[Bug 1943] Review request: Butt - Broadcast using this tool to Icecast or Shoutcast servers

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943





--- Comment #9 from s.baus86 at gmx.net  2011-10-11 21:28:13 ---
Some work has been done:
SRPM:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SRPMS/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm 
SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SPECS/butt.spec
ConfigurePatch:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt-0.1.12-CONFIGURE.patch
LicensePatch:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt-0.1.12-LICENSE.patch
Desktopfile: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3351272/Stuff/butt/SOURCES/butt.desktop

Output rpmlint:

[makerpm at Sven SPECS]$ rpmlint butt.spec
../RPMS/x86_64/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
../SRPMS/butt-0.1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm
butt.spec:38: W: configure-without-libdir-spec

Not supported but configure

butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US alsa -> alas, ala, salsa

Correct spelling!

butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oss -> oz, os, ss

Correct spelling!

butt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pulseaudio -> pulse audio,
pulse-audio, pulsation

Correct spelling!

butt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary butt

No manual available

butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US alsa -> alas, ala, salsa

Correct spelling!

butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oss -> oz, os, ss

Correct spelling!

butt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pulseaudio -> pulse audio,
pulse-audio, pulsation

Correct spelling!

butt.src:38: W: configure-without-libdir-spec


2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.

Not supported but configure

(In reply to comment #4)

> * You must never patch the LICENSE file. Please ask upstream to fix it.
> 

Should I go here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=206231&atid=996827
and open a ticket for this, correct?!

> * Have you tried to build this package with mock to verify 
> BuildRequires?
Yes, got no errors, if I used mock correct.
> 
> * About "./configure --prefix /usr". Isn't "%configure" working?

No, without prefix, install is tried under rpmbuild path (with is afterwards
cleaned up).

> 
> * Compilers used to build packages must honor the applicable compiler flags set
> in the system rpm configuration:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags

Sorry, can you explain me, what to do? I really have no idea, what I should do
right now.

Thanks for support ;)!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.