[Bug 1595] Review request: tarsnap - Online encrypted backup service
(client)
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri Feb 4 15:26:40 CET 2011
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595
Tim Lauridsen <tla at rasmil.dk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #7 from Tim Lauridsen <tla at rasmil.dk> 2011-02-04 15:26:40 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think the buildroot is actually fine. Current versions of Fedora no longer
> require this (I'm only including it for EL5 compatibility), so it's in the EPEL
> guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
>
> The one I chose was the most preferred one in the list of three in that
> guideline.
>
> Thanks a lot for the review!
>
Ok, fine with me
Looks like the buildroot tag is ignored for latest versions of fedora :)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
So it make sense to use the EPEL5 guidelines.
APPROVED
P.S I should go into the non-free base on the license
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595#c5
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list