stables ? (vlc in particular). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100407/16306f9c/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 7 18:36:59 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 7 18:37:10 2010 Subject: [Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100407163703.2DD09686F3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |supercyper@163.com --- Comment #21 from Chen Lei 2010-04-07 18:36:59 --- Some comments: 1.unrar is freeware though rar is a 90-day limited shareware, it'll be better to package unrar in a subpackage. 2.rar_static is useless for fedora, because fedora include all libs needed by rar. 3. *.sfx is an elf file and should be installed into %{_libdir} -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 7 19:34:35 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 7 19:34:46 2010 Subject: [Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100407173439.6592A686DD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 --- Comment #22 from Chen Lei 2010-04-07 19:34:35 --- (In reply to comment #21) > Some comments: > 1.unrar is freeware though rar is a 90-day limited shareware, it'll be better > to package unrar in a subpackage. > 2.rar_static is useless for fedora, because fedora include all libs needed by > rar. > 3. *.sfx is an elf file and should be installed into %{_libdir} 1.We should not distribute default.sfx in rar, because it's opensource and can be built from unrar source(unrar already in fedora but missing default.sfx) for all platform. 2.I can not find any differnent between opensource unrar and closesource one, anymore information about this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 7 21:05:20 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 7 21:05:32 2010 Subject: [Bug 1035] Review request: amap - Network tool for application protocol detection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100407190524.AD48E6842A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 7 21:05:21 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 7 21:05:35 2010 Subject: [Bug 1122] Review request: mame - Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100407190525.5ECF668441@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 7 23:38:31 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 7 23:38:44 2010 Subject: [Bug 1122] Review request: mame - Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100407213835.BC7F26855A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From belegdol at gmail.com Thu Apr 8 08:18:15 2010 From: belegdol at gmail.com (Julian Sikorski) Date: Thu Apr 8 08:18:29 2010 Subject: CVS admin request (Was: mame review request) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: W dniu 05.04.2010 00:44, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 26.03.2010 21:34, Julian Sikorski pisze: >> Dear Ralf, >> >> you have recently revoked the approval for mame due to using non-verbose >> make. I have fixed that, so I would kindly ask you to grant the approval >> again, unless you think that something more needs to be improved. >> >> Regards, >> Julian >> >> > Dear CVS admins, > > since I got no response from Ralf, I assume he is OK with the fix - we > cannot wait forever. Please do the necessary CVS magic. > > Thanks, > Julian > > I'm still locked out of F-13 branch, please fix this. Julian From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 8 15:07:49 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 8 15:13:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files In-Reply-To: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> References: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 21:25:51 +0200, RPM wrote: > http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569 > > > > > > --- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2010-04-04 21:25:50 --- > (In reply to comment #9) > > Is this problem fixed ? > > I would not call it a problem, more a RFE -- for something that even Fedora > sill doesn't do iirc > > but whatever: seems this is one of the dozens of things in RPM Fusion that > really would be nice to fix or improved, without anybody working on it :-(( > (and most of the other things that need to get improved are way more important > IMHO) RFEs like this are in need of _somebody_ to make decisions. In particular: Is using "gpg-agent" an option? (I think it is) Would using "expect" be considered acceptable? (I don't like it) As I've mentioned in that bz ticket last year, a repomdsigncmds feature is available in the pushscripts. It just needs to be configured _and_ evaluated. Without using gpg-agent (or expect), one would need to enter the key passphrase too often (IMO), however. Has anyone followed the development of the signing server (and its requirements)? A fundamental problem with RPMFusion is that at the management level there is no work-horse to "just do it", i.e. to decide on something and work with contributors on feasible solutions. Where something sucks, it needs somebody to say "we want to improve in that area" and to put something onto an agenda (or call it "wishlist"). From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 8 16:38:53 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 8 16:39:03 2010 Subject: [Bug 1153] New: Review request: m2vmp2cut - MPEG2 frame accurate cutter Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 Summary: Review request: m2vmp2cut - MPEG2 frame accurate cutter Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: goeran@uddeborg.se CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 985 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/m2vmp2cut/m2vmp2cut-0.79-1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/m2vmp2cut/m2vmp2cut.spec Description: m2vmp2cut is frame accurate (currently PAL) mpeg2 video (m2v file) with accompanied mp2 audio (mp2 file) cutter. Frame accuracy is achieved by re-encoding video around cutpoints. Audio is cut from separate mp2 file at positions that keep a/v sync as good as possible (maximum sync difference is around 10-15 milliseconds). Very handy to cut out commercials from recordings of DVB transmissions! :-) Why not Fedora: This package depends on several other packages from RPM Fusion like libmpeg2. One of them, ProjectX, has not yet passed the review, bug 985, so there is a dependency between these two requests. Rpmlint messages: m2vmp2cut.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bildprecis -> baldrics, baldric's, boldface's This and a number of similar complaints about the spelling is because of a rpmbuild bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578299). In the SRPM, the English description and summary contain the Swedish text. There are some spelling-error warnings for the binary RPM too. Both about the Swedish and the English description. They, I believe, are indeed correctly spelled. Mostly it's about unknown acronyms m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-buildroot-tag m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-%clean-section I'm aiming this package for Fedora 13 and later, and in F13 these are no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 8 16:38:53 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 8 16:39:03 2010 Subject: [Bug 985] Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100408143856.5CE4168717@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985 G?ran Uddeborg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1153 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From laxathom at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 8 17:32:45 2010 From: laxathom at fedoraproject.org (Xavier Lamien) Date: Thu Apr 8 17:38:19 2010 Subject: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files In-Reply-To: <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> References: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, ?4 Apr 2010 21:25:51 +0200, RPM wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569 >> >> >> >> >> >> --- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2010-04-04 21:25:50 --- >> (In reply to comment #9) >> > Is this problem fixed ? >> >> I would not call it a problem, more a RFE -- for something that even Fedora >> sill doesn't do iirc >> >> but whatever: seems this is one of the dozens of things in RPM Fusion that >> really would be nice to fix or improved, without anybody working on it :-(( >> (and most of the other things that need to get improved are way more important >> IMHO) > > RFEs like this are in need of _somebody_ to make decisions. > > In particular: Is using "gpg-agent" an option? (I think it is) > Would using "expect" be considered acceptable? (I don't like it) Why not talk about that on rpmfusion-sysadmin list as well? > > As I've mentioned in that bz ticket last year, a repomdsigncmds feature is > available in the pushscripts. It just needs to be configured _and_ > evaluated. Without using gpg-agent (or expect), one would need to enter > the key passphrase too often (IMO), however. Has anyone followed the > development of the signing server (and its requirements)? I did. > > A fundamental problem with RPMFusion is that at the management level there > is no work-horse to "just do it", i.e. to decide on something and work > with contributors on feasible solutions. Where something sucks, it needs > somebody to say "we want to improve in that area" and to put something > onto an agenda (or call it "wishlist"). > That what i used to say to the list and... as usual noone step up except jeroen, nicolas and anvil to "just do it" (on the build and CVS side). AFAIK, we always work that way. i.e RPM Fusion was looking for help on having a Account system (FAS1 which was running but broken), i did step up and ask for improve things and dit it with FAS2. -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB From supercyper at 163.com Fri Apr 9 10:55:09 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Fri Apr 9 10:55:21 2010 Subject: Fusionbuilder64 hangs, but still seems available. In-Reply-To: <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> References: <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> Message-ID: <1c3b1d6.6cb6.127e1c7a259.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Anyone can fix it? Chen Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100409/8a5ad860/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 9 23:29:22 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 9 23:29:36 2010 Subject: [Bug 1035] Review request: amap - Network tool for application protocol detection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100409212926.A3189687FF@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-09 23:29:21 --- Thanks to Nikolas Chauvert who added amap to EL-5 branch I have tried to rebuild it for EL-5, but build is still running: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=6728 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 10 12:59:42 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 10 12:59:43 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-10 Message-ID: <20100410105942.9862524367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: 8 NEW amap-5.2-4.fc12 : Network tool for application protocol detection nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.2 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.2 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.2 qmc2-0.2-0.18.b14.fc12 sdlmame-data-0137-1.fc12 NEW sdlmame-data-samples-0137-1.fc12 : Sound samples for the SDLMAME package wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.5 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 1 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc12 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: amap-5.2-4.fc12 --------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-4 - more flexible pcre cflags to build also on RHEL4 * Sat Mar 20 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-3 - License changed to AMAP license to avoid confusion - patch makefile to link to amap6 instead of copy nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.2 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.25-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.2 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.16-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.2 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.15-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel qmc2-0.2-0.18.b14.fc12 ---------------------- * Mon Mar 15 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.18.b14 - Updated to 0.2b14 - Dropped --fno-var-tracking-assignments sdlmame-data-0137-1.fc12 ------------------------ * Thu Mar 25 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0137-1 - Updated to 0.137 sdlmame-data-samples-0137-1.fc12 -------------------------------- * Thu Mar 25 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0137-1 - Added speedfrk and wotw wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.5 --------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: mame-0.137-4.fc12 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt * Thu Mar 11 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0137-1 - Initial package based on sdlmame From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 10 13:32:56 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 10 13:32:57 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-10 Message-ID: <20100410113256.5B1D524367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 12: 26 bsnes-0.063-1.fc12 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-18 NEW compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc12 : An interpreted, interactive, object-oriented programming language devede-3.16.6-1.fc12 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.17 NEW gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.10-1.fc12 : GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.31 NEW lame-3.98.3-1.fc12 : Free MP3 audio compressor ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.30 ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc12 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.11 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.1 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.2 NEW rt2860-2.1.2.0-3.fc12 : Common files for RaLink 802.11 rt2860 driver rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.22 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.14 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.22 NEW sonic-visualiser-freeworld-1.7.1-1.fc12 : A program for viewing and exploring audio data staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.6 NEW vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc12 : Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.7 NEW x264-0.0.0-0.27.20091109git3daa02e.fc12 : H264/AVC video streams encoder NEW xbmc-9.11-18.fc12 : Media center ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 1 cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc12 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 12: bsnes-0.063-1.fc12 ------------------ * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 - Updated to 0.063 - Dropped upstreamed dso patch * Sun Feb 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.060-1 - Updated to 0.060 - Use sed to prevent premature binaries stripping - Included supergameboy, snesfilter, pixelshaders and optionally snesreader - Added patch to explicitly link against libdl buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-18 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-18 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12 compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc12 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 20 2010 Jonathan Steffan - 2.4.6-1 - Update to 2.4.6 - Add a patch for bdb 4.8 devede-3.16.6-1.fc12 -------------------- * Sat Mar 20 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.6-1 - Updated to version 3.16.6 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.17 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.4-1.17 - rebuild for new kernel gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.10-1.fc12 ------------------------------- * Sun Mar 14 2010 Hans de Goede 0.10.10-1 - New upstream release 0.10.10 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.31 --------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.31 - rebuild for new kernel lame-3.98.3-1.fc12 ------------------ * Sat Feb 27 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 3.98.3-1 - update to 3.98.3 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.30 ------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.30 - rebuild for new kernel ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc12 -------------------- * Mon Mar 22 2010 Gianluca Sforna - 0.13.4-1 - New upstream release - Add patch to compile against GTK 2.19 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.11 ------------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.3.svn288.11 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12 --------------------------------- * Fri Apr 09 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 - Added patch to fix missing -ldl link with vmware-user open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12 -------------------------------------- * Fri Apr 09 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.1 ---------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel * Fri Apr 09 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12 -------------------------- * Mon Mar 15 2010 Jack Neely 0:1.4.12-1 - Update to OpenAFS 1.4.12 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.2 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Mon Mar 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-2.1.2.0-3.fc12 --------------------- * Wed Dec 09 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 2.1.2.0-3 - Blacklist kernel's rt2800pci module rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.22 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.22 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.14 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.14 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.22 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.22 - rebuild for new kernel sonic-visualiser-freeworld-1.7.1-1.fc12 --------------------------------------- * Wed Jan 13 2010 Michel Salim - 1.7.1-1 - Update to 1.7.1 staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.6 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc12 --------------------- * Mon Mar 29 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-3 - Restore .xpm icon * Sat Mar 27 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-2 - Exclude old .xpm icon * Thu Mar 18 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-1 - Update to 0.8.3 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.7 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.4-1.7 - rebuild for new kernel x264-0.0.0-0.27.20091109git3daa02e.fc12 --------------------------------------- * Fri Mar 05 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski 0.0.0-0.27.20091109git3daa02e - 20091109 snapshot (last before ABI change) - don't remove config.h and don't re-run version.sh - link x264 binary to the shared library - really don't strip if debug is enabled xbmc-9.11-18.fc12 ----------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-18 - Exclude ppc64 (not available for F-13+ in any case) * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-17 - Fixed license tag to include GPLv3+ * Wed Mar 24 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-16 - Add BuildRequires: hdhomerun-devel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc12 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 - 2.1.3-8 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-2 - Try to enable Network-Monitor and Scooby-do (while the codes say that this will be enabled from 2.1.4) (bug 578393) From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 10 13:59:54 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 10 13:59:56 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-10 Message-ID: <20100410115954.75DDC24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 1 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc13 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 1 qmc2-0.2-0.18.b14.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 2 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc11 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: mame-0.137-4.fc13 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt * Thu Mar 11 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0137-1 - Initial package based on sdlmame ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: qmc2-0.2-0.18.b14.fc11 ---------------------- * Mon Mar 15 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.2-0.18.b14 - Updated to 0.2b14 - Dropped --fno-var-tracking-assignments ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: mame-0.137-4.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt * Thu Mar 11 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0137-1 - Initial package based on sdlmame openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Apr 10 15:48:36 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat Apr 10 15:58:12 2010 Subject: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files In-Reply-To: <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> References: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <4BC081B4.4050407@leemhuis.info> On 08.04.2010 15:07, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 21:25:51 +0200, RPM wrote: >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569 >> --- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2010-04-04 21:25:50 --- >> (In reply to comment #9) >>> Is this problem fixed ? >> I would not call it a problem, more a RFE -- for something that even Fedora >> sill doesn't do iirc >> but whatever: seems this is one of the dozens of things in RPM Fusion that >> really would be nice to fix or improved, without anybody working on it :-(( >> (and most of the other things that need to get improved are way more important >> IMHO) > RFEs like this are in need of _somebody_ to make decisions. I would agree for most RFE's. But not for this specific RFE: There is (afaics) no real downside for users. So there is not much to discuss IMHO, it just needs somebody to do it and work out the details -- and start a privte or public discussion in case problems emerge where a discussion and a decision is needed. But discussing that without knowing that anybody will work further on it seems like a lot of wasted time for me. > [...] > A fundamental problem with RPMFusion is that at the management level there > is no work-horse to "just do it", i.e. to decide on something and work > with contributors on feasible solutions. I partly did that in the past, but as I said multiple times: I don't want to anymore for now and I'm willing to support individuals or (preferred better) a group of people that want to take of steering and "governing" RPM Fusion. > Where something sucks, it needs > somebody to say "we want to improve in that area" and to put something > onto an agenda (or call it "wishlist"). Maybe yes, but in RPM Fusion that IMHO didn't help much until now, as we are (afaics) to few people. Take the repoclosure scripts for example -- it now years ago was definitely planed to run them after each push and you even did some groudwork to make it easy for our sysadmins to integrate (thx again for that), but they never got installed on our servers (and there were many situations where the lack of automated repoclosure scripts was discussed on this list, so it was never really forgotten). Cu knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 10 20:40:25 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 10 20:40:37 2010 Subject: [Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100410184029.ABF0968766@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 --- Comment #23 from Lubos Stanek 2010-04-10 20:40:25 --- (In reply to comment #22) > > 2.rar_static is useless for fedora, because fedora include all libs needed by > > rar. The idea is to distribute the package without changes but managed by RPM/Yum. > > 3. *.sfx is an elf file and should be installed into %{_libdir} I installed sfxs there with symlinks to the place where the application awaits them. It was changed by kwizart lately. > 1.We should not distribute default.sfx in rar, because it's opensource and can > be built from unrar source(unrar already in fedora but missing default.sfx) for > all platform. > 2.I can not find any differnent between opensource unrar and closesource one, > anymore information about this? See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248#c8. For other questions regarding removing parts or splitting the package please read the point #5 in the license.txt. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 10 21:05:36 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 10 21:05:48 2010 Subject: [Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100410190540.1CA366860C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 --- Comment #24 from Chen Lei 2010-04-10 21:05:34 --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > 2.rar_static is useless for fedora, because fedora include all libs needed by > > > rar. > The idea is to distribute the package without changes but managed by RPM/Yum. No needed. rar_static is all the same as rar except static linking with some common libs which is totally forbidden in fedora package guideline. Also the default makefile in rarlinux do not install it. > > > 3. *.sfx is an elf file and should be installed into %{_libdir} > I installed sfxs there with symlinks to the place where the application awaits > them. It was changed by kwizart lately. Using /usr/local is not permitted in fedora package. The default path in makefile for sfx is /usr/lib and it works, though it's not the best place for sfx. > > 1.We should not distribute default.sfx in rar, because it's opensource and can > > be built from unrar source(unrar already in fedora but missing default.sfx) for > > all platform. > > 2.I can not find any differnent between opensource unrar and closesource one, > > anymore information about this? > See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248#c8. Maybe you should add more evidence about this, I tried "unrar help" with both types of unrar and they display the same content. The opensource rar definitely can handles the encryption and the authenticity verification. Note: opensource unrar=nonfree rar gna unrar=free rar See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrar > For other questions regarding removing parts or splitting the package please > read the point #5 in the license.txt. We don't need to distribute files that already in other package with the same function and probably the same copy of source. The rpm from Atrpms and also debian repo don't distribute unrar in rar. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From kevin.kofler at chello.at Sat Apr 10 22:20:13 2010 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Sat Apr 10 22:20:37 2010 Subject: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files References: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: Xavier Lamien wrote: > That what i used to say to the list and... as usual noone step up > except jeroen, nicolas and anvil to "just do it" (on the build and CVS > side). AFAIK, we always work that way. The problem is that nobody else has the access required to "just do it". People have offered help with various tasks on several occasions, they never got the required access. Kevin Kofler From mschwendt at gmail.com Sun Apr 11 00:39:17 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun Apr 11 00:39:35 2010 Subject: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files In-Reply-To: <4BC081B4.4050407@leemhuis.info> References: <20100404192555.64072683DA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> <20100408150749.467b88d4@faldor.intranet> <4BC081B4.4050407@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20100411003917.479f8ffe@faldor.intranet> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:48:36 +0200, Thorsten wrote: > >> IMHO) > > RFEs like this are in need of _somebody_ to make decisions. > > I would agree for most RFE's. > > But not for this specific RFE: There is (afaics) no real downside for > users. So there is not much to discuss IMHO, it just needs somebody to > do it and work out the details -- and start a privte or public > discussion in case problems emerge where a discussion and a decision is > needed. > > But discussing that without knowing that anybody will work further on it > seems like a lot of wasted time for me. Work on _what_? The bugzilla ticket has not seen any reply since May 2009. No feedback, no discussion, no progress, no effort spent on researching alternative solutions. Plus: koji+bodhi for rpmfusion has been mentioned a year ago (or even before that), with no status updates or public discussion. As where you see "a lot of wasted time", dunno. Lengthy discussions are _not_ needed. (Though, somebody who will switch to koji+bodhi+mash must consider the consequences, e.g. very likely increased maintenance requirements). Time _is_ wasted, when after many months old/unchanged software is still being used, and suddenly there is a need (or request) to add something to it. Sometimes that means that months pass without even small steps being made. > > Where something sucks, it needs > > somebody to say "we want to improve in that area" and to put something > > onto an agenda (or call it "wishlist"). > > Maybe yes, but in RPM Fusion that IMHO didn't help much until now, as we > are (afaics) to few people. Take the repoclosure scripts for example -- > it now years ago was definitely planed to run them after each push and > you even did some groudwork to make it easy for our sysadmins to > integrate (thx again for that), but they never got installed on our > servers (and there were many situations where the lack of automated > repoclosure scripts was discussed on this list, so it was never really > forgotten). Over the past months, I have replied to several people who had contacted me about broken deps reports (even EPEL related once more). I've seen nothing else than promises. No one has returned with specific questions about yum-util's original repoclosure. No one has sent any feedback, no one has shown any credible interest in creating broken deps reports and/or in collaborating on related helper scripts (Python and/or bash). Running repoclosure (the original one or the modified one) with different options for different sets of repositories isn't a lot of home work. It's a tool like many others (e.g. repoquery, repodiff). Except that anyone, who really wants to start using it, will need to give it a try and gain a little bit of experience while doing so. The larger excercise has been to fix it, to port it (to Yum APIs), to hack it -- and to keep helper/report scripts running -- but such activity can be distributed between a tool's users and its developers. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 11 10:23:44 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 11 10:23:45 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-11 Message-ID: <20100411082344.6B7AA24357@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 1 vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 7 bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 mythtv-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 mythtv-themes-0.23-0.4.rc2.fc13 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: 1 cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 3 bsnes-0.063-1.fc11 cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc11 lame-3.98.3-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 ---------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0.5-3 - rebuilt for opencv * Sat Feb 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0.5-2 - Add BR libtiger-devel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 ------------------ * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 - Updated to 0.063 - Dropped upstreamed dso patch cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 - 2.1.3-8 mythtv-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 ------------------------ * Thu Apr 08 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.5.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24030 - Should fix some recording issues when using both inputs on an hdhomerun * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 mythtv-themes-0.23-0.4.rc2.fc13 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 --------------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to build 243334 - Added patch to fix missing -ldl link with vmware-user * Sat Mar 20 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.236320-1 - Update to build 236320 - Only start guestd if running on guest VM (#382) open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 -------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 08 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 ------------------------------ * Wed Nov 11 2009 Alex Lancaster - 0.12.1-2 - Rebuild again for F-12 (bump release tag) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc11 ------------------------- * Sun Mar 14 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-1 - 2.1.3-7 - Some packaging changes out of requests from the upstream * rename %name package to -core, make %name be a metapkg for pulling -core and -plug-ins * split kde related files from -plug-ins - Change R: wget -> curl * Wed Mar 03 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.6-1 - 2.1.3-6 * Fri Feb 26 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.5-1 - 2.1.3-5 * Thu Feb 18 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.3-1 - 2.1.3-3 * Fri Feb 12 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.2-1 - 2.1.3-2 * Sun Jan 17 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - F-13: Rebuild for libxklavier soname bump ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: bsnes-0.063-1.fc11 ------------------ * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 - Updated to 0.063 - Dropped upstreamed dso patch * Sun Feb 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.060-1 - Updated to 0.060 - Use sed to prevent premature binaries stripping - Included supergameboy, snesfilter, pixelshaders and optionally snesreader - Added patch to explicitly link against libdl cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc11 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 - 2.1.3-8 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-2 - Try to enable Network-Monitor and Scooby-do (while the codes say that this will be enabled from 2.1.4) (bug 578393) lame-3.98.3-1.fc11 ------------------ * Sat Feb 27 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 3.98.3-1 - update to 3.98.3 From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 11 11:07:11 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 11 11:07:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] New: Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Summary: Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: magnus.tuominen@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/ffmpegthumbnailer/SPEC/ffmpegthumbnailer.spec http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/ffmpegthumbnailer/SRPM/ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm description: This video thumbnailer can be used to create thumbnails for your video files. rpmlint output for binary: ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Url is correct, spelling error not important. ---- rpmlint output on src.rpm: ffmpegthumbnailer.src: I: checking ffmpegthumbnailer.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.src: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) ffmpegthumbnailer.src: I: checking-url http://ffmpegthumbnailer.googlecode.com/files/ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) ffmpegthumbnailer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ffmpegthumbnailer.googlecode.com/files/ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Url is correct, spelling error not important. ----- This is my first package on RPMFusion -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 11 15:36:15 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 11 15:36:24 2010 Subject: [Bug 1156] New: Review request: performous - Karaoke game Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1156 Summary: Review request: performous - Karaoke game Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: gauret@free.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Performous is a karaoke game, clone of the PS2 karaoke game Singstar. http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/performous/performous-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/performous/performous.spec This package depends on ffmpeg for audio and video playback. $ rpmlint ./i686/performous-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686.rpm ./performous-0.5.1-1.fc12.src.rpm performous.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.1-1 ['0.5.1-1.fc12', '0.5.1-1.fc12'] -> yes, I dont put disttags in the changelog's version. I think it's OK. It's not my first package in rpmfusion, but I haven't been packaging for a little while (since the livna era), so it may need some work. I'm already a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From the.masch at gmail.com Sun Apr 11 16:36:02 2010 From: the.masch at gmail.com (Mario Chacon) Date: Sun Apr 11 17:36:28 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-11 In-Reply-To: <20100411082344.6B7AA24357@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20100411082344.6B7AA24357@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: Hello, I cannot install VLC on my Fedora13 64bit, I get this error: --> Processing Dependency: libml.so.4()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libhighgui.so.4()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libcxcore.so.4()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 ---> Package zvbi.x86_64 0:0.2.33-4.fc12 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libcxcore.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libcv.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libml.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libcvaux.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: vlc-1.0.5-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) Requires: libhighgui.so.4()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem Is it a dependency issue? Thanks! salu2... masch... On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:23 AM, wrote: > > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 1 > > vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 > > > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 7 > > bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 > cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 > mythtv-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 > mythtv-themes-0.23-0.4.rc2.fc13 > open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 > open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 > picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 > > > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: 1 > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc11 > > > > ============================================================================ > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 3 > > bsnes-0.063-1.fc11 > cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc11 > lame-3.98.3-1.fc11 > > > > ============================================================================ > Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: > > > vlc-1.0.5-3.fc13 > ---------------- > * Fri Mar 26 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0.5-3 > - rebuilt for opencv > > * Sat Feb 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0.5-2 > - Add BR libtiger-devel > > > > ============================================================================ > Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: > > > bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 > ------------------ > * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 > - Updated to 0.063 > - Dropped upstreamed dso patch > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 > ------------------------- > * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 > - 2.1.3-8 > > mythtv-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 > ------------------------ > * Thu Apr 08 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.5.rc2 > - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24030 > - Should fix some recording issues when using both inputs > on an hdhomerun > > * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 > - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 > > mythtv-themes-0.23-0.4.rc2.fc13 > ------------------------------- > * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 > - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 > > open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 > --------------------------------- > * Wed Apr 07 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 > - Update to build 243334 > - Added patch to fix missing -ldl link with vmware-user > > * Sat Mar 20 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.236320-1 > - Update to build 236320 > - Only start guestd if running on guest VM (#382) > > open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 > -------------------------------------- > * Thu Apr 08 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 > - Update to upstream build 243334 > > picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 > ------------------------------ > * Wed Nov 11 2009 Alex Lancaster - 0.12.1-2 > - Rebuild again for F-12 (bump release tag) > > > > ============================================================================ > Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: > > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc11 > ------------------------- > * Sun Mar 14 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-1 > - 2.1.3-7 > - Some packaging changes out of requests from the upstream > * rename %name package to -core, make %name be a metapkg for > pulling -core and -plug-ins > * split kde related files from -plug-ins > - Change R: wget -> curl > > * Wed Mar 03 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.6-1 > - 2.1.3-6 > > * Fri Feb 26 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.5-1 > - 2.1.3-5 > > * Thu Feb 18 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.3-1 > - 2.1.3-3 > > * Fri Feb 12 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.2-1 > - 2.1.3-2 > > * Sun Jan 17 2010 Mamoru Tasaka > - F-13: Rebuild for libxklavier soname bump > > > > ============================================================================ > Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: > > > bsnes-0.063-1.fc11 > ------------------ > * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 > - Updated to 0.063 > - Dropped upstreamed dso patch > > * Sun Feb 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.060-1 > - Updated to 0.060 > - Use sed to prevent premature binaries stripping > - Included supergameboy, snesfilter, pixelshaders and optionally snesreader > - Added patch to explicitly link against libdl > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc11 > ------------------------- > * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 > - 2.1.3-8 > > * Thu Apr 01 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-2 > - Try to enable Network-Monitor and Scooby-do (while the codes say that > this will be enabled from 2.1.4) (bug 578393) > > lame-3.98.3-1.fc11 > ------------------ > * Sat Feb 27 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 3.98.3-1 > - update to 3.98.3 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100411/01ec59c8/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 02:43:01 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 02:43:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412004306.E60196852B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 02:43:01 --- I can help review this (either tonight or tomorrow). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 16:51:06 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 16:51:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412145109.010B8685E2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1157 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 16:51:04 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 16:51:18 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] New: Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 Summary: Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: magnus.tuominen@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Depends on: 1155 Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/kffmpegthumbnailer/SPEC/kffmpegthumbnailer.spec http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/kffmpegthumbnailer/SRPM/kffmpegthumbnailer-1.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm description: This video thumbnailer can be used to create thumbnails for your video files. The thumbnailer uses ffmpeg to decode frames from the video files. This is the part that lets you choose kffmpegthumbnailer as preview for video files in dolphin (Genereal -> previews). Not eligible in fedora becuase it depends on ffmpeg-devel. rpmlint: kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) kde -> ode, knead, kidder The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ffmpegthumbnailer -> thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> imperf The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. kffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) Url is correct, spelling error not important. kffmpegthumbnailer-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking kffmpegthumbnailer-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) Url is correct. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:01:51 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:02:02 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412160154.C12C86867B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 18:01:49 --- source confirmed, md5sum *.gz 876bb0d57e218bfd76ca77b5abba813b ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0.tar.gz 1. SHOULD move %{_includedir}/libffmpegthumbnailer dir ownership to -devel pkg 2. SHOULD move chmod -x README INSTALL COPYING AUTHORS to %prep section (not %build) 3. SHOULD remove %doc README INSTALL COPYING AUTHORS from -devel, no need to duplicate this from the main pkg. While you're at it, no need to %doc INSTALL at all really. 4. SHOULD checked the code, it all contains the "or later" clause, so can use License: GPLv2+ scriptlets: ok naming: ok macros: ok, though you can drop %{?_kde4_macros_api:Requires: kde4-macros(api) = %{_kde4_macros_api} } none of the _kde4_* macros are used anywhere in this package that I can see. 5. SHOULD track lib sonames closer, currently %files contains, %{_libdir}/*.so.* and %{_libdir}/*.so (-devel) I'd suggest using %{_libdir}/libffmpegthumbnailer.so.4* %{_libdir}/libffmpegthumbnailer.so respectively instead, to better highlight future ABI breaks. I don't consider any of these SHOULD items review blockers, but please consider addressing them before making any package releases. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:02:35 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:02:44 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412160238.5789A68540@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 18:02:33 --- I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:46:24 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:46:34 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412164627.A7AD16869C@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-12 18:46:23 --- Thank you for your review, I have addressed the issues you mentioned. http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/ffmpegthumbnailer/SPEC/ffmpegthumbnailer.spec rpmlint: ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) ffmpegthumbnailer-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking ffmpegthumbnailer-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) ffmpegthumbnailer-devel.x86_64: I: checking ffmpegthumbnailer-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailer -> thumbnail er, thumbnail-er, thumbnail The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ffmpegthumbnailer-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/ (timeout 10 seconds) ffmpegthumbnailer-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:50:45 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:50:58 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412165049.483B068635@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 18:50:45 --- I just noticed this, $ cat /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr libdir=/usr/lib64 includedir=/usr/include Name: libffmpegthumbnailer Description: Generates thumbnails for movie files Version: 2.0.0 Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer Cflags: -I${includedir} This should be patched to be something like this instead: Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer Libs.private: -lavutil -lavformat -lavcodec -lswscale -lpng12 -ljpeg Else, (mostly needless) dependencies will have to be added to -devel Requires: ffmpeg-devel libpng-devel libjpeg-devel -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:52:05 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:52:16 2010 Subject: [Bug 934] Review request: mplayerthumbs - Thumbnail generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412165209.6A28568643@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:55:15 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:55:26 2010 Subject: [Bug 934] Review request: mplayerthumbs - Thumbnail generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412165519.0219E686C8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 18:55:15 --- Nevermind, looks like this got included in kdemultimedia-4.4.0 and newer. No need to package separately anymore (marking INVALID for lack of something better). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 18:55:46 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 18:55:57 2010 Subject: [Bug 934] Review request: mplayerthumbs - Thumbnail generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412165549.89939686C8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 19:09:37 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 19:09:47 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412170940.8CB316868A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-12 19:09:36 --- 1. SHOULD: License: GPLv2+ 2. SHOULD omit INSTALL from packaging 3. SHOULD omit Requires: ffmpegthumbnailer as it is already linked implicitly. 4. SHOULD add Requires: kdebase-workspace (ie, this isn't all that useful without kdebase-workspace. :) ) sources verified, $ md5sum *.gz fa897450ee691b6d225d8f79a6cfd409 kffmpegthumbnailer-1.1.0.tar.gz naming: ok macros: ok %files: ok I don't consider any of these SHOULD items review blockers, but please consider addressing them before making any package releases. Otherwise, this one is relatively simple and small, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 22:55:18 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:55:32 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - iptables extension for offsetting censorship firewall. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412205523.4A0D068811@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 22:55:19 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:55:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412205523.9BF1868813@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 22:55:20 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:55:36 2010 Subject: [Bug 1129] Review Request: xtables-addons - Extensions targets and matches for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412205524.785A568819@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 12 22:55:22 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:55:38 2010 Subject: [Bug 1141] Review Request: xtables-addons-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100412205526.B6F8A68828@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rebus at seznam.cz Mon Apr 12 22:48:25 2010 From: rebus at seznam.cz (=?us-ascii?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?=) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:59:54 2010 Subject: Build for EL-5 is stucked Message-ID: <44560.17136.37552-3429-1629155357-1271105305@seznam.cz> Dear developers, I have tried to rebuild the amap package for the EL-5, but it seems the buildsystem for EL-5 got stucked. It is now trying to build the package for several days now. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=6728 As it takes only couple of seconds on my system I assume there is something wrong. Please who can have a look on the build system fusionbuilder64 what happened? What is the right procedure? - I was not able to find any info on the http://www.rpmfusion.org Thank you Michal Ambroz From supercyper at 163.com Tue Apr 13 09:34:41 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Tue Apr 13 09:50:08 2010 Subject: Build for EL-5 is stucked In-Reply-To: <44560.17136.37552-3429-1629155357-1271105305@seznam.cz> References: <44560.17136.37552-3429-1629155357-1271105305@seznam.cz> Message-ID: <63529c4d.8548.127f6176a18.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> >Dear developers, >I have tried to rebuild the amap package for the EL-5, but it seems the buildsystem for EL-5 >got stucked. It is now trying to build the package for several days now. >http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=6728 > >As it takes only couple of seconds on my system I assume there is something wrong. >Please who can have a look on the build system fusionbuilder64 what happened? >What is the right procedure? - I was not able to find any info on the http://www.rpmfusion.org > >Thank you >Michal Ambroz Try: plague-client kill 6728 plague-client requeue 6728 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100413/35b1a3eb/attachment.html From kwizart at gmail.com Thu Apr 15 10:30:19 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Thu Apr 15 10:30:39 2010 Subject: rpms/west-chamber/F-12 west-chamber-20100405.tar.bz2, NONE, 1.1 west-chamber-manpage.patch, NONE, 1.1 west-chamber-userspace.patch, NONE, 1.1 west-chamber.spec, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <20100415064532.3231418116@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> References: <20100415064532.3231418116@se02.es.rpmfusion.net> Message-ID: 2010/4/15 Caius 'kaio' Chance > Author: kaio > > Update of /cvs/free/rpms/west-chamber/F-12 > In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv21982 > > Modified Files: > west-chamber.spec > Added Files: > west-chamber-20100405.tar.bz2 west-chamber-manpage.patch > west-chamber-userspace.patch > Log Message: > Added sources and patches and latest spec. > > > --- NEW FILE west-chamber-20100405.tar.bz2 --- > BZh91AY&SY5Z{ > Z ??????????????????0`H??bE[?ke ?a?????? ? >? ( > uwp ???}`m?v?? > #???wjU?h!)??? L??????=?????? ?}?? >?t????? c ? ????????0?E? > ?????6???{@?tK????z:= ?5 ????A??V?X ? ]???(?M ?[o??h??( i&? ?? ? ??, > 6???? ????? ? ??7??iF?@?k? ??`=? > ??? ?70 ?6 > Hi Kaio, Binary files are not welcome in CVS. Please use the cvs-import.sh script that will automatically upload the file in the cache directory. Thx. Nicolas (kwizart) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100415/962b5dcc/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 15 10:36:18 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 15 10:36:26 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100415083621.9BB1468822@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #5 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-15 10:36:17 --- I have patched this build. http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/ffmpegthumbnailer/SPEC/ffmpegthumbnailer.spec http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/ffmpegthumbnailer/SRPM/ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 15 10:39:28 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 15 10:39:34 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100415083929.AE882688CB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 15 11:22:58 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 15 11:23:04 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100415092259.CAE12687A3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet 2010-04-15 11:22:56 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I just noticed this, ... > Name: libffmpegthumbnailer > Description: Generates thumbnails for movie files > Version: 2.0.0 > Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer > Cflags: -I${includedir} > > This should be patched to be something like this instead: > Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer > Libs.private: -lavutil -lavformat -lavcodec -lswscale -lpng12 -ljpeg Why would you like to hardcode Libs.private dependencies while we do not use static linking ? That's pointless for us, but if one to make things right. You need to use the @FFMPEG_LIBS@ flags that was actually used at compilation time. (or to uses Requires.private: the_right_ffmpeg.pc , but this one will indeed bring undeeded ffmpeg-devel CFLAGS in libffmpegthumbnailer_CFLAGS also when using building shared). Please ask upstream to review this change ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 19:23:28 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 19:23:39 2010 Subject: [Bug 1035] Review request: amap - Network tool for application protocol detection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416172331.DC8DC6890B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035 Michal Ambroz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1163 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 19:26:58 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 19:27:10 2010 Subject: [Bug 1129] Review Request: xtables-addons - Extensions targets and matches for iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416172702.272CD6893D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2010-04-16 19:26:58 --- Already build for F11-F13. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 19:27:04 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 19:27:15 2010 Subject: [Bug 1141] Review Request: xtables-addons-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416172708.235806893D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-04-16 19:27:04 --- Already build for F11-F13. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 22:15:18 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 22:15:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416201522.E54B268959@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-16 22:15:17 --- The patch is just: diff -up ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in.libspatch ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in --- ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in.libspatch 2010-04-12 20:41:30.230052856 +0300 +++ ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in 2010-04-12 20:47:57.000000000 +0300 @@ -6,5 +6,6 @@ includedir=@includedir@ Name: libffmpegthumbnailer Description: Generates thumbnails for movie files Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@ -Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer @FFMPEG_LIBS@ @PNG_LIBS@ @JPEG_LIBS@ +Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer +Libs.private: @FFMPEG_LIBS@ @PNG_LIBS@ @JPEG_LIBS@ Cflags: -I${includedir} This is much better that without the patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 22:23:28 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 22:23:41 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416202332.EC7A368941@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #8 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-16 22:23:28 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: ffmpegthumbnailer Short Description: Lightweight video thumbnailer Owners: magnu5 Branches:F-12, devel InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 22:57:10 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 16 22:57:23 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100416205714.8C46F68962@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin.kofler@chello.at --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2010-04-16 22:57:09 --- > 5. SHOULD track lib sonames closer FWIW, I disagree with this, I always use .so.* wildcards, it makes our job as a packager much easier not to have to update the specfile for each soname bump. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 23:00:31 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 16 23:00:34 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-16 Message-ID: <20100416210032.02C8F24383@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-1 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 1 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 2 (!) mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc12 : INVALID build results, not published! NEW rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 : RPM Fusion (nonfree) Repository Configuration ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 2 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-1 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-1 - add key for Rawhide/F14 - remove key for F12 * Sun Nov 22 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-0.1 - Bump for Fedora 13's rawhide. - Put the version at 13 from the start. - drop post script ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc13 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc12 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 - mark config file as noreplace which was missing for some strange reason From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 16 23:51:48 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 16 23:51:48 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-16 Message-ID: <20100416215148.5ACFE2438F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 10 mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc13 mythtv-0.23-0.7.rc2.fc13 mythtv-themes-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 NEW west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc13 : Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables NEW west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13 : Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber NEW xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc13 : Extensions targets and matches for iptables NEW xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13 : Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 6 NEW mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc12 : Mock config files for the RPM Fusion Free Repository NEW rpmfusion-free-release-12-2 : RPM Fusion (free) Repository Configuration NEW west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12 : Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables NEW west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12 : Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber NEW xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc12 : Extensions targets and matches for iptables NEW xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12 : Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 4 (!) mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc11 : INVALID build results, not published! (!) rpmfusion-free-release-11-2 : INVALID build results, not published! NEW xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc11 : Extensions targets and matches for iptables NEW xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc11 : Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc13 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 mythtv-0.23-0.7.rc2.fc13 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.7.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24159 * Tue Apr 13 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.6.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24129 - Assorted spec file resyncs w/mythtv svn spec mythtv-themes-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 ------------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.5.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24159 rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-1 - add key for Rawhide/F14 - remove key for F12 * Sun Nov 22 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-0.1 - Bump for Fedora 13's rawhide. - Put the version at 13 from the start. - drop post script staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-1 - update to 2.6.33.2 - enable RAMZSWAP R8187SE RTL8192U BATMAN_ADV SAMSUNG_LAPTOP - disable RTL8187SE (renamed) - disable WAVELAN.* and PCMCIA_NETWAVE, as they are enabled in Fedora * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1 - update to 2.6.32.8 for updates-testing kernel - disable hv on ppc as it's useless and does not build staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 ----------------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-1 - update to 2.6.33.2 for F13 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1 - update to 2.6.32.8 for updates-testing kernel west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc13 ------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13 ------------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 15 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn-- Changed 'buildforkernels' to current. * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc13 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13 ------------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc12 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 rpmfusion-free-release-12-2 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc12 ------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12 ------------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 15 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn-- Changed 'buildforkernels' to current. * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc12 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12 ------------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc11 ------------------------------- rpmfusion-free-release-11-2 --------------------------- xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc11 ------------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 12:10:13 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 12:10:20 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417101015.5EF396836E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux@fedoraproject. | |org --- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2010-04-17 12:10:12 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Package CVS request > ====================== > Package Name: ffmpegthumbnailer > Short Description: Lightweight video thumbnailer > Owners: magnu5 > Branches:F-12, devel > InitialCC: > ---------------------- > License tag: free > You have forgotten to apply for the F-13 branch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 12:19:59 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 12:20:07 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417102001.EE43F68607@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 --- Comment #11 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-17 12:19:59 --- (In reply to comment #7) > The patch is just: > > diff -up ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in.libspatch > ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in > --- ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in.libspatch > 2010-04-12 20:41:30.230052856 +0300 > +++ ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.0/libffmpegthumbnailer.pc.in 2010-04-12 > 20:47:57.000000000 +0300 > @@ -6,5 +6,6 @@ includedir=@includedir@ > Name: libffmpegthumbnailer > Description: Generates thumbnails for movie files > Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@ > -Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer @FFMPEG_LIBS@ @PNG_LIBS@ @JPEG_LIBS@ > +Libs: -L${libdir} -lffmpegthumbnailer > +Libs.private: @FFMPEG_LIBS@ @PNG_LIBS@ @JPEG_LIBS@ > Cflags: -I${includedir} > > This is much better that without the patch. > upstream agrees: http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegthumbnailer/issues/detail?id=59&can=1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 12:20:26 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 12:20:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417102028.953F968607@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 --- Comment #12 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-17 12:20:26 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: ffmpegthumbnailer Short Description: Lightweight video thumbnailer Owners: magnu5 Branches:F-12, F-13, devel InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 12:35:56 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 12:36:03 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417103558.3F0426891A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-17 12:35:55 --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. SHOULD: > License: GPLv2+ > > 2. SHOULD omit INSTALL from packaging > > 3. SHOULD omit > Requires: ffmpegthumbnailer > as it is already linked implicitly. > > 4. SHOULD add > Requires: kdebase-workspace > (ie, this isn't all that useful without kdebase-workspace. :) ) > > sources verified, > $ md5sum *.gz > fa897450ee691b6d225d8f79a6cfd409 kffmpegthumbnailer-1.1.0.tar.gz > > naming: ok > > macros: ok > > %files: ok > > > I don't consider any of these SHOULD items review blockers, but please consider > addressing them before making any package releases. > > Otherwise, this one is relatively simple and small, > APPROVED. > issues fixed. http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/kffmpegthumbnailer/SPEC/kffmpegthumbnailer.spec http://magnu5.fedorapeople.org/review/kffmpegthumbnailer/SRPM/kffmpegthumbnailer-1.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 15:45:30 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 15:45:40 2010 Subject: [Bug 1165] New: Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 Summary: Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://robert.hurst-ri.us/files/linux/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: robert@hurst-ri.us CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://robert.hurst-ri.us/files/linux/cc65.spec http://robert.hurst-ri.us/files/linux/cc65-2.13.2-1.src.rpm A C crosscompiler for 6502 systems, including a macroassembler that supports 6502, 65SC02 and 65816 CPUs, a linker, an archiver and some other tools. To create programs for one of the supported target machines, you have to install at least one of the target platform packages in addition to the main package. Not eligible for Fedora, as it is a "non-free" package. Received permission from its author, Ullrich von Bassewitz, to act as a package maintainer and request submission to RPM Fusion. License: Freeware with exceptions - see docs $ rpmlint SPECS/cc65.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/cc65-2.13.2-1.src.rpm cc65.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Crosscompiler -> Cross compiler, Cross-compiler, Crosscutting cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crosscompiler -> cross compiler, cross-compiler, crosscutting cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US macroassembler -> macro assembler, macro-assembler, assembler cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US archiver -> archive, archives, archived cc65.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog cc65.src: W: invalid-license Freeware with exceptions - see docs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. With the exception of the invalid-license warning, I see no issue. Please advise what this non-free packaging license may conform to, thank you, as this is my FIRST package submission. I am seeking to become an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. If this 8-bit compiler suite is adopted, it will allow other homebrewed 8-bit software to be packaged to run with VICE and other emulators found in RPM Fusion repository. But this package would be the first, necessary step for dependency issues. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 15:45:31 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 15:45:40 2010 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417134534.00275689AA@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Robert Hurst changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |1165 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 16:21:48 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 16:21:57 2010 Subject: [Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417142151.93D23685B2@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 Robert Hurst changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://robert.hurst- |http://www.cc65.org |ri.us/files/linux/ | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 16:26:23 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 16:26:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417142626.712F4689AE@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2010-04-17 16:26:23 --- I already did some work to package cc65 in a Fedora complaint way, please see http://fedora.danny.cz/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 16:42:24 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 16:42:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417144227.1FF2068991@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 --- Comment #2 from Robert Hurst 2010-04-17 16:42:23 --- That's wonderful news, Dan. My objective is to see that cc65 gets wider distribution for the homebrew developers that continue to produce 8-bit software using this C and assembler suite and for the many emulators already available. Your terse comment, though, leaves much to interpretation. Are you actively pursuing this package to go into Fedora? Clearly, no one wants duplicate work, so please advise on your package status with Fedora. I have been in contact with the project's main author and maintainer (Uz) these past two weeks, both on his mailing list and private emails. He has accepted my recent SPEC file changes made back into the project, pending further advisement from this process to make it RPM Fusion compliant. I noticed the updated SPEC file from the URL you provided showing it was updated as of today -- with a license of zlib -- is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 17 17:23:37 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 17 17:23:48 2010 Subject: [Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100417152340.4648D688EC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan@danny.cz --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2010-04-17 17:23:36 --- first do s/complaint/compliant/ :-) I'm not actively working on it, I did the 2.12.0 a year ago and if I remember correctly the update to 2.13.0 would need also to port the makefile patch. The license - almost all files are licensed under zlib with only 2 files having the original license that's considered non-free by Fedora (and thus it can't go directly to Fedora). I think the details could be found either in bugzilla.redhat.com or in the archives of fedora-legal mailing list. But the Fedora packaging guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) apply also to packages in RPM Fusion. The date of http://fedora.danny.cz/cc65-2.13.0.spec is the date of upload, I last touched it half a year ago. It's meant primarily as an inspiration, but in my opinion it could be acceptable for RPM Fusion. The problems I see in the upstream spec file are - the name/version %defines are redundant - explicit usage of %attr - using absolute paths instead of macros - the target headers/libs should (IMHO) go into %{_datadir} (instead of %{_libdir}) because the content is not arch dependent from the host's view - the binaries are stripped and the -debuginfo subpackage is then useless -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 18 20:26:19 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sun Apr 18 20:26:31 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100418182623.8134168679@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 18 22:26:36 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 18 22:26:37 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-18 Message-ID: <20100418202637.0C51E24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 1 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc13 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 4 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.3 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.3 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.3 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.6 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: mame-0.137-4.fc13 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.3 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.25-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.3 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.16-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.3 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.15-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.6 --------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 18 22:26:41 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 18 22:26:40 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-18 Message-ID: <20100418202641.1D6CA24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 1 devede-3.16.7-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 15 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-19 (!) devede-3.16.7-1.fc12 : INVALID build results, not published! em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.18 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.32 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.31 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.12 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.2 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.3 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.23 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.15 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.23 staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.7 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.8 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.1 xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: devede-3.16.7-1.fc13 -------------------- * Sun Apr 18 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.7-1 - Updated to version 3.16.7 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-19 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-19 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.32.11-102.fc12 devede-3.16.7-1.fc12 -------------------- * Sun Apr 18 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.7-1 - Updated to version 3.16.7 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.18 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.4-1.18 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.32 --------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.32 - rebuild for new kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.31 ------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.31 - rebuild for new kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.12 ------------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.3.svn288.12 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.2 ---------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.3 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Mon Mar 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.23 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.23 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.15 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.15 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.23 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.23 - rebuild for new kernel staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.7 ------------------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1.7 - rebuild for new kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.8 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.4-1.8 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.1 -------------------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.1 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.1 --------------------------------- * Sat Apr 17 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 17:55:49 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 17:56:02 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] New: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Summary: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwmw2@infradead.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump.spec SRPM: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump-2.2c-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: rtmpdump is a toolkit for RTMP streams. All forms of RTMP are supported, including rtmp://, rtmpt://, rtmpe://, rtmpte://, and rtmps://. Not suitable for Fedora because it was subject to a DMCA takedown request because it "can be used to download copyrighted works"... much like a web browser can: http://www.chillingeffects.org/anticircumvention/notice.cgi?NoticeID=25159 rpmlint whines about spelling errors on the names of the various rtmp-based protocols, but has no valid objections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 18:10:07 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 18:10:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419161011.34B24689A6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-04-19 18:10:07 --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 18:17:43 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 18:17:54 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419161746.93D30689B3@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-04-19 18:17:41 --- rpmlint output: rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmp -> ramp, romp, rump rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpt -> prompt, rampart, tempt rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpe -> romper, temper, tamper rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpte -> tempter, prompter, prompted rtmpdump.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmps -> ramps, romps, rumps rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmp -> ramp, romp, rump rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpt -> prompt, rampart, tempt rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpe -> romper, temper, tamper rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmpte -> tempter, prompter, prompted rtmpdump.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rtmps -> ramps, romps, rumps 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. These are OK. *** Drop SOURCE1, it's functionally identical to the original makefile. *** MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. ~OK - Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/rtmpdump.1.* %{_mandir}/man8/rtmpgw.8.* MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 18:18:25 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 18:18:35 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419161828.80224689B4@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 20:31:50 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 20:32:01 2010 Subject: [Bug 1155] Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419183153.EC5D468A11@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-19 20:31:49 --- Imported and built for F-12, F-13, devel branches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 20:31:50 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 20:32:04 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419183154.571C368A15@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 Bug 1157 depends on bug 1155, which changed state. Bug 1155 Summary: Review request: ffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 20:36:56 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 20:37:08 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419183700.1EB8468A32@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 Magnus Tuominen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #4 from Magnus Tuominen 2010-04-19 20:36:55 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: kffmpegthumbnailer Short Description: Lightweight video thumbnailer Owners: magnu5 Branches: F-12, F-13, devel InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 21:18:33 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 21:18:45 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419191837.2242268A15@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #3 from dwmw2@infradead.org 2010-04-19 21:18:32 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Drop SOURCE1, it's functionally identical to the original makefile. Oops, sorry -- that was there to debug why 'make posix' wasn't working (because $MAKEFLAGS ends up with weird stuff in it), and I forgot to drop it. > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. ~OK > - Please change > %{_mandir}/*/* > to > %{_mandir}/man1/rtmpdump.1.* > %{_mandir}/man8/rtmpgw.8.* Um, OK -- but why? That was having the same effect anyway, surely? Updated files in same location. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 21:24:11 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 21:24:23 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419192415.B733A68A26@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 dwmw2@infradead.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #4 from dwmw2@infradead.org 2010-04-19 21:24:11 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: rtmpdump Short Description: Toolkit for RTMP streams Owners: dwmw2 Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 21:29:06 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 21:29:44 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419192910.6481F68A41@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-04-19 21:29:05 --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Please change > > %{_mandir}/*/* > > to > > %{_mandir}/man1/rtmpdump.1.* > > %{_mandir}/man8/rtmpgw.8.* > > Um, OK -- but why? That was having the same effect anyway, surely? Yes, but a) the latter one is clearer, and b) it can't end up owning anything it isn't supposed to. For instance the latter might end up owning the i18n man directories (e.g. %{_mandir}/en/man{0p,1,1p,2,3,3p,4,5,6,7,8,9} along with their content). Still approved. But do bump the release (and make a corresponding entry in the changelog) whenever you make changes, since otherwise it is near impossible for other people to see what has happened. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 23:43:02 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 23:43:16 2010 Subject: [Bug 1157] Review request: kffmpegthumbnailer - Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419214307.2AA44689DB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 19 23:43:03 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Mon Apr 19 23:43:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1171] Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100419214307.7B0AC689C6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 11:17:50 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 20 11:17:57 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] New: Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes Message-ID: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 Summary: Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwmw2@infradead.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review@rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://david.woodhou.se/get_iplayer.spec SRPM: http://david.woodhou.se/get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: get_iplayer is a tool for listing, recording and streaming BBC iPlayer TV programmes, and other programmes via 3rd-party plugins. Unsuitable for Fedora because it requires rtmpdump. rpmlint whines about spelling errors but nothing relevant. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 18:29:30 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 20 18:29:42 2010 Subject: [Bug 1030] Review request: xbmc - Media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100420162934.3953C68A20@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 Dobmec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dobmec@yahoo.fr --- Comment #170 from Dobmec 2010-04-20 18:29:29 --- Hello. I've got a little bug with xbmc 9.11-18.fc12 installed from the repo rpmfusion testing in fedora 12 : when I play original video dvd with subtitle, the first subtitle of each new chapter disappear or is not at the good time... There's no problems with subtitles for avi files. Thanks in advance for the solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 18:31:42 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 20 18:31:52 2010 Subject: [Bug 1150] Review request: west-chamber-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100420163145.8E65568A0A@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 18:31:46 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 20 18:31:56 2010 Subject: [Bug 1149] Review request: west-chamber - iptables extension for offsetting censorship firewall. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100420163149.9A02768A72@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 22:36:24 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 20 22:36:24 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-20 Message-ID: <20100420203624.A6BF524367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 4 NEW amap-5.2-4.fc13 : Network tool for application protocol detection nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc13 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc13 NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.15-1.fc13 : NVIDIA's proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 2 e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc13 libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 6 NEW e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc12 : A powerful Amiga Emulator, based on UAE NEW libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc12 : Provides IPF support, primarily for UAE/E-UAE nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.4 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.4 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.4 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.7 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: amap-5.2-4.fc13 --------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-4 - more flexible pcre cflags to build also on RHEL4 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 * Fri Mar 12 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-3 - Bump Epoch - Fan problem in recent release * Mon Mar 08 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-2 - Revert to 190.53 version http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/announcement.php?f=14 * Sat Feb 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 195.36.08-1 - Update to 195.36.08 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel * Thu Feb 11 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Feb 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Jan 30 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Jan 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc13 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.15-1.fc13 ------------------------------------ * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 - Use macro for Epoch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc13 --------------------------- * Sun Nov 15 2009 Ian Chapman 0.8.29-0.14.wip4 - Work around fix for libcaps support * Sun Oct 18 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.8.29-0.13.wip4 - fixed a 64bit gtk+ bug causing a segfault (BZ #850) libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc13 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.0-10 - rebuild for new F11 features ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc12 --------------------------- * Sun Nov 15 2009 Ian Chapman 0.8.29-0.14.wip4 - Work around fix for libcaps support libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc12 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.0-10 - rebuild for new F11 features nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.4 ------------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.25-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.4 ---------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.16-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.4 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.15-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.7 --------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.7 - rebuild for new kernel From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 20 22:37:35 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 20 22:37:35 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-20 Message-ID: <20100420203735.CF2A3246A1@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 11 bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc13 VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc13 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13 NEW xbmc-9.11-18.fc13 : Media center ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 3 devede-3.16.8-1.fc13 NEW ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc13 : Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers NEW rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc13 : Toolkit for RTMP streams ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 17 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-21 (!) devede-3.16.8-1.fc12 : INVALID build results, not published! em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.19 NEW ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc12 : Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.33 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.32 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.13 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.3 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.4 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.24 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.16 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.24 NEW rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc12 : Toolkit for RTMP streams staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.8 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.9 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.2 xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: bsnes-0.063-1.fc13 ------------------ * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 - Updated to 0.063 - Dropped upstreamed dso patch cairo-dock-2.1.3.8-1.fc13 ------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 - 2.1.3-8 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-2 - Try to enable Network-Monitor and Scooby-do (while the codes say that this will be enabled from 2.1.4) (bug 578393) compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 20 2010 Jonathan Steffan - 2.4.6-1 - Update to 2.4.6 - Add a patch for bdb 4.8 ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 -------------------- * Mon Mar 22 2010 Gianluca Sforna - 0.13.4-1 - New upstream release - Add patch to compile against GTK 2.19 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 --------------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to build 243334 - Added patch to fix missing -ldl link with vmware-user * Sat Mar 20 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.236320-1 - Update to build 236320 - Only start guestd if running on guest VM (#382) open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13 -------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 08 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc13 ------------------------------ * Wed Nov 11 2009 Alex Lancaster - 0.12.1-2 - Rebuild again for F-12 (bump release tag) vagalume-0.8.3-3.fc13 --------------------- * Mon Mar 29 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-3 - Restore .xpm icon * Sat Mar 27 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-2 - Exclude old .xpm icon VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc13 --------------------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.6-1 - New upstream release - Workaround trouble linking with new linker - modprobe configuration files into right directory (LI Rui Bin) - Own /etc/vbox (LI Rui Bin) - Use parallel build - Attempt to address #1083 by insmodding instead of modprobe VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13 -------------------------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.6-1 - New release * Wed Feb 17 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.4-1 - New release xbmc-9.11-18.fc13 ----------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-18 - Exclude ppc64 (not available for F-13+ in any case) * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-17 - Fixed license tag to include GPLv3+ * Wed Mar 24 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-16 - Add BuildRequires: hdhomerun-devel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: devede-3.16.8-1.fc13 -------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.8-1 - Updated to version 3.16.8 ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc13 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.1-1 - version bump - libspatch.patch merged upstream, issue 59 * Mon Apr 12 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-3 - drop _kde4_ macros - moving chmod to %prep - moving %{_includedir}/libffmpegthumbnailer to -devel - track sonames closer - license change to GPLv2+ - remove duplicate docs from -devel - patching libs in pkgconfig%{name}.pc, thanks to rdieter * Sun Apr 11 2010 leigh scott 2.0.0-2 - fix rpath - enable jpeg and png support - clean up spec file - remove static libs as they aren't needed - add docs * Sat Apr 10 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-1 - initial build - has to be built with "QA_RPATHS=$[0x0001|0x0010 ]" for now rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc13 -------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-2 - Link with libgcrypt explicitly since we call it directly * Mon Apr 19 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-1 - Initial package ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-21 ------------------------------ * Tue Apr 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-21 - rebuilt * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-20 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.32.11-104.fc12 devede-3.16.8-1.fc12 -------------------- em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.19 ---------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.4-1.19 - rebuild for new kernel ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc12 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.1-1 - version bump - libspatch.patch merged upstream, issue 59 * Mon Apr 12 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-3 - drop _kde4_ macros - moving chmod to %prep - moving %{_includedir}/libffmpegthumbnailer to -devel - track sonames closer - license change to GPLv2+ - remove duplicate docs from -devel - patching libs in pkgconfig%{name}.pc, thanks to rdieter * Sun Apr 11 2010 leigh scott 2.0.0-2 - fix rpath - enable jpeg and png support - clean up spec file - remove static libs as they aren't needed - add docs * Sat Apr 10 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-1 - initial build - has to be built with "QA_RPATHS=$[0x0001|0x0010 ]" for now kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.33 --------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.33 - rebuild for new kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.32 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.32 - rebuild for new kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.13 ------------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.3.svn288.13 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.3 ---------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.4 ---------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.24 ----------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.24 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.16 ----------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.16 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.24 ----------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.24 - rebuild for new kernel rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc12 -------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-2 - Link with libgcrypt explicitly since we call it directly * Mon Apr 19 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-1 - Initial package staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.8 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1.8 - rebuild for new kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.9 ---------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.4-1.9 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.2 -------------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.2 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.2 --------------------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 21 00:55:48 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 21 00:56:02 2010 Subject: [Bug 1030] Review request: xbmc - Media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100420225553.3739E6878E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 --- Comment #171 from Alex Lancaster 2010-04-21 00:55:46 --- (In reply to comment #170) > Hello. > I've got a little bug with xbmc 9.11-18.fc12 installed from the repo rpmfusion > testing in fedora 12 : when I play original video dvd with subtitle, the first > subtitle of each new chapter disappear or is not at the good time... There's no > problems with subtitles for avi files. > Thanks in advance for the solution. Please open up a bug against the actual "xbmc" component now on bugzilla.rpmfusion.org. This bug relates to the packaging effort only and is now closed. In addition, unless you know that this issue is Fedora/RPM Fusion-specific, it's best to also report these kinds of issues with XBMC upstream (and post a link to that upstream bug on the RPM Fusion bug) as I'm unlikely to be able fix things in the core code, but may be able to fix issues that relate to packaging errors. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From giallu at gmail.com Wed Apr 21 10:23:16 2010 From: giallu at gmail.com (Gianluca Sforna) Date: Wed Apr 21 10:29:11 2010 Subject: 32bit applications with a 64bit NVidia driver. Message-ID: I'm looking for some info to determine what's going on here, whether it's PEBCAK, or maybe some packaging bug, or just an unsupported setup. Basically, I have some 32bit binaries that I'd like to run in a 64bit installation; these binaries (qt based) use OpenGL via some OpenSceneGraph widget. The machine has NVidia drivers installed. At application startup I've got this message in the console: QGLContext::makeCurrent(): Cannot make invalid context current. and all OpenGL based widgets do not show up. Now, at this point I realized I did not install the 32bit xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs, but after installation it made no difference; however I also discovered everything start working as expected if I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/nvidia so it looks like the dynamic linker is not picking up correctly the 32bit libs in a 64bit environment. So, if you're still reading this, do you think we can fix the issue or is it something out of the packaging scope? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna From kwizart at gmail.com Wed Apr 21 10:38:23 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Wed Apr 21 10:38:29 2010 Subject: 32bit applications with a 64bit NVidia driver. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2010/4/21 Gianluca Sforna > > I'm looking for some info to determine what's going on here, whether > it's PEBCAK, or maybe some packaging bug, or just an unsupported > setup. > > Basically, I have some 32bit binaries that I'd like to run in a 64bit > installation; these binaries (qt based) use OpenGL via some > OpenSceneGraph widget. The machine has NVidia drivers installed. > > At application startup I've got this message in the console: > QGLContext::makeCurrent(): Cannot make invalid context current. > and all OpenGL based widgets do not show up. > > Now, at this point I realized I did not install the 32bit > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs, but after installation it made no > difference; however I also discovered everything start working as > expected if I set > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/nvidia The change should be immediate.So the problem might be in your application trying to dlopen the 32Bit library from an expected place instead of using the system linker. There is a need to check for rpath issue also. Nicolas (kwizart) From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 23 07:49:44 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 23 07:49:43 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-23 Message-ID: <20100423054944.4518524367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 1 mame-0.137u3-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 5 mame-0.137u3-1.fc12 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.5 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.5 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.5 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.8 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: mame-0.137u3-1.fc13 ------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u3-1 - Updated to 0137u3 - Dropped upstreamed ppc64 patch - Moved rpm patches application after upstream ones * Fri Apr 09 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u2-1 - Updated to 0137u2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: mame-0.137u3-1.fc12 ------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u3-1 - Updated to 0137u3 - Dropped upstreamed ppc64 patch - Moved rpm patches application after upstream ones * Fri Apr 09 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u2-1 - Updated to 0137u2 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.5 ------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.25-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.5 ---------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.16-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc12.5 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.15-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.8 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.8 - rebuild for new kernel From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 23 08:21:44 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 23 08:21:42 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-23 Message-ID: <20100423062144.D6B402438F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: 1 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc12 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: mame-0.137-4.fc12 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 23 08:58:15 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 23 08:58:14 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-23 Message-ID: <20100423065815.7FF282438F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 1 NEW mame-0.137-4.fc11 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: mame-0.137-4.fc11 ----------------- * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-4 - Stripped @ from the commands to make the build more verbose * Sun Mar 21 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-3 - Dropped suffix64 - Added ppc64 autodetection support - Re-diffed the fortify patch * Sat Mar 20 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137-2 - Changed the versioning scheme to include the dot - Changed the source URL to point to aarongiles.com mirror directly - Added missing application of the fortify patch - Added sparc64 and s390 to architectures getting suffix64 - Removed duplicate license.txt From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 23 17:20:50 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 23 17:20:52 2010 Subject: [Bug 980] Review Request: pragha - Lightweight GTK+ music manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100423152053.C4AE26874E@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=980 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2010-04-23 17:20:50 --- Spec: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/pragha.spec SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/pragha-0.7.4-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From jjneely at ncsu.edu Fri Apr 23 17:09:27 2010 From: jjneely at ncsu.edu (Jack Neely) Date: Fri Apr 23 17:23:54 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta Message-ID: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> Folks, The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL 6. Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. I'd like to put some work into making this happen. I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we can have easy access to the Yum repos. What needs to be done to create a new branch? Jack -- Jack Neely Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services Office of Information Technology, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 From kwizart at gmail.com Fri Apr 23 17:40:37 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Fri Apr 23 17:40:39 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : > Folks, > > The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL > 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to > put some work into making this happen. > > I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we > can have easy access to the Yum repos. I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to support their package in EL-6 also ? (so that we can eventually automatically branch packages from F-12) Nicolas (kwizart) ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before we solve two questions: How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is the rule). From jarod at wilsonet.com Fri Apr 23 21:08:27 2010 From: jarod at wilsonet.com (Jarod Wilson) Date: Fri Apr 23 21:08:29 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : >> Folks, >> >> The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL >> 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to >> put some work into making this happen. >> >> I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we >> can have easy access to the Yum repos. > I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. > But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of > http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html > I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). > > That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: > How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to > support their package in EL-6 also ? I'm definitely planning to support mythtv on EL6. > ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before > we solve two questions: > How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? Looks like that's a work in progress... Xavier said something about my builder also being a koji builder now, and the volume previously mounted at /var/lib/mock is now mouted at /srv/koji... > how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is > the rule). There's a kmodtool (variant? fork? switch?) for this, which uses kabi symbol checksums for rpm deps, which Red Hat has used itself for things like the kvm driver kmod packages for RHEL5. Build using that, and a given driver *should* Just Work for all subsequent kernels unless a symbol used changes (and assuming you use nothing but whitelisted symbols, they shouldn't change). -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 23 21:13:04 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Fri Apr 23 21:12:53 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-23 Message-ID: <20100423191305.1D2FF2438F@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 2 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc13 mlt-0.5.4-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 16 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-23 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.20 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.34 mlt-0.5.4-1.fc12 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.33 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.14 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.4 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.5 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.25 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.17 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.25 staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.9 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.10 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.3 xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.3 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 2 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc11 mlt-0.5.4-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc13 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.9-1 - 2.1.3-9 mlt-0.5.4-1.fc13 ---------------- * Wed Apr 21 2010 Ryan Rix - 0.5.4-1 - New upstream version to fix reported crashes against Kdenlive ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-23 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-23 - rebuilt * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-22 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.32.11-105.fc12 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.9-1 - 2.1.3-9 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.20 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.4-1.20 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.34 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.34 - rebuild for new kernel mlt-0.5.4-1.fc12 ---------------- * Wed Apr 21 2010 Ryan Rix - 0.5.4-1 - New upstream version to fix reported crashes against Kdenlive ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.33 ------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.33 - rebuild for new kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.14 ------------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.3.svn288.14 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.4 ---------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.5 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.25 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.25 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.17 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.17 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.25 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.25 - rebuild for new kernel staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.9 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1.9 - rebuild for new kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4-1.fc12.10 ----------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.4-1.10 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.3 -------------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.3 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc12.3 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc11 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.9-1 - 2.1.3-9 mlt-0.5.4-1.fc11 ---------------- * Wed Apr 21 2010 Ryan Rix - 0.5.4-1 - New upstream version to fix reported crashes against Kdenlive From jjneely at ncsu.edu Fri Apr 23 21:57:11 2010 From: jjneely at ncsu.edu (Jack Neely) Date: Fri Apr 23 21:57:15 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: <20100423195711.GB9146@virge.linuxczar.net> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : > > Folks, > > > > The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL > > 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to > > put some work into making this happen. > > > > I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we > > can have easy access to the Yum repos. > I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. > But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of > http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html > I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). > > That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: > How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to > support their package in EL-6 also ? > (so that we can eventually automatically branch packages from F-12) > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before > we solve two questions: > How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? > how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is > the rule). > I've been using the kmod standards as rpmfusion knows and loves with RHEL5 since it was released. It works very well there. I don't see this one as a blocker. Jack -- Jack Neely Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services Office of Information Technology, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 From kwizart at gmail.com Fri Apr 23 22:57:54 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Fri Apr 23 22:57:57 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: <20100423195711.GB9146@virge.linuxczar.net> References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> <20100423195711.GB9146@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : >> > Folks, >> > >> > The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL >> > 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to >> > put some work into making this happen. >> > >> > I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we >> > can have easy access to the Yum repos. >> I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. >> But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of >> http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html >> I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). >> >> That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: >> How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to >> support their package in EL-6 also ? >> (so that we can eventually automatically branch packages from F-12) >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) >> >> ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before >> we solve two questions: >> How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? >> how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is >> the rule). >> > > I've been using the kmod standards as rpmfusion knows and loves with > RHEL5 since it was released. ?It works very well there. ?I don't see > this one as a blocker. Which ones are you talking about? kmod1 or kmod2 standard ? And which one supports kABI if any ? The point is: I'm not aware rpmfusion ever did kABI the way it's currently done with Red Hat. Of course that's not about a blocker, but a decision to be made along with a team to be in charge to maintain. Nicolas (kwizart) From oget.fedora at gmail.com Sat Apr 24 03:22:37 2010 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Sat Apr 24 03:28:45 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? Message-ID: Is there any particular reason? Can we make them noarch? Orcan From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 09:28:31 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 09:28:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424072833.03F5B68530@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2010-04-24 09:28:31 --- Updated to 1.3.1: spec: http://thm.1erlei.de/review/guvcview.spec srpm: http://thm.1erlei.de/review/guvcview-1.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 10:30:03 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 10:30:04 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424083005.15226686D1@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |supercyper@163.com Blocks|2 |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |supercyper@163.com |review@rpmfusion.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 10:30:19 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 10:30:26 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424083021.821316870D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 10:37:53 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 10:37:55 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424083754.CA6736870D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-04-24 10:37:52 --- 1.BuildRequires: autoconf is useless. 2.%{_datadir}/menu/%{name} is debian menu files and should be disabled. See ./configure --help --disable-debian-menu disable debian menu (default: enabled) --disable-desktop disable desktop file (default: enabled) --enable-pulse enable pulseaudio support (default: disabled) 3. Please also upload binary rpms(including debug package) for review, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 12:31:57 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 12:31:58 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424103159.3B34E6874B@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Moschny 2010-04-24 12:31:56 --- Updated spec: - Removed BR autoconf - Disabled Debian menu Spec file, SRPM and binary RPMs are all here now: http://thm.1erlei.de/review/guvcview/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 13:49:16 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 13:49:18 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424114919.351EC685E6@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-04-24 13:49:16 --- Some comments: 1.It may be better to add some more Categories for desktop file. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio 2. I prefer to replace Icon=/usr/share/pixmaps/guvcview/guvcview.png with Icon=guvcview in desktop file. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#.desktop_files 3./usr/share/doc/guvcview-1.3.1/INSTALL should be removed. All other things are OK. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Apr 24 14:16:35 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat Apr 24 14:17:35 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> On 24.04.2010 03:22, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Is there any particular reason? Partly that history iirc, as noarch subpackages were not yet possible in the early akmod days. > Can we make them noarch? Yeah, should be possible, but might be best if tested in rawhide for at least a short while first. But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in the repos. The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager, but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone. Opinions? Cu knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 16:15:20 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 16:15:22 2010 Subject: [Bug 1127] Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424141523.17C39686D9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 Homer Xing changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Homer Xing 2010-04-24 16:15:19 --- Dear all, New upstream version of Ailurus has released. It cannot install any third party repositories, or closed source software. This package is eligible now. Therefore I close this bug. Thank you very much for reviewing! Best regards, Homer Xing -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 16:15:20 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Sat Apr 24 16:15:23 2010 Subject: [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100424141523.427EF686D9@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Bug 30 depends on bug 1127, which changed state. Bug 1127 Summary: Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 19:50:22 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 24 19:50:12 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-24 Message-ID: <20100424175022.81C9C24375@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 3 e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc13 libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc13 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 2 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc13 --------------------------- * Sun Nov 15 2009 Ian Chapman 0.8.29-0.14.wip4 - Work around fix for libcaps support * Sun Oct 18 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.8.29-0.13.wip4 - fixed a 64bit gtk+ bug causing a segfault (BZ #850) libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc13 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.0-10 - rebuild for new F11 features mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc13 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc13 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sat Apr 24 19:51:12 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sat Apr 24 19:51:06 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-24 Message-ID: <20100424175112.12CAC24367@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 15 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc13 compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 devede-3.16.8-1.fc13 NEW ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc13 : Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers mlt-0.5.4-1.fc13 mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc13 mythtv-0.23-0.7.rc2.fc13 mythtv-themes-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 NEW rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc13 : Toolkit for RTMP streams staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 NEW west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc13 : Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables NEW west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13 : Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc13 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.9-1 - 2.1.3-9 compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 20 2010 Jonathan Steffan - 2.4.6-1 - Update to 2.4.6 - Add a patch for bdb 4.8 devede-3.16.8-1.fc13 -------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.8-1 - Updated to version 3.16.8 * Sun Apr 18 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.7-1 - Updated to version 3.16.7 * Sat Mar 20 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.6-1 - Updated to version 3.16.6 ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc13 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.1-1 - version bump - libspatch.patch merged upstream, issue 59 * Mon Apr 12 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-3 - drop _kde4_ macros - moving chmod to %prep - moving %{_includedir}/libffmpegthumbnailer to -devel - track sonames closer - license change to GPLv2+ - remove duplicate docs from -devel - patching libs in pkgconfig%{name}.pc, thanks to rdieter * Sun Apr 11 2010 leigh scott 2.0.0-2 - fix rpath - enable jpeg and png support - clean up spec file - remove static libs as they aren't needed - add docs * Sat Apr 10 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-1 - initial build - has to be built with "QA_RPATHS=$[0x0001|0x0010 ]" for now mlt-0.5.4-1.fc13 ---------------- * Wed Apr 21 2010 Ryan Rix - 0.5.4-1 - New upstream version to fix reported crashes against Kdenlive mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc13 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 mythtv-0.23-0.7.rc2.fc13 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.7.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24159 * Tue Apr 13 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.6.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24129 - Assorted spec file resyncs w/mythtv svn spec * Thu Apr 08 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.5.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24030 - Should fix some recording issues when using both inputs on an hdhomerun * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.3.rc1 - Start tracking release-0-23-fixes branch - Update to post-rc1 svn snapshot, revision 23894 mythtv-themes-0.23-0.5.rc2.fc13 ------------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.5.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24159 * Tue Apr 06 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.4.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24014 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.3.rc1 - Update to post-rc1 snapshot - Start tracking release-0-23-fixes branch * Tue Mar 23 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.2.rc1 - Update to svn trunk, revision 23781, aka MythTV 0.23 RC1 (more or less) * Tue Mar 09 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.1.svn.r23702 - Update to pre-0.23 svn trunk, rev 23702 * Thu Mar 04 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.1.svn.r23662 - Update to pre-0.23 svn trunk, rev 23662 * Sun Feb 28 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.1.svn.r23627 - Update to pre-0.23 svn trunk, rev 23627 * Fri Feb 05 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.1.svn.r23586 - Update to pre-0.23 svn trunk, rev 23586 * Fri Feb 05 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.1.svn.r23479 - Update to pre-0.23 svn trunk, rev 23479 - Add hacky install of Arclight themes, still needs to be done Right ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 -------------------- * Mon Mar 22 2010 Gianluca Sforna - 0.13.4-1 - New upstream release - Add patch to compile against GTK 2.19 rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-1 - add key for Rawhide/F14 - remove key for F12 * Sun Nov 22 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-0.1 - Bump for Fedora 13's rawhide. - Put the version at 13 from the start. - drop post script rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc13 -------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-2 - Link with libgcrypt explicitly since we call it directly * Mon Apr 19 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-1 - Initial package staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-1 - update to 2.6.33.2 - enable RAMZSWAP R8187SE RTL8192U BATMAN_ADV SAMSUNG_LAPTOP - disable RTL8187SE (renamed) - disable WAVELAN.* and PCMCIA_NETWAVE, as they are enabled in Fedora * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1 - update to 2.6.32.8 for updates-testing kernel - disable hv on ppc as it's useless and does not build staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-1.fc13 ----------------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-1 - update to 2.6.33.2 for F13 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1 - update to 2.6.32.8 for updates-testing kernel west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc13 ------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13 ------------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 15 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn-- Changed 'buildforkernels' to current. * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 From maillist at diffingo.com Sat Apr 24 21:56:40 2010 From: maillist at diffingo.com (Stewart Adam) Date: Sat Apr 24 22:23:52 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? In-Reply-To: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> References: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <4BD34CF8.7040506@diffingo.com> On 2010/04/24 8:16 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months > ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a > separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define > buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly > is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the > one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in > the repos. > > The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when > integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the > foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip > a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager, > but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone. > > Opinions? +1. I think this is more intuitive and copying the spec if not a big deal anyways - just 'cvs diff -u' then 'patch < /path/to/diff' wherever needed. Stewart From xavier at bachelot.org Sun Apr 25 01:41:14 2010 From: xavier at bachelot.org (Xavier Bachelot) Date: Sun Apr 25 01:41:24 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: <4BD3819A.2050609@bachelot.org> On 04/23/2010 05:40 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to > support their package in EL-6 also ? Another alternative could be to have different maintainers for the Fedora and EL branches, if the Fedora maintainer doesn't want to take the EL branch too, just like it's done in EPEL. That may allow more people to participate and more packages to be maintained for the EL branch. Not sure how much work this would add on the already very limited workforce of the RPM Fusion infrastructure team though. Regards, Xavier From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 25 11:46:32 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 25 11:46:55 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-25 Message-ID: <20100425094632.9D7E924126@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 2 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.1 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.1 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 25 11:48:51 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 25 11:48:48 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-25 Message-ID: <20100425094851.CB75D24126@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 15 em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.1 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.17 mplayer-1.0-0.115.20100424svn.fc13 mythtv-0.23-0.8.rc2.fc13 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.16 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.1 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.8 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.1 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.8 smplayer-0.6.9-1.fc13 staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13.1 vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc13 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.1 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.1 xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.18.0-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.17 --------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.17 - rebuild for new kernel mplayer-1.0-0.115.20100424svn.fc13 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.115.20100424svn - 20100424 snapshot - patch to build against older x264 in F-13 * Sat Mar 27 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.114.20100327svn - 20100327 snapshot - drop unused patch - fix build on F-13+ by linking against libgif instead of libungif mythtv-0.23-0.8.rc2.fc13 ------------------------ * Fri Apr 23 2010 Jarod Wilson 0.23-0.8.rc2 - Update to post-rc2 svn snapshot, revision 24240 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.16 ------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.16 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.1 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.8 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.8 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.8 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.8 - rebuild for new kernel smplayer-0.6.9-1.fc13 --------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.9-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.9 staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-1.fc13.1 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc13 ---------------------- * Mon Jan 04 2010 Ville Skytt? - 0.2.10-3 - Use ISA qualified dependency to vdr(abi). - Filter out autoprovided libvdr-*.so.* (if %filter_setup is available). - Fix locale installation. VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.1 ---------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.6-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.1 -------------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.1 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13.1 --------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel From dominik at greysector.net Sun Apr 25 13:35:38 2010 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Sun Apr 25 14:03:14 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders Message-ID: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> Hi. I'm attaching two results from failed builds. One says it couldn't download result from the builder and the other complains about missing deps. Could the ppc builder admin check this? Thanks, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org Subject: Build Error (Job 6927): mplayer-1_0-0_112_20100424svn_fc12 on fedora-12-rpmfusion_free Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Size: 3684 Url: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100425/4d383bf3/attachment.mht -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org Subject: Build Error (Job 6928): mplayer-1_0-0_112_20100424svn_fc11 on fedora-11-rpmfusion_free Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Size: 5640 Url: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100425/4d383bf3/attachment-0001.mht From supercyper at 163.com Sun Apr 25 15:23:14 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Sun Apr 25 15:23:23 2010 Subject: xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13 disappeared in the repo In-Reply-To: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <1e8efc2.3526.1283522d22f.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Hi. One of my packages-xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13.src.rpm disappeared without any notification after staying in the F13 update-testing for two weeks. Can anyone tell me why this package was removed from repo? Regrads, Chen Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100425/1a950783/attachment.html From supercyper at 163.com Sun Apr 25 15:13:02 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Sun Apr 25 15:28:54 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders In-Reply-To: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> On 2010-04-25 19:35:38，"Dominik Rathann Mierzejewski" Wrote： >Hi. > >I'm attaching two results from failed builds. One says it couldn't download >result from the builder and the other complains about missing deps. > >Could the ppc builder admin check this? > >Thanks, >R. See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100425/b0b890a7/attachment.html From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 25 15:56:07 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 25 15:57:07 2010 Subject: xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13 disappeared in the repo In-Reply-To: <1e8efc2.3526.1283522d22f.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <1e8efc2.3526.1283522d22f.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Message-ID: <4BD449F7.1090101@leemhuis.info> On 25.04.2010 15:23, Chen Lei wrote: > > One of my packages-xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13.src.rpm > disappeared > without any notification after staying in the F13 update-testing for two > weeks. /me looks puzzled > Can anyone tell me why this package was removed from repo? I did some cleanups earlier today and remove kmod packages for older kernels and packages from updates-testing that were also in the updates repos. I sanity checked everything, but I guess either I or the push scripts did something stupid and removed the package for some reason (likely I) -- at least that's the only explanation that makes sense to me right now. Sorry for the trouble; please rebuild. CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 25 16:01:24 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 25 16:02:23 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders In-Reply-To: <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Message-ID: <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> On 25.04.2010 15:13, Chen Lei wrote: > On > 2010-04-25 19:35:38?"Dominik Rathann Mierzejewski" > Wrote? >> >>I'm attaching two results from failed builds. One says it couldn't download >>result from the builder and the other complains about missing deps. >> >>Could the ppc builder admin check this? >> > See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166 That's afaics the reason for the second problem in Dominik's mail (lame missing on ppc64) -- I don't know why that happens since a few days (I was bitten by that already as well). Xavier, did you change anything recently? The first problem ("Job failed on arch ppc: couldn't download result files from builder") likely is related. I happened really rarely in the past already iirc, but nobody every looked into this. Dominik, bumping and rebuilding lame (and hoping everything works fine on ppc/ppc64 this time) is likely the best way to fix this and make mplayer build. CU knurd From mschwendt at gmail.com Sun Apr 25 16:25:20 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun Apr 25 16:25:25 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders In-Reply-To: <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20100425162520.4649510a@faldor.intranet> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:01:24 +0200, Thorsten wrote: > The first problem ("Job failed on arch ppc: couldn't download result > files from builder") likely is related. I happened really rarely in the > past already iirc, but nobody every looked into this. There should be a log message about that in the Plague server log. In released versions of Plague, the job results download is retried 10 times before the server gives up. If you want to increase that, watch out for the DL_RETRIES variable in ArchJob.py - the max.value is hardcoded in that file. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Apr 25 16:50:23 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun Apr 25 16:51:24 2010 Subject: xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13 disappeared in the repo In-Reply-To: <4BD449F7.1090101@leemhuis.info> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <1e8efc2.3526.1283522d22f.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD449F7.1090101@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <4BD456AF.3000904@leemhuis.info> On 25.04.2010 15:56, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 25.04.2010 15:23, Chen Lei wrote: >> >> One of my packages-xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13.src.rpm >> disappeared >> without any notification after staying in the F13 update-testing for two >> weeks. > > /me looks puzzled > >> Can anyone tell me why this package was removed from repo? > > I did some cleanups earlier today and remove kmod packages for older > kernels and packages from updates-testing that were also in the updates > repos. I sanity checked everything, but I guess either I or the push > scripts did something stupid and removed the package for some reason > (likely I) -- at least that's the only explanation that makes sense to > me right now. > > Sorry for the trouble; please rebuild. Kicked the rebuild myself Cu knurd From dominik at greysector.net Sun Apr 25 18:42:59 2010 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Sun Apr 25 18:43:01 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders In-Reply-To: <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> On Sunday, 25 April 2010 at 16:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 25.04.2010 15:13, Chen Lei wrote: > > On > > 2010-04-25 19:35:38?"Dominik Rathann Mierzejewski" > > Wrote? > >> > >>I'm attaching two results from failed builds. One says it couldn't download > >>result from the builder and the other complains about missing deps. > >> > >>Could the ppc builder admin check this? > >> > > See https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166 > > That's afaics the reason for the second problem in Dominik's mail (lame > missing on ppc64) -- I don't know why that happens since a few days (I > was bitten by that already as well). Xavier, did you change anything > recently? > > The first problem ("Job failed on arch ppc: couldn't download result > files from builder") likely is related. I happened really rarely in the > past already iirc, but nobody every looked into this. > > Dominik, bumping and rebuilding lame (and hoping everything works fine > on ppc/ppc64 this time) is likely the best way to fix this and make > mplayer build. I requeued the F-12 build and it worked this time. F-11 is still not working. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From dominik at greysector.net Sun Apr 25 21:20:56 2010 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Sun Apr 25 21:20:59 2010 Subject: build errors on ppc builders In-Reply-To: <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> References: <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20100425192056.GB8604@mokona.greysector.net> On Sunday, 25 April 2010 at 16:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: [...] > Dominik, bumping and rebuilding lame (and hoping everything works fine > on ppc/ppc64 this time) is likely the best way to fix this and make > mplayer build. I did that and it worked. Thanks. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Sun Apr 25 21:42:19 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Sun Apr 25 21:42:08 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-25 Message-ID: <20100425194219.F0593243B3@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 3 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.1 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.1 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 1 mame-0.137u3-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 14 NEW amap-5.2-4.fc13 : Network tool for application protocol detection e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc14 libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc14 NEW mame-0.137u3-1.fc14 : Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc14 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc13 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc14 qmc2-0.2-0.18.b14.fc13 realcrypt-6.3a-4.fc13 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.1 sdlmame-data-0137-1.fc13 sdlmame-data-samples-0137-1.fc13 NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc14 : NVIDIA's proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.1 ------------------------------ * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: mame-0.137u3-1.fc11 ------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u3-1 - Updated to 0137u3 - Dropped upstreamed ppc64 patch - Moved rpm patches application after upstream ones * Fri Apr 09 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u2-1 - Updated to 0137u2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: amap-5.2-4.fc14 --------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Michal Ambroz 5.2-4 - more flexible pcre cflags to build also on RHEL4 e-uae-0.8.29-0.14.wip4.fc14 --------------------------- * Sun Nov 15 2009 Ian Chapman 0.8.29-0.14.wip4 - Work around fix for libcaps support * Sun Oct 18 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.8.29-0.13.wip4 - fixed a 64bit gtk+ bug causing a segfault (BZ #850) libcapsimage-2.0.0-10.fc14 -------------------------- * Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.0.0-10 - rebuild for new F11 features mame-0.137u3-1.fc14 ------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u3-1 - Updated to 0137u3 - Dropped upstreamed ppc64 patch - Moved rpm patches application after upstream ones * Fri Apr 09 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.137u2-1 - Updated to 0137u2 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc14 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 nvidia-kmod-195.36.15-1.fc14 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 * Fri Mar 12 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-3 - Bump Epoch - Fan problem in recent release * Mon Mar 08 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:190.53-2 - Revert to 190.53 version http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/announcement.php?f=14 * Sat Feb 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 195.36.08-1 - Update to 195.36.08 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Feb 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel * Thu Feb 11 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.4 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Feb 10 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.3 - rebuild for new kernel * Sat Jan 30 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Wed Jan 20 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 190.53-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc14 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy realcrypt-6.3a-4.fc14 --------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Leigh Scott - 6.3a-4 - add Br xz-lzma-compat rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-1 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-1 - add key for Rawhide/F14 - remove key for F12 * Sun Nov 22 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-0.1 - Bump for Fedora 13's rawhide. - Put the version at 13 from the start. - drop post script rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.1 -------------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 14-0.1 - rebuild for rawhide xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc14 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 * Sat Mar 27 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.15-1 - Update to 195.36.15 - Use macro for Epoch From oget.fedora at gmail.com Mon Apr 26 00:23:04 2010 From: oget.fedora at gmail.com (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Mon Apr 26 00:23:27 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? In-Reply-To: <4BD34CF8.7040506@diffingo.com> References: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> <4BD34CF8.7040506@diffingo.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Stewart Adam wrote: > On 2010/04/24 8:16 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months >> ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a >> separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define >> buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly >> is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the >> one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in >> the repos. >> >> The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when >> integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the >> foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip >> a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager, >> but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone. >> >> Opinions? > > +1. I think this is more intuitive and copying the spec if not a big deal > anyways - just 'cvs diff -u' then 'patch < /path/to/diff' wherever needed. > +1 from me too. This sounds like the most unambiguous solution. It will probably require some changes in kmodtool and a rewrite of the guidelines though. Orcan From supercyper at 163.com Mon Apr 26 06:28:14 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Mon Apr 26 06:28:22 2010 Subject: xtables-addons-1.24.1.fc13 disappeared in the repo In-Reply-To: <4BD456AF.3000904@leemhuis.info> References: <4BD456AF.3000904@leemhuis.info> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <1e8efc2.3526.1283522d22f.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD449F7.1090101@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: >On 2010-04-25 22:50:23，"Thorsten Leemhuis" wrote： > >Kicked the rebuild myself Thank you, Thorsten. Regard, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100426/76edbf8d/attachment.html From supercyper at 163.com Mon Apr 26 06:39:35 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Mon Apr 26 06:39:42 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? In-Reply-To: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: Hi all. Debian guys already split ffmepg into two parts and ship them separately in debian and debian-multimedia. And I realized that RHEL5 also have a stripped patent-free qffmpeg package. See http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm Could we also split it for fedora and rpmfusion? I think it'll benefit fedora a lot. Regard, Chen Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100426/56a4cceb/attachment.html From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Mon Apr 26 08:05:43 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:05:43 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-26 Message-ID: <20100426060543.9B4CC24126@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 11 em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.1 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.17 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.16 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.1 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.8 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.1 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.8 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.1 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.1 NEW xtables-addons-1.24-2.fc13 : Extensions targets and matches for iptables NEW xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13.1 : Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 4 bsnes-0.064-1.fc13 staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-2.fc13 staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-2.fc13 xtables-addons-1.24-2.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 3 bsnes-0.064-1.fc12 NEW mplayer-1.0-0.112.20100424svn.fc12 : Movie player playing most video formats and DVDs vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc12 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 4 bsnes-0.064-1.fc11 lame-3.98.3-1.fc11.1 mplayer-1.0-0.112.20100424svn.fc11 vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 29 bsnes-0.064-1.fc14 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc14 compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13 (!) compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc14 : INVALID build results, not published! devede-3.16.8-1.fc14 ffmpeg-0.6-0.2.20100320svn.fc13 NEW ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc14 : Lightweight video thumbnailer that can be used by file managers mlt-0.5.4-1.fc14 mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc14 mplayer-1.0-0.115.20100424svn.fc14 mythtv-0.23-0.2.rc1.fc13 ogmrip-0.13.4-1.fc13 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc14 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.236320-1.fc13 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc14 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc14 qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.3.4-1.fc14 rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 rpmfusion-free-release-14-0.1 rt2860-2.1.2.0-3.fc13 NEW rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc14 : Toolkit for RTMP streams smplayer-0.6.9-1.fc14 vagalume-0.8.3-1.fc13 vagalume-0.8.3-2.fc13 vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc14 VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc13 NEW west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc14 : Extensions named after Romance of the West Chamber for iptables NEW west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc14 : Kernel module (kmod) for west-chamber NEW xbmc-9.11-18.fc13 : Media center ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.1 --------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.18.0-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.17 --------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.17 - rebuild for new kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.16 ------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.16 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.1 ---------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.8 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.8 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.1 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.1 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.8 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.8 - rebuild for new kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.1 ---------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.6-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.1 -------------------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.1 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-1.24-2.fc13 -------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-2 - rebuilt xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc13.1 --------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: bsnes-0.064-1.fc13 ------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.064-1 - Updated to 0.064 - Rediffed the patches - Dropped pixelshaders subpackage since upstream did not ship it staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-2.fc13 ---------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-2 - enable echo staging-kmod-addons-2.6.33.2-2.fc13 ----------------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-2 - enable echo xtables-addons-1.24-2.fc13 -------------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-2 - rebuilt ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: bsnes-0.064-1.fc12 ------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.064-1 - Updated to 0.064 - Rediffed the patches - Dropped pixelshaders subpackage since upstream did not ship it mplayer-1.0-0.112.20100424svn.fc12 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.112.20100424svn - 20100424 snapshot - drop unused patch - fix licence tag when compiled with OpenCore AMR - fix build --with faac (bug #997) - enable radio support (bug #634) - openal-devel is now openal-soft-devel (bug #935) - move some files to -common subpackage, adjust dependencies (bug #1037) - introduce -tools subpackage, move scripts there (bugs #544, #1037) - support old x264 in F-11 - fix debuginfo generation (bug #101) vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc12 ---------------------- * Mon Jan 04 2010 Ville Skytt? - 0.2.10-3 - Use ISA qualified dependency to vdr(abi). - Filter out autoprovided libvdr-*.so.* (if %filter_setup is available). - Fix locale installation. ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: bsnes-0.064-1.fc11 ------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.064-1 - Updated to 0.064 - Rediffed the patches - Dropped pixelshaders subpackage since upstream did not ship it - Applied the F-11 fix to the correct Makefile lame-3.98.3-1.fc11.1 -------------------- * Sun Apr 25 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 3.98.3-1.1 - bump and rebuild to try and fix ppc64 builder problem mplayer-1.0-0.112.20100424svn.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.112.20100424svn - 20100424 snapshot - drop unused patch - fix licence tag when compiled with OpenCore AMR - fix build --with faac (bug #997) - enable radio support (bug #634) - openal-devel is now openal-soft-devel (bug #935) - move some files to -common subpackage, adjust dependencies (bug #1037) - introduce -tools subpackage, move scripts there (bugs #544, #1037) - support old x264 in F-11 - fix debuginfo generation (bug #101) vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc11 ---------------------- * Mon Jan 04 2010 Ville Skytt? - 0.2.10-3 - Use ISA qualified dependency to vdr(abi). - Filter out autoprovided libvdr-*.so.* (if %filter_setup is available). - Fix locale installation. ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: bsnes-0.064-1.fc14 ------------------ * Sat Apr 17 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.064-1 - Updated to 0.064 - Rediffed the patches - Dropped pixelshaders subpackage since upstream did not ship it * Sun Mar 28 2010 Julian Sikorski - 0.063-1 - Updated to 0.063 - Dropped upstreamed dso patch cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc14 ------------------------- * Thu Apr 22 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.9-1 - 2.1.3-9 * Wed Apr 07 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.8-1 - 2.1.3-8 * Thu Apr 01 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.1.3.7-2 - Try to enable Network-Monitor and Scooby-do (while the codes say that this will be enabled from 2.1.4) (bug 578393) compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc14 ---------------------------- * Sat Mar 20 2010 Jonathan Steffan - 2.4.6-1 - Update to 2.4.6 - Add a patch for bdb 4.8 devede-3.16.8-1.fc14 -------------------- * Mon Apr 19 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.8-1 - Updated to version 3.16.8 * Sun Apr 18 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.7-1 - Updated to version 3.16.7 * Sat Mar 20 2010 Andrea Musuruane 3.16.6-1 - Updated to version 3.16.6 ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.1-1.fc14 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 19 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.1-1 - version bump - libspatch.patch merged upstream, issue 59 * Mon Apr 12 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-3 - drop _kde4_ macros - moving chmod to %prep - moving %{_includedir}/libffmpegthumbnailer to -devel - track sonames closer - license change to GPLv2+ - remove duplicate docs from -devel - patching libs in pkgconfig%{name}.pc, thanks to rdieter * Sun Apr 11 2010 leigh scott 2.0.0-2 - fix rpath - enable jpeg and png support - clean up spec file - remove static libs as they aren't needed - add docs * Sat Apr 10 2010 Magnus Tuominen 2.0.0-1 - initial build - has to be built with "QA_RPATHS=$[0x0001|0x0010 ]" for now mlt-0.5.4-1.fc14 ---------------- * Wed Apr 21 2010 Ryan Rix - 0.5.4-1 - New upstream version to fix reported crashes against Kdenlive mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc14 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 mplayer-1.0-0.115.20100424svn.fc14 ---------------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.115.20100424svn - 20100424 snapshot - patch to build against older x264 * Sat Mar 27 2010 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.0-0.114.20100327svn - 20100327 snapshot - drop unused patch - fix build on F-13+ by linking against libgif instead of libungif open-vm-tools-0.0.0.243334-1.fc14 --------------------------------- * Wed Apr 07 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to build 243334 - Added patch to fix missing -ldl link with vmware-user * Sat Mar 20 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.236320-1 - Update to build 236320 - Only start guestd if running on guest VM (#382) open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc14 -------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 08 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.243334-1 - Update to upstream build 243334 picard-freeworld-0.12.1-2.fc14 ------------------------------ * Wed Nov 11 2009 Alex Lancaster - 0.12.1-2 - Rebuild again for F-12 (bump release tag) qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.3.4-1.fc14 ----------------------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 Karel Voln? 0.3.4-1 - version bump rpmfusion-free-release-13-1 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-1 - add key for Rawhide/F14 - remove key for F12 * Sun Nov 22 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-0.1 - Bump for Fedora 13's rawhide. - Put the version at 13 from the start. - drop post script rpmfusion-free-release-14-0.1 ----------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 14-0.1 - rebuild for rawhide rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc14 -------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-2 - Link with libgcrypt explicitly since we call it directly * Mon Apr 19 2010 David Woodhouse 2.2c-1 - Initial package smplayer-0.6.9-1.fc14 --------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Sebastian Vahl - 0.6.9-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.9 vagalume-0.8.3-2.fc14 --------------------- * Sat Mar 27 2010 Michel Salim - 0.8.3-2 - Exclude old .xpm icon vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-3.fc14 ---------------------- * Mon Jan 04 2010 Ville Skytt? - 0.2.10-3 - Use ISA qualified dependency to vdr(abi). - Filter out autoprovided libvdr-*.so.* (if %filter_setup is available). - Fix locale installation. VirtualBox-OSE-3.1.6-1.fc14 --------------------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.6-1 - New upstream release - Workaround trouble linking with new linker - modprobe configuration files into right directory (LI Rui Bin) - Own /etc/vbox (LI Rui Bin) - Use parallel build - Attempt to address #1083 by insmodding instead of modprobe west-chamber-0.0.1-3.20100405svn.fc14 ------------------------------------- * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc14 ------------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 15 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn-- Changed 'buildforkernels' to current. * Mon Apr 05 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-3.20100405svn - svn 84 * Mon Mar 29 2010 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.0.1-2.20100329svn - svn 76 xbmc-9.11-18.fc14 ----------------- * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-18 - Exclude ppc64 (not available for F-13+ in any case) * Fri Mar 26 2010 Alex Lancaster - 9.11-17 - Fixed license tag to include GPLv3+ From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 26 10:56:10 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 26 10:56:14 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? In-Reply-To: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> References: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: 2010/4/24 Thorsten Leemhuis : > On 24.04.2010 03:22, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Is there any particular reason? > > Partly that history iirc, as noarch subpackages were not yet possible in > the early akmod days. > >> Can we make them noarch? > > Yeah, should be possible, but might be best if tested in rawhide for at > least a short while first. > > But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months > ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a > separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define > buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly > is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the > one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in > the repos. > > The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when > integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the > foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip > a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager, > but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone. > > Opinions? I cannot understand why to maintain 3 cvs modules for a given kernel module (akmod/kmod/kmod-common) would be easier than having to maintain only two (kmod/kmod-common) and just switch an option in the spec file. At least, it would be easier to split an akmod from the kmod-common part instead. Now, there are a lot of things to solve in the kmod (non-)standard before trying to solve non-issue. Here are a few I could suggest: - akmod modules must be built as soon as a new kernel (or kernel-devel) is installed, not on reboot (as that's not reliable on disk controller and kms gpu drivers). This can probably be done with %trigger - kmod created by akmod must not be replaced by pre-built ones. - kABI support on appropriate branches (not much experienced if ever supported). - akmod must be noarch package on branches that support that. (if built from sub-package). - Need to check if an updated kernel module is rebuild if akmod-foo is updated. - Once reviewed, kmodtool should be added into rpm itself as that's not a separate project, IMO. Nicolas (kwizart) From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 26 14:38:51 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 26 14:38:54 2010 Subject: Why are akmod packages arch specific? In-Reply-To: References: <4BD2E123.3060707@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: 2010/4/26 Nicolas Chauvet : > 2010/4/24 Thorsten Leemhuis : >> On 24.04.2010 03:22, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> Is there any particular reason? >> >> Partly that history iirc, as noarch subpackages were not yet possible in >> the early akmod days. >> >>> Can we make them noarch? >> >> Yeah, should be possible, but might be best if tested in rawhide for at >> least a short while first. >> >> But here is another thought I wanted to bring up for discussion months >> ago: I think it might be easier to build the akmod packages from a >> separate source package. That way we avoid the flipping the "%define >> buildforkernels newest" macro when updating the package, which quickly >> is forgotten, confuses people (afaics), and makes things harder for the >> one that is pushing the packages and cleaning up old kmod packages in >> the repos. >> >> The downsides: When updating the kmod (e.g. to a newer version or when >> integrating a new patch) the maintainer would have to copy the >> foo-kmod.spec file and all the sources to a different directory and flip >> a bit (the name or a macro). That's a bit more work for the packager, >> but more "natural" and hence might be easier for everyone. >> >> Opinions? > I cannot understand why to maintain 3 cvs modules for a given kernel > module (akmod/kmod/kmod-common) would be easier than having to > maintain only two (kmod/kmod-common) and just switch an option in the > spec file. At least, it would be easier to split an akmod from the > kmod-common part instead. On a second thought, that will not pass when patching only the kernel module. Hence that will be a severe "duplicate work" if patches need to be applied once to the akmod, and a second time to the kmod. > Now, there are a lot of things to solve in the kmod (non-)standard > before trying to solve non-issue. Here are a few I could suggest: > > - akmod modules must be built as soon as a new kernel (or > kernel-devel) is ?installed, not on reboot (as that's not reliable on > disk controller and kms gpu drivers). This can probably be done with > %trigger > - kmod created by akmod must not be replaced by pre-built ones. > - kABI support on appropriate branches (not much experienced if ever supported). > - akmod must be noarch package on branches that support that. (if > built from sub-package). > - Need to check if an updated kernel module is rebuild if akmod-foo is updated. > - Once reviewed, kmodtool should be added into rpm itself as that's > not a separate project, IMO. > > Nicolas (kwizart) > From jjneely at ncsu.edu Mon Apr 26 20:01:10 2010 From: jjneely at ncsu.edu (Jack Neely) Date: Mon Apr 26 20:01:16 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> <20100423195711.GB9146@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: <20100426180110.GG9687@virge.linuxczar.net> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:57:54PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : > >> > Folks, > >> > > >> > The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL > >> > 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to > >> > put some work into making this happen. > >> > > >> > I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we > >> > can have easy access to the Yum repos. > >> I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. > >> But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of > >> http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html > >> I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). > >> > >> That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: > >> How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to > >> support their package in EL-6 also ? > >> (so that we can eventually automatically branch packages from F-12) > >> > >> Nicolas (kwizart) > >> > >> ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before > >> we solve two questions: > >> How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? > >> how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is > >> the rule). > >> > > > > I've been using the kmod standards as rpmfusion knows and loves with > > RHEL5 since it was released. ?It works very well there. ?I don't see > > this one as a blocker. > Which ones are you talking about? kmod1 or kmod2 standard ? And which > one supports kABI if any ? > The point is: I'm not aware rpmfusion ever did kABI the way it's > currently done with Red Hat. > > Of course that's not about a blocker, but a decision to be made along > with a team to be in charge to maintain. > > Nicolas (kwizart) > I've used both kmodv1 and v2. However neither support the kABI packaging model. Being that we have limited resources and we have a model for maintaining kernel modules that works with Fedora, we should use that same model with RHEL6 unless there is some incompatibility. By the way...we are the "team." :-) I just don't think RHEL6 is different enough to re-engineer our processes for it. Jack -- Jack Neely Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services Office of Information Technology, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 From jarod at wilsonet.com Mon Apr 26 20:19:30 2010 From: jarod at wilsonet.com (Jarod Wilson) Date: Mon Apr 26 20:25:19 2010 Subject: RHEL 6 Beta In-Reply-To: <20100426180110.GG9687@virge.linuxczar.net> References: <20100423150927.GR22782@virge.linuxczar.net> <20100423195711.GB9146@virge.linuxczar.net> <20100426180110.GG9687@virge.linuxczar.net> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Jack Neely wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:57:54PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : >> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> 2010/4/23 Jack Neely : >> >> > Folks, >> >> > >> >> > The RHEL 6 Beta is out and I'm interested in rpmfusion support for RHEL >> >> > 6. ?Sounds like EPEL will be branching in a week or two. ?I'd like to >> >> > put some work into making this happen. >> >> > >> >> > I guess the first step is to get RHEL6 Beta1 on more mirrors so that we >> >> > can have easy access to the Yum repos. >> >> I would be interested in creating an el-6 branch right now also. >> >> But because anything above ffmpeg in F-13 is doomed because of >> >> http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1003.html >> >> I would branch some packages from F-13 tree. (and vlc from F-14). >> >> >> >> That been said most packages should be branched from F-12, so the question is: >> >> How much of the current RPM Fusion packages maintainer do want to >> >> support their package in EL-6 also ? >> >> (so that we can eventually automatically branch packages from F-12) >> >> >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) >> >> >> >> ps: that been said, I cannot expect anything in el-? branches before >> >> we solve two questions: >> >> How to move to our own hosted koji build server infra ? >> >> how to deal with kernel module in the EL world (where a stable kABI is >> >> the rule). >> >> >> > >> > I've been using the kmod standards as rpmfusion knows and loves with >> > RHEL5 since it was released. ?It works very well there. ?I don't see >> > this one as a blocker. >> Which ones are you talking about? ?kmod1 or kmod2 standard ? And which >> one supports kABI if any ? >> The point is: I'm not aware rpmfusion ever did kABI the way it's >> currently done with Red Hat. >> >> Of course that's not about a blocker, but a decision to be made along >> with a team to be in charge to maintain. >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) >> > > I've used both kmodv1 and v2. ?However neither support the kABI > packaging model. Red Hat has a version of kmodtool that does, and so far as I know, is willing to share. > Being that we have limited resources and we have a model for maintaining > kernel modules that works with Fedora, we should use that same model > with RHEL6 unless there is some incompatibility. > > By the way...we are the "team." ?:-) ?I just don't think RHEL6 is > different enough to re-engineer our processes for it. Thing is... You build the kmod *once* if done w/the kmodtool that support symbol versions as rpm deps, and never have to rebuild it for a newer kernel version, so long as those symbols remain unchanged. Not taking advantage of that means doing lots of pointless rebuilds. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com From adamwill at shaw.ca Mon Apr 26 21:06:50 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Mon Apr 26 21:16:44 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 05:18 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > Just my 2 cent: In an ideal world we IMHO wouldn't do anything different > > from Fedora to avoid any confusion -- even if it's feels like we are > > doing something that looks better or easier... > > Just out of my personal curiosity. What is the current situation. > plan? Fedora is next to nothing on desktop computers, without > rpmfusion. Yeah, I am wondering what's going on here too. The mock files I have from RPM Fusion generate packages with a .fc13 extension but are building against the Fedora Rawhide repo, which is *not* Fedora 13. I don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. -- adamw From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 26 21:58:20 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 26 21:58:23 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> Message-ID: 2010/4/26 Adam Williamson : > On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 05:18 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> > Just my 2 cent: In an ideal world we IMHO wouldn't do anything different >> > from Fedora to avoid any confusion -- even if it's feels like we are >> > doing something that looks better or easier... >> >> Just out of my personal curiosity. What is the current situation. >> plan? Fedora is next to nothing on desktop computers, without >> rpmfusion. > > Yeah, I am wondering what's going on here too. The mock files I have > from RPM Fusion generate packages with a .fc13 extension but are > building against the Fedora Rawhide repo, which is *not* Fedora 13. I > don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but > labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really > shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for > Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. For the record, I try to maintain mock configuration files for free/nonfree repository in sync with fedora and the lastesd mock cfg files and the current shape of the rpmfusion repository. Thoses are availlabe in the related updates-testing repository. Nicolas (kwizart) From adamwill at shaw.ca Mon Apr 26 22:27:31 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Mon Apr 26 22:27:37 2010 Subject: Request for an F-12 branch for psb packages Message-ID: <1272313651.1983.10.camel@x60> Hi, everyone. When I first brought xorg-x11-drv-psb into Fusion, I asked not to have an F12 branch, as it was impossible to use the driver on F12. However, now I have some patches from Olivier Blin which should make F12 use possible, so can I please request an F-12 branch for the packages: xorg-x11-drv-psb libdrm-poulsbo psb-firmware xpsb-glx psb-kmod thanks! Please just copy over from F-11, if possible, to kick them off. If I should ask this somewhere else, please let me know where... -- adamw From kwizart at gmail.com Mon Apr 26 23:01:23 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Mon Apr 26 23:01:26 2010 Subject: Request for an F-12 branch for psb packages In-Reply-To: <1272313651.1983.10.camel@x60> References: <1272313651.1983.10.camel@x60> Message-ID: 2010/4/26 Adam Williamson : > Hi, everyone. When I first brought xorg-x11-drv-psb into Fusion, I asked > not to have an F12 branch, as it was impossible to use the driver on > F12. However, now I have some patches from Olivier Blin which should > make F12 use possible, so can I please request an F-12 branch for the > packages: > > xorg-x11-drv-psb > libdrm-poulsbo > psb-firmware > xpsb-glx > psb-kmod Can you do cvs request blocking #33 witth the appropriate updated cvs request (with your email as login) Thx for your work. From dominik at greysector.net Tue Apr 27 01:27:54 2010 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Tue Apr 27 01:27:55 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? In-Reply-To: References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> On Monday, 26 April 2010 at 06:39, Chen Lei wrote: > Hi all. > > Debian guys already split ffmepg into two parts and ship them separately > in debian and debian-multimedia. And I realized that RHEL5 also have > a stripped patent-free qffmpeg package. > See http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm > Could we also split it for fedora and rpmfusion? I think it'll benefit > fedora a lot. Interesting, but I see the only codec it has is mjpeg. Everything else is disabled and removed from the source tarball. I don't think it's useful for much, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise. You could start with providing a list of applications that could go into Fedora with a dependency on a stripped-down ffmpeg package and a list of codecs that we would need to have in such package for it to be usable with these applications. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From supercyper at 163.com Tue Apr 27 04:04:56 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Tue Apr 27 04:05:08 2010 Subject: builder.wilsonet.com hangs? In-Reply-To: <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1795964.194a.1283d028c89.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> I cannot build any packages on plague since yesterday. Anyone can help me? Thank you. Regards. Chen Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100427/0656bf4c/attachment.html From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 27 08:53:22 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 27 08:53:25 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> Message-ID: <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> Adam Williamson wrote on 26.04.2010 21:06: > [...] I > don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but > labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really > shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for > Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. There iirc was a small window when rawhide branched when F13 builds where done using rawhide. Xavier changed it back then and I did a lot of other adjustments in the past weeks, so everything should be sane now (and mostly was duing all that time; yes, that's the long story short, but there is nothing to worry about afaics). The only remaining thing that need fixing is a rebuild for those packages that were build against rawhide and contain "fc14" in their name. (libmms, gnome-mplayer, gecko-mediaplayer). That's on my todo list. BTW, in you blog post you wrote """ There?s a secondary problem with F13, which is that as far as RPM Fusion is concerned, F13 doesn?t seem to exist. """ That's incorrect. Everything is on the servers, but the 13 repo is not under development/13 -- instead there is an empty one in the final place and everything is in the updates and updates-testing repos for now, as that's easier to handle with our push scripts. CU knurd From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 27 08:56:16 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 27 08:56:26 2010 Subject: builder.wilsonet.com hangs? In-Reply-To: <1795964.194a.1283d028c89.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> References: <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> <1795964.194a.1283d028c89.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Message-ID: <4BD68A90.9030000@leemhuis.info> Chen Lei wrote on 27.04.2010 04:04: > I cannot build any packages on plague since yesterday. > > Anyone can help me? Thank you. There is a problem that is not simply fixed; I will need to talk to the one that hosts the builder before things can move on again. Please be patient, sorry for the trouble. CU knurd From kwizart at gmail.com Tue Apr 27 10:31:10 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Tue Apr 27 10:31:12 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? In-Reply-To: <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: 2010/4/27 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski : > On Monday, 26 April 2010 at 06:39, Chen Lei wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Debian guys already split ffmepg into two parts and ship them separately >> in debian and debian-multimedia. And I realized that RHEL5 also have >> a stripped patent-free qffmpeg package. >> See http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.src.rpm >> Could we also split it for fedora and rpmfusion? I think it'll benefit >> fedora a lot. > > Interesting, but I see the only codec it has is mjpeg. Everything else is > disabled and removed from the source tarball. I don't think it's useful > for much, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise. > > You could start with providing a list of applications that could go into > Fedora with a dependency on a stripped-down ffmpeg package and a list > of codecs that we would need to have in such package for it to be usable > with these applications. Above libavcodec and the related codec that would be involved, there are lot of others features that FFmpeg provides. One probably cannot imagine the number of fedora packages using or that could use one or the other FFmpeg library without requesting a particular patented codec. One example that we already have is picard-freeworld which rely on libavformat/libavcodec to extract some informations from the multimedia file and cannot be enabled in the fedora package itself because the FFmpeg headers aren't present. If we could have a basic FFmpeg in Fedora, with the whole set of headers, then we could avoid to split this package. Because that's a hard mess. The downside would be to verify each time either or not picard with FFmpeg enabled rely on a function that might not be present in the light fedora version of FFmpeg. Others packages that will benefit from this is blender, linphone (update to 3.0.0 is avoided in Fedora because it mandotary needs FFmpeg), vlc (currently in review within fedora), pulseaudio-libs. (using a static version currently) and probably many others. The other big subject is: "Is such patentless FFmpeg could enable GPU accelereated Video" , either with libvdpau or libva ? That's probably a question that worth to ask to FE-Legal. But technically having FFmpeg in Fedora can be possible and would worth it, even if no more codec are added. The other side of the question is , Will we experience unrecoverable regressions with such split ? Because if it is possible, then we might just simply do it. To have FFmpeg in Fedora, I would just built the library from stripped source with a special suffix SONAME and using alternatives with a low number for the pc files. Then with the same revision of the unstripped sources, the standard version only with libavcodec. (along with a tweaked library using the same SONAME). That way, codec that was not available in the package built with the fedora FFmpeg version will become available. Nicolas (kwizart) From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 12:24:20 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 12:24:21 2010 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427102422.74E80684F8@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |supercyper@163.com --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-04-27 12:24:19 --- Lucian, ping? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From adamwill at shaw.ca Tue Apr 27 14:05:13 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:05:22 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> Message-ID: <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:56 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > Okay, that's great - I'll post an update when I understand the process > more. I have here a freshly installed F13 system; how am I supposed to > enable Fusion on it? The download page gives me options for '10, 11 and > 12' or 'Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot aka. what > will become Fedora 13' (which seems to link to a 'rawhide' package); > there should be separate links for Rawhide and 'Alpha, Beta, Preview, > RC' etc. Should I use the 'rawhide' link? Is there no easy way to set it > up? Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with PackageKit. So I guess that needs to be fixed, and the text on the page explaining how to set up Fusion does too (I'd be happy to do that but I don't think I have access to it). For maintainers, we can just push F13 stuff the same way as for stable releases? -- adamw From adamwill at shaw.ca Tue Apr 27 13:56:04 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:06:00 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 08:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 26.04.2010 21:06: > > [...] I > > don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but > > labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really > > shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for > > Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. > > There iirc was a small window when rawhide branched when F13 builds > where done using rawhide. Xavier changed it back then and I did a lot of > other adjustments in the past weeks, so everything should be sane now > (and mostly was duing all that time; yes, that's the long story short, > but there is nothing to worry about afaics). > > The only remaining thing that need fixing is a rebuild for those > packages that were build against rawhide and contain "fc14" in their > name. (libmms, gnome-mplayer, gecko-mediaplayer). That's on my todo list. > > BTW, in you blog post you wrote > """ > There?s a secondary problem with F13, which is that as far as RPM Fusion > is concerned, F13 doesn?t seem to exist. > """ > That's incorrect. Everything is on the servers, but the 13 repo is not > under development/13 -- instead there is an empty one in the final place > and everything is in the updates and updates-testing repos for now, as > that's easier to handle with our push scripts. Okay, that's great - I'll post an update when I understand the process more. I have here a freshly installed F13 system; how am I supposed to enable Fusion on it? The download page gives me options for '10, 11 and 12' or 'Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot aka. what will become Fedora 13' (which seems to link to a 'rawhide' package); there should be separate links for Rawhide and 'Alpha, Beta, Preview, RC' etc. Should I use the 'rawhide' link? Is there no easy way to set it up? -- adamw From adamwill at shaw.ca Tue Apr 27 14:11:19 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:11:31 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> Message-ID: <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except > that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: > > GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read > file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 > > I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with > PackageKit. Sorry for the conversation with myself :) it seems that it initially installed rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. -- adamw From kwizart at gmail.com Tue Apr 27 14:30:52 2010 From: kwizart at gmail.com (Nicolas Chauvet) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:30:54 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> Message-ID: 2010/4/27 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >> >> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >> >> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >> PackageKit. > > Sorry for the conversation with myself :) > > it seems that it initially installed > rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with > rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK > refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with > yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. I think I've raised this point earlier, it could be better to have a symlink per fedora release That's what we were using during the livna lifetime IIRC. so rpmfusion-free-release-13.rpm at the root of the website will point to free/fedora/releases/13/Everything/i386/os/rpmfusion-release-13-1.noarch.rpm when populated. or eventually free/fedora/updates/13/i386/rpmfusion-release-13-2.noarch.rpm if updated. It will also be easier to maintain when one want to write docs and howto for a given fedora release and avoid key missmatch on legacy release. Nicolas (kwizart) From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 27 14:42:50 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:42:53 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> Message-ID: <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:11: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >> >> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >> >> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >> PackageKit. > > Sorry for the conversation with myself :) > > it seems that it initially installed > rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with > rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK > refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with > yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates /me wanders of to do that Cu knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 14:45:13 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:45:15 2010 Subject: [Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427124516.2411668669@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|4 |33 Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2010-04-27 14:45:12 --- Re-opening to request an F12 CVS branch, now there's a chance we can make the driver work on F12 (thanks to Olivier Blin). Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-psb , libdrm-poulsbo , psb-firmware , psb-kmod , xpsb-glx Short Description: Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) Owners: adamwill Branches: F12 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From adamwill at shaw.ca Tue Apr 27 14:46:50 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:46:57 2010 Subject: Request for an F-12 branch for psb packages In-Reply-To: References: <1272313651.1983.10.camel@x60> Message-ID: <1272372410.5401.14.camel@x60> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 23:01 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2010/4/26 Adam Williamson : > > Hi, everyone. When I first brought xorg-x11-drv-psb into Fusion, I asked > > not to have an F12 branch, as it was impossible to use the driver on > > F12. However, now I have some patches from Olivier Blin which should > > make F12 use possible, so can I please request an F-12 branch for the > > packages: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-psb > > libdrm-poulsbo > > psb-firmware > > xpsb-glx > > psb-kmod > Can you do cvs request blocking #33 witth the appropriate updated cvs > request (with your email as login) > > Thx for your work. Thanks, Nic - I've re-opened the initial review request: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 made it block bug #33, and added the new CVS request. Thanks again. -- adamw From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 27 14:56:23 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:56:31 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <4BD6DEF7.6030309@leemhuis.info> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 27.04.2010 14:42: > Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:11: >> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >>> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >>> >>> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >>> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >>> >>> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >>> PackageKit. >> >> Sorry for the conversation with myself :) >> >> it seems that it initially installed >> rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with >> rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK >> refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with >> yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. > > That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" > -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest > rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates > > /me wanders of to do that Looks like it will take a little longer as one packages that is needed was not build for some reason. CU knurd From adamwill at shaw.ca Tue Apr 27 14:57:45 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Tue Apr 27 14:57:53 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1272373065.5401.22.camel@x60> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" > -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest > rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates > > /me wanders of to do that I've updated the text on the web page (now I realized I just needed a Wiki account :>). One other thing I noticed - the links for Rawhide seem to be 404. -- adamw From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 27 15:16:41 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue Apr 27 15:16:42 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <1272373065.5401.22.camel@x60> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> <1272373065.5401.22.camel@x60> Message-ID: <4BD6E3B9.7020205@leemhuis.info> Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:57: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" >> -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest >> rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates >> /me wanders of to do that > > I've updated the text on the web page (now I realized I just needed a > Wiki account :>). > One other thing I noticed - the links for Rawhide seem to be 404. Noticed that in parallel :-/ Pushed a new release packages two days ago and forgot to adjust the link :-/ Cu knurd From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 15:28:32 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 27 15:28:26 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-27 Message-ID: <20100427132833.0159824031@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: 1 NEW rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 : RPM Fusion (nonfree) Repository Configuration ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 3 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 12: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-12-2 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-13.0-1.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 openmotif-2.3.3-1.fc11 ---------------------- * Wed Mar 31 2010 Jochen Schmitt 2.3.3-1 - New upstream releasee - Make an unhappy RH employee happy rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-2 ------------------------------ * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 11-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 - mark config file as noreplace which was missing for some strange reason From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 16:25:13 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Tue Apr 27 16:25:05 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-27 Message-ID: <20100427142513.F3D1B2433D@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 13: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-13-2 ------------------------------ * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-2 - fix compatibility symlink ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-14-0.2 -------------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 14-0.2 - fix compatibility symlink From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 19:52:32 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 19:52:33 2010 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427175236.22B0E68761@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa 2010-04-27 19:52:29 --- updated files to 2.8.0-RC2 SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.8-0.1.RC2.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 21:46:38 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 21:46:41 2010 Subject: [Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427194642.27F3868760@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@gmail.com Blocks|33 | --- Comment #20 from NicolasChauvet 2010-04-27 21:46:36 --- This seems to have been fixed already, releasing cvs request -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 23:36:03 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 23:36:04 2010 Subject: [Bug 952] Review request: Maelstrom - Space combat game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427213607.9B3B9684A0@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Tue Apr 27 23:36:36 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Tue Apr 27 23:36:37 2010 Subject: [Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427213640.975FA68763@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 00:25:56 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 00:25:57 2010 Subject: [Bug 775] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100427222600.DB2AE68754@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 --- Comment #25 from NicolasChauvet 2010-04-28 00:25:55 --- cvs request was proceded for the F-12 branch, but I'm not sure if ACL was setup. I'm currently investigating. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 05:55:05 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 05:55:08 2010 Subject: [Bug 472] Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428035506.20BFF6875D@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-04-28 05:55:03 --- (In reply to comment #8) > updated files to 2.8.0-RC2 > SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.8-0.1.RC2.fc13.src.rpm > SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec Thanks, some people in redhat bugzilla request for this program as well as GNS3, I'll try to review this package in two weeks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 10:52:43 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Wed Apr 28 10:52:41 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-28 Message-ID: <20100428085243.F02F724172@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 4 qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.3.4-1.fc13 rpmfusion-free-release-13-2 xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc13 xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 12: 2 NEW mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc12 : Mock config files for the RPM Fusion Free Repository NEW rpmfusion-free-release-12-2 : RPM Fusion (free) Repository Configuration ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 3 (!) buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-23 : INVALID rebuild, not published! xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc12 xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc12 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: 6 mock-rpmfusion-free-12.1-1.fc11 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.226760-1.fc11 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.226760-1.fc11 rpmfusion-free-release-11-2 NEW xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc11 : Extensions targets and matches for iptables NEW xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc11 : Kernel module (kmod) for xtables-addons ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 2 xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc11 xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 rpmfusion-free-release-14-0.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.3.4-1.fc13 ----------------------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 Karel Voln? 0.3.4-1 - version bump rpmfusion-free-release-13-2 --------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-2 - fix compatibility symlink xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc13 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc13 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 12: mock-rpmfusion-free-13.0-1.fc12 ------------------------------- * Tue Apr 13 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 13.0-1 - Update to 13.0 rpmfusion-free-release-12-2 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-23 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 22 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-23 - rebuilt xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc12 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-2 - rebuilt xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc12 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: mock-rpmfusion-free-12.1-1.fc11 ------------------------------- * Sat Nov 14 2009 Nicolas Chauvet - 12.1-1 - Resync with mock 0.19 (update local repos) - ccache is now available on EL5 - avoid to define the macro 'distribution' - Add buildsys repos (disabled by default). * Wed Nov 04 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 12.0-1 - Update to 12.0 (i686 by default) - Provides some macros - Fix fedora koji local repository - Bump rawhide to fc13 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.226760-1.fc11 --------------------------------- * Wed Feb 17 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.226760-1 - Update to build 226760 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.226760-1.fc11 -------------------------------------- * Wed Feb 17 2010 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.226760-1 - Update to upstream build 226760 - Added vmxnet3 patch rpmfusion-free-release-11-2 --------------------------- * Fri Apr 16 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 12-2 - Add keys for F13 and Rawhide/F14 xtables-addons-1.24-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build xtables-addons-kmod-1.24-1.fc11 ------------------------------- * Thu Mar 18 2010 Chen Lei - 1.24-1 - initial rpm build ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: xtables-addons-1.25-1.fc11 -------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-2 - rebuilt xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc11 ------------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Chen Lei - 1.25-1 - update to 1.25 * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: rpmfusion-free-release-14-0.2 ----------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 14-0.2 - fix compatibility symlink From fedora at leemhuis.info Wed Apr 28 10:59:18 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Wed Apr 28 10:59:20 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <4BD6DEF7.6030309@leemhuis.info> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> <4BD6DEF7.6030309@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <4BD7F8E6.1010700@leemhuis.info> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 27.04.2010 14:56: > > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 27.04.2010 14:42: >> Adam Williamson wrote on 27.04.2010 14:11: >>> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 13:05 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>>> Okay, so I used the link for 10, 11, 12 and that almost works, except >>>> that it gets the GPG key stuff wrong: >>>> >>>> GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read >>>> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-13-x86_64 >>>> >>>> I have to use --nogpgcheck with yum, can't install things with >>>> PackageKit. >>> >>> Sorry for the conversation with myself :) >>> >>> it seems that it initially installed >>> rpmfusion-free-release-10-5.noarch , with >>> rpmfusion-free-release-13-1.noarch available as an update (but PK >>> refuses to update it because of the key issue). If I update to 13-1 with >>> yum --nogpgcheck, the GPG key file now shows up. >> >> That's basically how it's supposed to work except for the "nogpgcheck" >> -- that problem should vanish once I move the latest >> rpmfusion-free-release from updates-testing to updates >> >> /me wanders of to do that > > Looks like it will take a little longer as one packages that is needed > was not build for some reason. Everything in place now. A simple rpm -Uvh http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm on any freshly installed Fedora 11, 12 or 13 will do the right thing now. Yes, the release packages will get updated on the first run on F12 and F13, but the above packages have all the required keys, so everything should work smoothly CU knurd From supercyper at 163.com Wed Apr 28 11:16:49 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Wed Apr 28 11:16:57 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? In-Reply-To: References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <19ea551.13e0e.12843b44cac.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> On 2010-04-27 16:31:10，"Nicolas Chauvet" Wrote ： >To have FFmpeg in Fedora, I would just built the library from stripped >source with a special suffix SONAME and using alternatives with a low >number for the pc files. Then with the same revision of the unstripped >sources, the standard version only with libavcodec. (along with a >tweaked library using the same SONAME). That way, codec that was not >available in the package built with the fedora FFmpeg version will >become available. > > >Nicolas (kwizart) Debian ffmpeg maintainers simply disabled some codecs in %configure instead of strip the source code as before. http://supercyper.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg/debian/README.Source But FE-legal seems much more strict than debian-legal, I wonder whether we can do it in the same way. Another thing need to consider is how many codecs could be approved by FE-legal, can we ship as many codecs as debian counterpart? http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ffmpeg Regard, Chen Lei Chen Lei 网易为中小企业免费提供企业邮箱（自主域名） -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100428/d53d934b/attachment.html From supercyper at 163.com Wed Apr 28 11:07:39 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Wed Apr 28 11:23:22 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? In-Reply-To: References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> Message-ID: <530418.13b93.12843abe8c0.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> On 2010-04-27 16:31:10，"Nicolas Chauvet" Wrote ： >To have FFmpeg in Fedora, I would just built the library from stripped >source with a special suffix SONAME and using alternatives with a low >number for the pc files. Then with the same revision of the unstripped >sources, the standard version only with libavcodec. (along with a >tweaked library using the same SONAME). That way, codec that was not >available in the package built with the fedora FFmpeg version will >become available. > > >Nicolas (kwizart) Debian ffmpeg maintainers simply disabled some codecs in %configure instead of strip the source code as before. http://supercyper.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg/debian/README.Source But FE-legal seems much more strict than debian-legal, I wonder whether we can do it in the same way. Another thing need to consider is how many codecs could be approved by FE-legal, can we ship as many codecs as debian counterpart? http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ffmpeg Regard, Chen Lei Chen Lei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100428/93dc669d/attachment.html From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 14:29:57 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:29:59 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428123000.5E4E5687BB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 14:30:18 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:30:24 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428123021.546C0687BB@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |rdieter@math.unl.edu |review@rpmfusion.org | Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 14:44:16 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:44:17 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428124418.F3240687C5@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter@math.unl.edu | Blocks|3 |4 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2010-04-28 14:44:15 --- Fairly simple package, though a hefty perl script at that. naming: ok scriplets: ok (none) MUST: %files: as discussed on irc, %{_sysconfdir}/get_iplayer/ needs to be owned SHOULD: add to %files: %doc README licensing: ok runtime: ok, I only verified basic functionality, fetching listings. SHOULD: consider using 'install -p' to preserve timestamps I think noarch should be ok here, provided all the Requires: deps are available on all archs. I trust you can address the relatively minor MUST item and look at the SHOULD's, prior to building. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 14:49:58 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:49:59 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428125001.0B34768304@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 dwmw2@infradead.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #2 from dwmw2@infradead.org 2010-04-28 14:49:57 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: get_iplayer Short Description: Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes Owners: dwmw2 Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Wed Apr 28 14:55:12 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:55:14 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428125514.F2569687BC@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 NicolasChauvet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From adamwill at shaw.ca Wed Apr 28 14:58:00 2010 From: adamwill at shaw.ca (Adam Williamson) Date: Wed Apr 28 14:58:14 2010 Subject: rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide In-Reply-To: <4BD7F8E6.1010700@leemhuis.info> References: <4B7BAAA8.20804@hhs.nl> <4B7DB57C.5040903@leemhuis.info> <1272308810.1983.7.camel@x60> <4BD689E2.3030604@leemhuis.info> <1272369364.5401.4.camel@x60> <1272369913.5401.6.camel@x60> <1272370279.5401.8.camel@x60> <4BD6DBCA.1050201@leemhuis.info> <4BD6DEF7.6030309@leemhuis.info> <4BD7F8E6.1010700@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1272459480.2054.14.camel@x60> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:59 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Everything in place now. A simple > > rpm -Uvh > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm > > on any freshly installed Fedora 11, 12 or 13 will do the right thing > now. Yes, the release packages will get updated on the first run on F12 > and F13, but the above packages have all the required keys, so > everything should work smoothly awesome, thanks - I think we're all in order for F13 then. at F13 release time I think all we'll need to do is update the wording on the site not to mention pre-releases and so on. Then the next important point is when F14 branches from Rawhide, which will be shortly after F13 comes out AIUI. then we'd need to have an F14 branch and release package and so on, and update the page again... -- adamw From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 01:24:48 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 29 01:24:50 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428232453.5B75A684AD@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschny 2010-04-29 01:24:47 --- > 1.It may be better to add some more Categories for desktop file. Ok, X-AudioVideoCapture added. > 2. I prefer to replace Icon=/usr/share/pixmaps/guvcview/guvcview.png > with Icon=guvcview in desktop file. That doesn't work, because the icon file is within a subdir, and subdirs are not searched by default. > 3./usr/share/doc/guvcview-1.3.1/INSTALL should be removed. Done. All files updated, same location. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 01:46:17 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 29 01:46:18 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428234622.8195468808@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 Chris Nolan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris@cenolan.com --- Comment #3 from Chris Nolan 2010-04-29 01:46:17 --- Great to see this here, but didn't upstream drop support for this [1]? What is the status, did someone else take over upstream maintenance? [1] http://linuxcentre.net/getiplayer -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 01:57:45 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 29 01:57:47 2010 Subject: [Bug 1174] Review request: get_iplayer - Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100428235750.DCECB68730@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 --- Comment #4 from dwmw2@infradead.org 2010-04-29 01:57:45 --- We're getting it from the new upstream: http://github.com/jjl/get_iplayer -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 02:59:18 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 29 02:59:20 2010 Subject: [Bug 1071] Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100429005923.A79A968816@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-04-29 02:59:16 --- +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. <>a3df7d7de4574b93b16fd570e3eed8cf [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [N/A] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 09:42:00 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 29 09:41:58 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429074200.98B5924172@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 1 nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 3 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc12 nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc12 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc12 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 1 nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc13 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-4 - Update internal to 195.36.24 - Avoid failure on NV_CTRL_NO_SCANOUT when not supported in legacy drivers. ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc12 ---------------------------- * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc12 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-4 - Update internal to 195.36.24 - Avoid failure on NV_CTRL_NO_SCANOUT when not supported in legacy drivers. * Sun Feb 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-3.4 - Update internal version to 195.36.08 - Add patch for -lm xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-195.36.24-1.fc12 ------------------------------------ * Sat Apr 24 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1:195.36.24-1 - Update to 195.36.24 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc11 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-4 - Update internal to 195.36.24 - Avoid failure on NV_CTRL_NO_SCANOUT when not supported in legacy drivers. * Sun Feb 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-3.4 - Update internal version to 195.36.08 - Add patch for -lm ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: nvidia-settings-1.0-4.fc14 -------------------------- * Wed Apr 28 2010 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.0-4 - Update internal to 195.36.24 - Avoid failure on NV_CTRL_NO_SCANOUT when not supported in legacy drivers. From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 09:42:08 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 29 09:42:08 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429074208.B885F24172@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: 1 rpmfusion-free-release-13-2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 1 NEW get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc13 : Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 1 NEW get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12 : Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 NEW get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc14 : Lists, Records and Streams BBC iPlayer TV and Radio programmes VirtualBox-OSE-3.2.0-0.1.beta1.fc14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 13: rpmfusion-free-release-13-2 --------------------------- * Mon Apr 26 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 13-2 - fix compatibility symlink ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc13 ----------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.76-1 - Initial package ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12 ----------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.76-1 - Initial package ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc14 ----------------------- * Tue Apr 20 2010 David Woodhouse 2.76-1 - Initial package VirtualBox-OSE-3.2.0-0.1.beta1.fc14 ----------------------------------- * Wed Apr 28 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.2.0-0.1.beta1 - 3.2.0 beta - Build i686 on el6 From mail at marcus-moeller.de Thu Apr 29 09:59:21 2010 From: mail at marcus-moeller.de (Marcus Moeller) Date: Thu Apr 29 10:06:36 2010 Subject: x264 - EL6 Test build Message-ID: Hi, I am doing some test builds on EL6 and noticed the following problem in x264 (at least while gpac is disabled): + rm '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/x264-0.0.0-0.27.20100116git3d0f110.el6.i386/usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/x264.pc' rm: cannot remove `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/x264-0.0.0-0.27.20100116git3d0f110.el6.i386/usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/x264.pc': No such file or directory Best Regards Marcus From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 29 11:01:15 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 29 11:06:40 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 13 - 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429090115.3516.76710@faldor.intranet> ====================================================================== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! ====================================================================== Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): compat-python24-libxml2 smc Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): j.w.r.degoede AT hhs nl smc jsteffan AT fedoraproject org compat-python24-libxml2 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-13-i386: compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.6-1.fc12.i686 requires libxml2 = 0:2.7.6 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-13-x86_64: compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.6-1.fc12.x86_64 requires libxml2 = 0:2.7.6 smc-1.9-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libboost_system.so.5()(64bit) smc-1.9-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.5()(64bit) From mschwendt at gmail.com Thu Apr 29 11:01:55 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu Apr 29 11:08:52 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion nonfree Fedora 13 - 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429090155.3519.65701@faldor.intranet> ====================================================================== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! ====================================================================== Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): mednafen Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): belegdol AT gmail com mednafen ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-13-i386: mednafen-0.8.12-1.0.8.C.fc12.i586 requires libcdio.so.10 mednafen-0.8.12-1.0.8.C.fc12.i586 requires libcdio.so.10(CDIO_10) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-13-x86_64: mednafen-0.8.12-1.0.8.C.fc12.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.10(CDIO_10)(64bit) mednafen-0.8.12-1.0.8.C.fc12.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.10()(64bit) From hicham.haouari at gmail.com Thu Apr 29 11:56:23 2010 From: hicham.haouari at gmail.com (Hicham Haouari) Date: Thu Apr 29 11:56:25 2010 Subject: Drop vboxgtk Message-ID: Hi All, I want to drop vboxgtk from rpmfusion because : - It is dead upstream - VirtualBox API changed from 3.0.x to 3.1.x causing vboxgtk to be non-functional. Please tell me which procedures I should follow Best Regards, Hicham -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100429/cf86e47f/attachment.html From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 15:33:25 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 29 15:33:18 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429133325.7BD962463C@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: 2 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.2 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.2 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 4 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.6 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.6 nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc12.1 wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/13: nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc13.2 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.24-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc13.2 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.25-1.fc12.6 ------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 173.14.25-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.16-1.fc12.6 ---------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 96.43.16-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel nvidia-kmod-195.36.24-1.fc12.1 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:195.36.24-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel wl-kmod-5.60.48.36-1.fc12.9 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 5.60.48.36-1.9 - rebuild for new kernel From rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 15:34:15 2010 From: rpmfusion-pkgs-report at rpmfusion.org (rpmfusion-pkgs-report@rpmfusion.org) Date: Thu Apr 29 15:34:09 2010 Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-04-29 Message-ID: <20100429133415.BC12A243B3@se03.es.rpmfusion.net> ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 12 em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.2 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.18 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.17 NEW omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.4.svn288.fc13.2 : Kernel module for HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite and Compal laptops open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.2 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.9 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.2 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.9 staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-2.fc13.1 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.2 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.2 xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc13.1 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 12 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-24 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.21 kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.35 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.34 omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.15 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.5 openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.6 rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.26 rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.18 rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.26 staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.10 west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.4 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.2.0-0.1.beta1.fc14 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: em8300-kmod-0.18.0-1.fc13.2 --------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.18.0-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc13.18 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.18 - rebuild for new kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc13.17 ------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.17 - rebuild for new kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.4.svn288.fc13.2 ------------------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.4.svn288.2 - rebuild for new kernel * Sun Apr 25 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.4.svn288.1 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc13.2 ---------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc13.9 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.9 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc13.2 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.2 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc13.9 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.9 - rebuild for new kernel staging-kmod-2.6.33.2-2.fc13.1 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.33.2-2.1 - rebuild for new kernel VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.6-1.fc13.2 ---------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 3.1.6-1.2 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc13.2 -------------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.2 - rebuild for new kernel xtables-addons-kmod-1.25-1.fc13.1 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.25-1.1 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-12-24 ------------------------------ * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:12-24 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.32.12-114.fc12 em8300-kmod-0.17.4-1.fc12.21 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.4-1.21 - rebuild for new kernel kqemu-kmod-1.4.0-0.2.pre1.fc12.35 --------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0-0.2.pre1.35 - rebuild for new kernel ndiswrapper-kmod-1.54-4.fc12.34 ------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.54-4.34 - rebuild for new kernel omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.3.svn288.fc12.15 ------------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.20090714-0.3.svn288.15 - rebuild for new kernel open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.243334-1.fc12.5 ---------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.243334-1.5 - rebuild for new kernel openafs-kmod-1.4.12-1.fc12.6 ---------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.12-1.6 - rebuild for new kernel rt2860-kmod-2.1.2.0-3.fc12.26 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-3.26 - rebuild for new kernel rt2870-kmod-2.1.2.0-6.fc12.18 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.2.0-6.18 - rebuild for new kernel rt3070-kmod-2.1.1.0-3.fc12.26 ----------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.1.1.0-3.26 - rebuild for new kernel staging-kmod-2.6.32.8-1.fc12.10 ------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 2.6.32.8-1.10 - rebuild for new kernel west-chamber-kmod-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.4 -------------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.1-4.20100405svn.4 - rebuild for new kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.2.0-0.1.beta1.fc14 ---------------------------------------- * Thu Apr 29 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.2.0-0.1.beta1 - Beta * Fri Mar 26 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.6-1 - New release * Wed Feb 17 2010 Lubomir Rintel - 3.1.4-1 - New release From noreply at rpmfusion.org Thu Apr 29 16:55:47 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Thu Apr 29 16:55:51 2010 Subject: [Bug 562] Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100429145550.52BC668850@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Stewart Adam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #7 from Stewart Adam 2010-04-29 16:55:46 --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: catalyst-kmod New Branches: F-12 Catalyst 10.4 (finally) supports the X server version used in F12. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dominik at greysector.net Fri Apr 30 00:07:19 2010 From: dominik at greysector.net (Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski) Date: Fri Apr 30 00:36:42 2010 Subject: x264 ABI change in rawhide Message-ID: <20100429220718.GA20768@mokona.greysector.net> Hi all, Current x264 snapshot is about to land in rawhide. FFmpeg and MPlayer support it just fine, so I'll rebuild them as soon as the x264 build completes. Other packages that need rebuild are: avidemux gstreamer-plugins-ugly libquicktime vlc I will be rebuilding them over the weekend if the maintainers don't react. Please reply in this thread if you will take care of the rebuild yourself. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" From kevin.kofler at chello.at Fri Apr 30 08:53:38 2010 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Fri Apr 30 08:53:52 2010 Subject: Is there any plan to split ffmpeg into ffmpeg(without patent issue) and ffmeeg-freeworld? References: <20100425164258.GA8604@mokona.greysector.net> <20100425113538.GB5865@mokona.greysector.net> <15ecbe1.344d.12835197e25.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <4BD44B34.80007@leemhuis.info> <20100426232753.GA19440@mokona.greysector.net> <530418.13b93.12843abe8c0.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Message-ID: Chen Lei wrote: > Debian ffmpeg maintainers simply disabled some codecs in %configure > instead of strip the source code as before. > > http://supercyper.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg/debian/README.Source > > But FE-legal seems much more strict than debian-legal, I wonder whether we > can do it in the same way. No. Fedora's position is that patent-encumbered code cannot be shipped at all, not even in the SRPM. Software patents in the US also apply to source code, at least according to Red Hat's lawyers. > Another thing need to consider is how many codecs could be approved by FE- > legal, can we ship as many codecs as debian counterpart? > http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ffmpeg No. Debian considers all decoders fair game to ship and only restricts encoders, for whatever reason. There is nothing in US patent law which would make decoders any less subject to patents than encoders. So Fedora is not that lax. Kevin Kofler From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 11:10:20 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 11:10:25 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 Message-ID: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> ====================================================================== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! ====================================================================== Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): bsnes cairo-dock ffmpegthumbnailer get_iplayer lame ogmrip west-chamber-kmod xtables-addons Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): belegdol AT gmail com bsnes dwmw2 AT infradead org get_iplayer giallu AT gmail com ogmrip k AT kaio me west-chamber-kmod (1 co-owner) magnus.tuominen AT gmail com ffmpegthumbnailer mtasaka AT ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac jp cairo-dock rpm AT greysector net lame supercyper AT 163 com xtables-addons (1 co-owner) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc: cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-plug-ins = 0:2.1.3.7-1.fc12 ogmrip-devel-0.13.4-1.fc12.ppc requires ogmrip = 0:0.13.4-1.fc12 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc64: lame-3.98.3-1.fc12.ppc64 requires lame-libs = 0:3.98.3-1.fc12 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: akmod-west-chamber-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.ppc requires west-chamber-kmod-common >= 0:0.0.1 bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 bsnes-supergameboy-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.ppc64 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0()(64bit) ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc64: bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc64 requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-x86_64: ffmpegthumbnailer-devel-2.0.1-1.fc12.i686 requires libffmpegthumbnailer.so.4 xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.i686 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0 From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 11:10:39 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 11:10:43 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion nonfree Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 Message-ID: <20100430091039.6165.53008@faldor.intranet> ====================================================================== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! ====================================================================== Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): libcapsimage mame qmc2 sdlmame sdlmame-data Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): belegdol AT gmail com mame qmc2 sdlmame-data sdlmame lxtnow AT gmail com libcapsimage ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-12-ppc: libcapsimage-devel-2.0.0-10.fc11.ppc requires libcapsimage = 0:2.0.0-10.fc11 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-12-ppc: qmc2-sdlmame-0.2-0.17.b13.fc12.ppc requires qmc2 = 0:0.2-0.17.b13.fc12 sdlmame-tools-0136-1.fc12.ppc requires sdlmame = 0:0136-1.fc12 ====================================================================== Broken packages in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-12-ppc64: mame-tools-0.137-4.fc12.ppc64 requires mame = 0:0.137-4.fc12 sdlmame-data-0137-1.fc12.noarch requires sdlmame >= 0:0137 From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 11:30:36 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 11:30:43 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <20100430113036.1ff43e00@faldor.intranet> As this one appeared to be odd: > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-x86_64: > > ffmpegthumbnailer-devel-2.0.1-1.fc12.i686 requires libffmpegthumbnailer.so.4 > xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.i686 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0 Multilib compose didn't pull in the dependencies here. Just checked several other i686 -devel packages in the x86_64 repo, and it has stopped working weeks ago. The F12 release repo is not affected. Configuration issue? From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Fri Apr 30 11:39:46 2010 From: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Mamoru Tasaka) Date: Fri Apr 30 11:46:37 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <4BDAA562.2010202@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Michael Schwendt wrote, at 04/30/2010 06:10 PM +9:00: > ====================================================================== > The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > ====================================================================== > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc: > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-plug-ins = 0:2.1.3.7-1.fc12 > ogmrip-devel-0.13.4-1.fc12.ppc requires ogmrip = 0:0.13.4-1.fc12 > > > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc64: > > lame-3.98.3-1.fc12.ppc64 requires lame-libs = 0:3.98.3-1.fc12 > > > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: > > akmod-west-chamber-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.ppc requires west-chamber-kmod-common>= 0:0.0.1 > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > bsnes-supergameboy-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump > xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.ppc64 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0()(64bit) > > > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc64: > > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc64 requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump > > > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-x86_64: > > ffmpegthumbnailer-devel-2.0.1-1.fc12.i686 requires libffmpegthumbnailer.so.4 > xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.i686 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0 > I guess these are buildsys side issue. For example cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 is actually built: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6875-cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12/ Recently I had to try rebuilding my package several times because sometimes something went wrong on buildsys like: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Job failed on arch ppc64: couldn't download result files from builder 'https://bombadil.infradead.org:8888'. Please contact the build system administrator. ------------------------------------------------------------------ I guess even if buildsys says "build succeeded" sometimes downloading the rebuilt rpms are failing. Regards, Mamoru From supercyper at 163.com Fri Apr 30 12:02:07 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Fri Apr 30 12:02:17 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <5d4428.eb0c.1284e2a7e97.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> On 2010-04-30 17:10:20，"Michael Schwendt" wrote： >====================================================================== >The results in this summary consider Test Updates! >====================================================================== > >Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): > > bsnes > cairo-dock > ffmpegthumbnailer > get_iplayer > lame > ogmrip > west-chamber-kmod > xtables-addons > > >Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): > > belegdol AT gmail com > bsnes > > dwmw2 AT infradead org > get_iplayer > > giallu AT gmail com > ogmrip > > k AT kaio me > west-chamber-kmod (1 co-owner) > > magnus.tuominen AT gmail com > ffmpegthumbnailer > > mtasaka AT ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac jp > cairo-dock > > rpm AT greysector net > lame > > supercyper AT 163 com > xtables-addons (1 co-owner) > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc: > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-plug-ins = 0:2.1.3.7-1.fc12 > ogmrip-devel-0.13.4-1.fc12.ppc requires ogmrip = 0:0.13.4-1.fc12 > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc64: > > lame-3.98.3-1.fc12.ppc64 requires lame-libs = 0:3.98.3-1.fc12 > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: > > akmod-west-chamber-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.ppc requires west-chamber-kmod-common >= 0:0.0.1 > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > bsnes-supergameboy-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump > xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.ppc64 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0()(64bit) > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc64: > > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc64 requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump All ppc(64) Broken deps are caused by https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166, I think it already fixed days ago. 网易为中小企业免费提供企业邮箱（自主域名） -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100430/28e483ba/attachment.html From supercyper at 163.com Fri Apr 30 11:48:02 2010 From: supercyper at 163.com (Chen Lei) Date: Fri Apr 30 12:03:21 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: On 2010-04-30 17:10:20，"Michael Schwendt" wrote： >====================================================================== >The results in this summary consider Test Updates! >====================================================================== > >Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): > > bsnes > cairo-dock > ffmpegthumbnailer > get_iplayer > lame > ogmrip > west-chamber-kmod > xtables-addons > > >Summary of broken packages (by primary owner): > > belegdol AT gmail com > bsnes > > dwmw2 AT infradead org > get_iplayer > > giallu AT gmail com > ogmrip > > k AT kaio me > west-chamber-kmod (1 co-owner) > > magnus.tuominen AT gmail com > ffmpegthumbnailer > > mtasaka AT ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac jp > cairo-dock > > rpm AT greysector net > lame > > supercyper AT 163 com > xtables-addons (1 co-owner) > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc: > > cairo-dock-2.1.3.7-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-plug-ins = 0:2.1.3.7-1.fc12 > ogmrip-devel-0.13.4-1.fc12.ppc requires ogmrip = 0:0.13.4-1.fc12 > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-12-ppc64: > > lame-3.98.3-1.fc12.ppc64 requires lame-libs = 0:3.98.3-1.fc12 > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: > > akmod-west-chamber-0.0.1-4.20100405svn.fc12.ppc requires west-chamber-kmod-common >= 0:0.0.1 > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > bsnes-supergameboy-0.064-1.fc12.ppc requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump > xtables-addons-devel-1.25-1.fc12.ppc64 requires libxt_ACCOUNT_cl.so.0()(64bit) > > >====================================================================== >Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc64: > > bsnes-snesfilter-0.064-1.fc12.ppc64 requires bsnes = 0:0.064-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-devel-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > cairo-dock-plug-ins-xfce-2.1.3.9-1.fc12.ppc64 requires cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump All ppc(64) Broken deps are caused by https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166, I think it already fixed days ago. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100430/79dc6ab9/attachment.html From dwmw2 at infradead.org Fri Apr 30 11:55:26 2010 From: dwmw2 at infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Fri Apr 30 12:51:56 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <1272621326.3367.5340.camel@macbook.infradead.org> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 09:10 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: > ====================================================================== > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump Um. It built fine: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6866-rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc12/ Why isn't it in the repo? 2.2d was released last night -- I'll update and do a new build and see if that fixes it, but there is something wrong here. -- dwmw2 From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 12:58:19 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 12:58:26 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <4BDAA562.2010202@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> <4BDAA562.2010202@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Message-ID: <20100430125819.07a38386@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:39:46 +0900, Mamoru wrote: > For example cairo-dock-core = 0:2.1.3.9-1.fc12 > is actually built: > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6875-cairo-dock-2.1.3.9-1.fc12/ > Looks strange indeed. For ppc, root.log and state.log are missing. For ppc64, job.log and state.log are missing. > Recently I had to try rebuilding my package several times because sometimes > something went wrong on buildsys like: > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Job failed on arch ppc64: couldn't download result files from builder 'https://bombadil.infradead.org:8888'. > Please contact the build system administrator. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > I guess even if buildsys says "build succeeded" sometimes downloading the rebuilt > rpms are failing. Normal behaviour for non-testing targets is that one failing arch job marks the entire build job as failed. From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 13:10:15 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 13:10:22 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <5d4428.eb0c.1284e2a7e97.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> <5d4428.eb0c.1284e2a7e97.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> Message-ID: <20100430131015.199ec7c1@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:02:07 +0800 (CST), Chen wrote: > All ppc(64) Broken deps are caused by https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166, I think it already fixed days ago. > Thanks for the pointer. Not responding to that ticket is exactly one thing that should not happen. I understand that some people hate Plague [for sometimes dubious reasons], but undermining it with lack of support is just rude. Are the Plague config files for ppc and ppc64 available in some public place? Download failures not killing the build job would only occur for testing targets, but none of RPM Fusions targets should be set up like that. Also, please save a copy of the server and builder logs. From mschwendt at gmail.com Fri Apr 30 13:13:55 2010 From: mschwendt at gmail.com (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri Apr 30 13:14:02 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <1272621326.3367.5340.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> <1272621326.3367.5340.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Message-ID: <20100430131355.3fe7ee70@faldor.intranet> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:55:26 +0100, David wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 09:10 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > ====================================================================== > > Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing-12-ppc: > > > get_iplayer-2.76-1.fc12.noarch requires rtmpdump > > Um. > > It built fine: > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6866-rtmpdump-2.2c-2.fc12/ > There are three .log files missing for both the ppc and ppc64 build jobs. Please see the other replies in this thread. Something is wrong with how build results and log files are downloaded from the ppc/ppc64 builders. From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 30 13:47:12 2010 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri Apr 30 13:47:15 2010 Subject: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 12 - 2010-04-30 In-Reply-To: <20100430131015.199ec7c1@faldor.intranet> References: <20100430091020.6162.83772@faldor.intranet> <5d4428.eb0c.1284e2a7e97.Coremail.supercyper@163.com> <20100430131015.199ec7c1@faldor.intranet> Message-ID: <4BDAC340.6000701@leemhuis.info> Michael Schwendt wrote on 30.04.2010 13:10: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:02:07 +0800 (CST), Chen wrote: > >> All ppc(64) Broken deps are caused by https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166, I think it already fixed days ago. > Thanks for the pointer. BTW, he pointed to it a few days ago when we discussed the ppc problem already (it iirc was a mail from Dominik about a mplayer build problem; the root of that problem was exactly the same) > Not responding to that ticket is exactly one thing that should not happen. > I understand that some people hate Plague [for sometimes dubious reasons], > but undermining it with lack of support is just rude. Just FYI, I still try to stay away from infra work, but if there is something help from my side is needed please ping me (maybe I'm the only one that has access to the ppc builder -- there was the plan to switch to a different one months (a year?) ago and give others from RPM Fusion access to it, but that work stalled). And as brought up a few days ago already: Xavier or others from the sysadmin team, is there anything that changed recently that might be the reason for this problem? > Are the Plague config files for ppc and ppc64 available in some public > place? I maintained those in CVS (cvs.rpmfusion.org, /cvs/rpmfusion/), but you might need a RPM Fusion FAS-Account to be able to access them. And the sysadmins now use puppet for some services, so those files might not be up2date in cvs. > Download failures not killing the build job would only occur for > testing targets, but none of RPM Fusions targets should be set up like > that. Also, please save a copy of the server and builder logs. /me will do that later and sent the config by private mail when back home from work /me will then also look into the multilib problem for the testing repos CU knurd From noreply at rpmfusion.org Fri Apr 30 21:24:45 2010 From: noreply at rpmfusion.org (RPM Fusion Bugzilla) Date: Fri Apr 30 21:24:46 2010 Subject: [Bug 13] Review request: rpmfusion-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion configuration files for the Smart package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100430192449.34992688E7@mx1.es6.egwn.net> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Stewart Adam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #21 from Stewart Adam 2010-04-30 21:24:44 --- (In reply to comment #20) > This seems to have been fixed already, releasing cvs request Something is wrong, I still can't commit :/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.