[Bug 1252] Review request: swftools - SWF manipulation and generation utilities

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252





--- Comment #12 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014 at gmail.com>  2010-11-11 17:38:28 ---
As promised, here is a new version:
SPEC URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools-0.9.1-2.fc14.src.rpm
Build logs: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/build.log

I added fftw-devel and zziplib-devel as BR, as suggested by Orion in comment
#8. I also re-enabled the build of Python modules. I mentionned too the other
licenses as asked by Orcan in comment #2.

About the prefix patch, it seems it was already suggested:
   http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2009-06/msg00079.html
With no effects...

About the license issue, I've just sent a message on the SWFTools mailing list:
   http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2010-11/msg00084.html

(In reply to comment #2)
> ? The package bundles a copy of xpdf which is available in Fedora. Is it
> possible to patch it out?
I see no way to link against xpdf, no API or such is provided in the Fedora
package. The sources embed a copy of gocr too, with the same problem.

(In reply to comment #9)
> If you allow me a suggestion, I think it would be extremely useful to package
> also swftools-unstable with the latest development snapshots. Some bugfixes or
> new implementations are there until the new version is released.
Unless I directly submit the devel version here, I don't think guidelines would
allow such a "double" packaging of swftools.

(In reply to comment #3)
> Please, also open a new account at rpmfusion as outlined in
> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-643ba68e754c44d2db673ad9aea6a843ad0b7fb3
Done.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.