ffmpeg-0.11

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 2012-06-13 00:28, Joseph D. Wagner pisze:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:11:00 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
>> W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze:
>>
>>> W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>>>
>>>> 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski :
>>>>
>>>>> Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days
>>>>> ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17?
>>>> I'm not against having it as an update, but: - Is the ABI the same ?
>>>> - does dependants package build fin ? - Can we make the update to
>>>> settle in rawhide first, and then to evaluate the update in F-17 (if
>>>> relevant) ? I also wonder if it won't be more relevant to wait for a
>>>> new 0.10.x release that might be done at a later point. Nicolas
>>>> (kwizart)
>>> After finally getting CVS access back I was able to finish the
>>> rebuild. Results are as follows: out of 34 dependencies, 5 worked out
>>> of the box, one required libquicktime to be built first, one needed BR
>>> fix and mplayer worked when updated to 1.1. I think we should still go
>>> on and let the maintainers fix their packages. Details:
>>> mplayer updated to 1.1 works, did not check otherwise picard-freeworld
>>> requires vlc qmmp-plugins-freeworld failed vbam failed vlc failed:
>>> free: command not found wxsvg worked xbmc failed
>>> xine-lib-extras-freeworld failed xmms2-freeworld failed Regards, Julian
>>
>> To be clear: go on in rawhide and then see where we stand once
>> everything is patched up.
>>
>> Julian
>
> By saying mplayer 1.1 works, are you confirming there's a mplayer
> updating coming down the pipes?
>
> Because I'd really appreciate one to fix some confirmed bugs, like this
> one:
>
> Bug 2373 - Regression Prevents Subtitles from Being Turned Off
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2373
>
> Upstream confirmed this as a bug that was fixed in svn r34996.
>
> Joseph D. Wagner
>
Yes, but it will only target rawhide and maybe F-17.

Regards,
Julian