renaming sdlmame to mame

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 16.03.2010 04:42, Chen Lei pisze:
> Please follow
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life to
> rename sdlmame to mame.
> 
> ÔÚ2010-03-16 04:49:41£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol at gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>>W dniu 18.01.2010 13:38, supercyper pisze:
>>> I agree with Andrea that
>>> the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame.
>>> SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by  mame.
>>> 
>>> See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was
>>> Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat.
>>> 
>>> ÔÚ2010-01-17 17:45:24£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol at gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>>>>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e.
>>>>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a
>>>>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a
>>>>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for
>>>>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bye,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>> 
>>>>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related
>>>>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from
>>>>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm
>>>>wondering if it's worth the effort.
>>>>
>>>>Julian
>>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>0.137 is out, I'll upload the new package for review in the next couple
>>of days.
>>
>>Julian
>>
> 
> 
> 
Submitted:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122

Julian