FTBFS for F-19 free section

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>
>
>     Hi,
>
>
>     On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>         ...
>         sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64
>
>
>     While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp,
>     which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and
>     sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with
>     libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following
>     packages can now be retired from rpmfusion:
>
>     sidplay
>     sidplay-libs
>     audacious-plugins-nonfree
>
>     I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is
>     the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ?
>
>
> I will manually remove them from the repository.
> taking care of that before the next push.
>
> BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?)
> It looks unmaintained.

I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now.

I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done
I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.

Regards,

Hans