ffmpeg-1.2 update

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>

> W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> > <belegdol at gmail.com
> > <mailto:belegdol at gmail.com>>
> >
> >     Dear all,
> >
> >     ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds
> and
> >     the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
> >     dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
> >     I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe
> even
> >     to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
> >     rpmsodiff output is attached.
> >
> > devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now,  Any update must pass rawhide
> > usability tests before anything else.
> > As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if
> any.
> >
> > I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
> > later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
> > because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
> > done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> >
> > Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed.
> More details can be seen here:
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/ffmpeg.html
>
what is the answear ? (I've no time to check)

> vlc builds indeed, I can look into setting up a test environment to
> check whether it runs. In any case, f20 is eons away so there will be
> plenty of time to fix this.
>
I prefer that you spend time on doing reviews than loosing it on testing
vlc-2.0.5 at runtime whereas latest bugfix as everything already commented
out.
That been said, the version that vlc tried to avoid was with
libavcodec.so.55 (so not yet).

When it comes to mplayer, each branch contains the latest mplayer that
> will build together with ffmpeg shipped on said branch. ffmpeg-1.2
> allows building today's snapshot, so the update limit has not been
> reached yet.

good,
so, but my comment still hold, get it settle on f20, then we will see if we
have it on f19 before GA.

Nicolas (kwizart)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20130318/e84f4f83/attachment.html>