OpenCascade license?

Richard Shaw hobbes1069 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 14:41:22 CET 2011


On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> wrote:
>> Richard Shaw píše v Po 31. 10. 2011 v 16:16 -0500:
>>> I'm taking a shot a building FreeCAD since I'm a CAD jockey in my day
>>> job and a "good" free CAD solution would be neat.
>>>
>>> It has OpenCascade as a major dependency, which uses their own
>>> license[1]. They claim it's LGPL-like. Would this have to go in free
>>> or non-free?
>>
>> per Tom "Spot" Callaway and Red Hat Legal it is non-free, you should be
>> able to find the details in the archive of the fedora-legal mailing list
>> and/or OCC package review request in Fedora bugzilla.
>>
>> OCC 6.3.0 is available from http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/ and it would
>> be nice to see OCC in a more official repo.
>
> I poked through all the source repos and didn't see OCC. Did I miss something?

Never mind.. I keep forgetting repoview only shows a certain number of
last updates...

Richard


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list