[Bug 1715] New: Review request: icecast Streaming Media Server

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Apr 25 22:22:20 CEST 2011


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1715

           Summary: Review request: icecast Streaming Media Server
           Product: Package Reviews
           Version: Current
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Review Request
        AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
        ReportedBy: baldur at email.de
                CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
            Blocks: 2
   Estimated Hours: 0.0


* Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. 
http://www.disir.de/icecast-2.3.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
http://www.disir.de/icecast.spec
* A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file). 
Icecast is a streaming media server which currently supports Ogg Vorbis 
and MP3 audio streams. It can be used to create an Internet radio 
station or a privately running jukebox and many things in between. 
It is very versatile in that new formats can be added relatively 
easily and supports open standards for communication and interaction.

*  Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora
Not known

* The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it. 

SRRPM- ignored because rpm set _lib to lib64 - this doesnt apply in this case
rpmlint icecast-2.3.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
icecast.src:26: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

RPM - no manpage 
rpmlint icecast-2.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
icecast.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary icecast
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. 
First package :-)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list