[Bug 2483] Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Oct 7 21:46:31 CEST 2012


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483

--- Comment #16 from Rob Janes <janes.rob at gmail.com> 2012-10-07 21:46:31 CEST ---
also, renamed the package to msttcore-fonts-installer.

Kevin - I was describing the debian package for the msttcore fonts.  I'm sorry
if you understood that to be a proposal for a this rpm package.  It was not. 
It was intended to be a compare and contrast.  As a pro and con comparison,
certainly the eula prompt is a con.  On the pro side, is the automated download
and installation of these fonts.

Another on the pro side, is the background download and installation of the
fonts.  I don't quite see how to do that in fedora.

Thorsten, Kevin - while I disagree with the idea that spec file scripts should
be short, I don't think it's productive to argue about it.  The debian package
builder choose to split out the script, and I agree it helps debugging and has
legitimate independent functionality.  So I've split it out.

Nicholas - I suppose that's possible, but it involves a lot of user interaction
I want to avoid.  It sounds like a proposal that someone at microsoft might
want to work on.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list