text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:22 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: 
> On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
> >> is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests
> >> run fine on my local mock set up.
> > 
> > 
> > But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to
> > know whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test
> > when fail, don't have logs about what happened.
> > 
> > 
> >> And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the 
> >> unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk
> >> sourcecode that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still
> >> failed.
> >> 
> >> Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check,
> >> so I can still run the tests manually before submitting an
> >> official build) but this is really odd.
> > 
> > Let me know if builds after disable the tests.
> > 
> It does build when the tests are disabled, since %check is actually
> performed after installation has succeeded, so the only way for the
> build to fail at that point is if the file listings are incomplete.

though that wiki
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing#Testing_graphical_packages_with_mock_and_Xnest
Testing graphical packages with mock and Xnest 

could help you, somehow 

the tread of this matter begins here : 
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166115.html

Best regards, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.