[Bug 2298] Review request: fceux - A cross platform, NTSC and PAL Famicom/NES emulator

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2298

--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com> 2012-04-28 10:54:55 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Package review:
> > 
> > Thanks for the quick review, Jeremy!
> 
> No problem, if you have some time, you can return the favour :)
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908

I'll try to.

> > > -The license issue should be fixed, with a license breakdown and all that.
> > 
> > Both BSD and LGPLv2+ are compatible with GPLv2+. So it is perfectly fine for
> > upstream to license the sources as GPLv2+.
> > 
> > Please see, for example:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#GPL_compatibility
> 
> Sorry I didn't mean that there is a problem with the licenses, but merely that
> all should be included in the spec like so:
> 
> >License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT
> 
> and a license breakdown should be included in the comments above or below it.
> If you need an example, take a look at this spec:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/pcsxr.spec

I think you are wrong. "The License: field refers to the licenses of the
contents of the binary rpm". Taken from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field

There is no doubt that the license of the of the binary RPM is GPLV2+.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.