[Bug 1065] Review request: aqualung - Music Player for GNU/Linux
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Feb 21 19:32:20 CET 2012
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065
Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt at hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alexjnewt at hotmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt at hotmail.com> 2012-02-21 19:32:20 CET ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Mac's license issue is tough for me.
> So I simply disabled mac support
> (Aqualung has the capability to play .ape using ffmpeg instead of mac).
> And this package came to "free".
> ---
> Spec URL: http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.jp/rpms/45780/aqualung.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.jp/rpms/45782/aqualung-0.9-0.5.svn1115.fc12.src.rpm
> ---
Are you still interested in maintaining this? As I have some time to do
reviews.
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > While the patent-encumbered stuff is fine in RPM Fusion, linking this GPLv2+
> > program against the non-Free and thus GPL-incompatible mac looks very much
> > like a no-go to me.
>
> this comes from upstream - maybe someone should tell them they are breaking
> their own licensing :-)
>
> anyways, I thought this is exactly what the non-free section of RPMFusion is
> for ... if we have mac, why not to have anything that links to it? - the
> Aqualung authors' intention surely wasn't to prevent distribution and usage of
> their software
Though this comment was made 2 years ago, for clarification reasons, believe
the issue is the violation of the GPL, not so much a RPMFusion specific issue.
This needs to have the libraries that link to mac (or other non-free) to be
LPGL or another compatible license.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list