[Bug 1351] Review request: frogatto - An old-school 2D platform game

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351





--- Comment #9 from Chen Lei <supercyper at 163.com>  2010-08-01 12:46:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > This is defined in license guideline, you just need to split data into a
> > subpackage. Also, It'll be better to add noarch to large static data
> > subpackage.
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
> 
> I can read there: "If your package contains files which are under multiple,
> distinct, and independent licenses, then ***the spec must reflect this by using
> "and" as a separator*** [Note: this is what I did]. Fedora maintainers are
> highly encouraged [Note: encouraged means that it is not mandatory] to avoid
> this scenario whenever reasonably possible, by dividing files into subpackages
> (subpackages can each have their own License: field). ". Therefore I do think I
> follow the guidelines.
> 

Mix good license part and bad license part is not a good idea, that's why we
have a gstreamer-bad-nonfree package in rpmfusion(linking free part with
nonfree libs). Fedora is strictly forbidden of shipping nonfree files in source
tarballs.

Also, many game engines are shared by multiple game datas, so even free game
datas are normally packaged separately in fedora. Debian even split this game
into two source packages instead of two binary subpackages.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.