[Bug 2125] Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Wed May 30 21:07:31 CEST 2012
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2125
Richard <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #6 from Richard <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2012-05-30 21:07:31 CEST ---
+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
?: Question or clairification needed
N: not applicable
MUST:
[+] rpmlint output: none
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[N] spec file base name matches package name: Package name intentionally
different from package name.
[+] package meets the packaging guidelines
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license: MIT and EPL
[+] license field matches the actual license.
[+] license file is included in %doc: COPYING
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream: md5 sum matches (9dbd642f18993335146480a3a2987874)
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested x86_64
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[N] spec file handles locales properly
[N] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[+] no relocatable packages
[+] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[+] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[N] header files in -devel
[N] static libraries in -static
[N] .so in -devel
[N] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[+] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8
SHOULD:
[+] query upstream for license text
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock
[+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64
[N] package functions as described: Not tested
[+] sane scriptlets
[N] subpackages require the main package
[N] placement of pkgconfig files
[+] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[N] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list