ffmpeg-0.11
Nicolas Chauvet
kwizart at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 18:41:32 CEST 2012
2012/6/14 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>:
> W dniu 14.06.2012 09:39, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>> 2012/6/14 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>:
>>> W dniu 13.06.2012 00:11, Julian Sikorski pisze:
>>>> W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze:
>>>>> W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>>>>>> 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Dear RPM Fusion developers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to
>>>>>>> push it to Fedora 17?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not against having it as an update, but:
>>>>>> - Is the ABI the same ?
>>>>>> - does dependants package build fin ?
>>>>>> - Can we make the update to settle in rawhide first, and then to
>>>>>> evaluate the update in F-17 (if relevant) ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also wonder if it won't be more relevant to wait for a new 0.10.x
>>>>>> release that might be done at a later point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>>>>>
>>>>> After finally getting CVS access back I was able to finish the rebuild.
>>>>> Results are as follows: out of 34 dependencies, 5 worked out of the box,
>>>>> one required libquicktime to be built first, one needed BR fix and
>>>>> mplayer worked when updated to 1.1. I think we should still go on and
>>>>> let the maintainers fix their packages. Details:
>>>>>
>>>>> acoustid-fingerprinter failed
>>>>> alsa-plugins-freeworld failed: 'MREMAP_MAYMOVE' undeclared (first use
>>>>> in this function)
>>>>> audacious-plugins-freeworld failed
>>>>> bino worked
>>>>> bombono-dvd failed: glib headers
>>>>> chromaprint-tools failed
>>>>> cmus failed
>>>>> dvbcut failed
>>>>> dvdstyler needs wxsvg, still fails afterwards
>>>>> ffmpeg2theora worked
>>>>> ffmpegthumbnailer failed
>>>>> gpac failed
>>>>> gstreamer-ffmpeg failed
>>>>> guvcview failed
>>>>> k3b-extras-freeworld requires vlc
>>>>> kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld requires vlc
>>>>> kmediafactory requires mencoder, vlc, mlt and libquicktime
>>>>> libquicktime worked
>>>>> lightspark worked
>>>>> minidlna failed
>>>>> miro failed
>>>>> mlt needs libquicktime, then OK
>>>>> motion failed
>>>>> mpd needs pulseaudio-lib-devel → pulseaudio-libs-devel BR fix, works
>>>>> afterwards
>>>>> mplayer updated to 1.1 works, did not check otherwise
>>>>> picard-freeworld requires vlc
>>>>> qmmp-plugins-freeworld failed
>>>>> vbam failed
>>>>> vlc failed: free: command not found
>>>>> wxsvg worked
>>>>> xbmc failed
>>>>> xine-lib-extras-freeworld failed
>>>>> xmms2-freeworld failed
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>> To be clear: go on in rawhide and then see where we stand once
>>>> everything is patched up.
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>> Dear package maintainers: updated ffmpeg is available here:
>>> http://lesloueizeh.com/belegdol/ffmpeg/
>>> Please try to fix your package to build against it.
>> Hi
>>
>> Can you verify that this package match what's in our cvs ?
>>
>> I would prefer the package to be built within the infra.
>> That's because it will be easier for a maintainer to enable the
>> unpushed 'plague result' repository that is already referenced in the
>> mock-rpmfusion_free configuration files, instead of adding various
>> alternate repository.
>>
>> Also It will also to build a first level dependency (such as
>> libquicktime) there and allow the local test of a second level
>> dependency then.
>>
>> Now I will be away this week-end and busy next week, so I would prefer
>> to schedule the update starting from the next week-end.
>> Does that sounds good ?
>>
>>
>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>
> OK, I forgot that I can build the package within the infra and still
> don't break the buildroots.
You can't, but you can commit it in devel without building.
That way every packager can rebuild locally test theird packages.
(even using a --with suffix option to make a parallel installable
ffmpeg-libs).
> By scheduling the update for the next weekend, would you prefer me to
> wait with with building ffmpeg until then? Or would you prefer me to
> build it right away to give the maintainers more time to test?
There is a certain number of package to build in order to bootstrap a
ffmpeg update (likely x264) this probably needs maintainer
coordination.
(BTW, there is a RFE for x264 that needs to be adressed about 10bit option)
Nicolas (kwizart)
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list