Any interest in sox with MP3 support?

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 16:02:44 CET 2012


Hi,

On 02/25/2012 03:52 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet<kwizart at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> 2012/2/24 Richard Shaw<hobbes1069 at gmail.com>:
>>> Ok, I tried the options and they seemed to work except for libmad...
>>>
>>> checking mad.h usability... no
>>> checking mad.h presence... no
>>> checking for mad.h... no
>>> checking whether to dlopen mad... yes
>>> ...
>>> mp3........................dyn
>>>   id3tag....................yes
>>>   lame......................yes
>>>   dlopen lame...............yes
>>>   mad.......................no
>>>
>>> Hmm... where to go from here.
>>
>> Please forget about "--enable-dl-lame --enable-dl-mad" I never talk about that.
>> This is not the the right path for fedora.
>
> I understand that we wouldn't use those options for the RPM Fusion
> package, but wouldn't the Fedora package need these options enabled in
> order to look for the additional plugin libraries?
>

Sorry for dropping into this thread late, and esp.
after not having read it all. But has someone considered to
add the relevant lame / mad header files as extra sources
to the existing Fedora package and to build the existing
Fedora package with dlopen support ?

Regards,

hans



More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list