libspotify in non-free?

[Jonathan Dieter]

On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:15 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 14:27 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2012/1/4 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter at lesbg.com>:
> > > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > >> 2012/1/4 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter at lesbg.com>:
> > >> > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:55 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> > >> >> On 04/01/12 22:31, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > >> >> > Does anyone object to putting libspotify into non-free?  I've put
> > >> >> > together a package, but I'm not sure what their redistribution policy
> > >> >> > is.  The main thing in their Terms of Use seems to be that it's for
> > >> >> > non-commercial use, but I don't think that's a problem for non-free.
> > >> >> For those of us not in the know: What is the URL to point to some info
> > >> >> about the software ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Sorry, here it is:
> > >> > http://developer.spotify.com/en/libspotify/overview/
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> It might be redistributable but then for which usage ?
> > >> Do you know a package that will use this library and at the same time,
> > >> don't plan to embed the exact libspotify version they will use to
> > >> instead, rely on a system library ?
> > >>
> > >> Also, I'm not sure about what the application key is for ?
> > >
> > > I'm looking at mopidy (http://www.mopidy.com) which is a MPD server that
> > > uses Spotify as it's music source.  It doesn't come with libspotify
> > > bundled, and I've put together packages for it, pyspotify, libspotify
> > > and pykka.  AFAIC, whatever application key is needed is embedded in
> > > mopidy.  FWIW, Mopidy, pyspotify and pykka are all licensed under ASL
> > > 2.0.
> > 
> > OK, But then this just move the problem elsewhere.
> > What is the application key for mopidy allowed to be redistributed ?
> > Will we be able to build mopidy from source and bundle their key ?
> 
> When I build mopidy from source, it works.  There's a file in the source
> tarball that's called spotify_appkey.key, so I'm assuming that's the
> application key.

I guess I'll go ahead and open up the review requests, unless I hear any
other concerns.

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20120105/db8e59fc/attachment.bin