[Bug 1595] Review request: tarsnap - Online encrypted backup service (client)

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri Feb 4 15:26:40 CET 2011


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595


Tim Lauridsen <tla at rasmil.dk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|3                           |4




--- Comment #7 from Tim Lauridsen <tla at rasmil.dk>  2011-02-04 15:26:40 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think the buildroot is actually fine.  Current versions of Fedora no longer
> require this (I'm only including it for EL5 compatibility), so it's in the EPEL
> guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
> 
> The one I chose was the most preferred one in the list of three in that
> guideline.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the review!
> 

Ok, fine with me

Looks like the buildroot tag is ignored for latest versions of fedora :)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag

So it make sense to use the EPEL5 guidelines.

APPROVED

P.S I should go into the non-free base on the license
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595#c5


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list