rpms/libfame/EL-6 libfame.spec,1.4,1.5

[Richard Shaw]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2012/4/10 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at rpmfusion.org>:
>>>> Author: hobbes1069
>>>>
>>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/libfame/EL-6
>>>> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv11440
>>>>
>>>> Modified Files:
>>>>        libfame.spec
>>>> Log Message:
>>>> * Tue Apr 10 2012 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> - 0.9.1-15
>>>> - Move static librari to a separate package as required by the Fedora
>>>>  packaging guidelines.
>>> Why aren't you just disabling the static file anyway ?
>>
>> Although unlikely, I wasn't absolutely sure that no one was using them
>> so I went with the least disruptive change. If no one complains after
>> a while, we can drop them.
>
> That kind of 'disruptive change' is more likely to be expected in a
> fedora version before.
> Can you please sync your changes to devel and F-17. I don't see any
> interest in having an update for earlier branches. (either creating a
> compat sub-package or disabling it).

I will, but we may not need to...


> Can you list the packages that would still use libfame ?

I can't find anything that uses it, although my repoquery-fu may not
be good enough. I thought we needed it for MythTV but I can't find
anything in "repoquery --requires mythtv\*" that shows it does. I've
commented it out of the BuildRequires: and I'm building now. It may be
left over from an earlier version.

If nothing uses it, do we need to keep it around? It hasn't been
updated in a LONG time.


> PS: BTW, I'm working on ffmpeg-compat for EL-6, to be reviewed ASAP.

I'll take a look as soon as I can, just been a bit busy lately.

Thanks,
Richard